testing-code
Helps write and maintain automated tests to ensure code quality and coverage.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/testing-code && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2845" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/testing-code && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/testing-code
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Write automated tests for features, validate functionality against acceptance criteria, and ensure code coverage. Use when writing test code, verifying functionality, or adding test coverage to existing code.Key capabilities
- →Map acceptance criteria to unit, integration, and E2E tests
- →Configure mocking patterns for external dependencies
- →Verify test suite coverage against project specifications
- →Identify necessary test data fixtures
How it works
It processes project specification documents to generate specific test code based on the project's established mocking and assertion frameworks.
Inputs & outputs
When to use testing-code
- →Write unit tests for new features
- →Validate code against acceptance criteria
- →Increase test coverage for existing code
About this skill
Testing Code
Core Workflow
Test writing follows a systematic approach: determine scope, understand patterns, map to requirements, write tests, verify coverage.
1. Determine Test Scope
Read project documentation:
docs/user-stories/US-###-*.mdfor acceptance criteria to testdocs/feature-spec/F-##-*.mdfor technical requirementsdocs/api-contracts.yamlfor API specifications- Existing test files to understand patterns
Choose test types needed:
- Unit tests: Individual functions, pure logic, utilities
- Integration tests: Multiple components working together, API endpoints
- Component tests: UI components, user interactions
- E2E tests: Complete user flows, critical paths
- Contract tests: API request/response validation
- Performance tests: Load, stress, benchmark testing
2. Understand Existing Patterns
Investigate current test approach:
- Test framework (Jest, Vitest, Pytest, etc.)
- Mocking patterns and utilities
- Test data fixtures and setup/teardown
- Assertion styles
Use code-finder agents if unfamiliar with test structure.
3. Map Tests to Requirements
Convert 3-5 acceptance criteria to specific test cases across test types:
Example mapping:
## User Story: US-101 User Login
### Test Cases
1. **Unit: Authentication service**
- validateCredentials() returns true for valid email/password
- validateCredentials() returns false for invalid password
- checkAccountStatus() detects locked accounts
2. **Integration: Login endpoint**
- POST /api/login with valid creds returns 200 + token
- POST /api/login with invalid creds returns 401 + error
- POST /api/login with locked account returns 403
3. **Component: Login form**
- Submitting form calls login API
- Error message displays on 401 response
- Success redirects to /dashboard
4. **E2E: Complete login flow**
- User enters credentials → submits → sees dashboard
- User enters wrong password → sees error → retries successfully
4. Write Tests
Unit Test Structure:
describe('AuthService', () => {
describe('validateCredentials', () => {
it('returns true for valid email and password', async () => {
const result = await authService.validateCredentials(
'[email protected]',
'ValidPass123'
);
expect(result).toBe(true);
});
it('returns false for invalid password', async () => {
const result = await authService.validateCredentials(
'[email protected]',
'WrongPassword'
);
expect(result).toBe(false);
});
});
});
Integration Test Structure:
describe('POST /api/auth/login', () => {
beforeEach(async () => {
await resetTestDatabase();
await createTestUser({
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'Test123!'
});
});
it('returns 200 and token for valid credentials', async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/auth/login')
.send({ email: '[email protected]', password: 'Test123!' });
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
expect(response.body).toHaveProperty('token');
expect(response.body.token).toMatch(/^eyJ/); // JWT format
});
it('returns 401 for invalid password', async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post('/api/auth/login')
.send({ email: '[email protected]', password: 'WrongPassword' });
expect(response.status).toBe(401);
expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials');
});
});
Component Test Structure:
describe('LoginForm', () => {
it('submits form with valid data', async () => {
const mockLogin = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true });
render(<LoginForm onLogin={mockLogin} />);
await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), '[email protected]');
await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'Password123');
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /log in/i }));
expect(mockLogin).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'Password123'
});
});
it('displays error message on API failure', async () => {
const mockLogin = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Invalid credentials'));
render(<LoginForm onLogin={mockLogin} />);
await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/email/i), '[email protected]');
await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'wrong');
await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /log in/i }));
expect(await screen.findByText(/invalid credentials/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
E2E Test Structure:
test('user can log in successfully', async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto('/login');
await page.fill('[name="email"]', '[email protected]');
await page.fill('[name="password"]', 'Test123!');
await page.click('button:has-text("Log In")');
await page.waitForURL('/dashboard');
expect(page.url()).toContain('/dashboard');
});
5. Edge Cases & Error Scenarios
Include boundary conditions and error paths:
describe('Edge cases', () => {
it('handles empty email gracefully', async () => {
await expect(
authService.validateCredentials('', 'password')
).rejects.toThrow('Email is required');
});
it('handles extremely long password', async () => {
const longPassword = 'a'.repeat(10000);
await expect(
authService.validateCredentials('[email protected]', longPassword)
).rejects.toThrow('Password too long');
});
it('handles network timeout', async () => {
jest.spyOn(global, 'fetch').mockImplementation(
() => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 10000))
);
await expect(
authService.login('[email protected]', 'pass')
).rejects.toThrow('Request timeout');
});
});
Edge cases to always include:
- Empty/null inputs
- Minimum/maximum values
- Invalid formats
- Network failures
- API errors (4xx, 5xx)
- Timeout conditions
- Concurrent operations
6. Test Data & Fixtures
Create reusable test fixtures:
// tests/fixtures/users.ts
export const validUser = {
email: '[email protected]',
password: 'Test123!',
name: 'Test User'
};
export const invalidUsers = {
noEmail: { password: 'Test123!' },
noPassword: { email: '[email protected]' },
invalidEmail: { email: 'not-an-email', password: 'Test123!' },
weakPassword: { email: '[email protected]', password: '123' }
};
// Use in tests
import { validUser, invalidUsers } from './fixtures/users';
it('validates user data', () => {
expect(validate(validUser)).toBe(true);
expect(validate(invalidUsers.noEmail)).toBe(false);
});
7. Parallel Test Implementation
When tests are independent (different modules, different test types), spawn parallel agents:
Pattern 1: Layer-based
- Agent 1: Unit tests for services/utilities
- Agent 2: Integration tests for API endpoints
- Agent 3: Component tests for UI
- Agent 4: E2E tests for critical flows
Pattern 2: Feature-based
- Agent 1: All tests for Feature A
- Agent 2: All tests for Feature B
- Agent 3: All tests for Feature C
Pattern 3: Type-based
- Agent 1: All unit tests
- Agent 2: All integration tests
- Agent 3: All E2E tests
8. Run & Verify Tests
Execute test suite:
# Unit tests
npm test -- --coverage
# Integration tests
npm run test:integration
# E2E tests
npm run test:e2e
# All tests
npm run test:all
Verify coverage:
- Aim for >80% code coverage
- 100% coverage of critical paths
- All acceptance criteria have tests
- All error scenarios tested
Quality Checklist
Coverage:
- All acceptance criteria from user stories tested
- Happy path covered
- Edge cases included
- Error scenarios tested
- Boundary conditions validated
Structure:
- Tests follow existing patterns
- Clear test descriptions
- Proper setup/teardown
- No flaky tests (consistent results)
- Tests are isolated (no interdependencies)
Data:
- Test fixtures reusable
- Database properly seeded/reset
- Mocks used appropriately
- No hardcoded test data in production
Integration:
- Tests run in CI/CD
- Coverage thresholds enforced
- Fast feedback (quick tests)
- Clear failure messages
When not to use it
- →Writing application production code
- →Manual QA testing workflows
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Limited by the quality of the provided requirements documentation
- →Does not guarantee logical correctness of the underlying code
How it compares
It bridges the gap between requirements and implementation, ensuring that every acceptance criterion has a measurable, automated verification step.
Compared to similar skills
testing-code side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| testing-code (this skill) | 1 | 10mo | Review | Intermediate |
| python-testing-patterns | 77 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| dependency-upgrade | 26 | 5mo | Review | Intermediate |
| test-cases | 57 | 7mo | No flags | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by CaptainCrouton89
View all by CaptainCrouton89 →You might also like
python-testing-patterns
wshobson
Implement comprehensive testing strategies with pytest, fixtures, mocking, and test-driven development. Use when writing Python tests, setting up test suites, or implementing testing best practices.
dependency-upgrade
wshobson
Manage major dependency version upgrades with compatibility analysis, staged rollout, and comprehensive testing. Use when upgrading framework versions, updating major dependencies, or managing breaking changes in libraries.
test-cases
cexll
This skill should be used when generating comprehensive test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. Triggers when users request test case generation, QA planning, test scenario creation, or need structured test documentation. Produces detailed test cases covering functional, edge case, error handling, and state transition scenarios.
reviewing-code
CaptainCrouton89
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.
wcag-audit-patterns
wshobson
Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility, fixing WCAG violations, or implementing accessible design patterns.
code-coverage-with-gcov
gadievron
Add gcov code coverage instrumentation to C/C++ projects