pydantic-ai
A Python framework for building reliable AI agents with strong type-safety and structured data validation.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/pydantic-ai && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/14983" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/pydantic-ai && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/pydantic-ai
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Build production-ready AI agents with PydanticAI — type-safe tool use, structured outputs, dependency injection, and multi-model support.Key capabilities
- →Build Python AI agents with type-safe tool use
- →Ensure structured outputs using Pydantic models
- →Implement dependency injection for agent logic
- →Integrate with multiple LLM providers
- →Test agent logic without real LLM calls
How it works
PydanticAI uses Pydantic models to enforce type-safety and validation for LLM outputs and tool inputs. It supports dependency injection for testing and allows agents to interact with various LLM providers.
Inputs & outputs
When to use pydantic-ai
- →Create a type-safe AI agent with structured tool calls
- →Implement dependency injection for LLM logic testing
- →Build a multi-turn chatbot with validated outputs
- →Switch LLM providers in an agent workflow
About this skill
PydanticAI — Typed AI Agents in Python
Overview
PydanticAI is a Python agent framework from the Pydantic team that brings the same type-safety and validation guarantees as Pydantic to LLM-based applications. It supports structured outputs (validated with Pydantic models), dependency injection for testability, streamed responses, multi-turn conversations, and tool use — across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, Mistral, and Ollama. Use this skill when building production AI agents, chatbots, or LLM pipelines where correctness and testability matter.
When to Use This Skill
- Use when building Python AI agents that call tools and return structured data
- Use when you need validated, typed LLM outputs (not raw strings)
- Use when you want to write unit tests for agent logic without hitting a real LLM
- Use when switching between LLM providers without rewriting agent code
- Use when the user asks about
Agent,@agent.tool,RunContext,ModelRetry, orresult_type
How It Works
Step 1: Installation
pip install pydantic-ai
# Install extras for specific providers
pip install 'pydantic-ai[openai]' # OpenAI / Azure OpenAI
pip install 'pydantic-ai[anthropic]' # Anthropic Claude
pip install 'pydantic-ai[gemini]' # Google Gemini
pip install 'pydantic-ai[groq]' # Groq
pip install 'pydantic-ai[vertexai]' # Google Vertex AI
Step 2: A Minimal Agent
from pydantic_ai import Agent
# Simple agent — returns a plain string
agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
system_prompt='You are a helpful assistant. Be concise.',
)
result = agent.run_sync('What is the capital of Japan?')
print(result.data) # "Tokyo"
print(result.usage()) # Usage(requests=1, request_tokens=..., response_tokens=...)
Step 3: Structured Output with Pydantic Models
from pydantic import BaseModel
from pydantic_ai import Agent
class MovieReview(BaseModel):
title: str
year: int
rating: float # 0.0 to 10.0
summary: str
recommended: bool
agent = Agent(
'openai:gpt-4o',
result_type=MovieReview,
system_prompt='You are a film critic. Return structured reviews.',
)
result = agent.run_sync('Review Inception (2010)')
review = result.data # Fully typed MovieReview instance
print(f"{review.title} ({review.year}): {review.rating}/10")
print(f"Recommended: {review.recommended}")
Step 4: Tool Use
Register tools with @agent.tool — the LLM can call them during a run:
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
from pydantic import BaseModel
import httpx
class WeatherReport(BaseModel):
city: str
temperature_c: float
condition: str
weather_agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
result_type=WeatherReport,
system_prompt='Get current weather for the requested city.',
)
@weather_agent.tool
async def get_temperature(ctx: RunContext, city: str) -> dict:
"""Fetch the current temperature for a city from the weather API."""
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
r = await client.get(f'https://wttr.in/{city}?format=j1')
data = r.json()
return {
'temp_c': float(data['current_condition'][0]['temp_C']),
'description': data['current_condition'][0]['weatherDesc'][0]['value'],
}
import asyncio
result = asyncio.run(weather_agent.run('What is the weather in Tokyo?'))
print(result.data)
Step 5: Dependency Injection
Inject services (database, HTTP clients, config) into agents for testability:
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
from pydantic import BaseModel
@dataclass
class Deps:
db: Database
user_id: str
class SupportResponse(BaseModel):
message: str
escalate: bool
support_agent = Agent(
'openai:gpt-4o-mini',
deps_type=Deps,
result_type=SupportResponse,
system_prompt='You are a support agent. Use the tools to help customers.',
)
@support_agent.tool
async def get_order_history(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> list[dict]:
"""Fetch recent orders for the current user."""
return await ctx.deps.db.get_orders(ctx.deps.user_id, limit=5)
@support_agent.tool
async def create_refund(ctx: RunContext[Deps], order_id: str, reason: str) -> dict:
"""Initiate a refund for a specific order."""
return await ctx.deps.db.create_refund(order_id, reason, ctx.deps.user_id)
# Usage
async def handle_support(user_id: str, message: str):
deps = Deps(db=get_db(), user_id=user_id)
result = await support_agent.run(message, deps=deps)
return result.data
Step 6: Testing with TestModel
Write unit tests without real LLM calls:
from pydantic_ai.models.test import TestModel
def test_support_agent_escalates():
with support_agent.override(model=TestModel()):
# TestModel returns a minimal valid response matching result_type
result = support_agent.run_sync(
'I want to cancel my account',
deps=Deps(db=FakeDb(), user_id='user-123'),
)
# Test the structure, not the LLM's exact words
assert isinstance(result.data, SupportResponse)
assert isinstance(result.data.escalate, bool)
FunctionModel for deterministic test responses:
from pydantic_ai.models.function import FunctionModel, ModelContext
def my_model(messages, info):
return ModelResponse(parts=[TextPart('Always this response')])
with agent.override(model=FunctionModel(my_model)):
result = agent.run_sync('anything')
Step 7: Streaming Responses
import asyncio
from pydantic_ai import Agent
agent = Agent('anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6')
async def stream_response():
async with agent.run_stream('Write a haiku about Python') as result:
async for chunk in result.stream_text():
print(chunk, end='', flush=True)
print() # newline
print(f"Total tokens: {result.usage()}")
asyncio.run(stream_response())
Step 8: Multi-Turn Conversations
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic_ai.messages import ModelMessagesTypeAdapter
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', system_prompt='You are a helpful assistant.')
# First turn
result1 = agent.run_sync('My name is Alice.')
history = result1.all_messages()
# Second turn — passes conversation history
result2 = agent.run_sync('What is my name?', message_history=history)
print(result2.data) # "Your name is Alice."
Examples
Example 1: Code Review Agent
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from typing import Literal
class CodeReview(BaseModel):
quality: Literal['excellent', 'good', 'needs_work', 'poor']
issues: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
suggestions: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)
approved: bool
code_review_agent = Agent(
'anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6',
result_type=CodeReview,
system_prompt="""
You are a senior engineer performing code review.
Evaluate code quality, identify issues, and provide actionable suggestions.
Set approved=True only for good or excellent quality code with no security issues.
""",
)
def review_code(diff: str) -> CodeReview:
result = code_review_agent.run_sync(f"Review this code:\n\n{diff}")
return result.data
Example 2: Agent with Retry Logic
from pydantic_ai import Agent, ModelRetry
from pydantic import BaseModel, field_validator
class StrictJson(BaseModel):
value: int
@field_validator('value')
def must_be_positive(cls, v):
if v <= 0:
raise ValueError('value must be positive')
return v
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o-mini', result_type=StrictJson)
@agent.result_validator
async def validate_result(ctx, result: StrictJson) -> StrictJson:
if result.value > 1000:
raise ModelRetry('Value must be under 1000. Try again with a smaller number.')
return result
Example 3: Multi-Agent Pipeline
from pydantic_ai import Agent
from pydantic import BaseModel
class ResearchSummary(BaseModel):
key_points: list[str]
conclusion: str
class BlogPost(BaseModel):
title: str
body: str
meta_description: str
researcher = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', result_type=ResearchSummary)
writer = Agent('anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-6', result_type=BlogPost)
async def research_and_write(topic: str) -> BlogPost:
# Stage 1: research
research = await researcher.run(f'Research the topic: {topic}')
# Stage 2: write based on research
post = await writer.run(
f'Write a blog post about: {topic}\n\nResearch:\n' +
'\n'.join(f'- {p}' for p in research.data.key_points) +
f'\n\nConclusion: {research.data.conclusion}'
)
return post.data
Best Practices
- ✅ Always define
result_typewith a Pydantic model — avoid returning raw strings in production - ✅ Use
deps_typewith a dataclass for dependency injection — makes agents testable - ✅ Use
TestModelin unit tests — never hit a real LLM in CI - ✅ Add
@agent.result_validatorfor business-logic checks beyond Pydantic validation - ✅ Use
run_streamfor long outputs in user-facing applications to show progressive results - ❌ Don't put secrets (API keys) in
Agent()arguments — use environment variables - ❌ Don't share a single
Agentinstance across async tasks if deps differ — create per-request instances or useagent.run()with per-calldeps - ❌ Don't catch
ValidationErrorbroadly — let PydanticAI retry withModelRetryfor recoverable LLM output errors
Security & Safety Notes
- Set API keys via environment variables (
OPENAI_API_KEY,ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, etc.) — never hardcode them. - Validate all tool inputs before passing to external systems — use Pydantic models or manual checks.
- Tools that mutate data (write to DB, send emails, call payment APIs) should require explicit user confirmation before the agent invokes them in production.
- Log `result.all_
Content truncated.
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Overly strict Pydantic schemas may cause validation errors
- →Tool docstrings must be clear for the LLM to call them
How it compares
This skill provides a type-safe framework for AI agents with Pydantic validation and dependency injection, which differs from building agents with raw string outputs or without structured testing.
Compared to similar skills
pydantic-ai side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pydantic-ai (this skill) | 0 | 2mo | Review | Intermediate |
| llama-cpp | 21 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| langchain | 26 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| llama-factory | 15 | 8mo | No flags | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by Youssef-Ashraf2099
View all by Youssef-Ashraf2099 →You might also like
llama-cpp
zechenzhangAGI
Runs LLM inference on CPU, Apple Silicon, and consumer GPUs without NVIDIA hardware. Use for edge deployment, M1/M2/M3 Macs, AMD/Intel GPUs, or when CUDA is unavailable. Supports GGUF quantization (1.5-8 bit) for reduced memory and 4-10× speedup vs PyTorch on CPU.
langchain
zechenzhangAGI
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.
llama-factory
zechenzhangAGI
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with LLaMA-Factory - WebUI no-code, 100+ models, 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit QLoRA, multimodal support
langgraph
davila7
Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.
computer-use-agents
davila7
Build AI agents that interact with computers like humans do - viewing screens, moving cursors, clicking buttons, and typing text. Covers Anthropic's Computer Use, OpenAI's Operator/CUA, and open-source alternatives. Critical focus on sandboxing, security, and handling the unique challenges of vision-based control. Use when: computer use, desktop automation agent, screen control AI, vision-based agent, GUI automation.
senior-prompt-engineer
davila7
World-class prompt engineering skill for LLM optimization, prompt patterns, structured outputs, and AI product development. Expertise in Claude, GPT-4, prompt design patterns, few-shot learning, chain-of-thought, and AI evaluation. Includes RAG optimization, agent design, and LLM system architecture. Use when building AI products, optimizing LLM performance, designing agentic systems, or implementing advanced prompting techniques.