python-anti-patterns
An audit tool that identifies common Python coding mistakes. Helps prevent bugs and refactor legacy code during code reviews.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/python-anti-patterns && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/2066" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/python-anti-patterns && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/python-anti-patterns
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use this skill when reviewing Python code for common anti-patterns to avoid. Use as a checklist when reviewing code, before finalizing implementations, or when debugging issues that might stem from known bad practices.Key capabilities
- →Identify scattered retry logic
- →Detect hard-coded secrets
- →Flag exposed internal types
- →Spot blocking calls in async code
- →Verify type hint coverage
- →Check for unclosed resources
How it works
The skill acts as a checklist to scan code for common Python mistakes and provides idiomatic refactoring examples for each identified issue.
Inputs & outputs
When to use python-anti-patterns
- →Review code for anti-patterns
- →Debug mysterious runtime issues
- →Standardize team coding practices during refactoring
About this skill
Python Anti-Patterns Checklist
A reference checklist of common mistakes and anti-patterns in Python code. Review this before finalizing implementations to catch issues early.
When to Use This Skill
- Reviewing code before merge
- Debugging mysterious issues
- Teaching or learning Python best practices
- Establishing team coding standards
- Refactoring legacy code
Note: This skill focuses on what to avoid. For guidance on positive patterns and architecture, see the python-design-patterns skill.
Infrastructure Anti-Patterns
Scattered Timeout/Retry Logic
# BAD: Timeout logic duplicated everywhere
def fetch_user(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching user")
return None
def fetch_orders(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching orders")
return None
Fix: Centralize in decorators or client wrappers.
# GOOD: Centralized retry logic
@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential())
def http_get(url: str) -> Response:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
Double Retry
# BAD: Retrying at multiple layers
@retry(max_attempts=3) # Application retry
def call_service():
return client.request() # Client also has retry configured!
Fix: Retry at one layer only. Know your infrastructure's retry behavior.
Hard-Coded Configuration
# BAD: Secrets and config in code
DB_HOST = "prod-db.example.com"
API_KEY = "sk-12345"
def connect():
return psycopg.connect(f"host={DB_HOST}...")
Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.
# GOOD
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings
class Settings(BaseSettings):
db_host: str = Field(alias="DB_HOST")
api_key: str = Field(alias="API_KEY")
settings = Settings()
Architecture Anti-Patterns
Exposed Internal Types
# BAD: Leaking ORM model to API
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserModel: # SQLAlchemy model
return db.query(UserModel).get(id)
Fix: Use DTOs/response models.
# GOOD
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserResponse:
user = db.query(UserModel).get(id)
return UserResponse.from_orm(user)
Mixed I/O and Business Logic
# BAD: SQL embedded in business logic
def calculate_discount(user_id: str) -> float:
user = db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", user_id)
orders = db.query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user_id)
# Business logic mixed with data access
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0
Fix: Repository pattern. Keep business logic pure.
# GOOD
def calculate_discount(user: User, orders: list[Order]) -> float:
# Pure business logic, easily testable
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0
Error Handling Anti-Patterns
Bare Exception Handling
# BAD: Swallowing all exceptions
try:
process()
except Exception:
pass # Silent failure - bugs hidden forever
Fix: Catch specific exceptions. Log or handle appropriately.
# GOOD
try:
process()
except ConnectionError as e:
logger.warning("Connection failed, will retry", error=str(e))
raise
except ValueError as e:
logger.error("Invalid input", error=str(e))
raise BadRequestError(str(e))
Ignored Partial Failures
# BAD: Stops on first error
def process_batch(items):
results = []
for item in items:
result = process(item) # Raises on error - batch aborted
results.append(result)
return results
Fix: Capture both successes and failures.
# GOOD
def process_batch(items) -> BatchResult:
succeeded = {}
failed = {}
for idx, item in enumerate(items):
try:
succeeded[idx] = process(item)
except Exception as e:
failed[idx] = e
return BatchResult(succeeded, failed)
Missing Input Validation
# BAD: No validation
def create_user(data: dict):
return User(**data) # Crashes deep in code on bad input
Fix: Validate early at API boundaries.
# GOOD
def create_user(data: dict) -> User:
validated = CreateUserInput.model_validate(data)
return User.from_input(validated)
Resource Anti-Patterns
Unclosed Resources
# BAD: File never closed
def read_file(path):
f = open(path)
return f.read() # What if this raises?
Fix: Use context managers.
# GOOD
def read_file(path):
with open(path) as f:
return f.read()
Blocking in Async
# BAD: Blocks the entire event loop
async def fetch_data():
time.sleep(1) # Blocks everything!
response = requests.get(url) # Also blocks!
Fix: Use async-native libraries.
# GOOD
async def fetch_data():
await asyncio.sleep(1)
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
response = await client.get(url)
Type Safety Anti-Patterns
Missing Type Hints
# BAD: No types
def process(data):
return data["value"] * 2
Fix: Annotate all public functions.
# GOOD
def process(data: dict[str, int]) -> int:
return data["value"] * 2
Untyped Collections
# BAD: Generic list without type parameter
def get_users() -> list:
...
Fix: Use type parameters.
# GOOD
def get_users() -> list[User]:
...
Testing Anti-Patterns
Only Testing Happy Paths
# BAD: Only tests success case
def test_create_user():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not None
Fix: Test error conditions and edge cases.
# GOOD
def test_create_user_success():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not None
def test_create_user_invalid_email():
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid email"):
service.create_user(invalid_email_data)
def test_create_user_duplicate_email():
service.create_user(valid_data)
with pytest.raises(ConflictError):
service.create_user(valid_data)
Over-Mocking
# BAD: Mocking everything
def test_user_service():
mock_repo = Mock()
mock_cache = Mock()
mock_logger = Mock()
mock_metrics = Mock()
# Test doesn't verify real behavior
Fix: Use integration tests for critical paths. Mock only external services.
Quick Review Checklist
Before finalizing code, verify:
- No scattered timeout/retry logic (centralized)
- No double retry (app + infrastructure)
- No hard-coded configuration or secrets
- No exposed internal types (ORM models, protobufs)
- No mixed I/O and business logic
- No bare
except Exception: pass - No ignored partial failures in batches
- No missing input validation
- No unclosed resources (using context managers)
- No blocking calls in async code
- All public functions have type hints
- Collections have type parameters
- Error paths are tested
- Edge cases are covered
Common Fixes Summary
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| Scattered retry logic | Centralized decorators |
| Hard-coded config | Environment variables + pydantic-settings |
| Exposed ORM models | DTO/response schemas |
| Mixed I/O + logic | Repository pattern |
| Bare except | Catch specific exceptions |
| Batch stops on error | Return BatchResult with successes/failures |
| No validation | Validate at boundaries with Pydantic |
| Unclosed resources | Context managers |
| Blocking in async | Async-native libraries |
| Missing types | Type annotations on all public APIs |
| Only happy path tests | Test errors and edge cases |
When not to use it
- →Providing guidance on positive design patterns
- →Architectural design advice
Limitations
- →Focuses exclusively on negative patterns to avoid
How it compares
Unlike a standard linter, this skill provides conceptual refactoring patterns and architectural advice rather than just syntax checking.
Compared to similar skills
python-anti-patterns side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| python-anti-patterns (this skill) | 6 | 4mo | Review | Intermediate |
| python-testing-patterns | 77 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| codex-code-review | 1 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
| dead-code | 1 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by wshobson
View all by wshobson →You might also like
python-testing-patterns
wshobson
Implement comprehensive testing strategies with pytest, fixtures, mocking, and test-driven development. Use when writing Python tests, setting up test suites, or implementing testing best practices.
codex-code-review
tyrchen
Perform comprehensive code reviews using OpenAI Codex CLI. This skill should be used when users request code reviews, want to analyze diffs/PRs, need security audits, performance analysis, or want automated code quality feedback. Supports reviewing staged changes, specific files, entire directories, or git diffs.
dead-code
parcadei
Find unused functions and dead code in the codebase
python-linting
OpenHands
This skill helps lint Python code using ruff. Use when the user asks to "lint", "check code quality", or "fix style issues".
python-review
jometzg
Review Python code for correctness, reliability, security, performance, type/async pitfalls, and missing test coverage.
validation
aidotters
コード品質検証と受け入れテストの共通ロジック。validate-code と acceptance-test スキルから使用。