test-fixing
Fixes broken test suites by identifying patterns and applying targeted code updates.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/test-fixing && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2555" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/test-fixing && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/test-fixing
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.Key capabilities
- →Identify failing tests via make test
- →Group failures by error type or module
- →Prioritize fixes based on impact and dependency
- →Verify fixes using focused test execution
- →Perform final regression testing
How it works
It systematically groups test failures by error type or module, then applies fixes in a specific order starting with infrastructure, followed by API changes, and finally logic issues.
Inputs & outputs
When to use test-fixing
- →Fix failing test suite
- →Debug broken CI/CD pipelines
- →Resolve test regressions after refactoring
About this skill
Test Fixing
Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies.
When to Use
- Explicitly asks to fix tests ("fix these tests", "make tests pass")
- Reports test failures ("tests are failing", "test suite is broken")
- Completes implementation and wants tests passing
- Mentions CI/CD failures due to tests
Systematic Approach
1. Initial Test Run
Run make test to identify all failing tests.
Analyze output for:
- Total number of failures
- Error types and patterns
- Affected modules/files
2. Smart Error Grouping
Group similar failures by:
- Error type: ImportError, AttributeError, AssertionError, etc.
- Module/file: Same file causing multiple test failures
- Root cause: Missing dependencies, API changes, refactoring impacts
Prioritize groups by:
- Number of affected tests (highest impact first)
- Dependency order (fix infrastructure before functionality)
3. Systematic Fixing Process
For each group (starting with highest impact):
-
Identify root cause
- Read relevant code
- Check recent changes with
git diff - Understand the error pattern
-
Implement fix
- Use Edit tool for code changes
- Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
- Make minimal, focused changes
-
Verify fix
- Run subset of tests for this group
- Use pytest markers or file patterns:
uv run pytest tests/path/to/test_file.py -v uv run pytest -k "pattern" -v - Ensure group passes before moving on
-
Move to next group
4. Fix Order Strategy
Infrastructure first:
- Import errors
- Missing dependencies
- Configuration issues
Then API changes:
- Function signature changes
- Module reorganization
- Renamed variables/functions
Finally, logic issues:
- Assertion failures
- Business logic bugs
- Edge case handling
5. Final Verification
After all groups fixed:
- Run complete test suite:
make test - Verify no regressions
- Check test coverage remains intact
Best Practices
- Fix one group at a time
- Run focused tests after each fix
- Use
git diffto understand recent changes - Look for patterns in failures
- Don't move to next group until current passes
- Keep changes minimal and focused
Example Workflow
User: "The tests are failing after my refactor"
- Run
make test→ 15 failures identified - Group errors:
- 8 ImportErrors (module renamed)
- 5 AttributeErrors (function signature changed)
- 2 AssertionErrors (logic bugs)
- Fix ImportErrors first → Run subset → Verify
- Fix AttributeErrors → Run subset → Verify
- Fix AssertionErrors → Run subset → Verify
- Run full suite → All pass ✓
When not to use it
- →Non-test related code debugging
- →Fixing issues without existing test coverage
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires existing test suite
- →Fixes must follow project conventions
How it compares
It uses a structured grouping strategy to resolve root causes rather than addressing individual test failures in isolation.
Compared to similar skills
test-fixing side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| test-fixing (this skill) | 1 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
| python-testing-patterns | 77 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| fix-bug | 11 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
| fixing-bugs-systematically | 1 | 8mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by mhattingpete
View all by mhattingpete →You might also like
python-testing-patterns
wshobson
Implement comprehensive testing strategies with pytest, fixtures, mocking, and test-driven development. Use when writing Python tests, setting up test suites, or implementing testing best practices.
fix-bug
tddworks
Guide for fixing bugs in ClaudeBar following Chicago School TDD and rich domain design. Use this skill when: (1) User reports a bug or unexpected behavior (2) Fixing a defect in existing functionality (3) User asks "fix this bug" or "this doesn't work correctly" (4) Correcting behavior that violates the user's mental model
fixing-bugs-systematically
CaptainCrouton89
Diagnose and fix bugs through systematic investigation, root cause analysis, and targeted validation. Use when something is broken, errors occur, performance degrades, or unexpected behavior manifests.
moai-workflow-testing
modu-ai
Comprehensive development workflow specialist combining DDD testing, debugging, performance optimization, code review, PR review, and quality assurance into unified development workflows
investigate
MadAppGang
Unified entry point for code investigation. Auto-routes to specialized detective based on query keywords. Use when investigation type is unclear or for general exploration.
review
MatrixAges
Review uncommitted code changes to find unreasonable design, unfinished requirements, potential bugs, missed reuse opportunities, and optimization opportunities. Use when the user asks for a review of pending, uncommitted, or unpublished code changes and expects both findings and concrete improvemen