Translates high-level tasks into executable code following project design and style specs.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/sdd-apply && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/15311" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/sdd-apply && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/sdd-apply

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Implement tasks from the change, writing actual code following the specs and design. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to implement one or more tasks from a change.
174 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Implement tasks from `tasks.md`
  • Write code following specs and design
  • Detect TDD mode and apply workflow
  • Mark completed tasks in `tasks.md`
  • Generate implementation progress summaries
  • Persist progress according to specified contract

How it works

The skill reads task descriptions, project specifications, and design documents, then implements code, following either a TDD or standard workflow, and persists progress according to the specified contract.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Change name, specific tasks, artifact store mode, project specs and design
You get back
Implemented code, updated `tasks.md`, implementation progress summary

When to use sdd-apply

  • Implementing feature tasks
  • Applying bug fixes
  • Executing spec-driven code changes

About this skill

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for IMPLEMENTATION. You receive specific tasks from tasks.md and implement them by writing actual code. You follow the specs and design strictly.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name
  • The specific task(s) to implement (e.g., "Phase 1, tasks 1.1-1.3")
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | hybrid | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

  • If mode is engram: Read and follow skills/_shared/engram-convention.md. Artifact type: apply-progress. Retrieve proposal, spec, design, and tasks as dependencies. Also use mem_update to mark completed tasks in the tasks artifact.
  • If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. Update tasks.md with [x] marks.
  • If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist progress to Engram (mem_update for tasks) AND update tasks.md with [x] marks on filesystem.
  • If mode is none: Return progress only. Do not update project artifacts.

What to Do

Step 1: Read Context

Before writing ANY code:

  1. Read the specs — understand WHAT the code must do
  2. Read the design — understand HOW to structure the code
  3. Read existing code in affected files — understand current patterns
  4. Check the project's coding conventions from config.yaml

Step 2: Detect Implementation Mode

Before writing code, determine if the project uses TDD:

Detect TDD mode from (in priority order):
├── openspec/config.yaml → rules.apply.tdd (true/false — highest priority)
├── User's installed skills (e.g., tdd/SKILL.md exists)
├── Existing test patterns in the codebase (test files alongside source)
└── Default: standard mode (write code first, then verify)

IF TDD mode is detected → use Step 2a (TDD Workflow)
IF standard mode → use Step 2b (Standard Workflow)

Step 2a: Implement Tasks (TDD Workflow — RED → GREEN → REFACTOR)

When TDD is active, EVERY task follows this cycle:

FOR EACH TASK:
├── 1. UNDERSTAND
│   ├── Read the task description
│   ├── Read relevant spec scenarios (these are your acceptance criteria)
│   ├── Read the design decisions (these constrain your approach)
│   └── Read existing code and test patterns
│
├── 2. RED — Write a failing test FIRST
│   ├── Write test(s) that describe the expected behavior from the spec scenarios
│   ├── Run tests — confirm they FAIL (this proves the test is meaningful)
│   └── If test passes immediately → the behavior already exists or the test is wrong
│
├── 3. GREEN — Write the minimum code to pass
│   ├── Implement ONLY what's needed to make the failing test(s) pass
│   ├── Run tests — confirm they PASS
│   └── Do NOT add extra functionality beyond what the test requires
│
├── 4. REFACTOR — Clean up without changing behavior
│   ├── Improve code structure, naming, duplication
│   ├── Run tests again — confirm they STILL PASS
│   └── Match project conventions and patterns
│
├── 5. Mark task as complete [x] in tasks.md
└── 6. Note any issues or deviations

Detect the test runner for execution:

Detect test runner from:
├── openspec/config.yaml → rules.apply.test_command (highest priority)
├── package.json → scripts.test
├── pyproject.toml / pytest.ini → pytest
├── Makefile → make test
└── Fallback: report that tests couldn't be run automatically

Important: If any user coding skills are installed (e.g., tdd/SKILL.md, pytest/SKILL.md, vitest/SKILL.md), read and follow those skill patterns for writing tests.

Step 2b: Implement Tasks (Standard Workflow)

When TDD is not active:

FOR EACH TASK:
├── Read the task description
├── Read relevant spec scenarios (these are your acceptance criteria)
├── Read the design decisions (these constrain your approach)
├── Read existing code patterns (match the project's style)
├── Write the code
├── Mark task as complete [x] in tasks.md
└── Note any issues or deviations

Step 3: Mark Tasks Complete

Update tasks.md — change - [ ] to - [x] for completed tasks:

## Phase 1: Foundation

- [x] 1.1 Create `internal/auth/middleware.go` with JWT validation
- [x] 1.2 Add `AuthConfig` struct to `internal/config/config.go`
- [ ] 1.3 Add auth routes to `internal/server/server.go`  ← still pending

Step 4: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

## Implementation Progress

**Change**: {change-name}
**Mode**: {TDD | Standard}

### Completed Tasks
- [x] {task 1.1 description}
- [x] {task 1.2 description}

### Files Changed
| File | Action | What Was Done |
|------|--------|---------------|
| `path/to/file.ext` | Created | {brief description} |
| `path/to/other.ext` | Modified | {brief description} |

### Tests (TDD mode only)
| Task | Test File | RED (fail) | GREEN (pass) | REFACTOR |
|------|-----------|------------|--------------|----------|
| 1.1 | `path/to/test.ext` | ✅ Failed as expected | ✅ Passed | ✅ Clean |
| 1.2 | `path/to/test.ext` | ✅ Failed as expected | ✅ Passed | ✅ Clean |

{Omit this section if standard mode was used.}

### Deviations from Design
{List any places where the implementation deviated from design.md and why.
If none, say "None — implementation matches design."}

### Issues Found
{List any problems discovered during implementation.
If none, say "None."}

### Remaining Tasks
- [ ] {next task}
- [ ] {next task}

### Status
{N}/{total} tasks complete. {Ready for next batch / Ready for verify / Blocked by X}

Rules

  • ALWAYS read specs before implementing — specs are your acceptance criteria
  • ALWAYS follow the design decisions — don't freelance a different approach
  • ALWAYS match existing code patterns and conventions in the project
  • In openspec mode, mark tasks complete in tasks.md AS you go, not at the end
  • If you discover the design is wrong or incomplete, NOTE IT in your return summary — don't silently deviate
  • If a task is blocked by something unexpected, STOP and report back
  • NEVER implement tasks that weren't assigned to you
  • Load and follow any relevant coding skills for the project stack (e.g., react-19, typescript, django-drf, tdd, pytest, vitest) if available in the user's skill set
  • Apply any rules.apply from openspec/config.yaml
  • If TDD mode is detected (Step 2), ALWAYS follow the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle — never skip RED (writing the failing test first)
  • When running tests during TDD, run ONLY the relevant test file/suite, not the entire test suite (for speed)
  • Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks

When not to use it

  • When the user wants to implement tasks not assigned
  • When the user wants to silently deviate from design
  • When the user wants to skip the RED phase in TDD

Limitations

  • The skill never implements tasks that were not assigned.
  • The skill always follows the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle if TDD mode is detected.
  • The skill does not silently deviate if the design is wrong or incomplete.

How it compares

This skill automates the implementation of tasks by strictly adhering to predefined specs and design, ensuring consistency and reducing manual interpretation errors compared to ad-hoc coding.

Compared to similar skills

sdd-apply side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
sdd-apply (this skill)03moNo flagsAdvanced
vc-execute02moNo flagsIntermediate
plan-before-code02moNo flagsBeginner
software-architecture3336moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry