TE

technology-radar

A decision-making framework for CTOs covering technology selection, build-vs-buy analysis, and engineering team health metrics.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/technology-radar && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/19425" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/technology-radar && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/technology-radar

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

CTO methodology for technology evaluation, architecture governance, build-vs-buy decisions, engineering metrics, technical debt quantification, and innovation pipeline management. Covers technology radar framework (Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold), TCO analysis, architecture review boards, RFC processes, DORA/SPACE/DevEx metrics, debt interest calculation, and POC-to-production readiness criteria.
392 charsno explicit “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Evaluate technology stacks using Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold quadrants
  • Perform build-vs-buy analysis with TCO calculations
  • Design architecture governance processes and RFC workflows
  • Track engineering performance using DORA, SPACE, and DevEx metrics
  • Quantify technical debt with principal and interest estimation
  • Manage innovation pipelines with POC-to-production readiness gates

How it works

The skill applies a CTO-level methodology to evaluate technology and engineering processes. It uses structured frameworks to balance delivery velocity with long-term platform health.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Business requirements and technical context
You get back
Technology radar document, build-vs-buy recommendation, or engineering health report

When to use technology-radar

  • Perform build-vs-buy analysis
  • Establish architecture review processes
  • Calculate and track technical debt
  • Evaluate engineering performance metrics

About this skill

Technology Radar

CTO methodology for making technology decisions, governing architecture, measuring engineering effectiveness, managing technical debt, and operating an innovation pipeline. These frameworks help a CTO balance short-term delivery velocity with long-term platform health.

Domain Model

DomainCoversArtifact
Technology RadarAdopt/Trial/Assess/Hold quadrants, tool selection criteria, deprecation policyTechnology radar document
Build vs BuyTCO analysis, decision matrices, vendor evaluation, integration costBuild-vs-buy recommendation
Architecture GovernanceStandards, review boards, RFC process, design reviewsADRs, RFC documents, governance charter
Engineering MetricsDORA (deploy frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate), SPACE, DevExEngineering dashboard, health report
Technical DebtInterest calculation, remediation prioritization, principal estimationTechnical debt register
Innovation PipelineHorizon scanning, POC criteria, production readiness gatesInnovation funnel, POC report

When to Load

Load this skill when the task involves:

  • Evaluating a new technology or tool for adoption
  • Making a build-vs-buy decision with TCO analysis
  • Designing or auditing architecture governance processes
  • Setting up engineering metrics dashboards (DORA, SPACE)
  • Quantifying and prioritizing technical debt remediation
  • Running an innovation pipeline with POC-to-production gates
  • Deprecating or retiring legacy technology
  • Conducting an architecture review board session

Loading Order

skill_view('technology-radar')                      # This — methodology index
skill_view('executive-methodology')                  # Shared decision frameworks
skill_view('artifact-pyramids')                      # Output contract
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/technology-radar.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/build-vs-buy.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/architecture-governance.md')
skill_view('technology-radar', file_path='references/engineering-metrics.md')

Reference Files

ReferenceLoad WhenFile
Technology RadarYou need to evaluate and categorize a technology or tool for adoption, trial, assessment, or holdreferences/technology-radar.md
Build vs BuyYou're comparing build vs buy options with TCO analysis and decision criteriareferences/build-vs-buy.md
Architecture GovernanceYou're designing RFC processes, review boards, or architecture standardsreferences/architecture-governance.md
Engineering MetricsYou need to measure engineering effectiveness with DORA, SPACE, or DevEx frameworksreferences/engineering-metrics.md

Design Principles

  1. Technology is a means, not an end. Every technology decision must trace back to a business outcome. "Because it's new" is not a reason to adopt. "Because it solves X faster/safer/cheaper" is.
  2. Radar is a living document. A technology radar updated once a year is a museum. Update it quarterly, or every time a significant adoption/hold/promote/promote-to-trial decision is made.
  3. Build vs buy is never just cost. Total Cost of Ownership includes maintenance, hiring, training, integration, migration, and opportunity cost. A cheaper build today may be vastly more expensive over 3 years.
  4. Engineering metrics measure the system, not the people. DORA metrics measure the delivery capability of the org. SPACE measures developer satisfaction. Neither is a performance review tool for individuals.
  5. Technical debt has a principal and an interest payment. The principal is the cost to fix it properly. The interest is the recurring drag on velocity. Prioritize debt where interest/principal ratio is highest.
  6. Production readiness gates exist to prevent crisis. Every gate that is skipped in the name of speed will be paid for in incident response time later.

Related Skills

  • executive-methodology — shared decision frameworks and governance
  • operational-design — COO-side process design and scaling
  • artifact-pyramids — output contract specification
  • platform-engineering — infrastructure and CI/CD implementation patterns

When not to use it

  • Evaluating technology solely based on novelty
  • Using engineering metrics for individual performance reviews
  • Skipping production readiness gates to increase speed

Limitations

  • Requires quarterly updates to remain relevant
  • Metrics measure system performance rather than individual output

How it compares

Unlike generic project management, this skill focuses on specific CTO-level governance artifacts like ADRs, technical debt registers, and innovation funnels.

Compared to similar skills

technology-radar side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
technology-radar (this skill)01moNo flagsAdvanced
INDUSTRY_RND02moNo flagsIntermediate
create-plan367moReviewBeginner
project-planner329moReviewIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

INDUSTRY_RND

neej4

INDUSTRY_RND — an agent skill by neej4.

00

create-plan

antinomyhq

Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.

36121

project-planner

adrianpuiu

Comprehensive project planning and documentation generator for software projects. Creates structured requirements documents, system design documents, and task breakdown plans with implementation tracking. Use when starting a new project, defining specifications, creating technical designs, or breaking down complex systems into implementable tasks. Supports user story format, acceptance criteria, component design, API specifications, and hierarchical task decomposition with requirement traceability.

32115

system-design

lagz0ne

Use when designing, architecting, or planning a new system from requirements or ideas - transforms concepts into navigable design catalog using EventStorming methodology, Mermaid diagrams, and progressive elaboration through 5 phases (Requirements, Big Picture, Processes, Data/Flows, Integration)

19108

spec-kit-workflow

jmanhype

Guides specification-driven development workflow. Automatically invoked when discussing new features, specifications, technical planning, or implementation tasks. Ensures proper workflow phases (specify → clarify → plan → checklist → tasks → analyze → implement).

11111

sparc-methodology

ruvnet

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

8100

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry