tdd-workflow
Enforces a strict TDD workflow requiring tests for all features and bug fixes.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/tdd-workflow-caovinhphuc && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/19099" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/tdd-workflow-caovinhphuc && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/tdd-workflow-caovinhphuc
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.Key capabilities
- →Write tests before implementing code
- →Ensure minimum 80% code coverage across test types
- →Validate RED state before production code changes
- →Implement minimal code to achieve GREEN state
- →Refactor code while maintaining GREEN tests
How it works
The skill guides development through a strict TDD cycle: writing failing tests, confirming the RED state, implementing minimal code to achieve a GREEN state, and then refactoring while ensuring tests remain GREEN. It emphasizes checkpoint commits for each stage.
Inputs & outputs
When to use tdd-workflow
- →Developing new features
- →Fixing production bugs
- →Refactoring code
About this skill
Test-Driven Development Workflow
This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
When to Activate
- Writing new features or functionality
- Fixing bugs or issues
- Refactoring existing code
- Adding API endpoints
- Creating new components
Core Principles
1. Tests BEFORE Code
ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
2. Coverage Requirements
- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
- All edge cases covered
- Error scenarios tested
- Boundary conditions verified
3. Test Types
Unit Tests
- Individual functions and utilities
- Component logic
- Pure functions
- Helpers and utilities
Integration Tests
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- Service interactions
- External API calls
E2E Tests (Playwright)
- Critical user flows
- Complete workflows
- Browser automation
- UI interactions
4. Git Checkpoints
- If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit after each TDD stage
- Do not squash or rewrite these checkpoint commits until the workflow is complete
- Each checkpoint commit message must describe the stage and the exact evidence captured
- Count only commits created on the current active branch for the current task
- Do not treat commits from other branches, earlier unrelated work, or distant branch history as valid checkpoint evidence
- Before treating a checkpoint as satisfied, verify that the commit is reachable from the current
HEADon the active branch and belongs to the current task sequence - The preferred compact workflow is:
- one commit for failing test added and RED validated
- one commit for minimal fix applied and GREEN validated
- one optional commit for refactor complete
- Separate evidence-only commits are not required if the test commit clearly corresponds to RED and the fix commit clearly corresponds to GREEN
TDD Workflow Steps
Step 1: Write User Journeys
As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
Example:
As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.
Step 2: Generate Test Cases
For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
describe("Semantic Search", () => {
it("returns relevant markets for query", async () => {
// Test implementation
});
it("handles empty query gracefully", async () => {
// Test edge case
});
it("falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable", async () => {
// Test fallback behavior
});
it("sorts results by similarity score", async () => {
// Test sorting logic
});
});
Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
npm test
# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yet
This step is mandatory and is the RED gate for all production changes.
Before modifying business logic or other production code, you must verify a valid RED state via one of these paths:
- Runtime RED:
- The relevant test target compiles successfully
- The new or changed test is actually executed
- The result is RED
- Compile-time RED:
- The new test newly instantiates, references, or exercises the buggy code path
- The compile failure is itself the intended RED signal
- In either case, the failure is caused by the intended business-logic bug, undefined behavior, or missing implementation
- The failure is not caused only by unrelated syntax errors, broken test setup, missing dependencies, or unrelated regressions
A test that was only written but not compiled and executed does not count as RED.
Do not edit production code until this RED state is confirmed.
If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after this stage is validated. Recommended commit message format:
test: add reproducer for <feature or bug>- This commit may also serve as the RED validation checkpoint if the reproducer was compiled and executed and failed for the intended reason
- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before continuing
Step 4: Implement Code
Write minimal code to make tests pass:
// Implementation guided by tests
export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
// Implementation here
}
If the repository is under Git, stage the minimal fix now but defer the checkpoint commit until GREEN is validated in Step 5.
Step 5: Run Tests Again
npm test
# Tests should now pass
Rerun the same relevant test target after the fix and confirm the previously failing test is now GREEN.
Only after a valid GREEN result may you proceed to refactor.
If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after GREEN is validated. Recommended commit message format:
fix: <feature or bug>- The fix commit may also serve as the GREEN validation checkpoint if the same relevant test target was rerun and passed
- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before continuing
Step 6: Refactor
Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
- Remove duplication
- Improve naming
- Optimize performance
- Enhance readability
If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after refactoring is complete and tests remain green. Recommended commit message format:
refactor: clean up after <feature or bug> implementation- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before considering the TDD cycle complete
Step 7: Verify Coverage
npm run test:coverage
# Verify 80%+ coverage achieved
Testing Patterns
Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { Button } from './Button'
describe('Button Component', () => {
it('renders with correct text', () => {
render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
const handleClick = jest.fn()
render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})
})
API Integration Test Pattern
import { NextRequest } from "next/server";
import { GET } from "./route";
describe("GET /api/markets", () => {
it("returns markets successfully", async () => {
const request = new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/markets");
const response = await GET(request);
const data = await response.json();
expect(response.status).toBe(200);
expect(data.success).toBe(true);
expect(Array.isArray(data.data)).toBe(true);
});
it("validates query parameters", async () => {
const request = new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/markets?limit=invalid");
const response = await GET(request);
expect(response.status).toBe(400);
});
it("handles database errors gracefully", async () => {
// Mock database failure
const request = new NextRequest("http://localhost/api/markets");
// Test error handling
});
});
E2E Test Pattern (Playwright)
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
test("user can search and filter markets", async ({ page }) => {
// Navigate to markets page
await page.goto("/");
await page.click('a[href="/markets"]');
// Verify page loaded
await expect(page.locator("h1")).toContainText("Markets");
// Search for markets
await page.fill('input[placeholder="Search markets"]', "election");
// Wait for debounce and results
await page.waitForTimeout(600);
// Verify search results displayed
const results = page.locator('[data-testid="market-card"]');
await expect(results).toHaveCount(5, { timeout: 5000 });
// Verify results contain search term
const firstResult = results.first();
await expect(firstResult).toContainText("election", { ignoreCase: true });
// Filter by status
await page.click('button:has-text("Active")');
// Verify filtered results
await expect(results).toHaveCount(3);
});
test("user can create a new market", async ({ page }) => {
// Login first
await page.goto("/creator-dashboard");
// Fill market creation form
await page.fill('input[name="name"]', "Test Market");
await page.fill('textarea[name="description"]', "Test description");
await page.fill('input[name="endDate"]', "2025-12-31");
// Submit form
await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
// Verify success message
await expect(page.locator("text=Market created successfully")).toBeVisible();
// Verify redirect to market page
await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/markets\/test-market/);
});
Test File Organization
src/
├── components/
│ ├── Button/
│ │ ├── Button.tsx
│ │ ├── Button.test.tsx # Unit tests
│ │ └── Button.stories.tsx # Storybook
│ └── MarketCard/
│ ├── MarketCard.tsx
│ └── MarketCard.test.tsx
├── app/
│ └── api/
│ └── markets/
│ ├── route.ts
│ └── route.test.ts # Integration tests
└── e2e/
├── markets.spec.ts # E2E tests
├── trading.spec.ts
└── auth.spec.ts
Mocking External Services
Supabase Mock
jest.mock("@/lib/supabase", () => ({
supabase: {
from: jest.fn(() => ({
select: jest.fn(() => ({
eq: jest.fn(() =>
Promise.resolve({
data: [{ id: 1, name: "Test Market" }],
error: null,
})
),
})),
})),
},
}));
Redis Mock
jest.mock("@/lib/redis", () => ({
searchMarketsByVector: jest.fn(() =>
Promise.resolve([{ slug: "test-market", similarity_score: 0.95 }])
),
checkRedisHealth: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ connected: true })),
}));
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →When test-driven development principles are not followed
- →When complete test coverage is not a requirement
- →When tests are not executed to confirm RED or GREEN states
Limitations
- →Requires minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
- →Requires checkpoint commits for each TDD stage
- →Does not allow editing production code until RED state is confirmed
How it compares
This workflow enforces a disciplined TDD approach with explicit RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycles and Git checkpoints, contrasting with development where tests are written after code or coverage is not strictly enforced.
Compared to similar skills
tdd-workflow side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tdd-workflow (this skill) | 0 | 3mo | Review | Intermediate |
| vitest | 41 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| svelte-expert | 11 | 9mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| implementing-cards | 7 | 1mo | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
vitest
antfu
Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.
svelte-expert
Raudbjorn
Expert Svelte/SvelteKit development assistant for building components, utilities, and applications. Use when creating Svelte components, SvelteKit applications, implementing reactive patterns, handling state management, working with stores, transitions, animations, or any Svelte/SvelteKit development task. Includes comprehensive documentation access, code validation with svelte-autofixer, and playground link generation.
implementing-cards
bcollazo
Fill out the implementation of effects of different attacks, abilities, and trainer cards in this Pokemon TCG Pocket engine codebase.
zod-4
prowler-cloud
Zod 4 schema validation patterns. Trigger: When creating or updating Zod v4 schemas for validation/parsing (forms, request payloads, adapters), including v3 -> v4 migration patterns.
csharp-pro
sickn33
Write modern C# code with advanced features like records, pattern matching, and async/await. Optimizes .NET applications, implements enterprise patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for C# refactoring, performance optimization, or complex .NET solutions.
write-unit-tests
tldraw
Writing unit and integration tests for the tldraw SDK. Use when creating new tests, adding test coverage, or fixing failing tests in packages/editor or packages/tldraw. Covers Vitest patterns, TestEditor usage, and test file organization.