supabase-known-pitfalls
Identifies common Supabase mistakes like missing RLS, service role exposure, and improper error handling.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/supabase-known-pitfalls && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/7425" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/supabase-known-pitfalls && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/supabase-known-pitfalls
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use when reviewing Supabase code, onboarding developers, auditing an existing project, or debugging unexpected behavior — catches the twelve most common Supabase mistakes: exposing the service_role key in client bundles, forgetting to enable RLS, skipping connection pooling in serverless, .single() throwing on empty results, missing .select() after insert/update, ignoring { data, error }, creating multiple client instances, and not using generated types. Trigger with phrases like "supabase mistakes", "supabase anti-patterns", "supabase pitfalls", "supabase code review", "supabase gotchas", "supabase debugging", "what not to do supabase", "supabase common errors".Key capabilities
- →Identify service_role key exposure in client bundles
- →Detect tables without Row Level Security enabled
- →Find overly permissive RLS policies
- →Verify connection pooling usage in serverless environments
- →Ensure proper handling of { data, error } responses
- →Check for missing .select() after mutations
How it works
This skill reviews a Supabase codebase against a list of common anti-patterns, categorized by severity. It provides detection methods and correct code patterns for each pitfall.
Inputs & outputs
When to use supabase-known-pitfalls
- →Auditing Supabase projects
- →Debugging common Supabase errors
- →Improving code quality
About this skill
Supabase Known Pitfalls
Overview
The twelve most common Supabase mistakes, ranked by severity: security (service_role exposure, missing RLS, permissive policies, no connection pooling), data integrity (ignoring { data, error }, missing .select() after mutations, .single() on optional results), and performance / maintainability (select('*'), N+1 queries, missing FK indexes, multiple client instances, no generated types). Each pitfall shows the broken code, why it fails, and the correct pattern using createClient from @supabase/supabase-js.
This SKILL.md carries the full pitfall table plus one representative fix per category. The verbatim broken-vs-correct code and detection queries for all twelve live in references/pitfalls.md — drill in there for depth.
Prerequisites
- Access to a Supabase project codebase for review
@supabase/supabase-jsv2+ installed- Basic understanding of Row Level Security (RLS)
Instructions
Work the pitfalls top-down by severity. Fix every Critical finding before moving on — a single security miss can expose the whole database.
| # | Pitfall | Severity | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | service_role key in client bundle | Critical | anon key on client; service_role server-only, no NEXT_PUBLIC_ |
| 2 | Table without RLS | Critical | ALTER TABLE … ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY right after CREATE TABLE |
| 3 | Overly permissive RLS policy | Critical | scope USING (…) to auth.uid(), never USING (true) for writes |
| 4 | No connection pooling in serverless | Critical | pooled string (Supavisor, port 6543), not the direct 5432 URL |
| 5 | Ignoring { data, error } | High | destructure both; check error before touching data |
| 6 | Missing .select() after mutation | High | chain .select('cols') — mutations return null otherwise |
| 7 | .single() on optional result | High | use .maybeSingle() for 0-or-1; .single() only for guaranteed 1 |
| 8 | select('*') everywhere | Medium | name the columns — smaller payload, typed, no leakage |
| 9 | N+1 query loop | Medium | PostgREST embedded join, or batch with .in() |
| 10 | FK column without index | Medium | CREATE INDEX on every foreign-key column |
| 11 | Multiple client instances | Low | singleton in lib/supabase.ts, imported everywhere |
| 12 | Hand-written DB types | Low | supabase gen types typescript --linked |
Step 1 — Security (Critical, pitfalls 1-4)
The service_role key bypasses all RLS, so it must never reach a browser bundle. Split the client by trust boundary:
// Client (browser): anon key — respects RLS
const supabase = createClient(url, process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY!)
// Server only (API routes, server actions): service_role, NO NEXT_PUBLIC_ prefix
const supabaseAdmin = createClient(url, process.env.SUPABASE_SERVICE_ROLE_KEY!,
{ auth: { autoRefreshToken: false, persistSession: false } })
Then confirm RLS is enabled on every table, tighten any USING (true) policy to auth.uid(), and use the pooled connection string in serverless. Full broken-vs-correct code and the SQL detection queries for pitfalls 1-4 are in the Security section of references/pitfalls.md.
Step 2 — Data Integrity (High, pitfalls 5-7)
Supabase returns { data, error } and mutations return null unless you ask for the row back:
const { data, error } = await supabase
.from('orders').insert(order)
.select('id, status') // without .select(), data is null
.maybeSingle() // .single() throws PGRST116 on 0 rows
if (error) throw new Error(`Order failed: ${error.message}`)
See the Data Integrity section of references/pitfalls.md for the .single() vs .maybeSingle() rule of thumb and each failure mode.
Step 3 — Performance & Maintainability (Medium/Low, pitfalls 8-12)
Name your columns, collapse N+1 loops into a single embedded join, index foreign keys, share one client instance, and use generated types:
// One query instead of 1 + N — PostgREST embeds the FK relation
const { data } = await supabase
.from('projects')
.select('id, name, tasks (id, title, status)')
The full singleton pattern, the FK-index detection query, and the supabase gen types workflow are in the Performance and Maintainability section of references/pitfalls.md.
Output
- Security pitfalls identified: service_role exposure, missing RLS, permissive policies, no connection pooling
- Data integrity pitfalls fixed:
{ data, error }handling,.select()after mutations,.maybeSingle()usage - Performance pitfalls resolved: column-specific selects, JOIN queries, FK indexes
- Maintainability improved: singleton client, generated types
- Detection commands for automated scanning of each pitfall
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
PGRST116: JSON object requested, multiple (or no) rows returned | Used .single() when 0 or 2+ rows match | Use .maybeSingle() for optional lookups |
data is null after insert | Missing .select() chain | Add .select('column1, column2') after .insert() |
TypeError: Cannot read property of null | Destructured only data, ignoring error | Always destructure { data, error } and check error first |
too many connections for role | Direct connection from serverless | Use pooled connection string (port 6543) |
permission denied for table | RLS blocking access, no matching policy | Check RLS policies match the authenticated user's JWT claims |
relation does not exist | Table name typo, not caught at compile time | Use generated types for compile-time validation |
More operator-facing failure modes (legacy codebases, false positives, fixes that break tests): references/errors.md.
Examples
Quick Security Audit
# Check for the three critical code-level security pitfalls in one pass
echo "=== Pitfall 1: Service role in client code ==="
grep -rn 'SERVICE_ROLE' --include="*.tsx" --include="*.ts" src/ app/ components/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Clean"
echo "=== Pitfall 2: Tables without RLS (run in SQL Editor) ==="
echo "SELECT tablename FROM pg_tables WHERE schemaname='public' AND rowsecurity=false;"
echo "=== Pitfall 3: Overly permissive policies (run in SQL Editor) ==="
echo "SELECT tablename, policyname FROM pg_policies WHERE qual='true' AND cmd!='r';"
Code Review Checklist
### Security
- [ ] No SERVICE_ROLE_KEY in client-side code or NEXT_PUBLIC_* vars
- [ ] RLS enabled on all new tables; policies scope to auth.uid() (no USING(true) writes)
### Data Integrity
- [ ] All calls destructure { data, error } and check error
- [ ] .select() chained after insert/update/upsert; .maybeSingle() for optional lookups
### Performance & Maintainability
- [ ] Columns named in .select() (no select('*')); no N+1; FK columns indexed
- [ ] Single createClient instance; generated types; pooled connection string in serverless
More detection one-liners: references/examples.md. Every pitfall's full before/after code: references/pitfalls.md.
Resources
- Supabase Auth: Securing Your Data
- Row Level Security
- TypeScript Support
- Connection Pooling
- Supabase JavaScript Client Reference
- PostgREST Error Codes
Next Steps
This completes the Supabase pitfalls reference. To start a new project with best practices from day one, see supabase-hello-world.
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires manual review of code and SQL queries for full verification
- →Detection queries may not cover all possible variations of anti-patterns
- →Fixes may require changes to existing application logic
How it compares
This workflow systematically identifies and corrects common Supabase mistakes, providing specific fixes unlike a general code review.
Compared to similar skills
supabase-known-pitfalls side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| supabase-known-pitfalls (this skill) | 1 | 27d | Review | Intermediate |
| pida-code-review | 0 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| supabase-migration-deep-dive | 1 | 27d | Review | Intermediate |
| supabase-postgres-best-practices | 4 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
pida-code-review
Team-PIDA
Use when reviewing a PIDA branch, diff, or PR. Focus on bugs, regressions, missing tests, API contract drift, persistence risks, and operational issues before style comments.
supabase-migration-deep-dive
jeremylongshore
Execute Supabase major re-architecture and migration strategies with strangler fig pattern. Use when migrating to or from Supabase, performing major version upgrades, or re-platforming existing integrations to Supabase. Trigger with phrases like "migrate supabase", "supabase migration", "switch to supabase", "supabase replatform", "supabase upgrade major".
supabase-postgres-best-practices
davila7
Postgres performance optimization and best practices from Supabase. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or optimizing Postgres queries, schema designs, or database configurations.
supabase-common-errors
jeremylongshore
Execute diagnose and fix Supabase common errors and exceptions. Use when encountering Supabase errors, debugging failed requests, or troubleshooting integration issues. Trigger with phrases like "supabase error", "fix supabase", "supabase not working", "debug supabase".
supabase-policy-guardrails
jeremylongshore
Implement Supabase lint rules, policy enforcement, and automated guardrails. Use when setting up code quality rules for Supabase integrations, implementing pre-commit hooks, or configuring CI policy checks for Supabase best practices. Trigger with phrases like "supabase policy", "supabase lint", "supabase guardrails", "supabase best practices check", "supabase eslint".
convex-best-practices
waynesutton
Guidelines for building production-ready Convex apps covering function organization, query patterns, validation, TypeScript usage, error handling, and the Zen of Convex design philosophy