solver
Toolkit for debugging and extending the Faebryk symbolic parameter solver.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/solver && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/4607" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/solver && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/solver
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
How the Faebryk parameter solver works (Sets/Literals, Parameters, Expressions), the core invariants enforced during mutation, and practical workflows for debugging and extending the solver. Use when implementing or modifying constraint solving, parameter bounds, or debugging expression simplification.Key capabilities
- →Simplifies symbolic constraint expressions
- →Validates mutation graph invariants
- →Orchestrates solver loop iterations
- →Extracts superset parameters from graphs
How it works
It runs the solver orchestration loop and applies transformation passes over an append-only graph structure to resolve symbolic constraints.
Inputs & outputs
When to use solver
- →Debug parameter expression simplification
- →Modify solver invariants
- →Extend symbolic constraint solving
About this skill
Solver Module
The solver is the heart of atopile's parameter subsystem: it symbolically simplifies and checks constraint systems built from Parameters, Literals (Sets), and Expressions.
If you are touching solver internals, read these first:
src/faebryk/core/solver/README.md(concepts, set correlation, append-only graphs, canonicalization)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py(the actual invariants enforced during expression insertion)
Quick Start
import faebryk.core.node as fabll
import faebryk.library._F as F
from faebryk.core.solver.defaultsolver import DefaultSolver
from faebryk.libs.test.boundexpressions import BoundExpressions
E = BoundExpressions()
class _App(fabll.Node):
x = F.Parameters.NumericParameter.MakeChild(unit=E.U.dl)
app = _App.bind_typegraph(tg=E.tg).create_instance(g=E.g)
x = app.x.get().can_be_operand.get()
E.is_subset(x, E.lit_op_range(((9, E.U.dl), (11, E.U.dl))), assert_=True)
solver = DefaultSolver()
res = solver.simplify(g=E.g, tg=E.tg, terminal=True).data.mutation_map
lit = res.try_extract_superset(app.x.get().is_parameter_operatable.get(), domain_default=True)
assert lit is not None
Relevant Files
- Solver runtime + orchestration:
src/faebryk/core/solver/defaultsolver.py(DefaultSolver, iteration loop, terminal vs non-terminal)src/faebryk/core/solver/solver.py(solver protocol + helper APIs)
- Mutation machinery (this is where “graphs are append-only” is handled):
src/faebryk/core/solver/mutator.py(Mutator,Transformations,MutationStage,MutationMap, tracebacks)
- Symbolic layer (canonical forms + invariants):
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py(insert_expression(...)invariant pipeline)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/canonical.py(canonicalization passes)src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*(structural + expression-wise algorithms)
- Domain objects (what users actually create in graphs):
src/faebryk/library/Parameters.py(ParameterOperatables, domains, compact repr)src/faebryk/library/Expressions.py(expression node types, predicates, assertables)src/faebryk/library/Literals.py(Sets; numeric/boolean/enum literals)
- Test helpers:
src/faebryk/libs/test/boundexpressions.py(concise graph + expression construction for tests)
Dependants (Call Sites)
- Library components (
src/faebryk/library/): define parameters/constraints (e.g.R.resistance) - Compiler + frontends: translate
atoconstraints into solver expressions - Picker backend: uses solver simplification + bounds extraction to prune candidate parts
How to Work With / Develop / Test
Mental Model (the parts that matter for correctness)
1) Literals are Sets (and correlation is subtle)
- A literal like
100kOhm +/- 10%is a Set (a range), not a scalar. - Singleton sets are self-correlated; all other sets are treated as uncorrelated, even with themselves.
- This is why
X - Xis not necessarily{0}whenXis a range, but is{0}whenXis a singleton.
- This is why
2) Symbols (Parameters) introduce correlation
- A
Parameterbehaves like a mathematical symbol (variable), not a Python variable. - Correlation between symbols is created via asserted constraints, most notably:
Is(A, B).assert_()/A.alias_is(B)creates a strong “these are the same” correlation.IsSubset(A, X).assert_()/A.constrain_subset(X)constrainsAto be withinX.IsSubset(X, A).assert_()/A.constrain_superset(X)constrainsAto accept at leastX.
3) Expressions are graph objects (not just Python trees)
Expressions are nodes in the Faebryk graph that point at operand nodes. This matters because…
4) The underlying graphs are append-only
The solver cannot “edit” an expression in-place. Instead it:
- builds a new graph containing transformed/copied nodes,
- records a mapping from old nodes → new nodes (
MutationMap), - leaves the old graph untouched.
Development Workflow
- Reproduce in a minimal graph (prefer tests +
BoundExpressions). - Run
DefaultSolver().simplify(...)and inspect the resultingMutationMap. - If you’re changing rewrite logic, make sure you understand and preserve the invariant pipeline in
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression. - Add/adjust algorithms in
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/*(most logic lives there, not inmutator.py).
Testing
- Solver tests live in
test/core/solver/:test/core/solver/test_solver.pytest/core/solver/test_literal_folding.pytest/core/solver/test_solver_util.py
Run a tight loop while iterating:
ato dev test --llm test/core/solver -k invariant -qato dev test --llm test/core/solver/test_solver.py::test_simplify -q
Best Practices
Prefer explicit simplify(...) arguments
DefaultSolver.simplify has a compatibility layer that accepts (tg, g) or (g, tg). In new code, prefer named args:
res = DefaultSolver().simplify(g=g, tg=tg, terminal=True)
mutation_map = res.data.mutation_map
Use the Mutator/insert_expression pipeline, not ad-hoc rewrites
When you “create” or “rewrite” an expression, you are really requesting that the solver insert something into the transient graph while upholding invariants. The canonical place where this happens is:
src/faebryk/core/solver/symbolic/invariants.py::insert_expression
If you bypass this, you will almost certainly violate an invariant and get:
- duplicate/congruent expressions,
- multiple incompatible bounds on an operand,
- predicates used as operands,
- missed literal folding, or
- contradictions that don’t point back to the real root cause.
Core Invariants (source of truth: insert_expression)
The invariant pipeline is sequencing-sensitive. At a high level it enforces (paraphrased):
- No predicate operands:
Op(P!, ...)is rewritten to use boolean literals where possible - Predicate literal rules:
P{S|True} -> P!;P!{S/P|False} -> Contradiction;P!{S|True} -> P! - No literal inequalities: inequalities involving literals are rewritten into subset constraints
- No singleton supersets as operands:
f(A{S|{x}}, ...) -> f(x, ...) - No congruence: congruent expressions are deduplicated (with optional rules for uncorrelated congruence)
- Minimal subsumption: stronger constraints subsume weaker ones; redundant ones become irrelevant
- Single “merged” superset/subset per operand (e.g. intersected supersets)
- No empty supersets/subsets: empty-set constraints are contradictions
- Fold pure literal expressions into literals (and re-express as subset/superset where appropriate)
- Terminate certain literal subset constraints to stop churn
- Canonical form: expressions are created/normalized into canonical operators
When adding a new algorithm, the easiest way to stay correct is to construct a new ExpressionBuilder
and let insert_expression do the hard work.
Internals & Runtime Behavior
Instantiation & Dependencies
DefaultSolver()holds state: when called withterminal=False, it can keep a reusable internal state for incremental solving.- Terminal vs non-terminal:
terminal=True(default) is more powerful but not intended to be reused as incremental state.terminal=Falseruns only non-terminal algorithms and storesreusable_statefor subsequent calls.
- Graph scoping:
simplify(..., relevant=[...])is the intended hook to avoid “solve the entire world”.
Data Structures
MutationStage: one algorithm application over an input graph → output graph, with aTransformationsobject.MutationMap: a chain of stages; lets you:- map old → new operables (
map_forward) - map new → old sources (
map_backward) - extract current bounds as literals (
try_extract_superset; subset extraction is typically via the mapped operable’stry_extract_subset()) - generate tracebacks for “why did this change?” (see
Tracebackinmutator.py)
- map old → new operables (
Debugging & Logging
Useful config flags (see src/faebryk/core/solver/utils.py):
SLOG=1: debug logging for solver/mutatorSPRINT_START=1: log start of each phaseSVERBOSE_TABLE=1: verbose mutation tablesSSHOW_SS_IS=1: include subset/is predicates in graph printoutsSMAX_ITERATIONS=N: raise early if stuck looping (helps catch bad rewrites)
In failures, look for Contradiction / ContradictionByLiteral output: it prints mutation tracebacks back to
origin expressions/parameters, which is usually the shortest path to the actual bug.
Performance
- Prefer restricting scope via
relevant=[...]when you can. - Avoid creating huge numbers of near-duplicate expressions; congruence + subsumption help, but churn still costs.
- If you add an algorithm, make it idempotent (or explicitly mark/terminate what you produce) to avoid infinite iteration.
When not to use it
- →Debugging non-symbolic circuit parameters
- →Performance-critical loops outside solver logic
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Highly specific to Faebryk architecture
- →Requires understanding of symbolic invariant pipeline
How it compares
It provides direct access to internal mutation machinery and canonicalization pipelines that manual debugging cannot easily inspect.
Compared to similar skills
solver side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| solver (this skill) | 2 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
| mcp-builder | 136 | 3mo | Review | Advanced |
| architecture-patterns | 55 | 2mo | No flags | Advanced |
| deepwiki-rs | 25 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by atopile
View all by atopile →You might also like
mcp-builder
anthropics
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
architecture-patterns
wshobson
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.
deepwiki-rs
sopaco
AI-powered Rust documentation generation engine for comprehensive codebase analysis, C4 architecture diagrams, and automated technical documentation. Use when Claude needs to analyze source code, understand software architecture, generate technical specs, or create professional documentation from any programming language.
langchain-architecture
wshobson
Design LLM applications using the LangChain framework with agents, memory, and tool integration patterns. Use when building LangChain applications, implementing AI agents, or creating complex LLM workflows.
python-design-patterns
wshobson
Python design patterns including KISS, Separation of Concerns, Single Responsibility, and composition over inheritance. Use when making architecture decisions, refactoring code structure, or evaluating when abstractions are appropriate.
python-project-structure
wshobson
Python project organization, module architecture, and public API design. Use when setting up new projects, organizing modules, defining public interfaces with __all__, or planning directory layouts.