TO

tooluniverse-literature-deep-research

It conducts systematic research by querying academic databases and grading claims to produce reports with citations.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2415" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/tooluniverse-literature-deep-research

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Deep literature review — PubMed, EuropePMC, bioRxiv preprints, citation networks, evidence synthesis. Disambiguates queries, runs collision-aware searches, grades evidence T1-T4, and produces structured reports. Use for systematic literature review, meta-analysis evidence collection, and detailed answer-with-citations workflows.
330 chars✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Disambiguates research queries for precision
  • Grades literature claims using T1-T4 scale
  • Synthesizes bioRxiv and PubMed search results
  • Produces structured citation-backed reports

How it works

Uses an automated search-and-grade pipeline that performs disambiguation, retrieves external data, and computes synthesis in Python.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Research topic or specific question
You get back
Graded literature report with citations

When to use tooluniverse-literature-deep-research

  • Conduct systematic literature review
  • Gather evidence for meta-analysis
  • Synthesize bioRxiv preprint data
  • Grade evidence for research claims

About this skill

Literature Deep Research

Systematic literature research: disambiguate, search with collision-aware queries, grade evidence, produce structured reports.

KEY PRINCIPLES: (1) Disambiguate first (2) Right-size deliverable (3) Grade every claim T1-T4 (4) All sections mandatory even if "limited evidence" (5) Source attribution for every claim (6) English-first queries, respond in user's language (7) Report = deliverable, not search log


LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS

Search PubMed/EuropePMC FIRST before reasoning. A published paper beats memory.

Factoid search strategy:

  1. Extract KEY TERMS (most specific nouns/verbs)
  2. EuropePMC_search_articles(query="term1 term2 term3", limit=5)
  3. No results -> BROADEN (remove most restrictive term)
  4. Too many -> NARROW (add specific terms)
  5. Answer usually in abstract of top results
  6. Failed query -> try DIFFERENT TERMS/synonyms, don't repeat

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

Workflow

Phase 0: Clarify + Mode Select → Phase 1: Disambiguate + Profile → Phase 2: Literature Search → Phase 3: Report

Phase 0: Mode Selection

ModeWhenDeliverable
FactoidSingle concrete question1-page fact-check report + bibliography
Mini-reviewNarrow topic1-3 page narrative
Full Deep-ResearchComprehensive overview15-section report + bibliography

Factoid Mode (Fast Path)

# [TOPIC]: Fact-check Report
## Question / ## Answer (with evidence rating) / ## Source(s) / ## Verification Notes / ## Limitations

Domain Detection

PatternDomainAction
Gene/protein symbolBiological targetFull bio disambiguation
Drug nameDrugDrug disambiguation (1.5)
Disease nameDiseaseDisease disambiguation (1.6)
CS/ML topicGeneral academicSkip bio tools, literature-only
Cross-domainInterdisciplinaryResolve each entity in its domain

Cross-Skill Delegation

  • Gene/protein deep-dive: tooluniverse-target-research
  • Drug profile: tooluniverse-drug-research
  • Disease profile: tooluniverse-disease-research

Use this skill for literature synthesis. Use specialized skills for entity profiling. For max depth, run both.


Phase 1: Subject Disambiguation + Profile

1.1 Biological Target Resolution

UniProt_search → UniProt_get_entry_by_accession → UniProt_id_mapping
ensembl_lookup_gene → MyGene_get_gene_annotation

1.2 Naming Collision Detection

Check first 20 results. If >20% off-topic, build negative filter: NOT [collision1] NOT [collision2]. Gene family: "ADAR" NOT "ADAR2" NOT "ADARB1". Cross-domain: add context terms.

1.3 Baseline Profile (Bio Targets)

InterPro_get_protein_domains, UniProt_get_ptm_processing_by_accession, HPA_get_subcellular_location,
GTEx_get_median_gene_expression, GO_get_annotations_for_gene, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways,
STRING_get_protein_interactions, intact_get_interactions, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID

GPCR targets: delegate to tooluniverse-target-research.

1.5 Drug Disambiguation

Identity: OpenTargets_get_drug_chembId_by_generic_name, ChEMBL_get_drug, PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name, drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id Targets: ChEMBL_get_drug_mechanisms, OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_drug_chemblId, DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions Safety: OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId, OpenTargets_get_drug_indications_by_chemblId, search_clinical_trials

1.6 Disease Disambiguation

OpenTargets disease search → EFO/MONDO IDs
DisGeNET_get_disease_genes, DisGeNET_search_disease
CTD_get_disease_chemicals

1.7 Compound Queries (e.g., "metformin in breast cancer")

Resolve both entities, then cross-reference via CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions, CTD_get_chemical_diseases, OpenTargets drug-target/drug-disease tools. Intersect shared targets/pathways.

1.8 General Academic / 1.9 Interdisciplinary

Non-bio: skip bio tools, use ArXiv/DBLP/OSF. Cross-domain: resolve bio entities with 1.1-1.3, search CS/general in parallel, merge and cross-reference.


Phase 2: Literature Search

Methodology stays internal. Report shows findings, not process.

2.1 Query Strategy

Step 1: Seeds (15-30 core papers): domain-specific title searches with date/sort filters. Step 2: Citation expansion: PubMed_get_cited_by, EuropePMC_get_citations/references, PubMed_get_related, SemanticScholar_get_recommendations, OpenCitations_get_citations Step 3: Collision-filtered broader queries: "[TERM]" AND ([context]) NOT [collision]

2.2 Literature Tools — core set + adaptive by domain

Run the core multi-field set on every review (catches what any single index misses), then add the domain rows that match the subject. Don't fire every source blindly — 6–10 well-chosen indexes beat 20 noisy ones.

ALWAYS run (core, all disciplines): PubMed_search_articles, EuropePMC_search_articles, openalex_search_works (query param search/query) or openalex_literature_search (query param search_keywords) — pick one and match its param; mixing them silently returns off-topic results — and SemanticScholar_search_papers

Then add by domain:

DomainAdd theseNotes
Biomedical / clinicalPMC_search_papers (full text), PubTator3_LiteratureSearch (entity & relations: queries), PubMed_Guidelines_Search (clinical guidelines)PubTator normalizes gene/drug/disease entities
Biology (ecology/evolution/plant)EuropePMC as PRIMARY + OpenAlexPubMed returns 0–1 for non-clinical biology
CS / ML / AIArXiv_search_papers, DBLP_search_publicationsarXiv + CS bibliography
Physics / HEP / astroInspireHEP_search_papers1.6M+ particle/astro records
Broad / hard-to-find / OACrossref_search_works, CORE_search_papers, DOAJ_search_articles, Fatcat_search_scholarDOI registry + OA aggregators + Internet Archive Scholar
Regional / EU-fundedOpenAIRE_search_publications, HAL_search_archiveEU open science + French national archive
Datasets / software / outputsFigshare_search_articles, Zenodo_search_recordsCitable DOIs for data & code
Preprints (latest)EuropePMC_search_articles(source='PPR'), OSF_search_preprints, BioRxiv_get_preprint/MedRxiv_get_preprint (DOI lookup)bioRxiv/medRxiv/PsyArXiv etc.

Multi-source: advanced_literature_search_agent (12+ DBs; needs Azure key -- fallback: query the core set individually). Citation impact: iCite_search_publications (RCR/APT), iCite_get_publications (by PMID), scite_get_tallies (support/contradict). PubMed-only; for CS use SemanticScholar.

A domain-specific index returning 0 (e.g. ArXiv on a pure-clinical topic) is normal — only worry if the whole core set is empty.

2.3-2.4 Full-Text & PubMed Zero-Result Fallback

Full-text: see FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md for three-tier strategy.

CRITICAL: PubMed returns 0 for ~30% of valid queries. Always retry with EuropePMC when PubMed returns empty. This is not optional.

2.5 Tool Failure / OA Handling

Retry once -> fallback tool. Key fallbacks: PubMed_get_cited_by -> EuropePMC_get_citations -> OpenCitations. OA: Unpaywall if configured, else Europe PMC/PMC/OpenAlex flags.


Phase 3: Evidence Grading

TierLabelBio ExampleCS/ML Example
T1MechanisticCRISPR KO + rescue, RCTFormal proof, controlled ablation
T2FunctionalsiRNA knockdown phenotypeBenchmark with baselines
T3AssociationGWAS, screen hitObservational, case study
T4MentionReview articleSurvey, workshop abstract

Inline: Target X regulates Y [T1: PMID:12345678]. Per theme: summarize evidence distribution.


Report Output

FileMode
[topic]_report.mdFull
[topic]_factcheck_report.mdFactoid
[topic]_bibliography.json + .csvAll

Progressive update: create report with all section headers immediately. Fill after each phase. Write Executive Summary LAST.

Use 15-section template from REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. Domain adaptations: bio (architecture/expression/GO/disease), drug (properties/MOA/PK/safety), disease (epi/patho/genes/treatments), general (history/theories/evidence/applications).


Communication

Brief progress updates only: "Resolving identifiers...", "Building paper set...", "Grading evidence..." Do NOT expose: raw tool outputs, dedup counts, search round details.


References

  • TOOL_NAMES_REFERENCE.md -- 123 tools with parameters
  • REPORT_TEMPLATE.md -- template, domain adaptations, bibliography, completeness checklist
  • FULLTEXT_STRATEGY.md -- three-tier full-text verification
  • WORKFLOW.md -- compact cheat-sheet
  • EXAMPLES.md -- worked examples

When not to use it

  • Retrieving non-academic or non-scientific data
  • Performing tasks outside research synthesis

Prerequisites

PubMed API accessPython (pandas, scipy)

Limitations

  • Restricted to academic literature sources
  • Requires distinct phases to prevent halluncination

How it compares

Enforces scientific rigor by requiring evidence grading and strict source attribution for every claim.

Compared to similar skills

tooluniverse-literature-deep-research side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
tooluniverse-literature-deep-research (this skill)22moNo flagsAdvanced
literature-review5592moReviewAdvanced
openalex-database487moReviewIntermediate
scientific-critical-thinking187moReviewAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

More by mims-harvard

View all by mims-harvard

tooluniverse-drug-research

mims-harvard

Generates comprehensive drug research reports with compound disambiguation, evidence grading, and mandatory completeness sections. Covers identity, chemistry, pharmacology, targets, clinical trials, safety, pharmacogenomics, and ADMET properties. Use when users ask about drugs, medications, therapeutics, or need drug profiling, safety assessment, or clinical development research.

323

tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance

mims-harvard

Analyze drug safety signals from FDA adverse event reports, label warnings, and pharmacogenomic data. Calculates disproportionality measures (PRR, ROR), identifies serious adverse events, assesses pharmacogenomic risk variants. Use when asked about drug safety, adverse events, post-market surveillance, or risk-benefit assessment.

323

tooluniverse-precision-oncology

mims-harvard

Provide actionable treatment recommendations for cancer patients based on molecular profile. Interprets tumor mutations, identifies FDA-approved therapies, finds resistance mechanisms, matches clinical trials. Use when oncologist asks about treatment options for specific mutations (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, etc.), therapy resistance, or clinical trial eligibility.

321

tooluniverse-expression-data-retrieval

mims-harvard

Retrieves gene expression and omics datasets from ArrayExpress and BioStudies with gene disambiguation, experiment quality assessment, and structured reports. Creates comprehensive dataset profiles with metadata, sample information, and download links. Use when users need expression data, omics datasets, or mention ArrayExpress (E-MTAB, E-GEOD) or BioStudies (S-BSST) accessions.

217

tooluniverse-target-research

mims-harvard

Gather comprehensive biological target intelligence from 9 parallel research paths covering protein info, structure, interactions, pathways, expression, variants, drug interactions, and literature. Features collision-aware searches, evidence grading (T1-T4), explicit Open Targets coverage, and mandatory completeness auditing. Use when users ask about drug targets, proteins, genes, or need target validation, druggability assessment, or comprehensive target profiling.

25

devtu-create-tool

mims-harvard

Create new scientific tools for ToolUniverse framework with proper structure, validation, and testing. Use when users need to add tools to ToolUniverse, implement new API integrations, create tool wrappers for scientific databases/services, expand ToolUniverse capabilities, or follow ToolUniverse contribution guidelines. Supports creating tool classes, JSON configurations, validation, error handling, and test examples.

14

You might also like

literature-review

K-Dense-AI

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

5591,298

openalex-database

davila7

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

48202

scientific-critical-thinking

davila7

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

1888

biorxiv-database

lifangda

Efficient database search tool for bioRxiv preprint server. Use this skill when searching for life sciences preprints by keywords, authors, date ranges, or categories, retrieving paper metadata, downloading PDFs, or conducting literature reviews.

780

physics-validator

omriwen

Validate optical physics parameters including Fresnel numbers, diffraction regimes, and resolution limits. This skill should be used when configuring Telescope, Microscope, or Camera instruments to ensure physically realistic parameters.

664

fda-database

davila7

Query openFDA API for drugs, devices, adverse events, recalls, regulatory submissions (510k, PMA), substance identification (UNII), for FDA regulatory data analysis and safety research.

539

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry