sales-battlecard
Produces one-page competitive sales cheat sheets designed for field use, focusing on objection handling and product positioning.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/sales-battlecard && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/19502" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/sales-battlecard && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/sales-battlecard
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Create a competitive sales battlecard for any competitor. Use when asked to build a battlecard, competitive comparison, sales cheat sheet, or objection handling guide for a specific competitor. Produces a one-page battlecard with positioning, differentiators, objection responses, and landmines.Key capabilities
- →Draft competitive positioning statements
- →Generate objection handling scripts
- →Identify competitor weaknesses
- →Plant landmine questions for prospects
- →Define win/loss scenarios
How it works
It maps your product against a competitor to produce a tactical cheat sheet focused on prospect problems and specific differentiators.
Inputs & outputs
When to use sales-battlecard
- →Draft competitive positioning for sales calls
- →Create responses to competitor objections
- →Generate a one-page cheat sheet for sales reps
- →Define differentiators against specific rivals
About this skill
Sales Battlecard Skill
Produces a practical one-page competitive battlecard that sales reps can use in calls — not a theoretical analysis.
Required Inputs
- Your product/company
- Competitor name
- Your target customer (ICP)
- Your top 3 differentiators vs this competitor
- Common objections when competing against them
- Known competitor weaknesses
Output Structure
Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
Updated: [Date] — Review quarterly
In One Sentence
When a prospect mentions [Competitor], say: "[Your positioning in one sentence]"
Why Customers Choose [Competitor]
(Be honest about their genuine strengths)
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]
Why Customers Choose Us
(Specific differentiators with proof points)
- [Differentiator 1]: [Proof point — customer outcome or capability]
- [Differentiator 2]: [Proof point]
Objection Responses
"[Competitor] is cheaper" "You are right their list price is lower. What our customers find is [specific TCO difference]. [Customer] saw [result]. Should we explore total cost of ownership?"
"We already use [Competitor]" "That is helpful. What is working well? [Listen] And what is one thing you wish was better?"
"[Competitor] has [feature] you do not" "You are right. What problem are you solving with that feature? [Listen] Here is how our customers solve that..."
Landmines to Plant
- "How do you currently handle [area where competitor is weak]?"
- "What happens when you need to [scenario competitor struggles with]?"
Traps to Avoid
- Never badmouth [Competitor] directly
- Do not lead with features — lead with the prospect problem
- Do not claim you do everything better — be specific about where you win
When We Win / When We Lose
We win when: [Scenario — e.g. customer prioritises outcome over price] We lose when: [Honest scenario — e.g. primary driver is lowest upfront cost]
Quality Checks
- Competitor strengths are listed honestly (not minimised)
- Differentiators have proof points (not just claims)
- Objection responses are conversational (not scripted-sounding)
- Landmine questions are natural and non-confrontational
- "When we lose" is included and honest
- Battlecard has a review date
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
- "Create a competitive cheat sheet for [competitor]"
- "Write objection handling for [competitor] comparisons"
Anti-Patterns
- Do not minimise or ignore genuine competitor strengths — sales reps who encounter them unprepared lose credibility
- Do not write differentiators without proof points — a claim without evidence is marketing, not a battlecard
- Do not make the battlecard exhaustive — it is a one-page cheat sheet, not a full competitive analysis
- Do not include a "When we lose" section that is dishonestly optimistic — honest loss scenarios build rep trust
- Do not skip the review date — an outdated battlecard with wrong information is worse than no battlecard
When not to use it
- →When attempting to create an exhaustive competitive analysis
Limitations
- →Battlecards must be reviewed quarterly to remain accurate
How it compares
This skill produces a practical one-page cheat sheet for sales calls instead of a theoretical competitive analysis document.
Compared to similar skills
sales-battlecard side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sales-battlecard (this skill) | 0 | 1mo | No flags | Beginner |
| marketing-psychology | 12 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| ai-prompting | 1 | 7mo | No flags | Beginner |
| it-role-expert | 0 | 5mo | No flags | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by mohitagw15856
View all by mohitagw15856 →You might also like
marketing-psychology
davila7
When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' or 'consumer behavior.' This skill provides 70+ mental models organized for marketing application.
ai-prompting
jasonkneen
Effective communication strategies for AI-assisted development. Learn context-first prompting, phased interactions, iterative refinement, and validation techniques to get better results from Claude and other AI coding assistants.
it-role-expert
krafton-ai
Provides role-specific expertise for 26+ IT company positions. Use when responding from a specific role's perspective, providing role-based advice, or when specialized knowledge is needed for engineering, product, design, data, marketing, sales, operations, HR, legal, finance, leadership, or academic functions.
meeting-insights-analyzer
ComposioHQ
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
sleap-support
talmolab
Handle SLEAP GitHub support workflow for issues and discussions. Use when the user says "support", provides a GitHub issue/discussion number like "#2512", or asks to investigate a user report from talmolab/sleap. Scaffolds investigation folders, downloads posts with images, analyzes problems, and drafts friendly responses.
difficult-workplace-conversations
davila7
Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.