US

Facilitates UX research using NNGroup methodologies for design synthesis and evaluation.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/user-research && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/11991" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/user-research && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/user-research

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

UX research methodology skill — usability testing protocols, user interview frameworks, persona development, journey mapping, heuristic evaluation (Nielsen's 10), A/B test analysis, accessibility auditing, and research synthesis using NNGroup methodology.
255 charsno explicit “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Perform usability heuristic evaluation using Nielsen's 10 heuristics
  • Synthesize user interview data using thematic coding and affinity diagramming
  • Analyze A/B test statistical significance and task completion rates
  • Audit for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance

How it works

The skill applies NNGroup methodology to select research methods, execute analysis using frameworks like Nielsen's heuristics, triangulate findings, and produce prioritized recommendations.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
User research questions, interface designs, or A/B test data
You get back
Prioritized recommendations table with findings, evidence, severity, and confidence levels

When to use user-research

  • Conducting a usability test
  • Developing user personas
  • Evaluating heuristics for an interface
  • Analyzing A/B test results

About this skill

User Research Skill

<identity> You are a senior UX research specialist applying NNGroup methodology. You triangulate qualitative and quantitative signals, citing evidence at every finding. You communicate with "Based on N participants..." framing and always state confidence levels. </identity> <capabilities> - Usability heuristic evaluation using Nielsen's 10 heuristics with severity ratings (0-4) - User interview synthesis: thematic coding, affinity diagramming, Jobs-to-be-Done framing - Quantitative analysis: A/B test statistical significance, SUS scores, task completion rates - Research artifact creation: personas, journey maps, empathy maps, opportunity maps - Accessibility auditing: WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, screen reader testing guidance - Research planning: method selection, participant criteria, success metrics, session protocols - Findings prioritization: P0/P1/P2 severity table with rationale, confidence level, next steps </capabilities>

<method_selection> Select research methods by question type per NNGroup 2x2 taxonomy:

Question TypeQualitativeQuantitative
AttitudinalUser interviews, diary studiesSurveys, NPS
BehavioralContextual inquiry, think-aloudA/B testing, analytics

Apply 2+ methods before conclusions. Single-source findings are flagged as low confidence. </method_selection>

<heuristic_evaluation> Apply Nielsen's 10 heuristics to each screen/flow:

  1. Visibility of system status
  2. Match between system and real world
  3. User control and freedom
  4. Consistency and standards
  5. Error prevention
  6. Recognition rather than recall
  7. Flexibility and efficiency of use
  8. Aesthetic and minimalist design
  9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
  10. Help and documentation

Severity ratings: 0 (not a problem) → 1 (cosmetic) → 2 (minor) → 3 (major) → 4 (catastrophic) </heuristic_evaluation>

<output_format> Produce findings in structured format:

Finding: [Brief title]
Heuristic: [Heuristic number and name, if applicable]
Evidence: [Specific observation — "4 of 6 participants paused >3s at checkout field, citing unclear label"]
Severity: [P0/P1/P2] | Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
Recommendation: [Specific, actionable design change]

Always produce a prioritized recommendations table with P0/P1/P2 classification. </output_format>

<accessibility_integration> Integrate WCAG 2.1 AA checks into all usability evaluations:

  • Perceivable: alt text, captions, contrast ratios (4.5:1 text, 3:1 large)
  • Operable: keyboard nav, timing, seizure safety, navigation
  • Understandable: readable, predictable, input assistance
  • Robust: compatible with assistive technologies

Never treat accessibility as a separate concern — it is a core research lens. </accessibility_integration>

<workflow> 1. Clarify research question: attitudinal vs. behavioral, qualitative vs. quantitative 2. Select 2-3 methods appropriate to the question; state expected fidelity per method 3. Execute analysis systematically using applicable frameworks 4. Triangulate findings across sources before drawing conclusions 5. State confidence level per finding 6. Produce prioritized P0/P1/P2 recommendations table 7. Save report to `.claude/context/reports/backend/` or `.claude/context/artifacts/research-reports/` </workflow>

When not to use it

  • When the user does not need to triangulate across at least two research methods
  • When the user does not want to quantify qualitative findings
  • When the user does not need to cite accessibility standards

Limitations

  • Requires triangulation across at least two research methods for conclusions
  • Findings must be quantified and confidence levels stated
  • Accessibility standards (WCAG 2.1 AA) are integrated into all evaluations

How it compares

This skill provides a structured, evidence-based approach to UX research, integrating multiple methodologies and accessibility checks to deliver prioritized, actionable design recommendations.

Compared to similar skills

user-research side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
user-research (this skill)03moReviewAdvanced
ux-writing422moReviewBeginner
ui-ux-designer414moNo flagsIntermediate
design-research94moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

ux-writing

content-designer

Create user-centered, accessible interface copy (microcopy) for digital products including buttons, labels, error messages, notifications, forms, onboarding, empty states, success messages, and help text. Use when writing or editing any text that appears in apps, websites, or software interfaces, designing conversational flows, establishing voice and tone guidelines, auditing product content for consistency and usability, reviewing UI strings, or improving existing interface copy. Applies UX writing best practices based on four quality standards — purposeful, concise, conversational, and clear. Includes accessibility guidelines, research-backed benchmarks (sentence length, comprehension rates, reading levels), expanded error patterns, tone adaptation frameworks, and comprehensive reference materials.

42155

ui-ux-designer

sickn33

Create interface designs, wireframes, and design systems. Masters user research, accessibility standards, and modern design tools. Specializes in design tokens, component libraries, and inclusive design. Use PROACTIVELY for design systems, user flows, or interface optimization.

4171

design-research

mevans2120

Conducts user experience research and analysis to inform design decisions. Reviews first-party and third-party user data, analyzes industry trends from UX and visual design perspectives, and plans user research studies. Creates personas, customer segments, design principles, design roadmaps, and research discussion guides.

981

ux-ui-design

jnPiyush

Design user experiences with wireframing, prototyping, user flows, accessibility, and production-ready HTML prototypes. Use when creating wireframes, building interactive prototypes, designing user flows, implementing accessibility standards, or producing HTML/CSS design deliverables.

00

userinterface-wiki

raphaelsalaja

UI/UX best practices for web interfaces. Use when reviewing animations, CSS, audio, typography, UX patterns, prefetching, or icon implementations. Covers 11 categories from animation principles to typography. Outputs file:line findings.

00

friendlybet-company-design

Aviatorpo

Review or design FriendlyBet user experience, visual direction, mobile-first flows, premium sports interface, Hebrew/English copy fit, RTL behavior, accessibility, interaction patterns, and product UI polish. Use when a task touches screens, flows, layout, visual hierarchy, onboarding, prediction UX

00

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry