writing-voice
It adjusts text to remove robotic phrasing and corporate jargon, ensuring UI and documentation remain clear and professional.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/writing-voice && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1090" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/writing-voice && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/writing-voice
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Voice/tone rules for prose, UI text, tooltips, error messages. Use when: "fix the tone", "rewrite this", "sounds like AI", "sounds corporate", or writing user-facing text and docs.Key capabilities
- →Refine prose to sound natural and read-aloud friendly
- →Identify and remove corporate jargon or AI-shaped phrasing
- →Adjust sentence length to improve rhythm and nuance
- →Replace abstract verbs with specific, direct alternatives
- →Standardize punctuation for spoken movement
How it works
The skill involves reading a draft at speaking speed to identify rhythm catches and generic language. It then replaces abstract verbs and marketing filler with direct, specific vocabulary while preserving the writer's original cadence.
Inputs & outputs
When to use writing-voice
- →Rewriting technical documentation
- →Drafting user-friendly UI copy
- →Fixing robotic error messages
- →Aligning product copy with a human voice
About this skill
Writing Voice
Product Promise
Make the prose recognizable as the writer on their clearest day: clearer, not flatter; more deliberate, not less theirs.
The destination skill decides what belongs in the document and in what order. Apply this skill from the first sentence while drafting and revising. It owns how those decisions are expressed, not which decisions are made.
Do not add, remove, reorder, promote, or demote material as a voice choice. A voice edit may clarify what is already there. Return content and structure decisions to the destination skill; when the two conflict, the destination skill wins.
Keep Editorial Judgment Human
Do not silently apply an agent-originated authorship move while drafting or revising prose the user owns. Authorship moves include new reactions, imagined reader objections, analogies, metaphors, dramatic reversals, aphorisms, and takeaways. A direct user-specified replacement, faithful expression of supplied material, or purely mechanical correction may proceed.
When the destination carries a temporary Draft Context, record worthwhile
editorial considerations under its Author Notes rather than silently
installing proposed prose. Let those notes accumulate with the work instead of
forcing them into a fixed up-front checklist. Then handle each selected
wording, cadence, content, or structural candidate one at a time:
- Read the complete piece and carry the larger ear pass privately.
- Surface exactly one consequential candidate with the current wording, the proposed wording, and the reason for the change.
- Reveal a clear recommendation, then wait for the user's decision.
- Apply only the accepted change.
- Treat the reaction as evidence about the writer's taste. Preserve wording whose apparent inefficiency performs a job the reaction reveals.
- Bring forward the next candidate only after the previous one resolves.
Do not dump a checklist of every possible improvement or make several taste-sensitive edits under one approval. Stop when no consequential candidate remains.
Preserve The Allocation Of Attention
Before or while drafting, identify:
- the strongest claim or emotional turn;
- the writer's characteristic nouns, verbs, humor, and unusual phrasing;
- where the writer is certain, tentative, delighted, frustrated, or unresolved;
- how much attention the source gives its center, context, caveats, and asides.
Preserve those proportions. Do not spend more words on caveats, context, or counterarguments than the writer did. Do not smooth away the detail or roughness that makes the prose recognizable.
Write As The Clearest Version Of The Writer
Draft and revise toward:
- directness: say the point instead of announcing that a point is coming;
- specificity: prefer the writer's concrete nouns and verbs over polished abstractions;
- mechanism: express what happens when the source or destination supplies it instead of substituting a generic takeaway;
- compression: remove scaffolding, recap, and repetition only when it carries no voice or meaning;
- cadence: vary sentence length and let short sentences carry real turns;
- reader relationship: preserve the relationship established by the destination, assume competence, and write beside the reader rather than above them;
- tradeoffs: express tradeoffs already present without introducing new ones or turning every choice into a defense;
- proportional certainty: preserve the certainty and qualifications established by the source or destination; keep a necessary qualifier at the narrowest relevant phrase and do not add precautionary hedges.
Keep intentional fragments, repetition, slang, or awkwardness when they carry the writer's rhythm or emotional temperature. The target is not generic smooth prose. It is recognizable thought made easier to hear.
Match The Destination
The same writer sounds different in a journal, technical explanation, UI label, pull request, and message to a friend. Preserve the person while matching the form. Do not import casual slang into documentation or formal scaffolding into a private note.
Connect Ideas Without Headers
Follow the structure chosen by the destination. When two ideas remain in one section, connect them only when the source or structure already supplies the relationship. Keep the connection direct and minimal; do not invent an objection, contrast, reaction, or claim merely to create a polished bridge. When the destination gives the ideas separate sections, use a heading that names the real change. Do not create a new section merely to make the prose look organized.
Punctuation
Use punctuation to make spoken movement legible. Prefer periods. Use colons when the second half names or explains the first, semicolons for closely related independent clauses, and parentheses for real asides.
Avoid en dash characters. Default away from em dash characters; keep one only for a genuine interruption or high-emphasis aside. In UI strings, headings, docs tables, commit messages, comments, and JSDoc, use a period, colon, semicolon, comma, or parentheses instead.
Ear Pass
Use the ear pass to verify the voice already established, not to begin a late rewrite. Read the draft at speaking speed. Preserve the beat. Compression is a tool, not the goal.
- Mark where the rhythm catches, the language becomes generic, or attention shifts away from what the writer cared about.
- Mark any sentence whose reaction, objection, analogy, or conclusion did not come from the writer.
- Remove unsupported connective scaffolding rather than polishing it.
- Route worthwhile agent-originated expression edits through the human decision loop above without changing the thought's strength or emotional proportions.
- Remove recursive hedges and explanations of why the prose is hedging.
- When a problem requires adding, removing, reordering, promoting, or demoting material, return it to the destination skill instead of fixing it here.
- Stop when the writing sounds natural and specific, not merely smooth.
When the destination writing skill invokes its final authorship pass, use the complete transcript and author notes to catch lost voice before that skill removes the entire temporary context bundle.
The final test is simple: did the voice make the intended thought easier to hear without changing what survived or how much it mattered?
When not to use it
- →When the goal is to maintain corporate or robotic tone
- →When the document requires rigid template scaffolding
Limitations
- →Does not determine the document's overall shape or structure
- →Requires the writer to maintain their own emotional temperature and claim strength
How it compares
Unlike generic editing that focuses on grammar, this approach prioritizes the ear pass to ensure the text sounds like something the writer would naturally say.
Compared to similar skills
writing-voice side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| writing-voice (this skill) | 6 | 2mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| scientific-writing | 94 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| resume-builder | 53 | 3mo | No flags | Beginner |
| humanizer | 90 | 6mo | No flags | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by EpicenterHQ
View all by EpicenterHQ →You might also like
scientific-writing
K-Dense-AI
Write scientific manuscripts. IMRAD structure, citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA), abstracts, for research papers and journal submissions.
resume-builder
amruthpillai
Generate professional resumes that conform to the Reactive Resume schema. Use when the user wants to create, build, or generate a resume through conversational AI, or asks about resume structure, sections, or content. This skill guides the agent to ask clarifying questions, avoid hallucination, and produce valid JSON output for https://rxresu.me.
humanizer
davila7
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer
ux-writing
content-designer
Create user-centered, accessible interface copy (microcopy) for digital products including buttons, labels, error messages, notifications, forms, onboarding, empty states, success messages, and help text. Use when writing or editing any text that appears in apps, websites, or software interfaces, designing conversational flows, establishing voice and tone guidelines, auditing product content for consistency and usability, reviewing UI strings, or improving existing interface copy. Applies UX writing best practices based on four quality standards — purposeful, concise, conversational, and clear. Includes accessibility guidelines, research-backed benchmarks (sentence length, comprehension rates, reading levels), expanded error patterns, tone adaptation frameworks, and comprehensive reference materials.
writing-rap-lyrics
asvskartheek
Helps write rap lyrics with proper rhythm, flow, cadences, and structure. Teaches musical fundamentals (bars, beats, tempo, BPM) and lyric formatting. Use when writing rap lyrics, creating verses, understanding flow, structuring bars, improving cadence, learning rhythm patterns, or formatting rap lyrics.
docs-write
metabase
Write documentation following Metabase's conversational, clear, and user-focused style. Use when creating or editing documentation files (markdown, MDX, etc.).