page-save-origin-semantics
Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for page save conflict detection.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/4206" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/page-save-origin-semantics
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Auto-invoked when modifying origin-based conflict detection, revision validation logic, or isUpdatable() method. Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for conflict detection and its separation from diff detection.Key capabilities
- →Validates frontend/backend origin mismatch
- →Determines revision requirements for save operations
- →Enforces conflict detection bypass rules
- →Differentiates revision checks from diff detection
- →Implements isUpdatable logic for collaboration
How it works
Validates the save request origin against the current revision state using a two-stage check between the browser and the server model.
Inputs & outputs
When to use page-save-origin-semantics
- →Modify page save origin logic
- →Debug revision validation issues
- →Update isUpdatable implementation
About this skill
Page Save Origin Semantics
Problem
When modifying page save logic, it's easy to accidentally break the carefully designed origin-based conflict detection system. The system uses a two-stage check mechanism (frontend + backend) to determine when revision validation should be enforced vs. bypassed for collaborative editing (Yjs).
Key Insight: Conflict detection (revision check) and diff detection (hasDiffToPrev) serve different purposes and require separate logic.
Solution
Understanding the two-stage origin check mechanism:
Stage 1: Frontend Determines revisionId Requirement
// apps/app/src/client/components/PageEditor/PageEditor.tsx:158
const isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = currentPage?.revision?.origin === undefined;
// lines 308-310
const revisionId = isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate
? currentRevisionId
: undefined;
Logic: Check the latest revision's origin on the page:
- If
origin === undefined(legacy/API save) → SendrevisionId - If
origin === "editor"or"view"→ Do NOT sendrevisionId
Stage 2: Backend Determines Conflict Check Behavior
// apps/app/src/server/models/obsolete-page.js:167-172
const ignoreLatestRevision =
origin === Origin.Editor &&
(latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View);
if (ignoreLatestRevision) {
return true; // Bypass revision check
}
// Otherwise, enforce strict revision matching
if (revision != previousRevision) {
return false; // Reject save
}
return true;
Logic: Check current request's origin AND latest revision's origin:
- If
origin === "editor"AND latest is"editor"or"view"→ Bypass revision check - Otherwise → Enforce strict revision ID matching
Origin Values
Three types of page update methods (called "origin"):
Origin.Editor = "editor"- Save from editor mode (collaborative editing via Yjs)Origin.View = "view"- Save from view mode- Examples: HandsontableModal, DrawioModal editing
undefined- API-based saves or legacy pages
Origin Strength (強弱)
Basic Rule: Page updates require the previous revision ID in the request. If the latest revision doesn't match, the server rejects the request.
Exception - Editor origin is stronger than View origin:
- UX Goal: Avoid
Posted param "revisionId" is outdatederrors when multiple members are using the Editor and View changes interrupt them - Special Case: When the latest revision's origin is View, Editor origin requests can update WITHOUT requiring revision ID
Origin Strength Matrix
| Latest Revision: Editor | Latest Revision: View | Latest Revision: API | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request: Editor | ⭕️ Bypass revision check | ⭕️ Bypass revision check | ❌ Strict check |
| Request: View | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check |
| Request: API | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check |
Reading the table:
- ⭕️ = Revision check bypassed (revisionId not required)
- ❌ = Strict revision check required (revisionId must match)
Behavior by Scenario
| Latest Revision Origin | Request Origin | revisionId Sent? | Revision Check | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
editor or view | editor | ❌ No | ✅ Bypassed | Normal Editor use (most common) |
undefined | editor | ✅ Yes | ✅ Enforced | Legacy page in Editor |
undefined | undefined (API) | ✅ Yes (required) | ✅ Enforced | API save |
Example: Server-Side Logic Respecting Origin Semantics
When adding server-side functionality that needs previous revision data:
// ✅ CORRECT: Separate concerns - conflict detection vs. diff detection
let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null;
// Priority 1: Use provided revisionId (for conflict detection)
if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) {
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId);
}
// Priority 2: Fallback to currentPage.revision (for other purposes like diff detection)
if (previousRevision == null && currentPage.revision != null) {
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision);
}
const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null;
// Continue with existing conflict detection logic (unchanged)
if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) {
// ... return conflict error
}
// Use previousBody for diff detection or other purposes
updatedPage = await crowi.pageService.updatePage(
currentPage,
body,
previousBody, // ← Available regardless of conflict detection logic
req.user,
options,
);
// ❌ WRONG: Forcing frontend to always send revisionId
const revisionId = currentRevisionId; // Always send, regardless of origin
// This breaks Yjs collaborative editing semantics!
// ❌ WRONG: Changing backend conflict detection logic
// Don't modify isUpdatable() unless you fully understand the implications
// for collaborative editing
When to Apply
Always consider this pattern when:
- Modifying page save/update API handlers
- Adding functionality that needs previous revision data
- Working on conflict detection or revision validation logic
- Implementing features that interact with page history
- Debugging save operation issues
Key Principles:
- Do NOT modify frontend revisionId logic unless explicitly required for conflict detection
- Do NOT modify isUpdatable() logic unless fixing conflict detection bugs
- Separate concerns: Conflict detection ≠ Other revision-based features (diff detection, history, etc.)
- Server-side fallback: If you need previous revision data when revisionId is not provided, fetch from
currentPage.revision
Detailed Scenario Analysis
Scenario A: Normal Editor Mode (Most Common Case)
Latest revision has origin=editor:
-
Frontend Logic:
isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = false(latest revision origin is not undefined)- Does NOT send
revisionIdin request - Sends
origin: Origin.Editor
-
API Layer:
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(undefined); // → nullResult: No previousRevision fetched via revisionId
-
Backend Conflict Check (
isUpdatable):ignoreLatestRevision = (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) && (latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View) // → true (latest revision is editor) return true; // Bypass revision checkResult: ✅ Save succeeds without revision validation
-
Impact on Other Features:
- If you need previousRevision data (e.g., for diff detection), it won't be available unless you implement server-side fallback
- This is where
currentPage.revisionfallback becomes necessary
Scenario B: Legacy Page in Editor Mode
Latest revision has origin=undefined:
-
Frontend Logic:
isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = true(latest revision origin is undefined)- Sends
revisionIdin request - Sends
origin: Origin.Editor
-
API Layer:
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId); // → revision objectResult: previousRevision fetched successfully
-
Backend Conflict Check (
isUpdatable):ignoreLatestRevision = (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) && (latestRevisionOrigin === undefined) // → false (latest revision is undefined, not editor/view) // Strict revision check if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) { return false; // Reject if mismatch } return true;Result: ✅ Save succeeds only if revisionId matches
-
Impact on Other Features:
- previousRevision data is available
- All revision-based features work correctly
Scenario C: API-Based Save
Request has origin=undefined or omitted:
-
Frontend: Not applicable (API client)
-
API Layer:
- API client MUST send
revisionIdin request previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId)
- API client MUST send
-
Backend Conflict Check (
isUpdatable):ignoreLatestRevision = (undefined === Origin.Editor) && ... // → false // Strict revision check if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) { return false; } return true;Result: Strict validation enforced
Root Cause: Why This Separation Matters
Historical Context: At some point, the frontend stopped sending previousRevision (revisionId) for certain scenarios to support Yjs collaborative editing. This broke features that relied on previousRevision data being available.
The Core Issue:
- Conflict detection needs to know "Is this save conflicting with another user's changes?" (Answered by revision check)
- Diff detection needs to know "Did the content actually change?" (Answered by comparing body)
- Current implementation conflates these: When conflict detection is bypassed, previousRevision is not fetched, breaking diff detection
The Solution Pattern:
// Separate the two concerns:
// 1. Fetch previousRevision for data purposes (diff detection, history, etc.)
let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null;
if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) {
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId);
} else if (currentPage.revision != null) {
previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision); // Fallback
}
// 2. Use previousRevision data for your feature
const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null;
// 3. Conflict detection happens independently via isUpdatable()
if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) {
// Return conflict error
}
Reference
Official Documentation:
Content truncated.
When not to use it
- →For standard, non-collaborative document editing
- →If the page save system doesn't utilize origin tracking
Limitations
- →Requires consistent origin reporting throughout the application stack
- →Logic can become brittle if new save methods are introduced
How it compares
It explicitly handles the complex logic required for Yjs-based collaborative editing that generic save functions ignore.
Compared to similar skills
page-save-origin-semantics side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| page-save-origin-semantics (this skill) | 1 | 6mo | No flags | Advanced |
| cc-skill-coding-standards-v2 | 0 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| dependency-upgrade | 26 | 5mo | Review | Intermediate |
| typescript-review | 39 | 2mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by growilabs
View all by growilabs →You might also like
cc-skill-coding-standards-v2
diegosouzapw
Coding Standards & Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before
dependency-upgrade
wshobson
Manage major dependency version upgrades with compatibility analysis, staged rollout, and comprehensive testing. Use when upgrading framework versions, updating major dependencies, or managing breaking changes in libraries.
typescript-review
metabase
Review TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.
accessibility-compliance
wshobson
Implement WCAG 2.2 compliant interfaces with mobile accessibility, inclusive design patterns, and assistive technology support. Use when auditing accessibility, implementing ARIA patterns, building for screen readers, or ensuring inclusive user experiences.
typescript-write
metabase
Write TypeScript and JavaScript code following Metabase coding standards and best practices. Use when developing or refactoring TypeScript/JavaScript code.
reviewing-nextjs-16-patterns
djankies
Review code for Next.js 16 compliance - security patterns, caching, breaking changes. Use when reviewing Next.js code, preparing for migration, or auditing for violations.