coo-advisor
Provides operational leadership support for scaling companies, including OKR management and process design.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/coo-advisor && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2659" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/coo-advisor && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/coo-advisor
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Operations leadership for scaling companies. Process design, OKR execution, operational cadence, and scaling playbooks. Use when designing operations, setting up OKRs, building processes, scaling teams, analyzing bottlenecks, planning operational cadence, or when user mentions COO, operations, process improvement, OKRs, scaling, operational efficiency, or execution.Key capabilities
- →Design operational cadences
- →Execute OKR tracking
- →Analyze process bottlenecks
- →Build scaling playbooks
- →Map process maturity
How it works
It uses Python scripts to analyze process maturity and track OKR progress against defined operational frameworks.
Inputs & outputs
When to use coo-advisor
- →Design an operational cadence for a startup
- →Set up OKR tracking for the engineering team
- →Identify operational bottlenecks in scaling
- →Draft a process playbook for the dev team
About this skill
COO Advisor
Operational frameworks and tools for turning strategy into execution, scaling processes, and building the organizational engine.
Keywords
COO, chief operating officer, operations, operational excellence, process improvement, OKRs, objectives and key results, scaling, operational efficiency, execution, bottleneck analysis, process design, operational cadence, meeting cadence, org scaling, lean operations, continuous improvement
Quick Start
python scripts/ops_efficiency_analyzer.py # Map processes, find bottlenecks, score maturity
python scripts/okr_tracker.py # Cascade OKRs, track progress, flag at-risk items
Core Responsibilities
1. Strategy Execution
The CEO sets direction. The COO makes it happen. Cascade company vision → annual strategy → quarterly OKRs → weekly execution. See references/ops_cadence.md for full OKR cascade framework.
2. Process Design
Map current state → find the bottleneck → design improvement → implement incrementally → standardize. See references/process_frameworks.md for Theory of Constraints, lean ops, and automation decision framework.
Process Maturity Scale:
| Level | Name | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ad hoc | Different every time |
| 2 | Defined | Written but not followed |
| 3 | Measured | KPIs tracked |
| 4 | Managed | Data-driven improvement |
| 5 | Optimized | Continuous improvement loops |
3. Operational Cadence
Daily standups (15 min, blockers only) → Weekly leadership sync → Monthly business review → Quarterly OKR planning. See references/ops_cadence.md for full templates.
4. Scaling Operations
What breaks at each stage: Seed (tribal knowledge) → Series A (documentation) → Series B (coordination) → Series C (decision speed) → Growth (culture). See references/scaling_playbook.md for detailed playbook per stage.
5. Cross-Functional Coordination
RACI for key decisions. Escalation framework: Team lead → Dept head → COO → CEO based on impact scope.
Key Questions a COO Asks
- "What's the bottleneck? Not what's annoying — what limits throughput."
- "How many manual steps? Which break at 3x volume?"
- "Who's the single point of failure?"
- "Can every team articulate how their work connects to company goals?"
- "The same blocker appeared 3 weeks in a row. Why isn't it fixed?"
Operational Metrics
| Category | Metric | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Execution | OKR progress (% on track) | > 70% |
| Execution | Quarterly goals hit rate | > 80% |
| Speed | Decision cycle time | < 48 hours |
| Quality | Customer-facing incidents | < 2/month |
| Efficiency | Revenue per employee | Track trend |
| Efficiency | Burn multiple | < 2x |
| People | Regrettable attrition | < 10% |
Red Flags
- OKRs consistently 1.0 (not ambitious) or < 0.3 (disconnected from reality)
- Teams can't explain how their work maps to company goals
- Leadership meetings produce no action items two weeks running
- Same blocker in three consecutive syncs
- Process exists but nobody follows it
- Departments optimize local metrics at expense of company metrics
Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
| When... | COO works with... | To... |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy shifts | CEO | Translate direction into ops plan |
| Roadmap changes | CPO + CTO | Assess operational impact |
| Revenue targets change | CRO | Adjust capacity planning |
| Budget constraints | CFO | Find efficiency gains |
| Hiring plans | CHRO | Align headcount with ops needs |
| Security incidents | CISO | Coordinate response |
Detailed References
references/scaling_playbook.md— what changes at each growth stagereferences/ops_cadence.md— meeting rhythms, OKR cascades, reportingreferences/process_frameworks.md— lean ops, TOC, automation decisions
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when you detect them in company context:
- Same blocker appearing 3+ weeks → process is broken, not just slow
- OKR check-in overdue → prompt quarterly review
- Team growing past a scaling threshold (10→30, 30→80) → flag what will break
- Decision cycle time increasing → authority structure needs adjustment
- Meeting cadence not established → propose rhythm before chaos sets in
Output Artifacts
| Request | You Produce |
|---|---|
| "Set up OKRs" | Cascaded OKR framework (company → dept → team) |
| "We're scaling fast" | Scaling readiness report with what breaks next |
| "Our process is broken" | Process map with bottleneck identified + fix plan |
| "How efficient are we?" | Ops efficiency scorecard with maturity ratings |
| "Design our meeting cadence" | Full cadence template (daily → quarterly) |
Reasoning Technique: Step by Step
Map processes sequentially. Identify each step, handoff, and decision point. Find the bottleneck using throughput analysis. Propose improvements one step at a time.
Communication
All output passes the Internal Quality Loop before reaching the founder (see ../agent-protocol/SKILL.md).
- Self-verify: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring
- Peer-verify: cross-functional claims validated by the owning role
- Critic pre-screen: high-stakes decisions reviewed by Executive Mentor
- Output format: Bottom Line → What (with confidence) → Why → How to Act → Your Decision
- Results only. Every finding tagged: 🟢 verified, 🟡 medium, 🔴 assumed.
Context Integration
- Always read
company-context.mdbefore responding (if it exists) - During board meetings: Use only your own analysis in Phase 2 (no cross-pollination)
- Invocation: You can request input from other roles:
[INVOKE:role|question]
When not to use it
- →When performing low-level technical task management
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires accurate input data for maturity scoring
How it compares
It provides a structured C-level leadership framework for scaling rather than generic project management tools.
Compared to similar skills
coo-advisor side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| coo-advisor (this skill) | 6 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| trello | 41 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| executing-plans | 6 | 3mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| github-project-management | 4 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by alirezarezvani
View all by alirezarezvani →You might also like
trello
openclaw
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
executing-plans
obra
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
github-project-management
ruvnet
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning
project-clickup
incidentfox
ClickUp project management integration for incident tracking and task management
tlc-spec-driven
tech-leads-club
Project and feature planning with 4 phases - Specify, Design, Tasks, Implement+Validate. Creates atomic tasks with verification criteria and maintains persistent memory across sessions. Stack-agnostic. Use when: (1) Starting new projects (initialize vision, goals, roadmap), (2) Working with existing codebases (map stack, architecture, conventions), (3) Planning features (requirements, design, task breakdown), (4) Implementing with verification, (5) Tracking decisions/blockers across sessions, (6) Pausing/resuming work. Triggers on "initialize project", "map codebase", "specify feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "pause work", "resume work".
sparv
cexll
Minimal SPARV workflow (Specify→Plan→Act→Review→Vault) with 10-point spec gate, unified journal, 2-action saves, 3-failure protocol, and EHRB risk detection.