openrouter-model-routing
Configures dynamic routing to automatically assign tasks to the most efficient OpenRouter model based on complexity and budget.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/openrouter-model-routing && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/7435" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/openrouter-model-routing && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/openrouter-model-routing
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Implement intelligent model routing to optimize cost, quality, and latencyKey capabilities
- →Route requests to specific model tiers based on task type
- →Classify prompt complexity using heuristics
- →Implement fallback chains for model availability
- →Fetch live model pricing data
- →Log routing decisions for audit trails
How it works
It maps task categories to predefined model tiers and uses a routing function to select the appropriate model, optionally using complexity heuristics to auto-route.
Inputs & outputs
When to use openrouter-model-routing
- →Route coding tasks to premium models and summarization to budget models
- →A/B test different model outputs
- →Optimize token costs based on task difficulty
- →Implement failover logic for model availability
About this skill
OpenRouter Model Routing
Overview
OpenRouter gives you access to 100+ models through one API. The key to cost efficiency is routing each request to the right model based on task complexity, required capabilities, cost budget, and latency requirements. This skill covers task-based routing, complexity classification, cost-aware selection, and OpenRouter's native routing features.
Prerequisites
- An OpenRouter API key exported as
OPENROUTER_API_KEY— see theopenrouter-install-authskill for setup - Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK and
requests(pip install openai requests) - A rough inventory of your task mix (classification, summarization, code generation, deep reasoning, ...) to seed the
TASK_ROUTINGtable - Credits sized for the tiers you route to — the premium tier (
openai/o1) runs $15/$60 per 1M tokens, 250x the budget tier
Instructions
- Define your tiers per Task-Based Router: the
MODELSdict (free → budget → mid → standard → premium) and theTASK_ROUTINGmap, then send requests throughroute_request(), which returnscontent, the servingmodel,tier, and token count. - When callers can't label tasks, switch to the Complexity-Based Auto-Router —
classify_complexity()scores word count, code, reasoning, and math markers to pick a tier insideauto_route(). - Add resilience per OpenRouter Native Routing:
extra_body={"models": [...], "route": "fallback"}tries models in order,provider.ordercontrols which provider serves, and the:floorvariant picks the cheapest provider automatically. - Keep pricing current per Cost-Aware Router —
get_model_pricing()pulls live per-1M rates fromGET /api/v1/models, andcheapest_model_for_task()selects under context/tooling constraints. - Log every routing decision (task type, tier, model, cost) and tune per Error Handling and Enterprise Considerations — escalate the tier on quality regressions and cap per-request cost with
max_tokens.
Task-Based Router
import os, re
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
# Model tiers by cost and capability
MODELS = {
"free": "google/gemma-2-9b-it:free", # $0/0 — testing only
"budget": "meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct", # $0.06/$0.06 per 1M
"mid": "openai/gpt-4o-mini", # $0.15/$0.60 per 1M
"standard":"anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet", # $3/$15 per 1M
"premium": "openai/o1", # $15/$60 per 1M
}
TASK_ROUTING = {
"classification": "budget", # Simple label assignment
"translation": "mid", # Moderate quality needed
"summarization": "mid", # Good quality, cost-effective
"code_generation": "standard", # Needs high accuracy
"code_review": "standard", # Needs reasoning
"analysis": "standard", # Complex reasoning
"creative_writing":"standard", # Quality matters
"deep_reasoning": "premium", # Multi-step logic
"simple_qa": "budget", # Basic questions
"chat": "mid", # General conversation
}
def route_request(task_type: str, messages: list[dict], **kwargs) -> dict:
"""Route to appropriate model based on task type."""
tier = TASK_ROUTING.get(task_type, "mid")
model = MODELS[tier]
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model, messages=messages, **kwargs
)
return {
"content": response.choices[0].message.content,
"model": response.model,
"tier": tier,
"tokens": response.usage.prompt_tokens + response.usage.completion_tokens,
}
Complexity-Based Auto-Router
def classify_complexity(prompt: str) -> str:
"""Classify prompt complexity to select model tier.
Simple heuristics -- replace with a trained classifier for production.
"""
word_count = len(prompt.split())
has_code = bool(re.search(r'```|def |function |class |import ', prompt))
has_reasoning = bool(re.search(r'explain|analyze|compare|why|how does|trade.?off', prompt, re.I))
has_math = bool(re.search(r'calculate|equation|formula|derive|proof', prompt, re.I))
if has_math or (has_reasoning and has_code):
return "premium"
if has_code or has_reasoning or word_count > 500:
return "standard"
if word_count > 100:
return "mid"
return "budget"
def auto_route(messages: list[dict], **kwargs):
"""Automatically select model based on prompt complexity."""
user_msg = next((m["content"] for m in reversed(messages) if m["role"] == "user"), "")
tier = classify_complexity(user_msg)
model = MODELS[tier]
response = client.chat.completions.create(model=model, messages=messages, **kwargs)
return response
OpenRouter Native Routing
# Route: "fallback" — try models in order until one succeeds
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
extra_body={
"models": [
"anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
"openai/gpt-4o",
"openai/gpt-4o-mini",
],
"route": "fallback",
},
)
# Provider routing — control which provider serves a model
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
extra_body={
"provider": {
"order": ["Anthropic", "AWS Bedrock"],
"allow_fallbacks": True,
},
},
)
# Model variant: ":floor" picks cheapest provider
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet:floor",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
max_tokens=200,
)
Cost-Aware Router
import requests
def get_model_pricing() -> dict:
"""Fetch current pricing for cost-aware routing."""
models = requests.get("https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models").json()["data"]
return {
m["id"]: {
"prompt": float(m["pricing"]["prompt"]) * 1_000_000,
"completion": float(m["pricing"]["completion"]) * 1_000_000,
"context": m["context_length"],
}
for m in models
}
def cheapest_model_for_task(pricing: dict, min_context: int = 4096,
needs_tools: bool = False) -> str:
"""Find the cheapest model that meets requirements."""
candidates = [
(mid, p) for mid, p in pricing.items()
if p["context"] >= min_context and p["prompt"] > 0 # Exclude free (unreliable)
]
candidates.sort(key=lambda x: x[1]["prompt"] + x[1]["completion"])
return candidates[0][0] if candidates else "openai/gpt-4o-mini"
Output
- Routed completion dicts from
route_request(): the replycontent, the actualmodelthat served, thetierchosen, and totaltokensconsumed - Router decision traces per request, e.g.
[Router] Task=code -> Model=anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet, giving you an audit trail to tune the routing table against - A live pricing map from
get_model_pricing()keyed by model ID: per-1Mprompt/completioncost pluscontextlength for cost-aware selection
Examples
The same router sends trivial and demanding prompts to opposite ends of the cost spectrum:
print(routed_completion("What is 2+2?"))
# [Router] Task=simple -> Model=google/gemma-2-9b-it:free
print(routed_completion("Write a Python function to merge two sorted lists."))
# [Router] Task=code -> Model=anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet
The 4-word arithmetic prompt lands on the free tier while the code request escalates to Claude 3.5 Sonnet — the spread between those two decisions is where the cost savings live. More worked examples: references/examples.md.
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong model selected | Classification too coarse | Add more task categories; test with diverse prompts |
| Model unavailable | Selected model temporarily down | Add fallback chain per tier |
| Cost overrun | Complex tasks routed to premium models | Set max_tokens and daily budget caps |
| Quality regression | Budget model can't handle task | Monitor output quality; escalate tier on poor results |
Enterprise Considerations
- Start with manual task-type routing (explicit labels), then graduate to auto-classification
- Log every routing decision (task type, tier, model, cost) to tune the router over time
- Use OpenRouter's
:floorvariant to automatically get the cheapest provider for any model - Set
max_tokenson every request to cap per-request cost regardless of model tier - A/B test routing rules: send 10% of traffic to a different tier and compare quality metrics
- Combine with fallback chains so each tier has backup models
References
- Examples | Errors
- Model Routing | Provider Routing
When not to use it
- →When task types are not clearly defined
- →When real-time latency requirements are extremely strict
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Classification heuristics may be too coarse for complex tasks
- →Requires manual maintenance of the task routing table
How it compares
This approach automates model selection based on business logic rather than manually choosing a model for every request.
Compared to similar skills
openrouter-model-routing side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| openrouter-model-routing (this skill) | 1 | 25d | Caution | Intermediate |
| llama-cpp | 21 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| mcp-builder | 136 | 3mo | Review | Advanced |
| langchain | 26 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
llama-cpp
zechenzhangAGI
Runs LLM inference on CPU, Apple Silicon, and consumer GPUs without NVIDIA hardware. Use for edge deployment, M1/M2/M3 Macs, AMD/Intel GPUs, or when CUDA is unavailable. Supports GGUF quantization (1.5-8 bit) for reduced memory and 4-10× speedup vs PyTorch on CPU.
mcp-builder
anthropics
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
langchain
zechenzhangAGI
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.
llama-factory
zechenzhangAGI
Expert guidance for fine-tuning LLMs with LLaMA-Factory - WebUI no-code, 100+ models, 2/3/4/5/6/8-bit QLoRA, multimodal support
langgraph
davila7
Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.
ollama-setup
jeremylongshore
Configure auto-configure Ollama when user needs local LLM deployment, free AI alternatives, or wants to eliminate hosted API costs. Trigger phrases: "install ollama", "local AI", "free LLM", "self-hosted AI", "replace OpenAI", "no API costs". Use when appropriate context detected. Trigger with relevant phrases based on skill purpose.