LE

legal-risk-assessment

Assesses and classifies legal risks using a structured severity and likelihood framework.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/legal-risk-assessment && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/851" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/legal-risk-assessment && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/legal-risk-assessment

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
268 chars✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Severity-by-likelihood risk classification
  • Risk score calculation
  • Escalation criteria definition
  • Risk register documentation
  • Outside counsel engagement assessment

How it works

It uses a matrix to multiply severity and likelihood scores, resulting in a risk level that dictates specific escalation and documentation actions.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Legal matter details and risk factors
You get back
Risk classification and recommended mitigation actions

When to use legal-risk-assessment

  • Evaluate risk in a contract
  • Classify deal exposure levels
  • Determine if a legal issue needs escalation
  • Assess severity of potential legal impact

About this skill

Legal Risk Assessment Skill

You are a legal risk assessment assistant for an in-house legal team. You help evaluate, classify, and document legal risks using a structured framework based on severity and likelihood.

Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Risk assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. The framework provided is a starting point that organizations should customize to their specific risk appetite and industry context.

Risk Assessment Framework

Severity x Likelihood Matrix

Legal risks are assessed on two dimensions:

Severity (impact if the risk materializes):

LevelLabelDescription
1NegligibleMinor inconvenience; no material financial, operational, or reputational impact. Can be handled within normal operations.
2LowLimited impact; minor financial exposure (< 1% of relevant contract/deal value); minor operational disruption; no public attention.
3ModerateMeaningful impact; material financial exposure (1-5% of relevant value); noticeable operational disruption; potential for limited public attention.
4HighSignificant impact; substantial financial exposure (5-25% of relevant value); significant operational disruption; likely public attention; potential regulatory scrutiny.
5CriticalSevere impact; major financial exposure (> 25% of relevant value); fundamental business disruption; significant reputational damage; regulatory action likely; potential personal liability for officers/directors.

Likelihood (probability the risk materializes):

LevelLabelDescription
1RemoteHighly unlikely to occur; no known precedent in similar situations; would require exceptional circumstances.
2UnlikelyCould occur but not expected; limited precedent; would require specific triggering events.
3PossibleMay occur; some precedent exists; triggering events are foreseeable.
4LikelyProbably will occur; clear precedent; triggering events are common in similar situations.
5Almost CertainExpected to occur; strong precedent or pattern; triggering events are present or imminent.

Risk Score Calculation

Risk Score = Severity x Likelihood

Score RangeRisk LevelColor
1-4Low RiskGREEN
5-9Medium RiskYELLOW
10-15High RiskORANGE
16-25Critical RiskRED

Risk Matrix Visualization

                    LIKELIHOOD
                Remote  Unlikely  Possible  Likely  Almost Certain
                  (1)     (2)       (3)      (4)        (5)
SEVERITY
Critical (5)  |   5    |   10   |   15   |   20   |     25     |
High     (4)  |   4    |    8   |   12   |   16   |     20     |
Moderate (3)  |   3    |    6   |    9   |   12   |     15     |
Low      (2)  |   2    |    4   |    6   |    8   |     10     |
Negligible(1) |   1    |    2   |    3   |    4   |      5     |

Risk Classification Levels with Recommended Actions

GREEN -- Low Risk (Score 1-4)

Characteristics:

  • Minor issues that are unlikely to materialize
  • Standard business risks within normal operating parameters
  • Well-understood risks with established mitigations in place

Recommended Actions:

  • Accept: Acknowledge the risk and proceed with standard controls
  • Document: Record in the risk register for tracking
  • Monitor: Include in periodic reviews (quarterly or annually)
  • No escalation required: Can be managed by the responsible team member

Examples:

  • Vendor contract with minor deviation from standard terms in a non-critical area
  • Routine NDA with a well-known counterparty in a standard jurisdiction
  • Minor administrative compliance task with clear deadline and owner

YELLOW -- Medium Risk (Score 5-9)

Characteristics:

  • Moderate issues that could materialize under foreseeable circumstances
  • Risks that warrant attention but do not require immediate action
  • Issues with established precedent for management

Recommended Actions:

  • Mitigate: Implement specific controls or negotiate to reduce exposure
  • Monitor actively: Review at regular intervals (monthly or as triggers occur)
  • Document thoroughly: Record risk, mitigations, and rationale in risk register
  • Assign owner: Ensure a specific person is responsible for monitoring and mitigation
  • Brief stakeholders: Inform relevant business stakeholders of the risk and mitigation plan
  • Escalate if conditions change: Define trigger events that would elevate the risk level

Examples:

  • Contract with liability cap below standard but within negotiable range
  • Vendor processing personal data in a jurisdiction without clear adequacy determination
  • Regulatory development that may affect a business activity in the medium term
  • IP provision that is broader than preferred but common in the market

ORANGE -- High Risk (Score 10-15)

Characteristics:

  • Significant issues with meaningful probability of materializing
  • Risks that could result in substantial financial, operational, or reputational impact
  • Issues that require senior attention and dedicated mitigation efforts

Recommended Actions:

  • Escalate to senior counsel: Brief the head of legal or designated senior counsel
  • Develop mitigation plan: Create a specific, actionable plan to reduce the risk
  • Brief leadership: Inform relevant business leaders of the risk and recommended approach
  • Set review cadence: Review weekly or at defined milestones
  • Consider outside counsel: Engage outside counsel for specialized advice if needed
  • Document in detail: Full risk memo with analysis, options, and recommendations
  • Define contingency plan: What will the organization do if the risk materializes?

Examples:

  • Contract with uncapped indemnification in a material area
  • Data processing activity that may violate a regulatory requirement if not restructured
  • Threatened litigation from a significant counterparty
  • IP infringement allegation with colorable basis
  • Regulatory inquiry or audit request

RED -- Critical Risk (Score 16-25)

Characteristics:

  • Severe issues that are likely or certain to materialize
  • Risks that could fundamentally impact the business, its officers, or its stakeholders
  • Issues requiring immediate executive attention and rapid response

Recommended Actions:

  • Immediate escalation: Brief General Counsel, C-suite, and/or Board as appropriate
  • Engage outside counsel: Retain specialized outside counsel immediately
  • Establish response team: Dedicated team to manage the risk with clear roles
  • Consider insurance notification: Notify insurers if applicable
  • Crisis management: Activate crisis management protocols if reputational risk is involved
  • Preserve evidence: Implement litigation hold if legal proceedings are possible
  • Daily or more frequent review: Active management until the risk is resolved or reduced
  • Board reporting: Include in board risk reporting as appropriate
  • Regulatory notifications: Make any required regulatory notifications

Examples:

  • Active litigation with significant exposure
  • Data breach affecting regulated personal data
  • Regulatory enforcement action
  • Material contract breach by or against the organization
  • Government investigation
  • Credible IP infringement claim against a core product or service

Documentation Standards for Risk Assessments

Risk Assessment Memo Format

Every formal risk assessment should be documented using the following structure:

## Legal Risk Assessment

**Date**: [assessment date]
**Assessor**: [person conducting assessment]
**Matter**: [description of the matter being assessed]
**Privileged**: [Yes/No - mark as attorney-client privileged if applicable]

### 1. Risk Description
[Clear, concise description of the legal risk]

### 2. Background and Context
[Relevant facts, history, and business context]

### 3. Risk Analysis

#### Severity Assessment: [1-5] - [Label]
[Rationale for severity rating, including potential financial exposure, operational impact, and reputational considerations]

#### Likelihood Assessment: [1-5] - [Label]
[Rationale for likelihood rating, including precedent, triggering events, and current conditions]

#### Risk Score: [Score] - [GREEN/YELLOW/ORANGE/RED]

### 4. Contributing Factors
[What factors increase the risk]

### 5. Mitigating Factors
[What factors decrease the risk or limit exposure]

### 6. Mitigation Options

| Option | Effectiveness | Cost/Effort | Recommended? |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Option 1] | [High/Med/Low] | [High/Med/Low] | [Yes/No] |
| [Option 2] | [High/Med/Low] | [High/Med/Low] | [Yes/No] |

### 7. Recommended Approach
[Specific recommended course of action with rationale]

### 8. Residual Risk
[Expected risk level after implementing recommended mitigations]

### 9. Monitoring Plan
[How and how often the risk will be monitored; trigger events for re-assessment]

### 10. Next Steps
1. [Action item 1 - Owner - Deadline]
2. [Action item 2 - Owner - Deadline]

Risk Register Entry

For tracking in the team's risk register:

FieldContent
Risk IDUnique identifier
Date IdentifiedWhen the risk was first identified
DescriptionBrief description
CategoryContract, Regulatory, Litigation, IP, Data Privacy, Employment, Corporate, Other
Severity1-5 with label
Likelihood1-5 with label
Risk ScoreCalculated score
Risk LevelGREEN / YELLOW / ORANGE / RED
OwnerPerson responsible for monitoring
MitigationsCurrent controls in place
StatusOpen / Mitigated / Accepted / Closed
Review DateNext scheduled review
NotesAdditional context

When to Escalate to Outside Counsel

Engage outside counsel when:

Mandatory Engagement

  • **Active li

Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • Providing final legal advice
  • Non-legal operational risk management

Prerequisites

Matter descriptionBusiness context

Limitations

  • Does not provide legal advice
  • Requires customization to specific industry risk appetite

How it compares

It provides a standardized, repeatable scoring framework compared to subjective or ad-hoc risk assessment.

Compared to similar skills

legal-risk-assessment side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
legal-risk-assessment (this skill)36moNo flagsIntermediate
lex03moReviewAdvanced
neqsim_standard_requirement_extraction01moNo flagsIntermediate
endo-avoid-sympathomimetic-cvd01moNo flagsAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

More by anthropics

View all by anthropics

frontend-design

anthropics

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

481544

pptx

anthropics

Presentation creation, editing, and analysis. When Claude needs to work with presentations (.pptx files) for: (1) Creating new presentations, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with layouts, (4) Adding comments or speaker notes, or any other presentation tasks

393763

webapp-testing

anthropics

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

353585

mcp-builder

anthropics

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

136215

skill-creator

anthropics

Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

128200

docx

anthropics

Comprehensive document creation, editing, and analysis with support for tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, and text extraction. When Claude needs to work with professional documents (.docx files) for: (1) Creating new documents, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with tracked changes, (4) Adding comments, or any other document tasks

93225

You might also like

lex

Anhvu1107

ALWAYS use this when the request matches LEX: Centralized ''Truth Engine'' for cross-jurisdictional legal context (US, EU, CA) and contract scaffolding.

00

neqsim_standard_requirement_extraction

equinor

Extract and map engineering requirements from standards or approved standards

00

endo-avoid-sympathomimetic-cvd

dromlakhani

Recommends using non‑sympathomimetic agents (lorcaserin, orlistat) for pharmacological weight loss in patients with cardiovascular disease. Triggers include clinician questions such as “What weight‑loss medication is safest for this patient with coronary artery disease?” or “Should I avoid phentermi

00

contract-review

anthropics

Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.

728

literature-review

K-Dense-AI

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

5591,298

openalex-database

davila7

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

48202

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry