tlc-spec-driven
A 4-phase planning tool that breaks projects into atomic, verifiable tasks with persistent state management.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/tlc-spec-driven && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/8440" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/tlc-spec-driven && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/tlc-spec-driven
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Project and feature planning with 4 adaptive phases - Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute. Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Creates atomic tasks with verification criteria, atomic git commits, requirement traceability, and persistent memory across sessions. Stack-agnostic. Use when (1) Starting new projects (initialize vision, goals, roadmap), (2) Working with existing codebases (map stack, architecture, conventions), (3) Planning features (requirements, design, task breakdown), (4) Implementing with verification and atomic commits, (5) Quick ad-hoc tasks (bug fixes, config changes), (6) Tracking decisions/blockers/deferred ideas across sessions, (7) Pausing/resuming work. Triggers on "initialize project", "map codebase", "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "quick fix", "quick task", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for architecture decomposition analysis (use architecture skills) or technical design docs (use create-technical-design-doc).Key capabilities
- →Define project specifications with requirement traceability
- →Break down features into atomic tasks with verification criteria
- →Maintain persistent project memory and decision logs
- →Execute implementation with atomic git commits
- →Validate outcomes using an independent verifier sub-agent
- →Distill verification failures into reusable project-local lessons
How it works
The skill follows a four-phase adaptive pipeline of Specify, Design, Tasks, and Execute. It auto-sizes the depth of these phases based on the complexity of the requested feature.
Inputs & outputs
When to use tlc-spec-driven
- →Initializing a new repository
- →Breaking down complex features into actionable tasks
- →Tracking project decisions and blockers
- →Mapping existing codebase architecture
About this skill
Tech Lead's Club - Spec-Driven Development
Plan and implement features with precision. Granular tasks. Clear dependencies. Right tools. Zero ceremony.
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ SPECIFY │ → │ DESIGN │ → │ TASKS │ → │ EXECUTE │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
required optional* optional* required
* Agent auto-skips when scope doesn't need it
Critical Rules (read before acting)
Loading this skill's files. Reference files live under references/ in this skill's own directory (where this SKILL.md resides). Resolve them relative to the skill directory - never the workspace root - and load them through the active skill by name; never assume a fixed install path. When a step tells you to read a reference, read it completely (to EOF) before acting - never act on a partial/truncated read.
Running this skill's scripts. Every scripts/*.py shipped with this skill lives under that same skill directory. Resolve the skill directory first, then invoke python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/<name>.py .... Never run python3 scripts/... from the consuming project root - that looks for a project-local scripts/ tree that is not this skill. Project data under .specs/ is still read/written relative to the project root (pass --root when the cwd is elsewhere). Below, <skill-dir> means the directory that contains this SKILL.md.
Execution contract - every task, non-negotiable (holds even if you do not open the reference files):
- Tests derive from the spec's acceptance criteria and assert spec-defined outcomes - they never mirror the implementation.
- The gate must pass (tests pass) before a task is done - the test runner decides, not self-assessment.
- One atomic commit per task. Mark the task complete in
tasks.md(and update spec traceability when used) before that commit, and include those updates in the same commit. Never batch tasks; never weaken, skip, or delete tests to make them pass. - After the LAST task, a fresh Verifier always runs automatically (author ≠ verifier) - spec-anchored outcome check + discrimination sensor. It is never optional and never prompted. See Sub-Agent Delegation.
- Blast radius: approving a spec or tasks authorizes local implementation and local commits only.
git push, force-push, deploy, production DB changes, and other remote / externally visible / destructive operations require an explicit go-ahead for that action.
Deterministic gates run before human review - not from memory. The structural gates for the spec and tasks are enforced by scripts in this skill's scripts/ directory, so they cannot silently drift when the model forgets a step:
- Before confirming a spec:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/validate_spec.py <spec-path-or-feature>(closure gate: EARS-shaped ACs, filled assumptions, well-formed requirement IDs, required sections). - Before presenting tasks for approval:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/validate_tasks.py <tasks-path-or-feature>(granularity smell, diagram-vs-Depends onparity within a phase, no forward-phase dependency, every task carriesTests+Gate). - On each commit:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/check_commit.py --message "<msg>"(Conventional Commits). Optionally wire it as a gitcommit-msgguard (git only, no agent dependency) - see implement.md. - Before declaring a feature done:
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/validate_state.py <feature>(completion gate: the Verifier'svalidation.mdexists, its verdict is filled to PASS, and it citesfile:lineevidence - a missing, FAIL, placeholder, or evidence-free report fails). The closing step of Execute runs this automatically, the same way the lessons layer runs at distillation; it is not a manual step.
A non-zero exit means STOP and fix before proceeding. Skip a script only when no code-execution tool is available; then perform the same checks by reading the artifact.
Before Execute: read implement.md completely and run <skill-dir>/scripts/validate_tasks.py; if a formal tasks.md packs into more than one task-budgeted batch (> ~8 tasks), present the sub-agent offer first (see Sub-Agent Delegation).
Auto-Sizing: The Core Principle
The complexity determines the depth, not a fixed pipeline. Before starting any feature, assess its scope and apply only what's needed:
| Scope | What | Specify | Design | Tasks | Execute |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small | ≤3 files, one sentence | One-liner spec (inline) | Skip | Skip | Implement + verify inline |
| Medium | Clear feature, <10 tasks | Spec (brief) | Skip - design inline | Skip - tasks implicit | Implement + verify |
| Large | Multi-component feature | Full spec + requirement IDs | Architecture + components | Full breakdown + dependencies | Implement + verify per task |
| Complex | Ambiguity, new domain | Full spec + discuss gray areas | Research + architecture | Breakdown + phase plan | Implement + interactive UAT |
Rules:
- Specify and Execute are always required - you always need to know WHAT and DO it
- Design is skipped when the change is straightforward (no architectural decisions, no new patterns)
- Tasks is skipped when there are ≤3 obvious steps (they become implicit in Execute)
- Discuss is triggered within Specify when the agent detects ambiguous gray areas that need user input, or when the feature has any implicit-requirement dimension present (persistence/state, external calls, auth, payments, concurrency, state transitions)
- Interactive UAT is triggered within Execute only for user-facing features with complex behavior
Safety valve: Even when Tasks is skipped, Execute ALWAYS starts by listing atomic steps inline (see implement.md). If that listing reveals >5 steps or complex dependencies, STOP and create a formal tasks.md - the Tasks phase was wrongly skipped.
.specs Structure
.specs/
├── STATE.md # Project memory: Decisions log (AD-NNN) + Handoff snapshot
├── LESSONS.md # Self-improving lessons playbook (rendered by scripts/lessons.py - do not hand-edit)
├── lessons.json # Canonical lessons state (machine-owned)
└── features/ # Feature specifications
└── [feature]/
├── spec.md # Requirements with traceable IDs
├── context.md # User decisions for gray areas (only when discuss is triggered)
├── design.md # Architecture & components (only for Large/Complex)
├── tasks.md # Atomic tasks with verification (only for Large/Complex)
└── validation.md # Verifier report: PASS/FAIL, per-AC evidence, sensor result, diff range
Create artifacts lazily. Write each file only when its phase actually produces content - never scaffold empty context.md, design.md, or tasks.md up front. An empty file signals a phase happened when it did not; absence is the correct state for a skipped phase. The deterministic validators (scripts/validate_spec.py, scripts/validate_tasks.py, scripts/check_commit.py, scripts/validate_state.py) ship inside this skill's own scripts/ directory, alongside lessons.py.
Workflow
New feature:
- Specify → (Design) → (Tasks) → Execute (depth auto-sized)
Resume work:
- Read
.specs/STATE.md(Handoff + Decisions). - Reconcile Handoff against git (
branch,status --porcelain, recent commits) andtasks.md- evidence wins over a stale snapshot. Full procedure: memory.md. - Propose the reconciled next step before writing code.
Context Loading Strategy
On-demand load (only what the current task needs):
.specs/STATE.md- Decisions section (read at Design, re-read on resume); Handoff section (read on resume only)- confirmed lessons - load at Specify and Design via
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/lessons.py list --status confirmed(lessons.md); confirmed only, never candidates - spec.md (when working on a specific feature)
- context.md (when designing or implementing from user decisions)
- design.md (when implementing from design)
- tasks.md (when executing tasks)
Never load simultaneously:
- Multiple feature specs
- Multiple architecture docs
Target: <40k tokens total context Reserve: 160k+ tokens for work, reasoning, outputs Monitoring: Display status when >40k (see context-limits.md)
Sub-Agent Delegation
Trigger: count total tasks. If the feature packs into more than one task-budgeted batch (> ~8 tasks) → offer sub-agents; if it fits a single batch (≤ ~8 tasks) → execute inline.
Offer-then-confirm - never auto-spawn. The user must accept before any sub-agent is dispatched.
One worker per task-budgeted batch (~7 tasks, whole phases): Phases stay the semantic/dependency unit; a batch is the execution unit - one or more consecutive whole phases packed to ~7 tasks. Walk phases in order, accumulate whole phases into the current batch until it reaches the budget, then start the next - **nev
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →Architecture decomposition analysis
- →Creating technical design documents
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires manual intervention for sub-agent dispatching
- →Bounded to 3 iterations for fix-and-verify loops
- →Context limit of 40k tokens for active files
How it compares
Unlike manual planning, this skill enforces an automated, spec-anchored verification gate where the author and verifier are distinct agents.
Compared to similar skills
tlc-spec-driven side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tlc-spec-driven (this skill) | 7 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| trello | 41 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| executing-plans | 6 | 3mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| github-project-management | 4 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by tech-leads-club
View all by tech-leads-club →You might also like
trello
openclaw
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
executing-plans
obra
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
github-project-management
ruvnet
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning
project-clickup
incidentfox
ClickUp project management integration for incident tracking and task management
coo-advisor
alirezarezvani
Operations leadership for scaling companies. Process design, OKR execution, operational cadence, and scaling playbooks. Use when designing operations, setting up OKRs, building processes, scaling teams, analyzing bottlenecks, planning operational cadence, or when user mentions COO, operations, process improvement, OKRs, scaling, operational efficiency, or execution.
sparv
cexll
Minimal SPARV workflow (Specify→Plan→Act→Review→Vault) with 10-point spec gate, unified journal, 2-action saves, 3-failure protocol, and EHRB risk detection.