tooluniverse-literature-deep-research
It conducts systematic research by querying academic databases and grading claims to produce reports with citations.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2415" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.Key capabilities
- →Disambiguates research queries for precision
- →Grades literature claims using T1-T4 scale
- →Synthesizes bioRxiv and PubMed search results
- →Produces structured citation-backed reports
How it works
Uses an automated search-and-grade pipeline that performs disambiguation, retrieves external data, and computes synthesis in Python.
Inputs & outputs
When to use tooluniverse-literature-deep-research
- →Conduct systematic literature review
- →Gather evidence for meta-analysis
- →Synthesize bioRxiv preprint data
- →Grade evidence for research claims
About this skill
Literature Deep Research
Systematic literature research: disambiguate, search with collision-aware queries, grade evidence, produce structured reports.
KEY PRINCIPLES: (1) Disambiguate first (2) Right-size deliverable (3) Grade every claim T1-T4 (4) All sections mandatory even if "limited evidence" (5) Source attribution for every claim (6) English-first queries, respond in user's language (7) Report = deliverable, not search log
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
Search PubMed/EuropePMC FIRST before reasoning. A published paper beats memory.
Factoid search strategy:
- Extract KEY TERMS (most specific nouns/verbs)
EuropePMC_search_articles(query="term1 term2 term3", limit=5)- No results -> BROADEN (remove most restrictive term)
- Too many -> NARROW (add specific terms)
- Answer usually in abstract of top results
- Failed query -> try DIFFERENT TERMS/synonyms, don't repeat
COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Workflow
Phase 0: Clarify + Mode Select → Phase 1: Disambiguate + Profile → Phase 2: Literature Search → Phase 3: Report
Phase 0: Mode Selection
| Mode | When | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| Factoid | Single concrete question | 1-page fact-check report + bibliography |
| Mini-review | Narrow topic | 1-3 page narrative |
| Full Deep-Research | Comprehensive overview | 15-section report + bibliography |
Factoid Mode (Fast Path)
# [TOPIC]: Fact-check Report
## Question / ## Answer (with evidence rating) / ## Source(s) / ## Verification Notes / ## Limitations
Domain Detection
| Pattern | Domain | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Gene/protein symbol | Biological target | Full bio disambiguation |
| Drug name | Drug | Drug disambiguation (1.5) |
| Disease name | Disease | Disease disambiguation (1.6) |
| CS/ML topic | General academic | Skip bio tools, literature-only |
| Cross-domain | Interdisciplinary | Resolve each entity in its domain |
Cross-Skill Delegation
- Gene/protein deep-dive:
tooluniverse-target-research - Drug profile:
tooluniverse-drug-research - Disease profile:
tooluniverse-disease-research
Use this skill for literature synthesis. Use specialized skills for entity profiling. For max depth, run both.
Phase 1: Subject Disambiguation + Profile
1.1 Biological Target Resolution
UniProt_search → UniProt_get_entry_by_accession → UniProt_id_mapping
ensembl_lookup_gene → MyGene_get_gene_annotation
1.2 Naming Collision Detection
Check first 20 results. If >20% off-topic, build negative filter: NOT [collision1] NOT [collision2].
Gene family: "ADAR" NOT "ADAR2" NOT "ADARB1". Cross-domain: add context terms.
1.3 Baseline Profile (Bio Targets)
InterPro_get_protein_domains, UniProt_get_ptm_processing_by_accession, HPA_get_subcellular_location,
GTEx_get_median_gene_expression, GO_get_annotations_for_gene, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways,
STRING_get_protein_interactions, intact_get_interactions, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID
GPCR targets: delegate to tooluniverse-target-research.
1.5 Drug Disambiguation
Identity: OpenTargets_get_drug_chembId_by_generic_name, ChEMBL_get_drug, PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name, drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id
Targets: ChEMBL_get_drug_mechanisms, OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_drug_chemblId, DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions
Safety: OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId, OpenTargets_get_drug_indications_by_chemblId, search_clinical_trials
1.6 Disease Disambiguation
OpenTargets disease search → EFO/MONDO IDs
DisGeNET_get_disease_genes, DisGeNET_search_disease
CTD_get_disease_chemicals
1.7 Compound Queries (e.g., "metformin in breast cancer")
Resolve both entities, then cross-reference via CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions, CTD_get_chemical_diseases, OpenTargets drug-target/drug-disease tools. Intersect shared targets/pathways.
1.8 General Academic / 1.9 Interdisciplinary
Non-bio: skip bio tools, use ArXiv/DBLP/OSF. Cross-domain: resolve bio entities with 1.1-1.3, search CS/general in parallel, merge and cross-reference.
Phase 2: Literature Search
Methodology stays internal. Report shows findings, not process.
2.1 Query Strategy
Step 1: Seeds (15-30 core papers): domain-specific title searches with date/sort filters.
Step 2: Citation expansion: PubMed_get_cited_by, EuropePMC_get_citations/references, PubMed_get_related, SemanticScholar_get_recommendations, OpenCitations_get_citations
Step 3: Collision-filtered broader queries: "[TERM]" AND ([context]) NOT [collision]
2.2 Literature Tools — core set + adaptive by domain
Run the core multi-field set on every review (catches what any single index misses), then add the domain rows that match the subject. Don't fire every source blindly — 6–10 well-chosen indexes beat 20 noisy ones.
ALWAYS run (core, all disciplines): PubMed_search_articles, EuropePMC_search_articles, openalex_search_works (query param search/query) or openalex_literature_search (query param search_keywords) — pick one and match its param; mixing them silently returns off-topic results — and SemanticScholar_search_papers
Then add by domain:
| Domain | Add these | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Biomedical / clinical | PMC_search_papers (full text), PubTator3_LiteratureSearch (entity & relations: queries), PubMed_Guidelines_Search (clinical guidelines) | PubTator normalizes gene/drug/disease entities |
| Biology (ecology/evolution/plant) | EuropePMC as PRIMARY + OpenAlex | PubMed returns 0–1 for non-clinical biology |
| CS / ML / AI | ArXiv_search_papers, DBLP_search_publications | arXiv + CS bibliography |
| Physics / HEP / astro | InspireHEP_search_papers | 1.6M+ particle/astro records |
| Broad / hard-to-find / OA | Crossref_search_works, CORE_search_papers, DOAJ_search_articles, Fatcat_search_scholar | DOI registry + OA aggregators + Internet Archive Scholar |
| Regional / EU-funded | OpenAIRE_search_publications, HAL_search_archive | EU open science + French national archive |
| Datasets / software / outputs | Figshare_search_articles, Zenodo_search_records | Citable DOIs for data & code |
| Preprints (latest) | EuropePMC_search_articles(source='PPR'), OSF_search_preprints, BioRxiv_get_preprint/MedRxiv_get_preprint (DOI lookup) | bioRxiv/medRxiv/PsyArXiv etc. |
Multi-source: advanced_literature_search_agent (12+ DBs; needs Azure key -- fallback: query the core set individually).
Citation impact: iCite_search_publications (RCR/APT), iCite_get_publications (by PMID), scite_get_tallies (support/contradict). PubMed-only; for CS use SemanticScholar.
A domain-specific index returning 0 (e.g. ArXiv on a pure-clinical topic) is normal — only worry if the whole core set is empty.
2.3-2.4 Full-Text & PubMed Zero-Result Fallback
Full-text: see FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md for three-tier strategy.
CRITICAL: PubMed returns 0 for ~30% of valid queries. Always retry with EuropePMC when PubMed returns empty. This is not optional.
2.5 Tool Failure / OA Handling
Retry once -> fallback tool. Key fallbacks: PubMed_get_cited_by -> EuropePMC_get_citations -> OpenCitations. OA: Unpaywall if configured, else Europe PMC/PMC/OpenAlex flags.
Phase 3: Evidence Grading
| Tier | Label | Bio Example | CS/ML Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Mechanistic | CRISPR KO + rescue, RCT | Formal proof, controlled ablation |
| T2 | Functional | siRNA knockdown phenotype | Benchmark with baselines |
| T3 | Association | GWAS, screen hit | Observational, case study |
| T4 | Mention | Review article | Survey, workshop abstract |
Inline: Target X regulates Y [T1: PMID:12345678]. Per theme: summarize evidence distribution.
Report Output
| File | Mode |
|---|---|
[topic]_report.md | Full |
[topic]_factcheck_report.md | Factoid |
[topic]_bibliography.json + .csv | All |
Progressive update: create report with all section headers immediately. Fill after each phase. Write Executive Summary LAST.
Use 15-section template from REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. Domain adaptations: bio (architecture/expression/GO/disease), drug (properties/MOA/PK/safety), disease (epi/patho/genes/treatments), general (history/theories/evidence/applications).
Communication
Brief progress updates only: "Resolving identifiers...", "Building paper set...", "Grading evidence..." Do NOT expose: raw tool outputs, dedup counts, search round details.
References
TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md-- 123 tools with parametersREPORT_TEMPLATE.md-- template, domain adaptations, bibliography, completeness checklistFULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md-- three-tier full-text verificationWORKFLOW.md-- compact cheat-sheetEXAMPLES.md-- worked examples
When not to use it
- →Retrieving non-academic or non-scientific data
- →Performing tasks outside research synthesis
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Restricted to academic literature sources
- →Requires distinct phases to prevent halluncination
How it compares
Enforces scientific rigor by requiring evidence grading and strict source attribution for every claim.
Compared to similar skills
tooluniverse-literature-deep-research side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tooluniverse-literature-deep-research (this skill) | 2 | 2mo | No flags | Advanced |
| literature-review | 559 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| openalex-database | 48 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
| scientific-critical-thinking | 18 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by mims-harvard
View all by mims-harvard →You might also like
literature-review
K-Dense-AI
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
openalex-database
davila7
Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.
scientific-critical-thinking
davila7
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
biorxiv-database
lifangda
Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.
physics-validator
omriwen
Validate optical physics parameters including Fresnel numbers, diffraction regimes, and resolution limits. This skill should be used when configuring Telescope, Microscope, or Camera instruments to ensure physically realistic parameters.
fda-database
davila7
Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.