team-composition-analysis
Assists founders and managers in planning startup team growth, compensation, and equity distribution.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/team-composition-analysis && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1967" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/team-composition-analysis && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/team-composition-analysis
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Design optimal team structures, hiring plans, compensation strategies, and equity allocation for early-stage startups from pre-seed through Series A. Use this skill when planning headcount, determining which roles to hire next, setting compensation or equity ranges, designing org structure, or building a hiring budget aligned to funding milestones.Key capabilities
- →Maps hiring needs to funding stages
- →Calculates equity allocation ranges
- →Benchmarks salary bands by role and seniority
- →Defines departmental budget distribution
How it works
It uses pre-defined startup growth patterns to align role hiring against revenue targets and budget constraints.
Inputs & outputs
When to use team-composition-analysis
- →Planning a seed-stage hiring roadmap
- →Determining equity ranges for early employees
- →Designing an organizational chart for a startup
- →Calculating a hiring budget for Series A
About this skill
Team Composition Analysis
Design optimal team structures, hiring plans, compensation strategies, and equity allocation for early-stage startups from pre-seed through Series A.
Overview
Build the right team at the right time with appropriate compensation and equity. Plan role-by-role hiring aligned with revenue milestones, budget constraints, and market benchmarks.
Team Structure by Stage
Pre-Seed (0-$500K ARR)
Team Size: 2-5 people
Core Roles:
- Founders (2-3): Product, engineering, business
- First engineer (if needed)
- Contract roles: Design, marketing
Focus: Build and validate product-market fit
Seed ($500K-$2M ARR)
Team Size: 5-15 people
Key Hires:
- Engineering lead + 2-3 engineers
- First sales/business development
- Product manager
- Marketing/growth lead
Focus: Scale product and prove repeatable sales
Series A ($2M-$10M ARR)
Team Size: 15-50 people
Department Build-Out:
- Engineering (40%): 6-20 people
- Sales & Marketing (30%): 5-15 people
- Customer Success (10%): 2-5 people
- G&A (10%): 2-5 people
- Product (10%): 2-5 people
Focus: Scale revenue and build repeatable processes
Detailed section: Role-by-Role Planning
Originally a 1720-byte section in this SKILL.md. Moved to references/details.md to fit Codex's 8 KB skill body cap.
Compensation Strategy
Base Salary Benchmarks (US, 2024)
Engineering:
- Junior: $90K-$120K
- Mid-Level: $120K-$150K
- Senior: $150K-$180K
- Staff/Principal: $180K-$220K
- Engineering Manager: $160K-$200K
- VP Engineering: $180K-$250K
Sales:
- SDR/BDR: $50K-$70K base + $50K-$70K commission
- Account Executive: $80K-$120K base + $80K-$120K commission
- Sales Manager: $120K-$160K base + $80K-$120K commission
- VP Sales: $150K-$200K base + $150K-$200K commission
Product:
- Product Manager: $120K-$150K
- Senior PM: $150K-$180K
- Head of Product: $150K-$180K
- VP Product: $180K-$220K
Marketing:
- Marketing Manager: $90K-$130K
- Content/Demand Gen: $70K-$100K
- Head of Marketing: $130K-$170K
- VP Marketing: $150K-$200K
Customer Success:
- CS Representative: $60K-$90K
- CS Manager: $100K-$130K
- VP Customer Success: $140K-$180K
Total Compensation Formula
Total Comp = Base Salary × 1.30 (benefits & taxes) + Equity Value
Fully-Loaded Cost:
- Base salary
- Payroll taxes (7.65% FICA)
- Benefits (health insurance, 401k): $10K-$15K per employee
- Other (workspace, equipment, software): $5K-$10K per employee
Rule of Thumb: Multiply base salary by 1.3-1.4 for fully-loaded cost
Geographic Adjustments
San Francisco / New York: +20-30% above benchmarks Seattle / Boston / Los Angeles: +10-20% Austin / Denver / Chicago: +0-10% Remote / Other US Cities: -10-20% International: Varies widely by country
Equity Allocation
Equity by Role and Stage
Founders:
- First founder: 40-60%
- Second founder: 20-40%
- Third founder: 10-20%
- Vesting: 4 years with 1-year cliff
Early Employees (Pre-Seed):
- First engineer: 0.5-2.0%
- First 5 employees: 0.25-1.0% each
Seed Stage Hires:
- VP/Head level: 0.5-1.5%
- Senior IC: 0.1-0.5%
- Mid-level: 0.05-0.25%
- Junior: 0.01-0.1%
Series A Hires:
- C-level (CTO, CFO): 1.0-3.0%
- VP level: 0.3-1.0%
- Director level: 0.1-0.5%
- Senior IC: 0.05-0.2%
- Mid-level: 0.01-0.1%
- Junior: 0.005-0.05%
Equity Pool Sizing
Option Pool by Round:
- Pre-Seed: 10-15% reserved
- Seed: 10-15% top-up
- Series A: 10-15% top-up
- Series B+: 5-10% per round
Pre-Funding Dilution: Investors often require option pool creation before investment, diluting founders.
Example:
Pre-money: $10M
Investors want 15% option pool post-money
Calculation:
Post-money: $15M ($10M + $5M investment)
Option pool: $2.25M (15% × $15M)
Founders diluted by pool creation before new money
Organizational Design
Reporting Structure
Pre-Seed:
Founders (flat structure)
├── Contractors
└── First hires (report to founders)
Seed:
CEO
├── Engineering Lead (2-4 engineers)
├── Sales/Growth Lead (1-2 reps)
├── Product Manager
└── Operations
Series A:
CEO
├── CTO / VP Engineering (6-20 people)
│ ├── Engineering Manager(s)
│ └── Individual Contributors
├── VP Sales (5-15 people)
│ ├── Sales Manager
│ ├── Account Executives
│ └── SDRs
├── Head of Product (2-5 people)
│ ├── Product Managers
│ └── Designers
├── Head of Customer Success (2-5 people)
└── CFO / Finance Lead (2-5 people)
├── Recruiter
└── Operations
Span of Control
Manager Ratios:
- First-line managers: 4-8 direct reports
- Directors: 3-5 direct reports (managers)
- VPs: 3-5 direct reports (directors)
- CEO: 5-8 direct reports (executive team)
Full-Time vs. Contract
Use Full-Time for:
- Core product development
- Sales (revenue-generating roles)
- Mission-critical operations
- Institutional knowledge roles
Use Contractors for:
- Specialized short-term needs (legal, accounting)
- Variable workload (design, marketing campaigns)
- Skills outside core competency
- Testing role before FTE hire
- Geographic expansion before permanent presence
Cost Comparison
Full-Time:
- Lower hourly cost
- Benefits and overhead
- Long-term commitment
- Cultural fit matters
Contract:
- Higher hourly rate ($75-$200/hour vs. $40-$100/hour FTE equivalent)
- No benefits or overhead
- Flexible engagement
- Easier to scale up/down
Hiring Velocity
Realistic Timeline
Role Opening to Hire:
- Junior: 6-8 weeks
- Mid-Level: 8-12 weeks
- Senior: 12-16 weeks
- Executive: 16-24 weeks
Time to Productivity:
- Junior: 4-6 months
- Mid-Level: 2-4 months
- Senior: 1-3 months
- Executive: 3-6 months
Planning Buffer
Always add 2-3 months buffer to hiring plans.
Example: If need engineer by July 1:
- Start recruiting: April 1 (12 weeks)
- Productivity: September 1 (2 months ramp)
Budget Planning
Compensation as % of Revenue
Early Stage (Seed):
- Total comp: 120-150% of revenue (burning cash to grow)
- Engineering: 50-60%
- Sales: 30-40%
- Other: 20-30%
Growth Stage (Series A):
- Total comp: 70-100% of revenue
- Engineering: 35-45%
- Sales: 25-35%
- Other: 20-30%
Headcount Budget Formula
Total Comp Budget = Σ (Role Count × Fully-Loaded Cost × % of Year)
Example:
3 Engineers × $202K × 100% = $606K
2 AEs × $230K × 75% (mid-year start) = $345K
1 PM × $162K × 100% = $162K
Total: $1.1M
Quick Start
To plan team composition:
- Identify stage - Pre-seed, seed, or Series A
- Define roles - What functions are needed now
- Prioritize hires - Critical path for business goals
- Set compensation - Base salary + equity by level
- Plan timeline - Account for recruiting and ramp time
- Calculate budget - Fully-loaded cost × headcount
- Design org chart - Reporting structure and span of control
- Allocate equity - Fair allocation that preserves pool
When not to use it
- →Large enterprise org design
- →Non-startup payroll management
Limitations
- →Limited to early-stage (Pre-seed to Series A)
- →Salary data is based on US 2024 benchmarks
How it compares
It offers specific startup financial benchmarks rather than general management theory.
Compared to similar skills
team-composition-analysis side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| team-composition-analysis (this skill) | 2 | 2mo | No flags | Beginner |
| planning-with-files | 233 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
| trello | 41 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| pmbok-project-management | 38 | 9mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by wshobson
View all by wshobson →You might also like
planning-with-files
davila7
Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.
trello
openclaw
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
pmbok-project-management
jgtolentino
Comprehensive PMP/PMBOK project management methodologies and best practices. Use this skill when users need guidance on project management processes, templates, knowledge areas, process groups, tools, techniques, or certification preparation. Covers all 10 PMBOK Knowledge Areas and 5 Process Groups with practical templates, frameworks, and industry-standard approaches. Includes risk management, stakeholder engagement, schedule management, cost control, quality assurance, and resource planning.
clickup
civitai
Interact with ClickUp tasks and documents - get task details, view comments, create and manage tasks, create and edit docs. Use when working with ClickUp task/doc URLs or IDs.
ma-playbook
alirezarezvani
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
create-plan
antinomyhq
Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.