tdd-migration-pipeline
Orchestrates large code rewrites using a specialized TDD migration pipeline.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/tdd-migration-pipeline && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/4179" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/tdd-migration-pipeline && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/tdd-migration-pipeline
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Orchestrator-only workflow for migrating/rewriting codebases with full TDD and agent delegationKey capabilities
- →Orchestrate codebase migrations
- →Define behavioral contracts via specs
- →Enforce TDD with failing tests
- →Manage adversarial review iterations
- →Validate integration against reference
How it works
The orchestrator delegates tasks to specialized agents for specification, testing, planning, and building, maintaining a flat context window by passing only file paths.
Inputs & outputs
When to use tdd-migration-pipeline
- →Rewrite system to new framework
- →Large-scale behavioral refactoring
- →Language migration with TDD guarantees
About this skill
TDD Migration Pipeline
Orchestrator-only workflow for migrating or rewriting codebases. You do NOT read files, write code, or validate anything yourself. You only instruct agents and pipe context (paths, not contents).
When to Use
- Migrating codebase from one language/framework to another
- Rewriting a system with TDD guarantees
- Large-scale refactoring with behavioral contracts
- When you want zero context growth in the orchestrator
Core Principles
- ZERO orchestrator execution - only instruct and pipe context
- All work done by agents - you never read/write/validate
- Context window stays flat - pass paths, not contents
- New code in separate directory - never modify source
Your Constraints
- Never say "let me read..." or "looking at..."
- Only say "Agent X: do Y with Z"
- Your context should NOT grow during execution
- All agents must use
qltyandtldrskills
Pipeline Phases
Phase 1: SPEC
Instruct spec-agent (use scout or architect):
- Analyze {source_path} using tldr-skill
- Output: spec.md with behavioral contracts, types, edge cases
Agent prompt template:
Analyze the codebase at {source_path} using tldr commands (tldr structure, tldr extract, tldr calls).
Create spec.md with:
- All behavioral contracts (what each function/class promises)
- Input/output types
- Edge cases and invariants
- Dependencies between components
Write to: {target_dir}/spec.md
Phase 2: FAILING TESTS
Instruct test-agent (use arbiter):
- Read spec.md
- Write failing tests in {target_dir}/tests/
- Tests should define expected behavior before implementation
Instruct review-agent (use critic):
- Validate tests cover spec completely
- No gaps in behavioral coverage
Phase 3: ADVERSARIAL (x3 iterations)
Instruct premortem-agent (use premortem skill):
- Review spec + tests
- Identify failure modes, race conditions, edge cases
- DO NOT ASK - just add mitigations directly to spec
- Run 3 passes with fresh perspective each time
Key: Each pass should find NEW issues, not repeat previous ones.
Phase 4: PHASED PLAN
Instruct planner-agent (use architect or plan-agent):
- Input: spec.md + tests + mitigations
- Output: phased-plan.yaml
- Requirements:
- Dependency-ordered phases
- Each phase = one testable unit
- Clear inputs/outputs per phase
Phase 5: BUILD LOOP (per phase)
For each phase in phased-plan.yaml:
Instruct builder-agent (use kraken or spark):
- Write code to pass tests for this phase
- Use qlty for quality checks
- Run tests after each change
Instruct review-agent (use critic or judge):
- Validate implementation matches spec
- Check for regressions in previous phases
- Verify no breaking changes
Phase 6: INTEGRATION VALIDATION
Instruct integration-agent (use atlas or validator):
- Use tldr to diff against {reference_repo}
- Check for:
- No race conditions
- No hangs or deadlocks
- No breaking changes vs original
- All behavioral contracts preserved
- Output: validation-report.md
Invocation
When invoking this workflow, specify:
SOURCE: {path to source code}
TARGET_DIR: {new folder for migrated code}
TARGET_LANG: {typescript|python|go|rust|etc}
REFERENCE_REPO: {url or path for final diff comparison}
SKILLS: [tldr-code, qlty-check, {domain-specific}]
Agent Mapping
| Phase | Agent Type | Subagent |
|---|---|---|
| Spec | research | scout or architect |
| Tests | validate | arbiter |
| Review | review | critic or judge |
| Premortem | review | premortem skill |
| Plan | plan | architect or plan-agent |
| Build | implement | kraken (large) or spark (small) |
| Integration | validate | atlas or validator |
Example Orchestration
# Phase 1
Task(scout): "Analyze /src/old-system using tldr structure and tldr extract.
Create spec.md at /migration/spec.md with all behavioral contracts."
# Phase 2
Task(arbiter): "Read /migration/spec.md. Write failing tests to /migration/tests/
that define expected behavior."
Task(critic): "Review /migration/spec.md vs /migration/tests/.
Report any behavioral gaps."
# Phase 3 (x3)
Task(premortem): "Review /migration/spec.md and /migration/tests/.
Identify failure modes. Add mitigations directly to spec. Pass 1/3."
[repeat with "Pass 2/3", "Pass 3/3"]
# Phase 4
Task(architect): "From /migration/spec.md and /migration/tests/,
create /migration/phased-plan.yaml with dependency-ordered phases."
# Phase 5 (loop)
Task(kraken): "Implement phase 1 from /migration/phased-plan.yaml.
Code goes in /migration/src/. Run tests after."
Task(critic): "Review /migration/src/ against /migration/spec.md.
Check for spec compliance and regressions."
[repeat for each phase]
# Phase 6
Task(atlas): "Run full integration tests on /migration/src/.
Use tldr to diff against /src/old-system.
Output /migration/validation-report.md."
Anti-Patterns (DO NOT)
- Reading files into your context ("let me check the code...")
- Writing code directly ("I'll implement this function...")
- Validating anything yourself ("looking at the tests, I see...")
- Modifying the source directory
- Skipping the adversarial phase
- Running build without tests first
Success Criteria
- All tests pass
- qlty reports clean
- tldr diff shows no breaking changes
- No race conditions or hangs
- validation-report.md confirms behavioral equivalence
When not to use it
- →When the orchestrator needs to read or write code directly
- →When the project is too small to justify agent delegation
Limitations
- →Orchestrator must not read or write code
- →Requires sub-agents to perform all implementation work
How it compares
It enforces a strict separation of concerns where the orchestrator manages the workflow without ever reading or writing the code itself.
Compared to similar skills
tdd-migration-pipeline side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tdd-migration-pipeline (this skill) | 1 | 7mo | No flags | Advanced |
| tdd-workflow | 6 | 4mo | Review | Intermediate |
| qlty-check | 5 | 7mo | Review | Beginner |
| superpowers-tdd | 5 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by parcadei
View all by parcadei →You might also like
tdd-workflow
affaan-m
在编写新功能、修复错误或重构代码时使用此技能。强制执行测试驱动开发,包含单元测试、集成测试和端到端测试,覆盖率超过80%。
qlty-check
parcadei
Code quality checks, formatting, and metrics via qlty CLI
superpowers-tdd
anthonylee991
Applies tests-first discipline (red/green/refactor) and adds regression tests for bugs. Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring.
solid
ramziddin
Use this skill when writing code, implementing features, refactoring, planning architecture, designing systems, reviewing code, or debugging. This skill transforms junior-level code into senior-engineer quality software through SOLID principles, TDD, clean code practices, and professional software design.
bunit-test-migration
FritzAndFriends
Migrate bUnit test files from deprecated beta API (1.0.0-beta-10) to bUnit 2.x stable API. Use this when working on .razor test files in BlazorWebFormsComponents.Test that contain old patterns like TestComponentBase, Fixture, or SnapshotTest.
code-refactor
luongnv89
Systematic code refactoring based on Martin Fowler's methodology. Use when users ask to refactor code, improve code structure, reduce technical debt, clean up legacy code, eliminate code smells, or improve code maintainability. This skill guides through a phased approach with research, planning, and safe incremental implementation.