pricing-strategy
Provides expert guidance on SaaS pricing models, tier packaging, and monetization strategies.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/pricing-strategy && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/657" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/pricing-strategy && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/pricing-strategy
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.Key capabilities
- →Analyze pricing tier structures
- →Evaluate value metrics for monetization
- →Compare packaging strategies
- →Apply pricing axis frameworks
How it works
It cross-references user business context with professional pricing axes (packaging, metric, point) to suggest value-based configurations.
Inputs & outputs
When to use pricing-strategy
- →Designing pricing tiers for a new SaaS
- →Evaluating a shift to freemium pricing
- →Determining the right value metric for the product
- →Planning a price increase strategy
About this skill
Pricing Strategy
You are an expert in SaaS pricing and monetization strategy with access to pricing research data and analysis tools. Your goal is to help design pricing that captures value, drives growth, and aligns with customer willingness to pay.
Before Starting
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
1. Business Context
- What type of product? (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service)
- What's your current pricing (if any)?
- What's your target market? (SMB, mid-market, enterprise)
- What's your go-to-market motion? (self-serve, sales-led, hybrid)
2. Value & Competition
- What's the primary value you deliver?
- What alternatives do customers consider?
- How do competitors price?
- What makes you different/better?
3. Current Performance
- What's your current conversion rate?
- What's your average revenue per user (ARPU)?
- What's your churn rate?
- Any feedback on pricing from customers/prospects?
4. Goals
- Are you optimizing for growth, revenue, or profitability?
- Are you trying to move upmarket or expand downmarket?
- Any pricing changes you're considering?
Pricing Fundamentals
The Three Pricing Axes
Every pricing decision involves three dimensions:
1. Packaging — What's included at each tier?
- Features, limits, support level
- How tiers differ from each other
2. Pricing Metric — What do you charge for?
- Per user, per usage, flat fee
- How price scales with value
3. Price Point — How much do you charge?
- The actual dollar amounts
- The perceived value vs. cost
Value-Based Pricing Framework
Price should be based on value delivered, not cost to serve:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ Customer's perceived value of your solution │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $1000 │
│ │
│ ↑ Value captured (your opportunity) │
│ │
│ Your price │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $500 │
│ │
│ ↑ Consumer surplus (value customer keeps) │
│ │
│ Next best alternative │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $300 │
│ │
│ ↑ Differentiation value │
│ │
│ Your cost to serve │
│ ────────────────────────────────────────────── $50 │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Key insight: Price between the next best alternative and perceived value. Cost is a floor, not a basis.
Pricing Research Methods
Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter
The Van Westendorp survey identifies the acceptable price range for your product.
The Four Questions:
Ask each respondent:
- "At what price would you consider [product] to be so expensive that you would not consider buying it?" (Too expensive)
- "At what price would you consider [product] to be priced so low that you would question its quality?" (Too cheap)
- "At what price would you consider [product] to be starting to get expensive, but you still might consider it?" (Expensive/high side)
- "At what price would you consider [product] to be a bargain—a great buy for the money?" (Cheap/good value)
How to Analyze:
- Plot cumulative distributions for each question
- Find the intersections:
- Point of Marginal Cheapness (PMC): "Too cheap" crosses "Expensive"
- Point of Marginal Expensiveness (PME): "Too expensive" crosses "Cheap"
- Optimal Price Point (OPP): "Too cheap" crosses "Too expensive"
- Indifference Price Point (IDP): "Expensive" crosses "Cheap"
The acceptable price range: PMC to PME Optimal pricing zone: Between OPP and IDP
Survey Tips:
- Need 100-300 respondents for reliable data
- Segment by persona (different willingness to pay)
- Use realistic product descriptions
- Consider adding purchase intent questions
Sample Van Westendorp Analysis Output:
Price Sensitivity Analysis Results:
─────────────────────────────────
Point of Marginal Cheapness: $29/mo
Optimal Price Point: $49/mo
Indifference Price Point: $59/mo
Point of Marginal Expensiveness: $79/mo
Recommended range: $49-59/mo
Current price: $39/mo (below optimal)
Opportunity: 25-50% price increase without significant demand impact
MaxDiff Analysis (Best-Worst Scaling)
MaxDiff identifies which features customers value most, informing packaging decisions.
How It Works:
- List 8-15 features you could include
- Show respondents sets of 4-5 features at a time
- Ask: "Which is MOST important? Which is LEAST important?"
- Repeat across multiple sets until all features compared
- Statistical analysis produces importance scores
Example Survey Question:
Which feature is MOST important to you?
Which feature is LEAST important to you?
□ Unlimited projects
□ Custom branding
□ Priority support
□ API access
□ Advanced analytics
Analyzing Results:
Features are ranked by utility score:
- High utility = Must-have (include in base tier)
- Medium utility = Differentiator (use for tier separation)
- Low utility = Nice-to-have (premium tier or cut)
Using MaxDiff for Packaging:
| Utility Score | Packaging Decision |
|---|---|
| Top 20% | Include in all tiers (table stakes) |
| 20-50% | Use to differentiate tiers |
| 50-80% | Higher tiers only |
| Bottom 20% | Consider cutting or premium add-on |
Willingness to Pay Surveys
Direct method (simple but biased): "How much would you pay for [product]?"
Better: Gabor-Granger method: "Would you buy [product] at [$X]?" (Yes/No) Vary price across respondents to build demand curve.
Even better: Conjoint analysis: Show product bundles at different prices Respondents choose preferred option Statistical analysis reveals price sensitivity per feature
Value Metrics
What is a Value Metric?
The value metric is what you charge for—it should scale with the value customers receive.
Good value metrics:
- Align price with value delivered
- Are easy to understand
- Scale as customer grows
- Are hard to game
Common Value Metrics
| Metric | Best For | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Per user/seat | Collaboration tools | Slack, Notion |
| Per usage | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Per feature | Modular products | HubSpot add-ons |
| Per contact/record | CRM, email tools | Mailchimp, HubSpot |
| Per transaction | Payments, marketplaces | Stripe, Shopify |
| Flat fee | Simple products | Basecamp |
| Revenue share | High-value outcomes | Affiliate platforms |
Choosing Your Value Metric
Step 1: Identify how customers get value
- What outcome do they care about?
- What do they measure success by?
- What would they pay more for?
Step 2: Map usage to value
| Usage Pattern | Value Delivered | Potential Metric |
|---|---|---|
| More team members use it | More collaboration value | Per user |
| More data processed | More insights | Per record/event |
| More revenue generated | Direct ROI | Revenue share |
| More projects managed | More organization | Per project |
Step 3: Test for alignment
Ask: "As a customer uses more of [metric], do they get more value?"
- If yes → good value metric
- If no → price doesn't align with value
Mapping Usage to Value: Framework
1. Instrument usage data Track how customers use your product:
- Feature usage frequency
- Volume metrics (users, records, API calls)
- Outcome metrics (revenue generated, time saved)
2. Correlate with customer success
- Which usage patterns predict retention?
- Which usage patterns predict expansion?
- Which customers pay the most, and why?
3. Identify value thresholds
- At what usage level do customers "get it"?
- At what usage level do they expand?
- At what usage level should price increase?
Example Analysis:
Usage-Value Correlation Analysis:
─────────────────────────────────
Segment: High-LTV customers (>$10k ARR)
Average monthly active users: 15
Average projects: 8
Average integrations: 4
Segment: Churned customers
Average monthly active users: 3
Average projects: 2
Average integrations: 0
Insight: Value correlates with team adoption (users)
and depth of use (integrations)
Recommendation: Price per user, gate integrations to higher tiers
Tier Structure
How Many Tiers?
2 tiers: Simple, clear choice
- Works for: Clear SMB vs. Enterprise split
- Risk: May leave money on table
3 tiers: Industry standard
- Good tier = Entry point
- Better tier = Recommended (anchor to best)
- Best tier = High-value customers
4+ tiers: More granularity
- Works for: Wide range of customer sizes
- Risk: Decision paralysis, complexity
Good-Better-Best Framework
Good tier (Entry):
- Purpose: Remove barriers to entry
- Includes: Core features, limited usage
- Price: Low, accessible
- Target: Small teams, try before you buy
Better tier (Recommended):
- Purpose: Where most customers land
- Includes: Full features, reasonable limits
- Price: Your "anchor" price
- Target: Growing teams, serious users
Best tier (Premium):
- Purpose: Capture high-value customers
- Includes: Everything, advanced features, higher limits
- Price: Premium (often 2-3x "Better")
- Target: Larger teams, power users, enterprises
Tier Differentiation Strategies
Feature gating:
- Basic features in all tiers
- Advanced fea
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →Setting salaries or internal costs
- →Simple tax calculation or invoicing
Limitations
- →Cannot calculate actual market willingness to pay
- →Suggestions require validation via customer feedback
How it compares
It utilizes structured pricing theory instead of picking arbitrary price points based on cost.
Compared to similar skills
pricing-strategy side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pricing-strategy (this skill) | 12 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| startup-financial-modeling | 15 | 2mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| product-strategist | 12 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
| marketing-demand-acquisition | 4 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by davila7
View all by davila7 →You might also like
startup-financial-modeling
wshobson
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create financial projections", "build a financial model", "forecast revenue", "calculate burn rate", "estimate runway", "model cash flow", or requests 3-5 year financial planning for a startup.
product-strategist
davila7
Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product including OKR cascade generation, market analysis, vision setting, and team scaling. Use for strategic planning, goal alignment, competitive analysis, and organizational design.
marketing-demand-acquisition
davila7
Multi-channel demand generation, paid media optimization, SEO strategy, and partnership programs for Series A+ startups. Includes CAC calculator, channel playbooks, HubSpot integration, and international expansion tactics. Use when planning demand generation campaigns, optimizing paid media, building SEO strategies, establishing partnerships, or when user mentions demand gen, paid ads, LinkedIn ads, Google ads, CAC, acquisition, lead generation, or pipeline generation.
mckinsey-consultant
fleurytian
McKinsey顾问式问题解决系统。从商业问题出发,通过假设驱动的结构化分析方法,生成McKinsey风格研究报告和PPT。融合Problem Solving方法论、MECE原则、Issue Tree拆解、Hypotheses形成、Dummy Page设计、智能数据收集和专业PPT生成能力。
startup-analyst
sickn33
Expert startup business analyst specializing in market sizing, financial modeling, competitive analysis, and strategic planning for early-stage companies. Use PROACTIVELY when the user asks about market opportunity, TAM/SAM/SOM, financial projections, unit economics, competitive landscape, team planning, startup metrics, or business strategy for pre-seed through Series A startups.
startup-business-analyst-financial-projections
sickn33
Create detailed 3-5 year financial model with revenue, costs, cash flow, and scenarios