roadmap-review
Facilitates interactive triage of project roadmap drift, walking through issues one by one with predefined resolutions.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/roadmap-review && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/18559" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/roadmap-review && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/roadmap-review
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
The doctrine for `/roadmap-review` — interactive triage of roadmap-shape drift, walked one item at a time, with paste-ready resolution phrasing for the active sizing lens.Key capabilities
- →Triage roadmap-shape drift one item at a time
- →Apply the 'Sizing' lens to roadmap items
- →Prioritize findings based on specific rules (e.g., `giant` without `size_ack`)
- →Offer canonical resolution options with paste-ready phrasing
- →Execute CLI commands on user confirmation
How it works
The skill interactively triages roadmap drift by presenting one finding at a time, proposing a resolution, and executing the corresponding CLI command upon user confirmation.
Inputs & outputs
When to use roadmap-review
- →Reviewing roadmap item sizing
- →Resolving roadmap shape drift
- →Standardizing project prioritization
- →Executing roadmap cleanup tasks
About this skill
What I do
Define the doctrine the roadmap-reviewer agent quotes from when the
user runs /roadmap-review. I carry:
- the Lenses model (sizing is active in v1; horizons / releases / sprint-shape are named placeholders the agent refuses to act on),
- the prioritization rules for the active sizing lens,
- the four canonical resolution options with paste-ready phrasing,
- the stop condition for a session,
- the session record format and path.
I am the source of truth for the triage loop. The agent loads me on invocation and quotes me directly — it does not improvise wording, and it does not invent resolutions outside the four I name.
hero check vs /roadmap-review (one sentence)
hero checkis workspace hygiene — a one-shot report of stale specs, missing fields, convention drift, and warning counts./roadmap-reviewis roadmap shape — an interactive triage that walks each high-impact drift, proposes a resolution, and executes the resolution CLI on confirm. Both surface drift; only/roadmap-reviewresolves it.
The agent prompt quotes this verbatim. If a user asks "which do I run,"
both surface drift — only /roadmap-review resolves it.
Walk one at a time
The defining behavior. The agent does not produce a wall of prose or enumerate all drift at once. It surfaces one finding, proposes one resolution, accepts the user's answer, executes on confirm, and advances to the next. No bulk operations. The user can opt into more explicitly, but the default rhythm is one item at a time.
Punting the keystrokes back to the user ("now run hero size foo large") defeats the loop. On confirm the agent runs the CLI
itself and surfaces the output before advancing.
Lenses
The extensibility seam. A lens is an analytical perspective the reviewer applies — sizing today, others tomorrow. Adding a new lens later means moving its section from Scaffolding to Active and filling in the four sub-sections (prioritization, resolution options, phrasing, stop condition). The agent prompt does not change.
Active
Sizing
The only lens implemented in v1. Surfaces drift between declared
size: and computed effort, oversized leaves that should /split,
container drift, and topical clusters that lack an initiative parent.
Prioritization rules
The agent walks findings in this order. It does not re-sort.
giantwithoutsize_ack— highest. Month+ specs that haven't been consciously acknowledged are the loudest shape failure.x-largefeatures / bugs / enhancements — multi-week leaf work. Almost always wants a/split.- Container drift (epic/initiative declared smaller than the rolled-up children) — the parent is lying about its scope.
- Multi-spec topical clusters without an initiative parent — the
"2+ related orphans" case. See
spec-compositionfor the detection heuristic and canonical phrasing. largefeatures / bugs / enhancements — soft. Surface only if nothing higher remains.
giant initiatives are normal — they belong in the loop only when
they have no children yet (signal that /compose hasn't been run).
Resolution options + paste-ready phrasing
Exactly four. Any other resolution is out of spec.
| Resolution | When the agent offers it | On confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledge | giant leaf where the user explicitly wants single-pass delivery | hero size --ack giant <slug> (or write size_ack: giant to frontmatter if the CLI flag doesn't exist yet) |
/compose | x-large / giant that should become an initiative with phased children | Invoke the /compose flow against the slug — agent hands off, doesn't simulate |
/split | large / x-large leaf that belongs as 2–3 sibling specs | Invoke the /split flow against the slug — agent hands off |
| Re-horizon (sizing-lens version: bump declared tier) | Drift where declared < computed; user agrees the spec really is the bigger tier | hero size <slug> <new-tier> |
Quote these scripts verbatim:
Acknowledge (for unacknowledged giant leaves):
This
giantspec is intentional? I can stampsize_ack: giantso it stops asking at design time — mid-delivery checks continue. Confirm?
/compose (for x-large / giant that should be an initiative):
This is
x-large— recommended path is/composeinto 3–5 phased children. Want me to kick that off now?
/split (for large / x-large leaves across subsystems):
This is
largeacross two subsystems —/splitinto a pair of sibling specs. Run it?
Re-horizon (for declared < computed drift):
Declared
medium, computedlarge. Bump tolarge? (Y/n)
Stop condition
A session ends on the first of:
- No high-impact drift remains — priorities 1–4 are exhausted. The agent reports the clean state and exits.
- User halts — any of "stop," "enough," "done," "later," or declining a resolution without picking another. The agent does not ask "are you sure"; it accepts and exits.
- Five items resolved in this session — soft cap to keep momentum. The agent reports the cap, summarizes what was resolved, and suggests re-running tomorrow.
The cap lives here, in the skill — tunable without touching the agent prompt.
Scaffolding (not implemented — future work)
The agent refuses to act on these. It does not improvise a triage. Canonical refusal phrase, substituting the lens name:
"<lens>-lens triage isn't implemented yet — that's deferred to future lens work. I can only act on sizing drift in this version."
Horizons
Placeholder. v1 does not act on horizon drift.
Releases
Placeholder. Same refusal pattern.
Sprint-shape
Placeholder. Same refusal pattern.
Session record (knowledge capture)
On exit — any reason — the agent writes a short note to
.hero/knowledge/roadmap-review-sessions/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{HHMM}.md.
This is the dogfood signal: cadence over time, items resolved per
session, what gets deferred. Sibling spec
roadmap-review-ambient-surfacing reads these records to power the
"stop nagging if nothing's changed since the last triage" rule, so the
drift_count_at_exit: frontmatter field is load-bearing, not
optional.
Format:
---
type: note
created: <ISO-8601 timestamp>
tags: [roadmap-review, sizing]
drift_count_at_exit: <int>
---
# Roadmap review — <YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM>
**Findings surveyed:** N (M sizing-drift, K missing-parent clusters)
**Walked:** N
**Resolved:** N (X `/split`, Y ack, Z size bump)
**Deferred:** N (user said "later")
**Exit reason:** <user halt | cap reached | exhausted | empty>
## Items
- `<slug>` (<tier>, <ack-state>) → <what happened>
- `<slug>` (declared <tier>, computed <tier>) → <what happened>
- `<slug-a>` + `<slug-b>` cluster → <what happened>
drift_count_at_exit is the count of remaining sizing-drift findings
at the moment the agent exited (after resolutions applied). Sibling
ambient-surfacing reads it to decide whether to suppress the next 24h
nudge. If the field is missing, the ambient reader treats it as "count
unchanged" — forward-compatible, but write the field every time.
Ambient surfaces
When this skill's interactive triage isn't actively running, three ambient surfaces carry the same paste-ready hint pointing here:
- NEXT.md projection — a
## Roadmap shapesection appears between## Nextand## Blocked onwhen drift surfaces. hero_pulse/hero_kickoffMCP tools — both responses populate asize_driftfield (count + hint) when drift surfaces.- Delivery-lead pre-flight —
feature-delivery-leadandplatform-delivery-leadquote the hint verbatim in their handoff output when the workspace-wide count is non-empty.
All three quote the canonical hint from internal/sizing/ambient.go —
they do not compose the string themselves. The noise threshold (active
spec union 7d recency union horizon:now unsized initiatives) and the
24h stop-nagging rule (suppress while a recent
.hero/knowledge/roadmap-review-sessions/ record's
drift_count_at_exit: is still ahead of the current filtered count)
keep the channel from going noisy. Tune via
hero.json: roadmap.ambient_recency_days and
roadmap.stop_nagging_hours.
Cross-skill references
spec-sizing— the size ladder, per-type bands, design-time nudges, and drift-handling rules live there. This skill is the triage loop over that ladder; the ladder itself is not re-litigated here.spec-composition— the canonical "multiple related specs" detection heuristic and phrasing. Priority-4 findings (orphan clusters) quotespec-compositionfor the recommendation script.note-capture— session record writes follow the note format defined there.
What the agent must not do
- Improvise a resolution outside the four named above.
- Bulk-operate. No "acknowledge all
giant," no "bump all drift." - Punt CLI keystrokes back to the user. On confirm, the agent runs the CLI itself.
- Act on a non-sizing lens. Refuse with the scaffolded phrase above.
- Write to the tracker. Read-local-only is a hard boundary.
- Re-ask after a halt word. "stop," "enough," "done," "later" exit immediately.
When not to use it
- →When a wall of prose or enumeration of all drift is desired
- →When bulk operations on roadmap items are needed
- →When acting on non-sizing lenses (e.g., horizons, releases, sprint-shape)
Limitations
- →Only the 'Sizing' lens is implemented in v1
- →Refuses to act on non-sizing lenses (horizons, releases, sprint-shape)
- →Does not support bulk operations; processes one item at a time
How it compares
This skill provides an interactive, item-by-item triage process for roadmap shape drift, offering specific resolution options and direct CLI execution, unlike a static report or manual resolution.
Compared to similar skills
roadmap-review side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| roadmap-review (this skill) | 0 | 15d | No flags | Intermediate |
| planning-with-files | 233 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
| trello | 41 | 2mo | Review | Beginner |
| pmbok-project-management | 38 | 8mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
You might also like
planning-with-files
davila7
Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.
trello
openclaw
Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.
pmbok-project-management
jgtolentino
Comprehensive PMP/PMBOK project management methodologies and best practices. Use this skill when users need guidance on project management processes, templates, knowledge areas, process groups, tools, techniques, or certification preparation. Covers all 10 PMBOK Knowledge Areas and 5 Process Groups with practical templates, frameworks, and industry-standard approaches. Includes risk management, stakeholder engagement, schedule management, cost control, quality assurance, and resource planning.
clickup
civitai
Interact with ClickUp tasks and documents - get task details, view comments, create and manage tasks, create and edit docs. Use when working with ClickUp task/doc URLs or IDs.
ma-playbook
alirezarezvani
M&A strategy for acquiring companies or being acquired. Due diligence, valuation, integration, and deal structure. Use when evaluating acquisitions, preparing for acquisition, M&A due diligence, integration planning, or deal negotiation.
create-plan
antinomyhq
Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.