PA

page-save-origin-semantics

Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for page save conflict detection.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/4206" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Auto-invoked when modifying origin-based conflict detection, revision validation logic, or isUpdatable() method. Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for conflict detection and its separation from diff detection.
221 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Validates frontend/backend origin mismatch
  • Determines revision requirements for save operations
  • Enforces conflict detection bypass rules
  • Differentiates revision checks from diff detection
  • Implements isUpdatable logic for collaboration

How it works

Validates the save request origin against the current revision state using a two-stage check between the browser and the server model.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Origin event context and latest revision metadata
You get back
Validation status or override flag

When to use page-save-origin-semantics

  • Modify page save origin logic
  • Debug revision validation issues
  • Update isUpdatable implementation

About this skill

Page Save Origin Semantics

Problem

When modifying page save logic, it's easy to accidentally break the carefully designed origin-based conflict detection system. The system uses a two-stage check mechanism (frontend + backend) to determine when revision validation should be enforced vs. bypassed for collaborative editing (Yjs).

Key Insight: Conflict detection (revision check) and diff detection (hasDiffToPrev) serve different purposes and require separate logic.

Solution

Understanding the two-stage origin check mechanism:

Stage 1: Frontend Determines revisionId Requirement

// apps/app/src/client/components/PageEditor/PageEditor.tsx:158
const isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = currentPage?.revision?.origin === undefined;

// lines 308-310
const revisionId = isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate
  ? currentRevisionId
  : undefined;

Logic: Check the latest revision's origin on the page:

  • If origin === undefined (legacy/API save) → Send revisionId
  • If origin === "editor" or "view" → Do NOT send revisionId

Stage 2: Backend Determines Conflict Check Behavior

// apps/app/src/server/models/obsolete-page.js:167-172
const ignoreLatestRevision =
  origin === Origin.Editor &&
  (latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View);

if (ignoreLatestRevision) {
  return true;  // Bypass revision check
}

// Otherwise, enforce strict revision matching
if (revision != previousRevision) {
  return false;  // Reject save
}
return true;

Logic: Check current request's origin AND latest revision's origin:

  • If origin === "editor" AND latest is "editor" or "view" → Bypass revision check
  • Otherwise → Enforce strict revision ID matching

Origin Values

Three types of page update methods (called "origin"):

  • Origin.Editor = "editor" - Save from editor mode (collaborative editing via Yjs)
  • Origin.View = "view" - Save from view mode
    • Examples: HandsontableModal, DrawioModal editing
  • undefined - API-based saves or legacy pages

Origin Strength (強弱)

Basic Rule: Page updates require the previous revision ID in the request. If the latest revision doesn't match, the server rejects the request.

Exception - Editor origin is stronger than View origin:

  • UX Goal: Avoid Posted param "revisionId" is outdated errors when multiple members are using the Editor and View changes interrupt them
  • Special Case: When the latest revision's origin is View, Editor origin requests can update WITHOUT requiring revision ID

Origin Strength Matrix

Latest Revision: EditorLatest Revision: ViewLatest Revision: API
Request: Editor⭕️ Bypass revision check⭕️ Bypass revision check❌ Strict check
Request: View❌ Strict check❌ Strict check❌ Strict check
Request: API❌ Strict check❌ Strict check❌ Strict check

Reading the table:

  • ⭕️ = Revision check bypassed (revisionId not required)
  • ❌ = Strict revision check required (revisionId must match)

Behavior by Scenario

Latest Revision OriginRequest OriginrevisionId Sent?Revision CheckUse Case
editor or vieweditor❌ No✅ BypassedNormal Editor use (most common)
undefinededitor✅ Yes✅ EnforcedLegacy page in Editor
undefinedundefined (API)✅ Yes (required)✅ EnforcedAPI save

Example: Server-Side Logic Respecting Origin Semantics

When adding server-side functionality that needs previous revision data:

// ✅ CORRECT: Separate concerns - conflict detection vs. diff detection
let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null;

// Priority 1: Use provided revisionId (for conflict detection)
if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) {
  previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId);
}

// Priority 2: Fallback to currentPage.revision (for other purposes like diff detection)
if (previousRevision == null && currentPage.revision != null) {
  previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision);
}

const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null;

// Continue with existing conflict detection logic (unchanged)
if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) {
  // ... return conflict error
}

// Use previousBody for diff detection or other purposes
updatedPage = await crowi.pageService.updatePage(
  currentPage,
  body,
  previousBody,  // ← Available regardless of conflict detection logic
  req.user,
  options,
);
// ❌ WRONG: Forcing frontend to always send revisionId
const revisionId = currentRevisionId;  // Always send, regardless of origin
// This breaks Yjs collaborative editing semantics!
// ❌ WRONG: Changing backend conflict detection logic
// Don't modify isUpdatable() unless you fully understand the implications
// for collaborative editing

When to Apply

Always consider this pattern when:

  • Modifying page save/update API handlers
  • Adding functionality that needs previous revision data
  • Working on conflict detection or revision validation logic
  • Implementing features that interact with page history
  • Debugging save operation issues

Key Principles:

  1. Do NOT modify frontend revisionId logic unless explicitly required for conflict detection
  2. Do NOT modify isUpdatable() logic unless fixing conflict detection bugs
  3. Separate concerns: Conflict detection ≠ Other revision-based features (diff detection, history, etc.)
  4. Server-side fallback: If you need previous revision data when revisionId is not provided, fetch from currentPage.revision

Detailed Scenario Analysis

Scenario A: Normal Editor Mode (Most Common Case)

Latest revision has origin=editor:

  1. Frontend Logic:

    • isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = false (latest revision origin is not undefined)
    • Does NOT send revisionId in request
    • Sends origin: Origin.Editor
  2. API Layer:

    previousRevision = await Revision.findById(undefined);  // → null
    

    Result: No previousRevision fetched via revisionId

  3. Backend Conflict Check (isUpdatable):

    ignoreLatestRevision =
      (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) &&
      (latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View)
    // → true (latest revision is editor)
    return true;  // Bypass revision check
    

    Result: ✅ Save succeeds without revision validation

  4. Impact on Other Features:

    • If you need previousRevision data (e.g., for diff detection), it won't be available unless you implement server-side fallback
    • This is where currentPage.revision fallback becomes necessary

Scenario B: Legacy Page in Editor Mode

Latest revision has origin=undefined:

  1. Frontend Logic:

    • isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = true (latest revision origin is undefined)
    • Sends revisionId in request
    • Sends origin: Origin.Editor
  2. API Layer:

    previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId);  // → revision object
    

    Result: previousRevision fetched successfully

  3. Backend Conflict Check (isUpdatable):

    ignoreLatestRevision =
      (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) &&
      (latestRevisionOrigin === undefined)
    // → false (latest revision is undefined, not editor/view)
    
    // Strict revision check
    if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) {
      return false;  // Reject if mismatch
    }
    return true;
    

    Result: ✅ Save succeeds only if revisionId matches

  4. Impact on Other Features:

    • previousRevision data is available
    • All revision-based features work correctly

Scenario C: API-Based Save

Request has origin=undefined or omitted:

  1. Frontend: Not applicable (API client)

  2. API Layer:

    • API client MUST send revisionId in request
    • previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId)
  3. Backend Conflict Check (isUpdatable):

    ignoreLatestRevision =
      (undefined === Origin.Editor) && ...
    // → false
    
    // Strict revision check
    if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) {
      return false;
    }
    return true;
    

    Result: Strict validation enforced

Root Cause: Why This Separation Matters

Historical Context: At some point, the frontend stopped sending previousRevision (revisionId) for certain scenarios to support Yjs collaborative editing. This broke features that relied on previousRevision data being available.

The Core Issue:

  • Conflict detection needs to know "Is this save conflicting with another user's changes?" (Answered by revision check)
  • Diff detection needs to know "Did the content actually change?" (Answered by comparing body)
  • Current implementation conflates these: When conflict detection is bypassed, previousRevision is not fetched, breaking diff detection

The Solution Pattern:

// Separate the two concerns:

// 1. Fetch previousRevision for data purposes (diff detection, history, etc.)
let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null;
if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) {
  previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId);
} else if (currentPage.revision != null) {
  previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision);  // Fallback
}

// 2. Use previousRevision data for your feature
const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null;

// 3. Conflict detection happens independently via isUpdatable()
if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) {
  // Return conflict error
}

Reference

Official Documentation:


Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • For standard, non-collaborative document editing
  • If the page save system doesn't utilize origin tracking

Limitations

  • Requires consistent origin reporting throughout the application stack
  • Logic can become brittle if new save methods are introduced

How it compares

It explicitly handles the complex logic required for Yjs-based collaborative editing that generic save functions ignore.

Compared to similar skills

page-save-origin-semantics side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
page-save-origin-semantics (this skill)16moNo flagsAdvanced
cc-skill-coding-standards-v202moReviewAdvanced
dependency-upgrade265moReviewIntermediate
typescript-review392moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

cc-skill-coding-standards-v2

diegosouzapw

Coding Standards & Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before

00

dependency-upgrade

wshobson

Manage major dependency version upgrades with compatibility analysis, staged rollout, and comprehensive testing. Use when upgrading framework versions, updating major dependencies, or managing breaking changes in libraries.

26240

typescript-review

metabase

Review TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.

39178

accessibility-compliance

wshobson

Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.

45132

typescript-write

metabase

Write TypeScript and JavaScript code following Metabase coding standards and best practices. Use when developing or refactoring TypeScript/JavaScript code.

30114

reviewing-nextjs-16-patterns

djankies

Review code for Next.js 16 compliance - security patterns, caching, breaking changes. Use when reviewing Next.js code, preparing for migration, or auditing for violations.

11106

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry