adverse-event-reporting-policy
Automates the creation of pharmacovigilance and adverse event reporting SOPs.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/11041" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/adverse-event-reporting-policy
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.Key capabilities
- →Draft pharmacovigilance SOPs
- →Update clinical trial safety policies
- →Prepare regulatory safety reports
- →Define AE/SAE reporting frameworks
How it works
It drafts policies compliant with FDA and ICH standards by integrating regulatory requirements, definitions, and role-based responsibilities.
Inputs & outputs
When to use adverse-event-reporting-policy
- →Draft pharmacovigilance SOP
- →Update clinical trial safety policy
- →Prepare regulatory safety report
About this skill
Adverse Event Reporting Policy
Drafts a binding AE reporting policy meeting FDA requirements and ICH standards for pharma, biotech, CROs, and healthcare organizations conducting or sponsoring clinical research.
Prerequisites
Gather before drafting. If any item is missing, pause and ask — do not assume.
- Organization type — pharmaceutical sponsor, CRO, healthcare system, academic medical center, or combination
- Product portfolio — IND products (Phase I–IV), approved drugs, biologics, devices, combination products, REMS-covered products
- Geographic footprint — domestic only vs. multi-jurisdictional (EU, Japan, Canada, etc.)
- Therapeutic areas — flag specialized populations: oncology, vaccines, biologics, pediatrics
- Existing SOPs — current pharmacovigilance SOPs, IRB agreements, DSMB charters to cross-reference
Step 1: Introduction & Compliance Statement
- Cite controlling regulations:
- 21 CFR 312.32 — IND safety reporting
- 21 CFR 314.80 — Postmarketing adverse drug experience
- ICH E2A — Clinical safety data management
- 21 CFR 803 — Medical device reporting (if applicable)
- Applicable state and international requirements
- Effective date, review cycle (annual minimum), approval authority
- Binding compliance statement: policy adherence is condition of employment; violations may constitute federal law violations
Step 2: Definitions
Include at minimum:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Adverse Event (AE) | Any untoward medical occurrence; causal relationship need not be established |
| Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | Meets ≥1 of 6 FDA/ICH seriousness criteria |
| Unexpected AE | Not in current IB, package insert, or reference safety information by nature, severity, or frequency |
| Suspected Adverse Reaction | Reasonable possibility of causal relationship |
| Causality Assessment | Systematic evaluation using validated algorithm (Naranjo, WHO-UMC) |
| Sponsor Awareness | When any sponsor employee first receives AE information — starts all reporting clocks |
| Expedited Report | 7-day (fatal/life-threatening) or 15-day (other serious) IND safety report |
SAE Seriousness Criteria (6 FDA/ICH):
- Death
- Life-threatening (immediate risk at time of event)
- Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation
- Persistent/significant disability or incapacity
- Congenital anomaly/birth defect
- Important medical event requiring intervention to prevent serious outcome
Step 3: Scope
Covered activities: Phase I–IV clinical trials; post-marketing surveillance; expanded access/compassionate use; investigator-initiated studies
Covered products: IND products, approved drugs, biologics, vaccines, gene therapies, medical devices (IDE), combination products, REMS-covered products
Geographic scope: Specify domestic-only vs. global; address how international events feed FDA reporting; handle countries where product is unapproved
Temporal boundaries:
- Begins: informed consent signature or first dose
- Ends: per protocol follow-up period (specify days; address long half-life/delayed-effect products)
Exclusions:
| Excluded Item | Redirect To |
|---|---|
| Product quality complaints (no patient impact) | Quality Assurance SOP |
| Occupational exposures without health effects | Occupational Health |
| Near-miss medication errors | Medication Safety Program |
| Competitor product AEs in comparator arms | Protocol-specific requirements |
Step 4: Roles & Responsibilities
| Role | Key Obligations | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Officer / PV Director | Final reportability, seriousness, causality, expectedness determinations; FDA liaison | Review within 4 hrs; reportability within 8 hrs |
| Principal Investigator | Evaluate each AE; causality/seriousness determination; IRB notification | Report to Safety Officer within 24 hrs of awareness |
| Clinical Research Coordinator | Active surveillance (interviews, labs, vitals); source documentation; escalate SAEs immediately | Escalate immediately; do not wait for scheduled visits |
| Clinical Monitor/CRA | Verify source docs vs. CRF; confirm timeline compliance; escalate systemic deficiencies | Document in monitoring reports; verify CAPAs at next visit |
| Senior Management | Resource adequacy; aggregate safety review; risk-benefit decisions | Quarterly review minimum |
| QA | Independent audits; CAPA oversight | Annual minimum audit; ad hoc for signals |
Step 5: AE Identification & Assessment
Active surveillance: Structured patient interviews at each contact; lab values vs. protocol ranges and clinically significant change thresholds; physical examination with baseline comparison; concomitant medication review (may indicate unreported AE).
Passive surveillance: Dedicated patient reporting line/email/portal; external provider reporting pathway; EHR alert integration (hospitalizations, ED visits, critical labs) where feasible.
Causality assessment — document each factor:
| Factor | Document |
|---|---|
| Temporal relationship | Time from last dose to onset |
| Biological plausibility | Known pharmacology/class effects |
| Dechallenge | Symptom change upon discontinuation |
| Rechallenge | Symptom recurrence upon restart |
| Alternative explanations | Disease progression, comedications, other factors |
| Prior literature/experience | Published reports, IB data |
Use validated tool (Naranjo Scale or WHO-UMC). Document algorithm applied and narrative rationale — not just final conclusion.
Severity grading: CTCAE or protocol-specified scale; document grade and supporting clinical findings.
Enhanced monitoring populations: Pediatric (developmental); pregnant (maternal/fetal); elderly with polypharmacy (attribution complexity); immunocompromised (atypical presentations).
Step 6: Reporting Timelines & Submission
Expedited IND Safety Reports (21 CFR 312.32):
| Event Type | FDA Deadline | Internal Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Fatal or life-threatening SUSAR | 7 calendar days from sponsor awareness | Safety Officer notified within 4 hrs |
| Other serious SUSAR | 15 calendar days from sponsor awareness | Safety Officer notified within 4 hrs |
| Follow-up to 7-day report | 8 additional calendar days (15 total) | Initiate at day 7 submission |
Other reporting obligations:
- Annual IND Safety Reports — within 60 days of IND anniversary; tabular AE summaries, narrative SAE descriptions, signal analysis, updated risk-benefit
- IRB/IEC — same timeline as FDA or 24 hours per IRB requirements, whichever more stringent; all SAEs regardless of causality
- DSMB/IDMC — per charter; unblinded data; expedited notification for predefined stopping rules
Postmarketing (21 CFR 314.80): 15-day alert reports for serious unexpected AEs; PADERs per approved schedule.
Submission mechanics: FDA Electronic Submission Gateway; Form 3500A; ICH E2B(R3) format. Backup: telephone for urgent situations. Retain all submission confirmations and FDA acknowledgment receipts.
Multi-jurisdictional overlay:
| Agency | Key Differences |
|---|---|
| EMA | EudraVigilance submission; potential seriousness/expectedness definition differences |
| PMDA (Japan) | Local timelines; Japanese labeling as reference document [VERIFY] |
| Health Canada | MedEffect reporting [VERIFY current timelines] |
Step 7: Documentation Standards
Source documents: Created in real-time or within 24 hours. Corrections by single strikethrough (original legible), correct entry, initials, date — no deletions or obliteration.
Required AE record elements:
- Date/time of onset (maximum available precision)
- Clinical description: signs/symptoms, severity (CTCAE grade), frequency, duration, anatomical location
- Causality assessment: algorithm used, each factor, narrative rationale, final determination
- Seriousness determination: specific criterion/criteria met
- Expectedness determination: IB/labeling section consulted
- Actions taken: dose modifications, discontinuation, concomitant treatments, procedures
- Hospitalizations: dates, facility
- Outcome: recovered/resolved | recovering/resolving | not recovered | recovered with sequelae | fatal
- Regulatory submission: date, submission number, FDA acknowledgment
Record retention:
| Record Type | Retention |
|---|---|
| Clinical trial AE records | 2 years post-NDA/BLA approval; or 2 years after IND discontinuation notified to FDA |
| Postmarketing AE reports | 10 years from creation or 2 years after product no longer marketed — whichever longer |
| Training records | Duration of employment + 3 years |
Storage: Access-controlled; audit trail with user ID and timestamps; geographically separate backups; validated electronic systems (21 CFR Part 11 where applicable).
Step 8: Training & Competency
Initial training (before assuming AE responsibilities): Regulatory framework (21 CFR 312.32, 314.80, ICH E2A); organizational policy and workflows; event identification; causality assessment with case exercises; documentation standards; reporting timelines and consequences of missed deadlines.
Annual refresher: Regulatory updates, audit lessons learned (anonymized), process revisions.
Role-specific advanced training:
| Role | Content |
|---|---|
| Medical monitors / safety physicians | Advanced causality in polypharmacy/comorbidity; dechallenge/rechallenge interpretation |
| Regulatory / safety coordinators | E2B(R3) submission mechanics; FDA gateway; Form 3500A |
| Regulatory writers | FDA narrative standards; MedDRA coding; QC before submission |
Competency assessment: Written exam (minimum passing score); practical case scenario evaluation; supervised performance period before independent authorization.
**Annual
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →Non-regulatory policy drafting
- →Direct clinical trial management
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires attorney/compliance review
- →Limited to regulatory safety reporting
How it compares
It provides a structured, regulatory-compliant drafting framework rather than general policy writing.
Compared to similar skills
adverse-event-reporting-policy side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| adverse-event-reporting-policy (this skill) | 0 | 3mo | No flags | Advanced |
| legal-advisor | 11 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| quality-documentation-manager | 3 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
| softcopyright | 1 | 8mo | Review | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by CaseMark
View all by CaseMark →You might also like
legal-advisor
sickn33
Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices. Creates GDPR-compliant texts, cookie policies, and data processing agreements. Use PROACTIVELY for legal documentation, compliance texts, or regulatory requirements.
quality-documentation-manager
davila7
Senior Quality Documentation Manager for comprehensive documentation control and regulatory document review. Provides document management system design, change control, configuration management, and regulatory documentation oversight. Use for document control system implementation, regulatory document review, change management, and documentation compliance verification.
softcopyright
peterfei
智能软件著作权申请材料生成工具。自动分析项目源码,生成符合软著申请要求的软件说明书和源代码文档。支持关键词搜索、智能源码分析、格式化输出和PDF导出。
iso-13485-certification
K-Dense-AI
Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.
DOCX Reviewer
Hagenbefragen
Skill for programmatically enabling track changes (Review Mode) and inserting revisions in Microsoft Word DOCX files using Python.
mdr-745-specialist
fabioeducacross
EU MDR 2017/745 regulation specialist and consultant for medical device requirement management. Provides comprehensive MDR compliance expertise, gap analysis, technical documentation guidance, clinical evidence requirements, and post-market surveillance implementation. Use for MDR compliance assessm