scarcity-urgency
Creates ethical and verifiable scarcity and urgency elements for sales offers.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/scarcity-urgency && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/16434" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/scarcity-urgency && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/scarcity-urgency
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Generate ethical scarcity and urgency elements for DTC offers — genuine limited stock, time-limited pricing, bonus deadlines, seasonal relevance, and enrollment caps with copy, visual treatment, and ethical justification.Key capabilities
- →Generate ethical scarcity elements for DTC offers
- →Generate ethical urgency elements for DTC offers
- →Validate scarcity claims for genuineness
- →Produce scarcity elements at soft, medium, and strong intensity levels
- →Recommend ethical alternatives if scarcity is weak
- →Assemble a recommended page implementation for scarcity elements
How it works
The skill validates the genuineness of a scarcity claim, then generates copy, visual treatment, and placement recommendations for different intensity levels, along with ethical justifications.
Inputs & outputs
When to use scarcity-urgency
- →Creating scarcity for product sales
- →Adding urgency to course enrollment
- →Drafting bonus deadlines
- →Improving CTA conversion
About this skill
scarcity-urgency
Purpose
Generate ethical scarcity and urgency elements for DTC offers. Scarcity and urgency are the two most powerful conversion accelerators in direct response — and the two most abused. Fake countdown timers, fabricated "only 3 left" claims, and phantom deadlines destroy trust and invite chargebacks. This skill produces scarcity/urgency elements that are genuinely true, ethically defensible, and conversion-effective. Every element includes copy text, visual treatment guidance, and an ethical justification proving the scarcity is real. If the scarcity isn't real, the skill says so and recommends alternatives.
Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
offer_description | Yes | The product/service, price, and what the prospect gets |
scarcity_type | Yes | One of: limited_stock, time_limited, bonus_deadline, seasonal, enrollment_cap |
deadline | No | Specific date/time if applicable (e.g., "March 31, 2026 at midnight") |
inventory_count | No | Actual remaining inventory or enrollment slots (must be truthful) |
target_audience | Yes | Who the prospect is — awareness level and sophistication matter for scarcity framing |
Execution Protocol
Step 1 — Load Framework Context
Read rmbc-context/SKILL.md to load RMBC framework definitions. Scarcity and urgency sit at the CTA layer of RMBC — they answer "why now?" after the mechanism answers "why this?" and proof answers "why believe?" Without a strong mechanism and proof foundation, urgency feels manipulative. With them, urgency feels like helpful information.
Step 2 — Validate the Scarcity Claim
Before writing any copy, verify the scarcity is genuine:
| Scarcity Type | Genuine When | Fabricated When |
|---|---|---|
| Limited Stock | Physical inventory has actual production/supply constraints | Digital product with "only 47 left" |
| Time-Limited Pricing | Price genuinely increases after deadline (and stays increased) | Countdown resets on page refresh |
| Bonus Deadline | Bonus is genuinely removed after date (and doesn't come back) | Bonus "expires" but is offered again next week |
| Seasonal | Offer tied to real calendar event, season, or market cycle | "Summer sale" in February |
| Enrollment Cap | Genuine capacity limit — coaching seats, cohort size, bandwidth | Artificial cap on a digital course with no interaction |
If the scarcity claim cannot be ethically justified, STOP. Output an honest assessment and recommend an alternative urgency approach (see Step 3 alternatives).
Step 3 — Generate Scarcity Elements
For the validated scarcity type, produce three elements at different intensity levels:
Soft (Informational)
- States the scarcity as a fact without pressure
- Tone: helpful, matter-of-fact
- Best for: high-awareness, sophisticated audiences who resist hard sells
Medium (Motivational)
- States the scarcity with consequence framing — what happens if they miss it
- Tone: direct, clear stakes
- Best for: mid-awareness audiences who need a reason to act today vs. "someday"
Strong (Urgent)
- States the scarcity with specific numbers, countdown, and immediate consequence
- Tone: time-sensitive, concrete
- Best for: ready-to-buy prospects who need a final nudge, not more persuasion
For each intensity level, provide:
- Headline/Banner Copy — The primary scarcity statement (1 line)
- Supporting Copy — Context that makes the scarcity believable (2-3 sentences)
- Visual Treatment — How to display it on the page (banner, badge, inline text, countdown)
- Placement — Where on the page this element belongs (above fold, near CTA, in cart)
- Ethical Justification — Why this claim is truthful and defensible
Step 4 — Recommend Alternatives (If Scarcity Is Weak)
If the scarcity type is borderline or the user has no genuine scarcity, recommend these ethical alternatives:
| Alternative | How It Works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Loss aversion framing | Frame the cost of NOT buying (ongoing problem cost) | "Every month without this, you're losing $X to..." |
| Momentum urgency | The sooner they start, the sooner they see results | "Start today, see your first results by [date]" |
| Social proof velocity | Show how many people are buying/joining right now | "147 people joined this week" (if true) |
| Decision fatigue | Position buying as the END of their search, not a new commitment | "Stop researching — this is the solution" |
| Seasonal relevance | Connect to a real upcoming event or season | "Get ready before summer" (if it's spring) |
Step 5 — Assemble the Scarcity Stack
Combine elements into a recommended page implementation:
- Primary placement — The single most impactful scarcity element and where it goes
- Reinforcement — A secondary mention that echoes the scarcity without repeating the same copy
- CTA integration — How the scarcity language integrates into the call-to-action button and surrounding copy
- Email/ad echo — How to reference the same scarcity in ads and emails driving to the page (must match exactly — mismatched urgency kills trust)
Output Format
## Scarcity & Urgency: [Offer Name]
**Scarcity Type:** [type]
**Deadline:** [date/time or "ongoing"]
**Inventory:** [count or "N/A"]
**Ethical Status:** VERIFIED / BORDERLINE / NOT GENUINE
---
### SOFT (Informational)
**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]
---
### MEDIUM (Motivational)
**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]
---
### STRONG (Urgent)
**Banner:** "[copy]"
**Supporting:** [2-3 sentences]
**Visual:** [treatment]
**Placement:** [location]
**Ethics:** [justification]
---
### SCARCITY STACK (Recommended Implementation)
| Element | Location | Copy |
|---------|----------|------|
| Primary | [placement] | [copy] |
| Reinforcement | [placement] | [copy] |
| CTA integration | [button area] | [copy] |
| Email/ad echo | [subject line + preview] | [copy] |
---
### ALTERNATIVES (if applicable)
[Ethical alternatives if primary scarcity is weak]
Quality Criteria
-
Every scarcity claim must pass the ethical validation — no fabricated urgency, ever
-
If scarcity cannot be verified as genuine, the skill must say so explicitly and offer alternatives
-
Three intensity levels must be genuinely different in tone and approach — not the same copy with more exclamation marks
-
Visual treatment must be specific and implementable — "add urgency" is not guidance
-
Placement must account for mobile-first layout — scarcity elements must be visible without scrolling past the CTA
-
CTA integration must feel natural — bolted-on urgency next to a calm CTA creates cognitive dissonance
-
Email/ad scarcity must match page scarcity exactly — mismatched deadlines or claims destroy credibility
-
Specificity gate: Every claim in the copy must include a number, name, or timeframe — no "get results" or "improve your business"
-
Mechanism quantification: When referencing the mechanism, include at least one specific data point (number, timeframe, study reference)
-
Audience journey: The copy must reference where the reader IS (what they've tried, what's failing) — not just who they are demographically
-
Proof diversity: Use at least 2 different proof types (testimonial, statistical, authority, case study) — do not rely on a single proof mode
-
Objection handling: The copy must address at least 2 likely objections with concrete responses (ROI math, proof of similar result, risk reversal)
Related Skills
- Run
/order-form-croto integrate scarcity elements into checkout pages - Run
/lander-copyto weave urgency into the full sales page - Run
/offer-stackto ensure the offer itself justifies the urgency - Run
/pricing-strategyto develop the pricing that scarcity protects - Run
/broadcast-emailto write deadline-driven promotional emails - Validate the full page with
/rmbc-copy-audit
Attribution
Generated using RMBC framework by Stefan Georgi. Learn more: copyaccelerator.com/join
When not to use it
- →When the scarcity claim cannot be ethically justified
- →When using fabricated urgency like fake countdown timers
- →When using phantom deadlines or false 'only X left' claims
Limitations
- →Every scarcity claim must pass ethical validation.
- →It explicitly states if scarcity cannot be ethically justified.
- →It does not generate fabricated urgency.
How it compares
This workflow ensures that scarcity and urgency elements are genuinely true and ethically defensible, unlike approaches that use fabricated claims.
Compared to similar skills
scarcity-urgency side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| scarcity-urgency (this skill) | 0 | 5mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| humanizer | 90 | 6mo | No flags | Beginner |
| ad-creative | 33 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| humanizer-zh | 40 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
humanizer
davila7
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer
ad-creative
alirezarezvani
When the user needs to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative for paid advertising. Use when they say 'write ad copy,' 'generate headlines,' 'create ad variations,' 'bulk creative,' 'iterate on ads,' 'ad copy validation,' 'RSA headlines,' 'Meta ad copy,' 'LinkedIn ad,' or 'creative testing.' This is pure creative production — distinct from paid-ads (campaign strategy). Use ad-creative when you need the copy, not the campaign plan.
humanizer-zh
op7418
去除文本中的 AI 生成痕迹。适用于编辑或审阅文本,使其听起来更自然、更像人类书写。 基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"综合指南。检测并修复以下模式:夸大的象征意义、 宣传性语言、以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析、模糊的归因、破折号过度使用、三段式法则、 AI 词汇、否定式排比、过多的连接性短语。
cold-email
alirezarezvani
When the user wants to write, improve, or build a sequence of B2B cold outreach emails to prospects who haven't asked to hear from them. Use when the user mentions 'cold email,' 'cold outreach,' 'prospecting emails,' 'SDR emails,' 'sales emails,' 'first touch email,' 'follow-up sequence,' or 'email prospecting.' Also use when they share an email draft that sounds too sales-y and needs to be humanized. Distinct from email-sequence (lifecycle/nurture to opted-in subscribers) — this is unsolicited outreach to new prospects. NOT for lifecycle emails, newsletters, or drip campaigns (use email-sequence).
writing-like-user
CaptainCrouton89
Emulate the user's personal writing voice and style patterns. Use when the user asks to write content in their voice, draft documents, compose messages, or requests "write this like me" or "in my style."
product-marketing-context
coreyhaines31
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Creates `.claude/product-marketing-context.md` that other marketing skills reference.