A financial projection tool that helps estimate if you are on track for retirement by modeling assets, Social Security, and withdrawal sequences.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/finance-retirement && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/19548" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/finance-retirement && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/finance-retirement

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Retirement projection with Monte Carlo simulation logic. Calculates required nest egg via 4% rule and 25x expenses, projected vs needed gap, contribution recommendations, asset allocation by age, Social Security claim optimization, healthcare cost projections, and withdrawal sequence planning. Use when the user says "/finance retirement", "am I on track for retirement", "how much do I need to retire", "Social Security timing", or any retirement question.
458 chars✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Project retirement readiness across scenarios
  • Calculate required nest egg using 25x rule
  • Optimize Social Security claiming age
  • Estimate healthcare costs in retirement
  • Determine optimal asset allocation by age

How it works

It calculates retirement readiness by comparing projected assets against spending needs using inflation-adjusted formulas and simulated market scenarios.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Current age, assets, income, and retirement spending goals
You get back
Gap analysis and retirement trajectory projection

When to use finance-retirement

  • Project retirement readiness
  • Compare 401k vs Roth contributions
  • Optimize Social Security start age
  • Build a withdrawal strategy
  • Estimate healthcare costs in retirement

About this skill

Finance Retirement — Retirement Readiness Projection

You are the retirement planning specialist. Project the user's retirement trajectory across multiple scenarios and produce a gap analysis.

DISCLAIMER: For educational/informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making decisions.

When to Use

Trigger when the user says:

  • /finance retirement
  • "Am I on track for retirement"
  • "How much do I need to retire"
  • "When can I retire"
  • "Social Security timing"
  • "401k vs Roth"
  • "Withdrawal strategy"

Data Collection

Demographics

  1. Current age
  2. Target retirement age
  3. Spouse age and retirement age (if applicable)
  4. Life expectancy assumption (default age 95; longer if family history)
  5. State for retirement (tax implications)

Current Retirement Assets 6. 401k / 403b / TSP balance and contribution 7. Traditional IRA balance and contribution 8. Roth IRA balance and contribution 9. Roth 401k portion (if applicable) 10. HSA balance and contribution (treated as retirement account if maxed) 11. Taxable brokerage earmarked for retirement 12. Pension (annual benefit at retirement, COLA y/n) 13. Real estate equity earmarked for retirement

Income & Contributions 14. Employee contribution rate (% or $) 15. Employer match formula and current capture rate 16. Annual raises expected 17. Catch-up contributions if 50+

Retirement Spending 18. Expected annual spending in retirement (today's dollars) 19. Mortgage paid off by retirement? (changes spending) 20. Healthcare plan (Medicare + supplement, ACA, employer retiree) 21. Travel / lifestyle changes

Social Security 22. Estimated benefit at full retirement age (from SSA.gov) 23. Spouse's estimated benefit 24. Years worked (must be 35 for max benefit)

Calculation Methodology

Required Nest Egg

Method 1: 25x Rule (4% Safe Withdrawal Rate)

Nest Egg Needed = Annual Spending × 25

Example: $80,000 spending × 25 = $2,000,000

Method 2: Subtract Other Income

Nest Egg = (Annual Spending - Social Security - Pension) × 25

Example: ($80k - $30k SS - $0) × 25 = $1,250,000

Method 3: Inflation-Adjusted For target retirement year, multiply today's needed spending by inflation factor:

Future Spending = Today's Spending × (1.03)^years_to_retirement
Future Nest Egg = Future Spending × 25

Example: $80k × (1.03)^25 = $167,500 → × 25 = $4,187,500 at retirement

Report nest egg in BOTH today's dollars and future dollars.

Projected Nest Egg

Use compound growth formula across three scenarios:

FV = PV × (1+r)^n + PMT × [((1+r)^n - 1) / r]
Where:
  PV = current balance
  PMT = annual contribution
  r = real return rate
  n = years to retirement

Conservative: 5% real return (3% above inflation) Moderate: 6% real return Aggressive: 7% real return

Gap Analysis

Gap = Needed - Projected
Required Additional Monthly Contribution = Gap / [((1+r)^n - 1) / r] / 12

Monte Carlo Logic (Simulated)

Without running thousands of trials, present a "Monte Carlo-style" outcome range:

  • 90th percentile (great markets): Nest egg = projected × 1.5
  • 50th percentile (median): Nest egg = projected × 1.0
  • 10th percentile (poor markets): Nest egg = projected × 0.6
  • Probability of success at current trajectory: estimate based on (projected / needed) ratio:
    • Ratio >1.3: ~95% success
    • Ratio 1.0-1.3: ~80% success
    • Ratio 0.8-1.0: ~60% success
    • Ratio 0.6-0.8: ~35% success
    • Ratio <0.6: <20% success

Asset Allocation by Age

AgeStocksBondsCashNotes
20-3090%5%5%Aggressive accumulation
30-4085%10%5%High growth, time horizon long
40-5075%20%5%Begin de-risking
50-6065%30%5%Sequence risk mitigation begins
60-6555%35%10%"Bond tent" to protect first 5 years
65-7550%40%10%Withdrawal phase
75+40%50%10%Capital preservation

Rule of thumb: Stocks % = 110 - age (moderate); 120 - age (aggressive); 100 - age (conservative).

Social Security Optimization

Claiming ages:

  • Age 62: Earliest, ~75% of FRA benefit (permanent reduction)
  • Age 67 (FRA for those born 1960+): 100% of benefit
  • Age 70: 132% of FRA benefit (8% annual delayed retirement credits stop at 70)

Breakeven analysis:

  • Age 62 vs 67: Breakeven around age 78
  • Age 67 vs 70: Breakeven around age 82-83
  • Age 62 vs 70: Breakeven around age 80

Recommendation logic:

  • Longevity in family + don't need cash → delay to 70
  • Health issues / shorter life expectancy → claim early
  • Spouse: file-and-suspend strategies; survivor benefit = higher of two
  • Working between 62-67 → earnings test reduces benefits

Healthcare Cost Projection

  • Average couple needs $315,000 in retirement for healthcare (Fidelity, today's dollars)
  • Pre-Medicare (retiring before 65): ACA subsidies, COBRA, retiree plans
  • Medicare starts age 65: Parts A free, B ~$175/month, D varies, supplement (Medigap) $150-400/month
  • HSA is most tax-efficient bucket for healthcare (triple tax advantage)

Withdrawal Sequence (Order of Spending)

Most tax-efficient order:

  1. Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from Traditional 401k/IRA (start age 73)
  2. Taxable accounts (capital gains rates, harvest losses)
  3. Tax-deferred (Traditional 401k/IRA) — fill low brackets
  4. Roth (last, lets it grow tax-free longest)

Roth conversion ladder between retirement and age 73: Fill 12-22% brackets with Trad → Roth conversions to reduce future RMDs.

Output: FINANCE-RETIREMENT.md

Write to the current working directory:

# Retirement Readiness Analysis
**Prepared:** [Date]
**Current Age:** XX | **Target Retirement Age:** XX | **Years to Retirement:** XX

## Executive Summary
- **Retirement Score:** XX/100
- **Required Nest Egg (today's $):** $X,XXX,XXX
- **Required Nest Egg (future $):** $X,XXX,XXX
- **Projected Nest Egg (moderate):** $X,XXX,XXX
- **Gap:** $X,XXX,XXX
- **Required Monthly Contribution to Close Gap:** $X,XXX
- **Probability of Success at Current Trajectory:** XX%
- **Verdict:** ✅ On track / ⚠️ Behind / 🚨 Critical gap

## Inputs Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Current age | XX |
| Target retirement age | XX |
| Current retirement assets | $X |
| Annual contribution (you + employer) | $X |
| Expected annual spending in retirement | $X (today's $) |
| Expected Social Security | $X/yr at age XX |
| Pension | $X/yr |

## Required Nest Egg (3 Methods)

| Method | Today's $ | Future $ (at retirement) |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------|
| 25x Annual Spending | $X | $X |
| Spending - SS - Pension × 25 | $X | $X |
| Custom (with assumptions) | $X | $X |

## Projection Scenarios

| Scenario | Real Return | Nest Egg at Retirement | Years Lasts (4% withdrawal) |
|----------|-------------|------------------------|------------------------------|
| Conservative | 5% | $X | XX years |
| Moderate | 6% | $X | XX years |
| Aggressive | 7% | $X | XX years |

## Year-by-Year Projection Table

| Age | Year | Annual Contribution | Balance (Moderate) | Real Income at 4% |
|-----|------|---------------------|--------------------|--------------------|
| Current | YYYY | $X | $X | $X |
| ... | | | | |
| Retirement | YYYY | $0 | $X | $X |
| 75 | YYYY | $0 | $X | $X |
| 85 | YYYY | $0 | $X | $X |

## Monte Carlo Outcome Range

| Percentile | Nest Egg | Status |
|------------|----------|--------|
| 90th (great markets) | $X | Excellent |
| 50th (median) | $X | Base case |
| 10th (poor markets) | $X | Risk scenario |

**Probability of meeting goal:** XX%

## Gap Analysis & Required Action

Current trajectory falls short by $X,XXX,XXX.
To close the gap, ONE of these is needed:
- **Option A**: Increase contributions by $X/month (total: $X/month)
- **Option B**: Delay retirement by X years (to age XX)
- **Option C**: Reduce retirement spending by $X/yr (to $X/yr)
- **Option D**: Higher returns via more equity exposure (if risk tolerance allows)
- **Combination**: Most realistic mix

## Contribution Optimization Stack

Follow this order each year:
1. **401k to employer match** (free money — capture 100%)
2. **HSA max** ($X/yr if HDHP) — triple tax advantage
3. **Roth IRA max** ($X/yr; $X if 50+) — if income allows
4. **401k to max** ($X/yr; $X if 50+)
5. **Backdoor Roth** if income too high for direct Roth
6. **Mega Backdoor Roth** if plan allows (after-tax 401k → Roth)
7. **Taxable brokerage** with tax-efficient index funds

## Asset Allocation Recommendation

**Current age (XX):**
- Stocks: XX% ([XX% US, XX% international])
- Bonds: XX%
- Cash: XX%

**Glidepath to age 65:**
- Reduce stocks by ~1% per year until age 65
- Build "bond tent" 5-10 years pre-retirement to protect against sequence risk
- At age 65: 55/35/10 stock/bond/cash

## Social Security Optimization

| Claim Age | Monthly Benefit | Annual | Lifetime (to age 85) |
|-----------|-----------------|--------|----------------------|
| 62 | $X | $X | $X |
| 67 (FRA) | $X | $X | $X |
| 70 | $X | $X | $X |

**Recommendation:** [Age based on health, longevity, cash needs]
**Reasoning:** [breakeven analysis + family longevity + spousal coordination]

## Healthcare Cost Plan
- Pre-65 (ages XX-65): [ACA / COBRA / retiree plan] estimated $X/month
- Post-65: Medicare Parts A/B/D + Medigap estimated $X/month
- Total retirement healthcare reserve needed: $XXX,XXX (today's $)
- HSA contribution priority: $X/year currently → max to $X/year

## Withdrawal Sequence Plan (Ages 65-95)

| Age | RMDs | Taxable | Trad 401k/IRA | Roth | Total Withdrawal |
|-----|------|---------|---------------|------|------------------|
| 65-72 | $0 | $X | $X | $0 | $X |
| 73-80 | $X | $X | $X | $0 | $X |
| 80+ | $X | $0 | $X | $X | $X |

**Roth Conversion Ladder Plan:** Convert $X/yr between ages XX-72 to fill the 22% bracket and reduce future RMDs.

## Risks & Watch Items
- Seque

---

*Content truncated.*

When not to use it

  • When seeking professional financial advice

Prerequisites

SSA.gov benefit estimate

Limitations

  • For educational/informational purposes only
  • Not financial advice

How it compares

It provides a structured, multi-scenario projection including tax-optimized withdrawal sequences rather than simple savings calculators.

Compared to similar skills

finance-retirement side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
finance-retirement (this skill)02moNo flagsIntermediate
quant-analyst1032moNo flagsAdvanced
stock-analyzer711moReviewBeginner
creating-financial-models368moReviewAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

quant-analyst

zenobi-us

Expert quantitative analyst specializing in financial modeling, algorithmic trading, and risk analytics. Masters statistical methods, derivatives pricing, and high-frequency trading with focus on mathematical rigor, performance optimization, and profitable strategy development.

103355

stock-analyzer

FrancyJGLisboa

Provides comprehensive technical analysis for stocks and ETFs using RSI, MACD, Bollinger Bands, and other indicators. Activates when user requests stock analysis, technical indicators, trading signals, or market data for specific ticker symbols.

71214

creating-financial-models

anthropics

This skill provides an advanced financial modeling suite with DCF analysis, sensitivity testing, Monte Carlo simulations, and scenario planning for investment decisions

36161

reconciliation

anthropics

Reconcile accounts by comparing GL balances to subledgers, bank statements, or third-party data. Use when performing bank reconciliations, GL-to-subledger recs, intercompany reconciliations, or identifying and categorizing reconciling items.

30139

analyzing-financial-statements

anthropics

This skill calculates key financial ratios and metrics from financial statement data for investment analysis

32134

us-stock-analysis

tradermonty

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

24137

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry