rwkv-architecture
Provides tools for working with RWKV, a linear-complexity AI model architecture.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/rwkv-architecture && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/6529" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/rwkv-architecture && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/rwkv-architecture
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
RNN+Transformer hybrid with O(n) inference. Linear time, infinite context, no KV cache. Train like GPT (parallel), infer like RNN (sequential). Linux Foundation AI project. Production at Windows, Office, NeMo. RWKV-7 (March 2025). Models up to 14B parameters.Key capabilities
- →Perform efficient text generation
- →Process long-context sequences
- →Fine-tune RWKV models
- →Manage stateful sequential processing
How it works
The model uses a linear-time RNN-Transformer hybrid architecture that maintains constant memory usage per token.
Inputs & outputs
When to use rwkv-architecture
- →Deploy efficient text generation models
- →Perform sequence modeling with infinite context
- →Optimize inference for long-context tasks
About this skill
RWKV - Receptance Weighted Key Value
Quick start
RWKV (RwaKuv) combines Transformer parallelization (training) with RNN efficiency (inference).
Installation:
# Install PyTorch
pip install torch --upgrade --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121
# Install dependencies
pip install pytorch-lightning==1.9.5 deepspeed wandb ninja --upgrade
# Install RWKV
pip install rwkv
Basic usage (GPT mode + RNN mode):
import os
from rwkv.model import RWKV
os.environ["RWKV_JIT_ON"] = '1'
os.environ["RWKV_CUDA_ON"] = '1' # Use CUDA kernel for speed
# Load model
model = RWKV(
model='/path/to/RWKV-4-Pile-1B5-20220903-8040',
strategy='cuda fp16'
)
# GPT mode (parallel processing)
out, state = model.forward([187, 510, 1563, 310, 247], None)
print(out.detach().cpu().numpy()) # Logits
# RNN mode (sequential processing, same result)
out, state = model.forward([187, 510], None) # First 2 tokens
out, state = model.forward([1563], state) # Next token
out, state = model.forward([310, 247], state) # Last tokens
print(out.detach().cpu().numpy()) # Same logits as above!
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Text generation (streaming)
Efficient token-by-token generation:
from rwkv.model import RWKV
from rwkv.utils import PIPELINE
model = RWKV(model='RWKV-4-Pile-14B-20230313-ctx8192-test1050', strategy='cuda fp16')
pipeline = PIPELINE(model, "20B_tokenizer.json")
# Initial prompt
prompt = "The future of AI is"
state = None
# Generate token by token
for token in prompt:
out, state = pipeline.model.forward(pipeline.encode(token), state)
# Continue generation
for _ in range(100):
out, state = pipeline.model.forward(None, state)
token = pipeline.sample_logits(out)
print(pipeline.decode(token), end='', flush=True)
Key advantage: Constant memory per token (no growing KV cache)
Workflow 2: Long context processing (infinite context)
Process million-token sequences:
model = RWKV(model='RWKV-4-Pile-14B', strategy='cuda fp16')
# Process very long document
state = None
long_document = load_document() # e.g., 1M tokens
# Stream through entire document
for chunk in chunks(long_document, chunk_size=1024):
out, state = model.forward(chunk, state)
# State now contains information from entire 1M token document
# Memory usage: O(1) (constant, not O(n)!)
Workflow 3: Fine-tuning RWKV
Standard fine-tuning workflow:
# Training script
import pytorch_lightning as pl
from rwkv.model import RWKV
from rwkv.trainer import RWKVTrainer
# Configure model
config = {
'n_layer': 24,
'n_embd': 1024,
'vocab_size': 50277,
'ctx_len': 1024
}
# Setup trainer
trainer = pl.Trainer(
accelerator='gpu',
devices=8,
precision='bf16',
strategy='deepspeed_stage_2',
max_epochs=1
)
# Train
model = RWKV(config)
trainer.fit(model, train_dataloader)
Workflow 4: RWKV vs Transformer comparison
Memory comparison (1M token sequence):
# Transformer (GPT)
# Memory: O(n²) for attention
# KV cache: 1M × hidden_dim × n_layers × 2 (keys + values)
# Example: 1M × 4096 × 24 × 2 = ~400GB (impractical!)
# RWKV
# Memory: O(1) per token
# State: hidden_dim × n_layers = 4096 × 24 = ~400KB
# 1,000,000× more efficient!
Speed comparison (inference):
# Transformer: O(n) per token (quadratic overall)
# First token: 1 computation
# Second token: 2 computations
# ...
# 1000th token: 1000 computations
# RWKV: O(1) per token (linear overall)
# Every token: 1 computation
# 1000th token: 1 computation (same as first!)
When to use vs alternatives
Use RWKV when:
- Need very long context (100K+ tokens)
- Want constant memory usage
- Building streaming applications
- Need RNN efficiency with Transformer performance
- Memory-constrained deployment
Key advantages:
- Linear time: O(n) vs O(n²) for Transformers
- No KV cache: Constant memory per token
- Infinite context: No fixed window limit
- Parallelizable training: Like GPT
- Sequential inference: Like RNN
Use alternatives instead:
- Transformers: Need absolute best performance, have compute
- Mamba: Want state-space models
- RetNet: Need retention mechanism
- Hyena: Want convolution-based approach
Common issues
Issue: Out of memory during training
Use gradient checkpointing and DeepSpeed:
trainer = pl.Trainer(
strategy='deepspeed_stage_3', # Full ZeRO-3
precision='bf16'
)
Issue: Slow inference
Enable CUDA kernel:
os.environ["RWKV_CUDA_ON"] = '1'
Issue: Model not loading
Check model path and strategy:
model = RWKV(
model='/absolute/path/to/model.pth',
strategy='cuda fp16' # Or 'cpu fp32' for CPU
)
Issue: State management in RNN mode
Always pass state between forward calls:
# WRONG: State lost
out1, _ = model.forward(tokens1, None)
out2, _ = model.forward(tokens2, None) # No context from tokens1!
# CORRECT: State preserved
out1, state = model.forward(tokens1, None)
out2, state = model.forward(tokens2, state) # Has context from tokens1
Advanced topics
Time-mixing and channel-mixing: See references/architecture-details.md for WKV operation, time-decay mechanism, and receptance gates.
State management: See references/state-management.md for att_x_prev, att_kv, ffn_x_prev states, and numerical stability considerations.
RWKV-7 improvements: See references/rwkv7.md for latest architectural improvements (March 2025) and multimodal capabilities.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA (CUDA 11.6+) or CPU
- VRAM (FP16):
- 169M model: 1GB
- 430M model: 2GB
- 1.5B model: 4GB
- 3B model: 8GB
- 7B model: 16GB
- 14B model: 32GB
- Inference: O(1) memory per token
- Training: Parallelizable like GPT
Performance (vs Transformers):
- Speed: Similar training, faster inference
- Memory: 1000× less for long sequences
- Scaling: Linear vs quadratic
Resources
- Paper (RWKV): https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13048 (May 2023)
- Paper (RWKV-7): https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14456 (March 2025)
- GitHub: https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM ⭐ 12,000+
- Docs: https://wiki.rwkv.com/
- Models: https://huggingface.co/BlinkDL
- Linux Foundation AI: Official project
- Production: Microsoft Windows, Office integration, NeMo support
When not to use it
- →Tasks requiring standard Transformer attention mechanisms
- →Memory-unconstrained environments
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires specific hardware for optimal performance
- →State management must be handled explicitly in RNN mode
How it compares
It offers O(n) inference complexity and constant memory usage compared to the O(n²) complexity of standard Transformers.
Compared to similar skills
rwkv-architecture side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rwkv-architecture (this skill) | 1 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
| llama-cpp | 21 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| langchain | 26 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| llama-factory | 15 | 8mo | No flags | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by davila7
View all by davila7 →You might also like
llama-cpp
zechenzhangAGI
Runs LLM inference on CPU, Apple Silicon, and consumer GPUs without NVIDIA hardware. Use for edge deployment, M1/M2/M3 Macs, AMD/Intel GPUs, or when CUDA is unavailable. Supports GGUF quantization (1.5-8 bit) for reduced memory and 4-10× speedup vs PyTorch on CPU.
langchain
zechenzhangAGI
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.
llama-factory
zechenzhangAGI
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with LLaMA-Factory - WebUI no-code, 100+ models, 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit QLoRA, multimodal support
langgraph
davila7
Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.
computer-use-agents
davila7
Build AI agents that interact with computers like humans do - viewing screens, moving cursors, clicking buttons, and typing text. Covers Anthropic's Computer Use, OpenAI's Operator/CUA, and open-source alternatives. Critical focus on sandboxing, security, and handling the unique challenges of vision-based control. Use when: computer use, desktop automation agent, screen control AI, vision-based agent, GUI automation.
senior-prompt-engineer
davila7
World-class prompt engineering skill for LLM optimization, prompt patterns, structured outputs, and AI product development. Expertise in Claude, GPT-4, prompt design patterns, few-shot learning, chain-of-thought, and AI evaluation. Includes RAG optimization, agent design, and LLM system architecture. Use when building AI products, optimizing LLM performance, designing agentic systems, or implementing advanced prompting techniques.