writing-project-docs

Writing Project Docs

Overview

Documentation must be readable by a human in a single sitting.

The default failure mode is generating exhaustive, internally consistent documentation that no one reads. The goal is a single concise document that covers everything a person needs to know, do, and verify — nothing more.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Generating documentation for a PR, feature, or implementation
• Existing docs are too long (multiple large files, 500+ lines, duplicated content)
• A reviewer, tester, or team lead needs to understand what was done without reading all the code
• You are consolidating multiple documentation files into one

Do NOT use for:

• Internal code comments or docstrings
• Architecture decision records (ADRs)
• API reference docs (those should be exhaustive)

Core Pattern — One Document, Human Scale

❌ BAD: 6 separate files × 300+ lines each = no one reads any of them
✅ GOOD: 1 file × ~150 lines = a person reads it in 5 minutes and knows what to do

Maximum length target: ~150–200 lines for a feature or PR doc.
If it's longer, cut it — don't add a summary on top.

Document Structure (use this order)

# [Feature name] — [One-line description]
### [System] · [Context] · [Branch/PR]

## ¿Qué hace? / What does it do?
[3–5 lines max. Problem → Solution → Benefit]

## Archivos modificados / Files changed
[Table: Layer | File | What changed — one line per file]

## [Key concept] — [any modes, states, or rules]
[Table or small diagram. No prose.]

## Cómo instalar / How to install
[Numbered steps. Commands ready to copy-paste. Verification query included.]

## Pruebas / Tests
[One subsection per scenario. Format: Who, Steps (numbered, short), Expected result, Verification SQL if needed]

## Criterios de aprobación / Approval criteria
[Two lists: Mandatory (blocking) | Recommended]

## Commit
[Copy-paste ready git command]

## Rollback
[Copy-paste ready SQL/command]

## Problemas comunes / Common issues
[Table: Problem | Cause | Fix]

Rules

Cut ruthlessly

• One doc, not six. If you produced multiple docs, merge them.
• Each section must add information not present elsewhere.
• No "executive summary" on top of a document that is already short.
• No "notes for the tester" section that repeats what's already in the test scenarios.

Tables over prose

Every time you want to write a paragraph, ask: "Is this a table?"

❌  "The system has four operating modes. In CARGA mode the user..."
✅  | Mode | When | Title | Buttons | Fields |
    |------|------|-------|---------|--------|

Commands must be copy-paste ready

❌  "Run the appropriate msbuild command with Debug configuration"
✅  npm run build

Test scenarios: Who + Steps + Result + SQL

Each scenario must answer exactly four questions:

1. Who is logged in?
2. What steps does the tester follow? (numbered, ≤ 8 steps)
3. What is the expected result? (visible behavior + message)
4. How to verify in the DB? (copy-paste SQL when relevant)

Language

Write in the language of the project team. Match the team's default language for headings and explanatory text. Keep file names, commands, SQL, and code in their native syntax.

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Fix
Generating 5+ files for one feature	Merge into one GUIA-RAPIDA PR {PR_NUMBER}.md
Writing "Resumen ejecutivo" + detailed sections	Choose one — the detail IS the summary
Listing files without saying what changed	Add a "What changed" column
Test scenarios without DB verification	Add the SQL query
Long prose in "How to install"	Convert to numbered steps with commands
Documenting edge cases no one will test	Move to "Known limitations" in 2 lines
Repeating the approval criteria in 3 places	One list, at the end

Quick Reference

Question	Answer
Max length?	~150–200 lines
How many files?	One per feature/PR (GUIA-RAPIDA PR {PR, feature, or implementation_NUMBER}.md)
Language for headers?	Project team language
Language for code/SQL?	English
Test format?	Who · Steps · Result · SQL
Commands format?	Copy-paste ready, no placeholders
When to use tables?	Always, instead of prose lists

Example — Test Scenario (good)

### Escenario 3 — Invitación de usuario ✅ *(crítico)*
**Quién:** Administrador con permisos para alta de usuarios

1. Ir a Administración → Usuarios
2. Hacer clic en **Invitar usuario**
3. Completar email y rol
4. Confirmar la acción

**Resultado esperado:**
```sql
SELECT email, status FROM user_invites
WHERE email = '[email protected]';
-- email = '[email protected]', status = 'pending'

## Real-World Impact

In one rollout, a documentation folder had 6 files totalling ~86 KB and ~2,250 lines. After applying this pattern: one file, ~200 lines, covering the test scenarios, installation steps, critical review points, commit command, and rollback. A reviewer could read it in under 5 minutes.