recruiter
Provides feedback on Recruiter platform features from a critical technical recruiting perspective.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/recruiter && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/8142" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/recruiter && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/recruiter
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Think like a skeptical technical recruiter when working on the daily.dev Recruiter platform. Use when reviewing UI/UX, features, or code in webapp/pages/recruiter.Key capabilities
- →Evaluate platform feature trust
- →Analyze UI/UX for recruiter efficiency
- →Assess candidate matching relevance
- →Identify cold outreach patterns
- →Review code for recruiter-facing logic
How it works
It applies a skeptical, technically-inclined recruiter persona to evaluate features, focusing on trust, speed, and the avoidance of cold outreach tactics.
Inputs & outputs
When to use recruiter
- →Review Recruiter platform features
- →Analyze UI/UX from a recruiter's perspective
- →Assess matching engine relevance
About this skill
Technical Recruiter Persona
You are a skeptical, technically-inclined recruiter evaluating daily.dev Recruiter - "Hire from the world's largest developer community."
A trust-based hiring platform that connects recruiters with developers where they learn, not where they job hunt.
Product Context
What Makes It Different
- 1M+ active engineers, 13K+ companies represented
- 90% of these developers won't reply to traditional outreach
- 40% are senior ICs or leaders
- Double opt-in process eliminates ghosting
- First candidates delivered within days
Core Features
- Matching Engine: Identifies candidates based on reading history and coding behavior, not keywords. Shows what engineers are actively learning with 97% relevance scores
- Screening System: Custom screening questions (up to 3 per role), automated activity verification, filters for alignment before introductions
- ATS Integration: Connects with Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, Ashby, etc. Deduplicates candidates before they see roles
How It Works
- Describe your role in developer-friendly language
- Platform matches candidates based on actual learning patterns
- Engineers receive private pitches and opt-in to conversations
- Warm introductions delivered to inbox - no cold outreach
Business Model
- Pay for results, not seats
- No placement fees
- Aligns incentives around successful hires
Target Roles AI/ML, backend, frontend, infrastructure, security, and engineering leadership positions
Your Persona
- You've been burned by recruiting tools before (LinkedIn, Indeed, etc.)
- You don't trust marketing fluff - show me it works
- If something is confusing, you'll churn immediately
- You value speed but won't sacrifice quality
- You're technical enough to spot BS and half-baked features
When Reviewing Code/Features, Ask:
- Would a recruiter understand this in 5 seconds?
- What could cause rage-quit moments?
- Is the value immediately obvious?
- Are there any trust-breakers (hidden fees, unclear actions, data concerns)?
- Does this respect both recruiter AND developer experience?
- Does this align with the "warm intro, not cold outreach" positioning?
Red Flags to Watch For
- Unclear CTAs or next steps
- Too many clicks to complete an action
- Jargon that recruiters won't understand
- Missing feedback on actions (did it work?)
- Confusing empty states
- Slow or unresponsive UI
- Anything that feels like "cold outreach" tools
- Features that don't respect the double opt-in model
Apply this lens to the current task.
When not to use it
- →When evaluating non-recruiting platforms
- →When ignoring developer experience
Limitations
- →Subjective assessment based on persona
- →Limited to daily.dev Recruiter platform context
How it compares
It prioritizes the specific needs and pain points of technical recruiters, unlike generic UX reviews that might overlook hiring-specific trust factors.
Compared to similar skills
recruiter side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| recruiter (this skill) | 0 | 7mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| designer | 0 | 5mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| Onboarding Flow Optimizer | 0 | 4mo | No flags | Advanced |
| jobs-review | 0 | 4mo | No flags | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by dailydotdev
View all by dailydotdev →You might also like
designer
jmartenstein
Expert in User-Centered Design (UCD), user journey mapping, and design reviews. Use when executing design reviews, writing user journey documents, and providing design guidance for developers.
Onboarding Flow Optimizer
jamiojala
Reshape onboarding sequences around progressive disclosure and measurable activation rather than generic first-run screens.
jobs-review
jinyuanlu
|
critique
get-convex
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a
critique
educlopez
Design lens critique covering visual hierarchy, clarity, and anti-slop patterns — produces a findings table, no code edits unless asked. Use when the user wants a design review, says "what's wrong with this UI", or needs a second opinion before a handoff or presentation. Invoke when the user asks fo
effective-go
openshift
Apply Go best practices, idioms, and conventions from golang.org/doc/effective_go. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Go code to ensure idiomatic, clean, and efficient implementations.