AD

adverse-event-reporting-policy

Automates the creation of pharmacovigilance and adverse event reporting SOPs.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/11041" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.
563 chars✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Draft pharmacovigilance SOPs
  • Update clinical trial safety policies
  • Prepare regulatory safety reports
  • Define AE/SAE reporting frameworks

How it works

It drafts policies compliant with FDA and ICH standards by integrating regulatory requirements, definitions, and role-based responsibilities.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Safety reporting requirements
You get back
Adverse event reporting policy draft

When to use adverse-event-reporting-policy

  • Draft pharmacovigilance SOP
  • Update clinical trial safety policy
  • Prepare regulatory safety report

About this skill

Adverse Event Reporting Policy

Drafts a binding AE reporting policy meeting FDA requirements and ICH standards for pharma, biotech, CROs, and healthcare organizations conducting or sponsoring clinical research.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting. If any item is missing, pause and ask — do not assume.

  1. Organization type — pharmaceutical sponsor, CRO, healthcare system, academic medical center, or combination
  2. Product portfolio — IND products (Phase I–IV), approved drugs, biologics, devices, combination products, REMS-covered products
  3. Geographic footprint — domestic only vs. multi-jurisdictional (EU, Japan, Canada, etc.)
  4. Therapeutic areas — flag specialized populations: oncology, vaccines, biologics, pediatrics
  5. Existing SOPs — current pharmacovigilance SOPs, IRB agreements, DSMB charters to cross-reference

Step 1: Introduction & Compliance Statement

  • Cite controlling regulations:
    • 21 CFR 312.32 — IND safety reporting
    • 21 CFR 314.80 — Postmarketing adverse drug experience
    • ICH E2A — Clinical safety data management
    • 21 CFR 803 — Medical device reporting (if applicable)
    • Applicable state and international requirements
  • Effective date, review cycle (annual minimum), approval authority
  • Binding compliance statement: policy adherence is condition of employment; violations may constitute federal law violations

Step 2: Definitions

Include at minimum:

TermDefinition
Adverse Event (AE)Any untoward medical occurrence; causal relationship need not be established
Serious Adverse Event (SAE)Meets ≥1 of 6 FDA/ICH seriousness criteria
Unexpected AENot in current IB, package insert, or reference safety information by nature, severity, or frequency
Suspected Adverse ReactionReasonable possibility of causal relationship
Causality AssessmentSystematic evaluation using validated algorithm (Naranjo, WHO-UMC)
Sponsor AwarenessWhen any sponsor employee first receives AE information — starts all reporting clocks
Expedited Report7-day (fatal/life-threatening) or 15-day (other serious) IND safety report

SAE Seriousness Criteria (6 FDA/ICH):

  1. Death
  2. Life-threatening (immediate risk at time of event)
  3. Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation
  4. Persistent/significant disability or incapacity
  5. Congenital anomaly/birth defect
  6. Important medical event requiring intervention to prevent serious outcome

Step 3: Scope

Covered activities: Phase I–IV clinical trials; post-marketing surveillance; expanded access/compassionate use; investigator-initiated studies

Covered products: IND products, approved drugs, biologics, vaccines, gene therapies, medical devices (IDE), combination products, REMS-covered products

Geographic scope: Specify domestic-only vs. global; address how international events feed FDA reporting; handle countries where product is unapproved

Temporal boundaries:

  • Begins: informed consent signature or first dose
  • Ends: per protocol follow-up period (specify days; address long half-life/delayed-effect products)

Exclusions:

Excluded ItemRedirect To
Product quality complaints (no patient impact)Quality Assurance SOP
Occupational exposures without health effectsOccupational Health
Near-miss medication errorsMedication Safety Program
Competitor product AEs in comparator armsProtocol-specific requirements

Step 4: Roles & Responsibilities

RoleKey ObligationsTimeline
Safety Officer / PV DirectorFinal reportability, seriousness, causality, expectedness determinations; FDA liaisonReview within 4 hrs; reportability within 8 hrs
Principal InvestigatorEvaluate each AE; causality/seriousness determination; IRB notificationReport to Safety Officer within 24 hrs of awareness
Clinical Research CoordinatorActive surveillance (interviews, labs, vitals); source documentation; escalate SAEs immediatelyEscalate immediately; do not wait for scheduled visits
Clinical Monitor/CRAVerify source docs vs. CRF; confirm timeline compliance; escalate systemic deficienciesDocument in monitoring reports; verify CAPAs at next visit
Senior ManagementResource adequacy; aggregate safety review; risk-benefit decisionsQuarterly review minimum
QAIndependent audits; CAPA oversightAnnual minimum audit; ad hoc for signals

Step 5: AE Identification & Assessment

Active surveillance: Structured patient interviews at each contact; lab values vs. protocol ranges and clinically significant change thresholds; physical examination with baseline comparison; concomitant medication review (may indicate unreported AE).

Passive surveillance: Dedicated patient reporting line/email/portal; external provider reporting pathway; EHR alert integration (hospitalizations, ED visits, critical labs) where feasible.

Causality assessment — document each factor:

FactorDocument
Temporal relationshipTime from last dose to onset
Biological plausibilityKnown pharmacology/class effects
DechallengeSymptom change upon discontinuation
RechallengeSymptom recurrence upon restart
Alternative explanationsDisease progression, comedications, other factors
Prior literature/experiencePublished reports, IB data

Use validated tool (Naranjo Scale or WHO-UMC). Document algorithm applied and narrative rationale — not just final conclusion.

Severity grading: CTCAE or protocol-specified scale; document grade and supporting clinical findings.

Enhanced monitoring populations: Pediatric (developmental); pregnant (maternal/fetal); elderly with polypharmacy (attribution complexity); immunocompromised (atypical presentations).

Step 6: Reporting Timelines & Submission

Expedited IND Safety Reports (21 CFR 312.32):

Event TypeFDA DeadlineInternal Trigger
Fatal or life-threatening SUSAR7 calendar days from sponsor awarenessSafety Officer notified within 4 hrs
Other serious SUSAR15 calendar days from sponsor awarenessSafety Officer notified within 4 hrs
Follow-up to 7-day report8 additional calendar days (15 total)Initiate at day 7 submission

Other reporting obligations:

  • Annual IND Safety Reports — within 60 days of IND anniversary; tabular AE summaries, narrative SAE descriptions, signal analysis, updated risk-benefit
  • IRB/IEC — same timeline as FDA or 24 hours per IRB requirements, whichever more stringent; all SAEs regardless of causality
  • DSMB/IDMC — per charter; unblinded data; expedited notification for predefined stopping rules

Postmarketing (21 CFR 314.80): 15-day alert reports for serious unexpected AEs; PADERs per approved schedule.

Submission mechanics: FDA Electronic Submission Gateway; Form 3500A; ICH E2B(R3) format. Backup: telephone for urgent situations. Retain all submission confirmations and FDA acknowledgment receipts.

Multi-jurisdictional overlay:

AgencyKey Differences
EMAEudraVigilance submission; potential seriousness/expectedness definition differences
PMDA (Japan)Local timelines; Japanese labeling as reference document [VERIFY]
Health CanadaMedEffect reporting [VERIFY current timelines]

Step 7: Documentation Standards

Source documents: Created in real-time or within 24 hours. Corrections by single strikethrough (original legible), correct entry, initials, date — no deletions or obliteration.

Required AE record elements:

  • Date/time of onset (maximum available precision)
  • Clinical description: signs/symptoms, severity (CTCAE grade), frequency, duration, anatomical location
  • Causality assessment: algorithm used, each factor, narrative rationale, final determination
  • Seriousness determination: specific criterion/criteria met
  • Expectedness determination: IB/labeling section consulted
  • Actions taken: dose modifications, discontinuation, concomitant treatments, procedures
  • Hospitalizations: dates, facility
  • Outcome: recovered/resolved | recovering/resolving | not recovered | recovered with sequelae | fatal
  • Regulatory submission: date, submission number, FDA acknowledgment

Record retention:

Record TypeRetention
Clinical trial AE records2 years post-NDA/BLA approval; or 2 years after IND discontinuation notified to FDA
Postmarketing AE reports10 years from creation or 2 years after product no longer marketed — whichever longer
Training recordsDuration of employment + 3 years

Storage: Access-controlled; audit trail with user ID and timestamps; geographically separate backups; validated electronic systems (21 CFR Part 11 where applicable).

Step 8: Training & Competency

Initial training (before assuming AE responsibilities): Regulatory framework (21 CFR 312.32, 314.80, ICH E2A); organizational policy and workflows; event identification; causality assessment with case exercises; documentation standards; reporting timelines and consequences of missed deadlines.

Annual refresher: Regulatory updates, audit lessons learned (anonymized), process revisions.

Role-specific advanced training:

RoleContent
Medical monitors / safety physiciansAdvanced causality in polypharmacy/comorbidity; dechallenge/rechallenge interpretation
Regulatory / safety coordinatorsE2B(R3) submission mechanics; FDA gateway; Form 3500A
Regulatory writersFDA narrative standards; MedDRA coding; QC before submission

Competency assessment: Written exam (minimum passing score); practical case scenario evaluation; supervised performance period before independent authorization.

**Annual


Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • Non-regulatory policy drafting
  • Direct clinical trial management

Prerequisites

Organization typeProduct portfolioGeographic footprint

Limitations

  • Requires attorney/compliance review
  • Limited to regulatory safety reporting

How it compares

It provides a structured, regulatory-compliant drafting framework rather than general policy writing.

Compared to similar skills

adverse-event-reporting-policy side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
adverse-event-reporting-policy (this skill)03moNo flagsAdvanced
legal-advisor114moNo flagsIntermediate
quality-documentation-manager37moReviewAdvanced
softcopyright18moReviewBeginner

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

legal-advisor

sickn33

Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices. Creates GDPR-compliant texts, cookie policies, and data processing agreements. Use PROACTIVELY for legal documentation, compliance texts, or regulatory requirements.

1155

quality-documentation-manager

davila7

Senior Quality Documentation Manager for comprehensive documentation control and regulatory document review. Provides document management system design, change control, configuration management, and regulatory documentation oversight. Use for document control system implementation, regulatory document review, change management, and documentation compliance verification.

329

softcopyright

peterfei

智能软件著作权申请材料生成工具。自动分析项目源码,生成符合软著申请要求的软件说明书和源代码文档。支持关键词搜索、智能源码分析、格式化输出和PDF导出。

13

iso-13485-certification

K-Dense-AI

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

11

DOCX Reviewer

Hagenbefragen

Skill for programmatically enabling track changes (Review Mode) and inserting revisions in Microsoft Word DOCX files using Python.

00

mdr-745-specialist

fabioeducacross

EU MDR 2017/745 regulation specialist and consultant for medical device requirement management. Provides comprehensive MDR compliance expertise, gap analysis, technical documentation guidance, clinical evidence requirements, and post-market surveillance implementation. Use for MDR compliance assessm

00

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry