ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment
Interactive risk assessment guide for CISO Assistant. Covers asset identification, threat mapping, and scenario generation.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/3467" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Guide users through a basic risk assessment workflow in CISO Assistant, from asset identification to scenario creation. Use when:
(1) User wants to start a risk assessment from scratch
(2) User mentions "risk assessment", "identify risks", "threat scenarios", or "risk register"
(3) User asks about qualitative vs quantitative risk approaches
(4) User needs help identifying assets, threats, or creating risk scenarios
Covers: risk approach selection (qualitative/quantitative), organizational context gathering, asset identification (primary/supporting), threat catalog usage, scenario generation from threat-asset combinations, risk assessment/study creation.Key capabilities
- →Maps primary and supporting assets
- →Enforces folder-specific scoping for risk objects
- →Generates risk scenarios from threat-asset pairs
- →Selects between qualitative or quantitative workflows
- →Ensures consistent threat library attribution
How it works
Operates as a wrapper for CISO Assistant MCP server tools to programmatically create and scope risk assessment data objects.
Inputs & outputs
When to use ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment
- →Start a new risk assessment from scratch
- →Identify assets and link to threat scenarios
- →Select risk assessment methodology
About this skill
CISO Assistant Basic Risk Assessment
Guide users through risk assessment setup using MCP server tools.
Prerequisites
- Verify MCP server connectivity - Test with
get_folders() - Backend must be running - CISO Assistant backend at configured URL
- If MCP tools unavailable - Fall back to direct API calls (see bootstrap skill)
Key Principles
Always Pass folder_id for Scoping
When creating objects, always pass folder_id to scope lookups and avoid ambiguity errors when objects with the same name exist in different folders.
# CORRECT - folder_id scopes all lookups to ACME folder
create_risk_scenario(
name="Ransomware on Customer Data",
risk_assessment_id="ACME Risk Assessment 2025",
folder_id="ACME", # <- Scopes asset/threat lookups
assets=["Customer Data"],
threats=["Ransomware"],
threat_library="urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog"
)
Always Use threat_library for Threat Lookups
Threats exist in multiple libraries (intuitem catalog, MITRE ATT&CK, etc.). Always specify the library:
threat_library="urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog"
Include Relevance in Scenario Descriptions
Always explain why a scenario matters for this specific organization:
"Ransomware attack encrypting customer data, leading to service disruption.
Relevance: GDPR breach implications with mandatory 72-hour notification
and potential fines up to 4% of annual revenue."
Workflow
Step 1: Choose Risk Approach
Ask the user which approach they prefer:
| Approach | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative | Probability/impact scales (Low/Medium/High), 4x4 or 5x5 matrix | Initial assessments, stakeholder communication |
| Quantitative | Monetary values, Monte Carlo simulations, ALE calculations | Mature orgs, budget justification, executive reporting |
Step 2: Gather Organizational Context
Ask about:
- Industry: healthcare, financial, tech/SaaS, retail, manufacturing, government
- Size: small (1-50), medium (50-500), large (500+)
- Region: for regulatory context (EU → GDPR, US healthcare → HIPAA, etc.)
- Cloud: AWS/Azure/GCP, SaaS-heavy or on-premise
- Compliance: specific requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, SOC2, ISO 27001)
Step 3: Create Domain and Perimeter
# 1. Create folder (domain)
create_folder(name="ACME", description="ACME Corp - Tech/SaaS, EU-based")
# 2. Create perimeter (assessment scope)
create_perimeter(name="ACME Platform", folder_id="ACME")
Step 4: Identify and Create Assets
Use references/typical-assets.md to suggest assets based on context.
Primary Assets (PR) - Business value:
- Customer/employee data, financial records, source code, API keys/secrets
Supporting Assets (SP) - Infrastructure:
- Cloud infrastructure, databases, CI/CD pipeline, email, endpoints
# Create assets - always pass folder_id
create_asset(name="Customer Data", description="Customer PII - GDPR relevant",
asset_type="PR", folder_id="ACME")
create_asset(name="Production Database", description="Primary data storage",
asset_type="SP", folder_id="ACME")
Step 5: Import Threat Catalog
# Import the intuitem common catalog (23 threats)
import_stored_library("urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog")
# Verify threats are available
get_threats(library="urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog")
Step 6: Generate Scenario Suggestions
Use the Threat-Asset Relevance Matrix in references/typical-assets.md to suggest the most relevant threat-asset combinations.
Naming convention: [Threat] on [Asset]
- "Ransomware on Customer Data"
- "Phishing targeting Employees"
- "Cloud Misconfiguration"
Present top 10-15 combinations and let user select which to create.
Step 7: Create Assessment Container
For Qualitative:
# Check available matrices
get_risk_matrices()
# Use matrix UUID to avoid ambiguity
create_risk_assessment(
name="ACME Risk Assessment 2025",
risk_matrix_id="<matrix-uuid>", # Use UUID from get_risk_matrices()
perimeter_id="ACME Platform",
folder_id="ACME",
status="in_progress"
)
For Quantitative:
create_quantitative_risk_study(
name="ACME Quantitative Risk Study 2025",
folder_id="ACME",
distribution_model="lognormal_ci90"
)
Step 8: Create Risk Scenarios
For Qualitative:
create_risk_scenario(
name="Ransomware on Customer Data",
description="Ransomware attack encrypting customer data. Relevance: GDPR breach with 72-hour notification requirement.",
risk_assessment_id="ACME Risk Assessment 2025",
folder_id="ACME", # CRITICAL: scope lookups
assets=["Customer Data"],
threats=["Ransomware"],
threat_library="urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog"
)
For Quantitative:
create_quantitative_risk_scenario(
name="Ransomware on Customer Data",
description="Ransomware attack... Relevance: ...",
quantitative_risk_study_id="ACME Quantitative Risk Study 2025",
folder_id="ACME",
assets=["Customer Data"],
threats=["Ransomware"],
threat_library="urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog"
)
Step 9: Summary and Next Steps
After creating scenarios, summarize and guide on next steps:
For Qualitative:
- Rate probability and impact for each scenario in the UI
- Identify and link existing controls
- Plan additional controls for high-risk scenarios
- Review risk matrix visualization
For Quantitative:
- Create hypotheses with probability and impact bounds
- Run Monte Carlo simulations
- Set risk tolerance curve
- Analyze portfolio-level risk
Quick Reference
MCP Tools
| Category | Tool | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | create_folder() | name, description |
create_perimeter() | name, folder_id | |
| Assets | create_asset() | name, description, asset_type, folder_id |
get_assets() | folder | |
| Threats | import_stored_library() | urn_or_id |
get_threats() | library, folder, limit | |
| Qualitative | get_risk_matrices() | - |
create_risk_assessment() | name, risk_matrix_id, perimeter_id, folder_id | |
create_risk_scenario() | name, description, risk_assessment_id, folder_id, assets, threats, threat_library | |
| Quantitative | create_quantitative_risk_study() | name, folder_id, distribution_model |
create_quantitative_risk_scenario() | name, quantitative_risk_study_id, folder_id, assets, threats, threat_library |
Common Threat Library URN
urn:intuitem:risk:library:intuitem-common-catalog
Threat Catalog Quick Reference
| Threat | Typical Target Assets |
|---|---|
| Ransomware | Customer Data, Databases, File Storage |
| Phishing | Employee Endpoints, Corporate Email |
| Data Breach/Leak | Customer Data, Source Code, API Keys |
| Cloud Security Threats | Cloud Infrastructure, SaaS Apps |
| API Security Threats | Application Code, API Gateway |
| Insider Threats | API Keys/Secrets, Source Code |
| Supply Chain Attacks | CI/CD Pipeline, Dependencies |
| Password Attacks | Corporate Email, Admin Accounts |
| System Outage | Production Database, Core Services |
| Regulatory Non-Compliance | Customer Data (GDPR/HIPAA/PCI) |
| Social Engineering | Employee Endpoints, Finance Team |
Fallback: Direct API Calls
If MCP tools unavailable:
POST /api/folders/POST /api/perimeters/POST /api/assets/POST /api/stored-libraries/<urn>/import/POST /api/risk-assessments/POST /api/risk-scenarios/POST /api/crq/quantitative-risk-studies/POST /api/crq/quantitative-risk-scenarios/
When not to use it
- →When the backend server is unreachable
- →For non-security-related organizational planning
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires valid CISO Assistant backend URL
- →Dependent on existing threat catalog structure
How it compares
It eliminates manual lookup errors by mandating folder-based scoping and standardized threat library references.
Compared to similar skills
ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ciso-assistant-basic-risk-assessment (this skill) | 3 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| reverse-engineering-tools | 73 | 4mo | No flags | Advanced |
| game-hacking-techniques | 42 | 2mo | No flags | Advanced |
| solidity-security | 15 | 2mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by intuitem
View all by intuitem →You might also like
reverse-engineering-tools
gmh5225
Guide for reverse engineering tools and techniques used in game security research. Use this skill when working with debuggers, disassemblers, memory analysis tools, binary analysis, or decompilers for game security research.
game-hacking-techniques
gmh5225
Guide for game hacking techniques and cheat development. Use this skill when researching memory manipulation, code injection, ESP/aimbot development, overlay rendering, or game exploitation methodologies.
solidity-security
wshobson
Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common vulnerabilities and implement secure Solidity patterns. Use when writing smart contracts, auditing existing contracts, or implementing security measures for blockchain applications.
1password
openclaw
Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in (single or multi-account), or reading/injecting/running secrets via op.
senior-security
davila7
Comprehensive security engineering skill for application security, penetration testing, security architecture, and compliance auditing. Includes security assessment tools, threat modeling, crypto implementation, and security automation. Use when designing security architecture, conducting penetration tests, implementing cryptography, or performing security audits.
ghidra
mitsuhiko
Reverse engineer binaries using Ghidra's headless analyzer. Decompile executables, extract functions, strings, symbols, and analyze call graphs without GUI.