terraform-skill
Implement professional-grade infrastructure as code with Terraform. Master modules, testing, and environment structuring.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/terraform-skill && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1082" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/terraform-skill && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/terraform-skill
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Terraform infrastructure as code best practicesKey capabilities
- →Define module hierarchies (Resource vs. Infrastructure vs. Composition)
- →Map directory structures for environment isolation
- →Configure testing fixtures within examples/ directories
- →Apply single-responsibility principles to module design
How it works
Applies a predefined architectural hierarchy and directory convention based on enterprise-grade infrastructure patterns.
Inputs & outputs
When to use terraform-skill
- →Structuring multi-environment IaC
- →Refactoring Terraform modules
- →Setting up CI/CD for cloud infrastructure
About this skill
Terraform Skill for Claude
Comprehensive Terraform and OpenTofu guidance covering testing, modules, CI/CD, and production patterns. Based on terraform-best-practices.com and enterprise experience.
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when:
- Creating new Terraform or OpenTofu configurations or modules
- Setting up testing infrastructure for IaC code
- Deciding between testing approaches (validate, plan, frameworks)
- Structuring multi-environment deployments
- Implementing CI/CD for infrastructure-as-code
- Reviewing or refactoring existing Terraform/OpenTofu projects
- Choosing between module patterns or state management approaches
Don't use this skill for:
- Basic Terraform/OpenTofu syntax questions (Claude knows this)
- Provider-specific API reference (link to docs instead)
- Cloud platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu
Core Principles
1. Code Structure Philosophy
Module Hierarchy:
| Type | When to Use | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Resource Module | Single logical group of connected resources | VPC + subnets, Security group + rules |
| Infrastructure Module | Collection of resource modules for a purpose | Multiple resource modules in one region/account |
| Composition | Complete infrastructure | Spans multiple regions/accounts |
Hierarchy: Resource → Resource Module → Infrastructure Module → Composition
Directory Structure:
environments/ # Environment-specific configurations
├── prod/
├── staging/
└── dev/
modules/ # Reusable modules
├── networking/
├── compute/
└── data/
examples/ # Module usage examples (also serve as tests)
├── complete/
└── minimal/
Key principle from terraform-best-practices.com:
- Separate environments (prod, staging) from modules (reusable components)
- Use examples/ as both documentation and integration test fixtures
- Keep modules small and focused (single responsibility)
For detailed module architecture, see: Code Patterns: Module Types & Hierarchy
2. Naming Conventions
Resources:
# Good: Descriptive, contextual
resource "aws_instance" "web_server" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "application_logs" { }
# Good: "this" for singleton resources (only one of that type)
resource "aws_vpc" "this" { }
resource "aws_security_group" "this" { }
# Avoid: Generic names for non-singletons
resource "aws_instance" "main" { }
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "bucket" { }
Singleton Resources:
Use "this" when your module creates only one resource of that type:
✅ DO:
resource "aws_vpc" "this" {} # Module creates one VPC
resource "aws_security_group" "this" {} # Module creates one SG
❌ DON'T use "this" for multiple resources:
resource "aws_subnet" "this" {} # If creating multiple subnets
Use descriptive names when creating multiple resources of the same type.
Variables:
# Prefix with context when needed
var.vpc_cidr_block # Not just "cidr"
var.database_instance_class # Not just "instance_class"
Files:
main.tf- Primary resourcesvariables.tf- Input variablesoutputs.tf- Output valuesversions.tf- Provider versionsdata.tf- Data sources (optional)
Testing Strategy Framework
Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?
| Your Situation | Recommended Approach | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick syntax check | Static analysis | terraform validate, fmt | Free |
| Pre-commit validation | Static + lint | validate, tflint, trivy, checkov | Free |
| Terraform 1.6+, simple logic | Native test framework | Built-in terraform test | Free-Low |
| Pre-1.6, or Go expertise | Integration testing | Terratest | Low-Med |
| Security/compliance focus | Policy as code | OPA, Sentinel | Free |
| Cost-sensitive workflow | Mock providers (1.7+) | Native tests + mocking | Free |
| Multi-cloud, complex | Full integration | Terratest + real infra | Med-High |
Testing Pyramid for Infrastructure
/\
/ \ End-to-End Tests (Expensive)
/____\ - Full environment deployment
/ \ - Production-like setup
/________\
/ \ Integration Tests (Moderate)
/____________\ - Module testing in isolation
/ \ - Real resources in test account
/________________\ Static Analysis (Cheap)
- validate, fmt, lint
- Security scanning
Native Test Best Practices (1.6+)
Before generating test code:
-
Validate schemas with Terraform MCP:
Search provider docs → Get resource schema → Identify block types -
Choose correct command mode:
command = plan- Fast, for input validationcommand = apply- Required for computed values and set-type blocks
-
Handle set-type blocks correctly:
- Cannot index with
[0] - Use
forexpressions to iterate - Or use
command = applyto materialize
- Cannot index with
Common patterns:
- S3 encryption rules: set (use for expressions)
- Lifecycle transitions: set (use for expressions)
- IAM policy statements: set (use for expressions)
For detailed testing guides, see:
- Testing Frameworks Guide - Deep dive into static analysis, native tests, and Terratest
- Quick Reference - Decision flowchart and command cheat sheet
Code Structure Standards
Resource Block Ordering
Strict ordering for consistency:
countorfor_eachFIRST (blank line after)- Other arguments
tagsas last real argumentdepends_onafter tags (if needed)lifecycleat the very end (if needed)
# ✅ GOOD - Correct ordering
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0
allocation_id = aws_eip.this[0].id
subnet_id = aws_subnet.public[0].id
tags = {
Name = "${var.name}-nat"
}
depends_on = [aws_internet_gateway.this]
lifecycle {
create_before_destroy = true
}
}
Variable Block Ordering
description(ALWAYS required)typedefaultvalidationnullable(when setting to false)
variable "environment" {
description = "Environment name for resource tagging"
type = string
default = "dev"
validation {
condition = contains(["dev", "staging", "prod"], var.environment)
error_message = "Environment must be one of: dev, staging, prod."
}
nullable = false
}
For complete structure guidelines, see: Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure
Count vs For_Each: When to Use Each
Quick Decision Guide
| Scenario | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Boolean condition (create or don't) | count = condition ? 1 : 0 | Simple on/off toggle |
| Simple numeric replication | count = 3 | Fixed number of identical resources |
| Items may be reordered/removed | for_each = toset(list) | Stable resource addresses |
| Reference by key | for_each = map | Named access to resources |
| Multiple named resources | for_each | Better maintainability |
Common Patterns
Boolean conditions:
# ✅ GOOD - Boolean condition
resource "aws_nat_gateway" "this" {
count = var.create_nat_gateway ? 1 : 0
# ...
}
Stable addressing with for_each:
# ✅ GOOD - Removing "us-east-1b" only affects that subnet
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
for_each = toset(var.availability_zones)
availability_zone = each.key
# ...
}
# ❌ BAD - Removing middle AZ recreates all subsequent subnets
resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
count = length(var.availability_zones)
availability_zone = var.availability_zones[count.index]
# ...
}
For migration guides and detailed examples, see: Code Patterns: Count vs For_Each
Locals for Dependency Management
Use locals to ensure correct resource deletion order:
# Problem: Subnets might be deleted after CIDR blocks, causing errors
# Solution: Use try() in locals to hint deletion order
locals {
# References secondary CIDR first, falling back to VPC
# Forces Terraform to delete subnets before CIDR association
vpc_id = try(
aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association.this[0].vpc_id,
aws_vpc.this.id,
""
)
}
resource "aws_vpc" "this" {
cidr_block = "10.0.0.0/16"
}
resource "aws_vpc_ipv4_cidr_block_association" "this" {
count = var.add_secondary_cidr ? 1 : 0
vpc_id = aws_vpc.this.id
cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/16"
}
resource "aws_subnet" "public" {
vpc_id = local.vpc_id # Uses local, not direct reference
cidr_block = "10.1.0.0/24"
}
Why this matters:
- Prevents deletion errors when destroying infrastructure
- Ensures correct dependency order without explicit
depends_on - Particularly useful for VPC configurations with secondary CIDR blocks
For detailed examples, see: Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management
Module Development
Standard Module Structure
my-module/
├── README.md # Usage documentation
├── main.tf # Primary resources
├── variables.tf # Input variables with descriptions
├── outputs.tf # Output values
├── versions.tf # Provider version constraints
├── examples/
│ ├── minimal/ # Minimal working example
│ └── complete/ # Full-featured example
└── tests/ # Test files
└── module_test.tftest.hcl # Or .go
Best Practices Summary
Variables:
- ✅ Always include
description - ✅ Use explicit
typeconstraints - ✅ Provide sensible
defaultvalues where appropriate - ✅ Add
validationblocks for complex constraints - ✅ Use
sensitive = truefor secrets
Outputs:
- ✅ Always include
description - ✅ Mark sensitive outputs with
sensitive = true - ✅ Consider returning objects for related values
- ✅ Document what consumers should do with each output
For detailed module patterns, see:
- **Module Patterns Gui
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →Answering basic Terraform/OpenTofu syntax queries
- →Providing provider-specific API references
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Relies on user-provided context for environment requirements
- →Requires manual migration for existing non-compliant directories
How it compares
Automates the application of industry-standard project organization rather than just writing plain configuration code.
Compared to similar skills
terraform-skill side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| terraform-skill (this skill) | 8 | 4mo | Review | Intermediate |
| aws-solution-architect | 20 | 3mo | Review | Advanced |
| terraform-module-library | 7 | 4mo | No flags | Advanced |
| azure-deployment-preflight | 7 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by sickn33
View all by sickn33 →You might also like
aws-solution-architect
alirezarezvani
Design AWS architectures for startups using serverless patterns and IaC templates. Use when asked to design serverless architecture, create CloudFormation templates, optimize AWS costs, set up CI/CD pipelines, or migrate to AWS. Covers Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, ECS, Aurora, and cost optimization.
terraform-module-library
wshobson
Build reusable Terraform modules for AWS, Azure, and GCP infrastructure following infrastructure-as-code best practices. Use when creating infrastructure modules, standardizing cloud provisioning, or implementing reusable IaC components.
azure-deployment-preflight
github
Performs comprehensive preflight validation of Bicep deployments to Azure, including template syntax validation, what-if analysis, and permission checks. Use this skill before any deployment to Azure to preview changes, identify potential issues, and ensure the deployment will succeed. Activate when users mention deploying to Azure, validating Bicep files, checking deployment permissions, previewing infrastructure changes, running what-if, or preparing for azd provision.
terraform-azurerm-set-diff-analyzer
github
Analyze Terraform plan JSON output for AzureRM Provider to distinguish between false-positive diffs (order-only changes in Set-type attributes) and actual resource changes. Use when reviewing terraform plan output for Azure resources like Application Gateway, Load Balancer, Firewall, Front Door, NSG, and other resources with Set-type attributes that cause spurious diffs due to internal ordering changes.
aws-advisor
tech-leads-club
Expert AWS Cloud Advisor for architecture design, security review, and implementation guidance. Leverages AWS MCP tools for accurate, documentation-backed answers. Use when user asks about AWS architecture, security, service selection, migrations, troubleshooting, or learning AWS. Triggers on AWS, Lambda, S3, EC2, ECS, EKS, DynamoDB, RDS, CloudFormation, CDK, Terraform, Serverless, SAM, IAM, VPC, API Gateway, or any AWS service.
senior-devops
davila7
Comprehensive DevOps skill for CI/CD, infrastructure automation, containerization, and cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure). Includes pipeline setup, infrastructure as code, deployment automation, and monitoring. Use when setting up pipelines, deploying applications, managing infrastructure, implementing monitoring, or optimizing deployment processes.