Provides a methodology for breaking down user stories into atomic, testable, and sequenced development tasks.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/sdlc-planning && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/19050" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/sdlc-planning && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/sdlc-planning
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use when creating implementation plans, breaking down tasks, sequencing changes, planning TDD cycles, or creating a roadmap for implementing a user story.Key capabilities
- →Review research findings to understand the problem and dependencies.
- →Define atomic tasks that are verifiable, independent, and testable.
- →Establish dependencies between tasks.
- →Sequence tasks by dependency order.
- →Use a structured format for tasks including files and dependencies.
- →Plan TDD cycles using RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each feature.
How it works
The skill guides the user through a planning methodology that involves reviewing research, defining atomic tasks, establishing dependencies, and sequencing tasks for efficient implementation, optionally incorporating TDD cycles.
Inputs & outputs
When to use sdlc-planning
- →Creating implementation plans
- →Sequencing development tasks
- →Defining task success criteria
- →Roadmapping user stories
About this skill
SDLC Planning Skill
This skill provides guidance for creating effective implementation plans during the SDLC planning phase.
Overview
A good implementation plan transforms research findings into actionable, atomic tasks that can be executed systematically. The plan serves as both a roadmap and a checklist for implementation.
Planning Methodology
Step 1: Review Research Findings
Before planning, ensure you have:
- Clear understanding of the problem
- List of files requiring changes
- Identified patterns to follow
- Testing strategy outlined
- Dependencies mapped
Step 2: Define Atomic Tasks
Break work into tasks that are:
- Atomic - Can be completed in one focused session (1-2 hours max)
- Verifiable - Has clear success criteria
- Independent - Minimal dependencies on other incomplete tasks
- Testable - Can be verified with automated tests when applicable
Step 3: Establish Dependencies
For each task, identify:
- What must be completed before this task?
- What tasks are blocked by this task?
- Are there any circular dependencies to resolve?
Step 4: Sequence by Dependency Order
Order tasks so that:
- Setup/infrastructure tasks come first
- Core functionality follows
- Edge cases and error handling
- Tests and verification
- Documentation (if required)
Task Format
Use this structured format for tasks:
## Phase 1: Setup
- [ ] **T1**: Create the service interface
- Files: `src/services/auth.ts`, `src/types/auth.ts`
- Dependencies: none
- [ ] **T2**: Add authentication middleware
- Files: `src/middleware/auth.ts`
- Dependencies: T1
## Phase 2: Implementation
- [ ] **T3**: Implement login endpoint
- Files: `src/routes/auth.ts`
- Dependencies: T1, T2
## Phase 3: Testing
- [ ] **T4**: Write unit tests for auth service
- Files: `src/services/auth.test.ts`
- Dependencies: T1
Task ID Convention
- Use sequential IDs: T1, T2, T3, etc.
- IDs help track dependencies clearly
- Reference IDs in dependency lists
File List Guidelines
- List ALL files that will be created or modified
- Use backticks for file paths:
src/services/auth.ts - Include test files in the plan
Dependency Guidelines
- Use "none" for tasks with no dependencies
- List multiple dependencies comma-separated: T1, T2
- Ensure no circular dependencies exist
TDD Planning (When Enabled)
When TDD mode is enabled, structure each feature using RED-GREEN-REFACTOR:
### Feature: User Login
- [ ] **T1**: 🔴 RED - Write failing test for successful login
- Files: `src/auth/login.test.ts`
- Dependencies: none
- Expected: Test fails (function doesn't exist)
- [ ] **T2**: 🟢 GREEN - Implement login function
- Files: `src/auth/login.ts`
- Dependencies: T1
- Expected: Test passes with minimal code
- [ ] **T3**: 🔵 REFACTOR - Clean up login implementation
- Files: `src/auth/login.ts`
- Dependencies: T2
- Expected: All tests still pass
- [ ] **T4**: 🔴 RED - Write failing test for invalid credentials
- Files: `src/auth/login.test.ts`
- Dependencies: T3
- Expected: Test fails
- [ ] **T5**: 🟢 GREEN - Add credential validation
- Files: `src/auth/login.ts`
- Dependencies: T4
- Expected: Test passes
TDD Rules
- NEVER write implementation before a test
- Each test verifies ONE specific behavior
- Tests must fail before implementation (verify the test works)
- After GREEN, run ALL tests to check for regressions
- REFACTOR phase is optional but recommended
Given-When-Then for Acceptance Criteria
Map acceptance criteria to test scenarios:
### AC: User can log in with valid credentials
**Given** a registered user with email "[email protected]" and password "secret123"
**When** they submit the login form with correct credentials
**Then** they receive an access token and are redirected to dashboard
Test: `src/auth/login.test.ts` - "should return token for valid credentials"
Plan Quality Checklist
Before finalizing the plan:
- Every task has a clear, actionable description (starts with a verb)
- All files to be modified are listed
- Dependencies are explicit (task IDs or "none")
- No circular dependencies exist
- Tasks are atomic (completable in 1-2 hours)
- Test tasks are included for new functionality
- Phases are logically ordered (setup → implementation → testing)
Common Phases
Standard Implementation
- Setup - Create interfaces, types, configuration
- Core Implementation - Main functionality
- Error Handling - Edge cases, validation
- Testing - Unit tests, integration tests
- Verification - Final checks, documentation
TDD Implementation
- Setup - Configure test environment, create fixtures
- Feature Cycles - Repeat RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for each feature
- Integration - Connect components, integration tests
- Verification - Full test suite, build verification
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
-
Monolithic tasks - "Implement the feature" is too big. Break it down.
-
Missing dependencies - If T3 needs T1's output, list T1 as a dependency.
-
Test-last planning - Tests should be planned alongside implementation, not as an afterthought.
-
Vague task descriptions - "Work on auth" is unclear. "Create JWT token generation function" is specific.
-
Skipping phases - Don't jump to implementation without setup tasks for types/interfaces.
Tips for Effective Planning
- Think in layers - Database → Service → API → UI
- Plan for testability - How will each task be verified?
- Consider rollback - If this fails, can we safely revert?
- Include cleanup - Remove temporary code, update imports
- Document decisions - Note why you chose this sequence
When not to use it
- →When tasks are monolithic and not atomic.
- →When dependencies are missing or circular.
- →When planning tests as an afterthought.
Limitations
- →Tasks must be atomic, completable in 1-2 hours max.
- →No implementation before a test in TDD mode.
- →Tests must fail before implementation in TDD mode.
How it compares
This skill provides a structured methodology for creating implementation plans with atomic, verifiable tasks and explicit dependencies, unlike ad-hoc planning that can lead to monolithic tasks or missed dependencies.
Compared to similar skills
sdlc-planning side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sdlc-planning (this skill) | 0 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| create-plan | 36 | 7mo | Review | Beginner |
| project-planner | 32 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
| system-design | 19 | 8mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
create-plan
antinomyhq
Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.
project-planner
adrianpuiu
Comprehensive project planning and documentation generator for software projects. Creates structured requirements documents, system design documents, and task breakdown plans with implementation tracking. Use when starting a new project, defining specifications, creating technical designs, or breaking down complex systems into implementable tasks. Supports user story format, acceptance criteria, component design, API specifications, and hierarchical task decomposition with requirement traceability.
system-design
lagz0ne
Use when designing, architecting, or planning a new system from requirements or ideas - transforms concepts into navigable design catalog using EventStorming methodology, Mermaid diagrams, and progressive elaboration through 5 phases (Requirements, Big Picture, Processes, Data/Flows, Integration)
spec-kit-workflow
jmanhype
Guides specification-driven development workflow. Automatically invoked when discussing new features, specifications, technical planning, or implementation tasks. Ensures proper workflow phases (specify → clarify → plan → checklist → tasks → analyze → implement).
sparc-methodology
ruvnet
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration
spec-workflow
TencentCloudBase
Standard software engineering workflow for requirement analysis, technical design, and task planning. Use this skill when developing new features, complex architecture designs, multi-module integrations, or projects involving database/UI design.