sdlc-impl-planning
Generates an ordered implementation plan with dependency mapping and risk identification.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/sdlc-impl-planning && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/14518" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/sdlc-impl-planning && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/sdlc-impl-planning
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Create an ordered implementation plan for a TriStar feature. Builds file dependency graph, maps acceptance criteria to files, defines wave-based execution order, and identifies risks.Key capabilities
- →Build an ordered implementation plan for a feature
- →Map acceptance criteria to files and test strategies
- →Define wave-based execution order for implementation
- →Identify implementation risks
- →Update artifact digest with pipeline stage
How it works
The skill loads feature artifacts, builds an ordered file list, computes dependencies, and assigns files to waves based on TriStar dependency ordering. It maps acceptance criteria to files and identifies implementation risks.
Inputs & outputs
When to use sdlc-impl-planning
- →Planning a complex new feature
- →Identifying implementation risks
- →Creating a task execution roadmap
About this skill
SDLC Implementation Planning Skill
Prime Directive
"Plan the work. Then work the plan."
This skill converts architecture design into an actionable, ordered implementation plan. Every file to create or modify is listed with dependencies, acceptance criteria mappings, and test strategies.
Arguments
--feature=<name>(required) - Feature name matching existing artifacts
Prerequisites
docs/artifacts/<feature>/problem_spec.mdmust existdocs/artifacts/<feature>/design_spec.mdmust existdocs/artifacts/<feature>/design_review.mdmust exist with APPROVE or APPROVE_WITH_CONCERNS decision
Process
Step 1: Load Artifacts
Read all feature artifacts:
docs/artifacts/<feature>/problem_spec.md- Requirements and acceptance criteriadocs/artifacts/<feature>/design_spec.md- Component design, API contracts, data modelsdocs/artifacts/<feature>/design_review.md- Review findings and concerns to addressdocs/ARCHITECTURE.md- System architecture baseline
Step 2: Build Ordered File List
Extract every file that needs to be created or modified from the design spec:
- List each file with its COMP-ID from the design
- Note whether the file is NEW or MODIFIED
- Note the layer (Designer / Hub / Scout / Shared / Tests)
- Note the file type (TypeScript / Python / Config)
Step 3: Compute Dependency Graph
For each file, determine its dependencies:
- Which other files must exist before this file can be implemented?
- Which shared types does it depend on?
- Which services does it call?
- Which models does it use?
Assign each file to a wave based on the TriStar dependency ordering (see references/tristar-dependencies.md):
- Wave 1: Shared types (no dependencies)
- Wave 2: Backend models (depends on shared types)
- Wave 3: Backend services (depends on models)
- Wave 4: Backend API routes (depends on services)
- Wave 5: Frontend services (depends on API contracts)
- Wave 6: Frontend components (depends on frontend services)
- Wave 7: Tests (depends on implementation)
Step 4: Map Acceptance Criteria to Files
For each acceptance criterion from the problem spec:
- Which files are involved in satisfying this AC?
- Which test files verify this AC?
- Mark any AC that spans multiple waves (integration risk)
Step 5: Map Test Strategy
For each implementation file:
- Corresponding unit test file path
- Key test scenarios (from testing.md patterns)
- Mock dependencies needed
- Integration test scenarios (if applicable)
Step 6: Identify Risks
Flag implementation risks:
- Files in multiple waves that share state (race condition risk)
- Complex logic that needs careful testing (fraud detection, scoring)
- External API integrations that need mocking strategy
- Schema changes that affect multiple layers (Zod + Pydantic sync)
- Design review concerns that need special attention during implementation
Step 7: Write Implementation Plan
Save to: docs/artifacts/<feature>/implementation_plan.md
Step 8: Update Artifact Digest
Create or update .claude/checkpoints/<feature>/artifact_digest.md with:
- List of all artifacts produced so far
- Current pipeline stage (impl-planning complete)
- Next expected stage (implementation)
Output Template
# Implementation Plan: <feature-name>
## Overview
- Total files: N (M new, K modified)
- Waves: 7
- Estimated complexity: Low / Medium / High
## Wave Plan
### Wave 1: Shared Types
| # | File | Action | COMP-ID | Description |
|---|------|--------|---------|-------------|
| 1 | src/shared/types/offer-brief.ts | MODIFY | COMP-001 | Add new fields to OfferBrief |
**Wave 1 Verification:**
- [ ] TypeScript compiles without errors
- [ ] Zod schema validates correctly
### Wave 2: Backend Models
| # | File | Action | COMP-ID | Description |
|---|------|--------|---------|-------------|
| 2 | src/backend/models/offer_brief.py | MODIFY | COMP-002 | Mirror OfferBrief changes in Pydantic |
**Wave 2 Verification:**
- [ ] Pydantic model validates correctly
- [ ] Fields match Wave 1 Zod schema
### Wave 3: Backend Services
...
### Wave 4: Backend API Routes
...
### Wave 5: Frontend Services
...
### Wave 6: Frontend Components
...
### Wave 7: Tests
| # | File | Action | Tests For | Scenarios |
|---|------|--------|-----------|-----------|
| N | tests/unit/backend/test_offer_brief.py | NEW | COMP-002 | Validation, edge cases |
**Wave 7 Verification:**
- [ ] All unit tests pass
- [ ] Coverage > 80%
- [ ] Integration tests pass
## Acceptance Criteria Mapping
| AC ID | Description | Files | Test File | Wave |
|-------|-------------|-------|-----------|------|
| AC-001 | Given X, When Y, Then Z | file1, file2 | test_file | 3,4 |
## Risk Register
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation | Wave |
|------|--------|------------|------|
| R-001: Schema sync | High | Implement Wave 1+2 together, verify match | 1-2 |
## Design Review Concerns
| Finding | Severity | How Addressed |
|---------|----------|---------------|
| F-001: Missing error handling | Major | Added try/catch in Wave 4 files |
## Implementation Order Summary
1. Wave 1: Shared types (foundation)
2. Wave 2: Backend models (must match Wave 1)
3. Wave 3: Backend services (business logic)
4. Wave 4: Backend routes (API layer)
5. Wave 5: Frontend services (API clients)
6. Wave 6: Frontend components (UI layer)
7. Wave 7: Tests (verification layer)
Reference Files
references/tristar-dependencies.md- Layer dependency ordering and wave assignment rules
When not to use it
- →Required design artifacts are missing or not approved
- →The feature does not have defined acceptance criteria
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires existing problem, design, and design review specifications
- →Requires a TriStar dependency ordering context
- →Output is a plan, not the implementation itself
How it compares
This skill generates a detailed, wave-based implementation plan with explicit file dependencies and risk identification, providing a structured roadmap compared to ad-hoc planning.
Compared to similar skills
sdlc-impl-planning side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sdlc-impl-planning (this skill) | 0 | 4mo | No flags | Advanced |
| create-plan | 36 | 8mo | Review | Beginner |
| project-planner | 32 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
| system-design | 19 | 9mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
create-plan
antinomyhq
Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.
project-planner
adrianpuiu
Comprehensive project planning and documentation generator for software projects. Creates structured requirements documents, system design documents, and task breakdown plans with implementation tracking. Use when starting a new project, defining specifications, creating technical designs, or breaking down complex systems into implementable tasks. Supports user story format, acceptance criteria, component design, API specifications, and hierarchical task decomposition with requirement traceability.
system-design
lagz0ne
Use when designing, architecting, or planning a new system from requirements or ideas - transforms concepts into navigable design catalog using EventStorming methodology, Mermaid diagrams, and progressive elaboration through 5 phases (Requirements, Big Picture, Processes, Data/Flows, Integration)
spec-kit-workflow
jmanhype
Guides specification-driven development workflow. Automatically invoked when discussing new features, specifications, technical planning, or implementation tasks. Ensures proper workflow phases (specify → clarify → plan → checklist → tasks → analyze → implement).
sparc-methodology
ruvnet
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration
spec-workflow
TencentCloudBase
Standard software engineering workflow for requirement analysis, technical design, and task planning. Use this skill when developing new features, complex architecture designs, multi-module integrations, or projects involving database/UI design.