M1

m13-domain-error

Provides a framework for designing domain-specific error types and recovery strategies.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/m13-domain-error && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/5628" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/m13-domain-error && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/m13-domain-error

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Use when designing domain error handling. Keywords: domain error, error categorization, recovery strategy, retry, fallback, domain error hierarchy, user-facing vs internal errors, error code design, circuit breaker, graceful degradation, resilience, error context, backoff, retry with backoff, error recovery, transient vs permanent error, 领域错误, 错误分类, 恢复策略, 重试, 熔断器, 优雅降级
371 chars✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Categorize errors by target audience (User, Developer, Ops)
  • Map error types to specific recovery flows (retry, fallback, fail-fast)
  • Define structured error context requirements
  • Trace business rules to implementation constraints
  • Draft circuit breaker and backoff logic requirements

How it works

It applies a structured taxonomy framework to categorize errors and traces them to specific domain constraints, helping map the error's lifecycle from occurrence to resolution.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Domain error requirements, business rules, or context requirements.
You get back
Structured error categorization table and recovery implementation plan.

When to use m13-domain-error

  • Design domain error hierarchy
  • Implement error recovery strategies
  • Determine user vs internal error messages
  • Design retry and backoff logic

About this skill

Domain Error Strategy

Layer 2: Design Choices

Core Question

Who needs to handle this error, and how should they recover?

Before designing error types:

  • Is this user-facing or internal?
  • Is recovery possible?
  • What context is needed for debugging?

Error Categorization

Error TypeAudienceRecoveryExample
User-facingEnd usersGuide actionInvalidEmail, NotFound
InternalDevelopersDebug infoDatabaseError, ParseError
SystemOps/SREMonitor/alertConnectionTimeout, RateLimited
TransientAutomationRetryNetworkError, ServiceUnavailable
PermanentHumanInvestigateConfigInvalid, DataCorrupted

Thinking Prompt

Before designing error types:

  1. Who sees this error?

    • End user → friendly message, actionable
    • Developer → detailed, debuggable
    • Ops → structured, alertable
  2. Can we recover?

    • Transient → retry with backoff
    • Degradable → fallback value
    • Permanent → fail fast, alert
  3. What context is needed?

    • Call chain → anyhow::Context
    • Request ID → structured logging
    • Input data → error payload

Trace Up ↑

To domain constraints (Layer 3):

"How should I handle payment failures?"
    ↑ Ask: What are the business rules for retries?
    ↑ Check: domain-fintech (transaction requirements)
    ↑ Check: SLA (availability requirements)
QuestionTrace ToAsk
Retry policydomain-*What's acceptable latency for retry?
User experiencedomain-*What message should users see?
Compliancedomain-*What must be logged for audit?

Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

"Need typed errors"
    ↓ m06-error-handling: thiserror for library
    ↓ m04-zero-cost: Error enum design

"Need error context"
    ↓ m06-error-handling: anyhow::Context
    ↓ Logging: tracing with fields

"Need retry logic"
    ↓ m07-concurrency: async retry patterns
    ↓ Crates: tokio-retry, backoff

Quick Reference

Recovery PatternWhenImplementation
RetryTransient failuresexponential backoff
FallbackDegraded modecached/default value
Circuit BreakerCascading failuresfailsafe-rs
TimeoutSlow operationstokio::time::timeout
BulkheadIsolationseparate thread pools

Error Hierarchy

#[derive(thiserror::Error, Debug)]
pub enum AppError {
    // User-facing
    #[error("Invalid input: {0}")]
    Validation(String),

    // Transient (retryable)
    #[error("Service temporarily unavailable")]
    ServiceUnavailable(#[source] reqwest::Error),

    // Internal (log details, show generic)
    #[error("Internal error")]
    Internal(#[source] anyhow::Error),
}

impl AppError {
    pub fn is_retryable(&self) -> bool {
        matches!(self, Self::ServiceUnavailable(_))
    }
}

Retry Pattern

use tokio_retry::{Retry, strategy::ExponentialBackoff};

async fn with_retry<F, T, E>(f: F) -> Result<T, E>
where
    F: Fn() -> impl Future<Output = Result<T, E>>,
    E: std::fmt::Debug,
{
    let strategy = ExponentialBackoff::from_millis(100)
        .max_delay(Duration::from_secs(10))
        .take(5);

    Retry::spawn(strategy, || f()).await
}

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy WrongBetter
Same error for allNo actionabilityCategorize by audience
Retry everythingWasted resourcesOnly transient errors
Infinite retryDoS selfMax attempts + backoff
Expose internal errorsSecurity riskUser-friendly messages
No contextHard to debug.context() everywhere

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy BadBetter
String errorsNo structurethiserror types
panic! for recoverableBad UXResult with context
Ignore errorsSilent failuresLog or propagate
Box<dyn Error> everywhereLost type infothiserror
Error in happy pathPerformanceEarly validation

Related Skills

WhenSee
Error handling basicsm06-error-handling
Retry implementationm07-concurrency
Domain modelingm09-domain
User-facing APIsdomain-*

When not to use it

  • Simple local scripts without error handling requirements
  • Debugging single-threaded code that lacks external dependencies

Limitations

  • Requires manual alignment with domain-specific business rules
  • Does not automate the implementation of the circuit breaker code itself

How it compares

It moves beyond generic error handling by enforcing a specific architectural taxonomy based on audience and recovery potential.

Compared to similar skills

m13-domain-error side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
m13-domain-error (this skill)16moNo flagsIntermediate
architect-review1094moNo flagsAdvanced
solid-principles579moNo flagsIntermediate
codex322moReviewAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

More by actionbook

View all by actionbook

rust-learner

actionbook

Use when asking about Rust versions or crate info. Keywords: latest version, what's new, changelog, Rust 1.x, Rust release, stable, nightly, crate info, crates.io, lib.rs, docs.rs, API documentation, crate features, dependencies, which crate, what version, Rust edition, edition 2021, edition 2024, cargo add, cargo update, 最新版本, 版本号, 稳定版, 最新, 哪个版本, crate 信息, 文档, 依赖, Rust 版本, 新特性, 有什么特性

83

arxiv-viewer

actionbook

View, search, and download academic papers from arXiv. Supports API queries, web scraping via Actionbook, and HTML paper reading via ar5iv. Use when user asks about arxiv papers, academic papers, research papers, paper summaries, latest papers, or wants to search/download/read papers.

49

rust-call-graph

actionbook

Visualize Rust function call graphs using LSP. Triggers on: /call-graph, call hierarchy, who calls, what calls, 调用图, 调用关系, 谁调用了, 调用了谁

31

rust-code-navigator

actionbook

Navigate Rust code using LSP. Triggers on: /navigate, go to definition, find references, where is defined, 跳转定义, 查找引用, 定义在哪, 谁用了这个

35

rust-daily

actionbook

CRITICAL: Use for Rust news and daily/weekly/monthly reports. Triggers on: rust news, rust daily, rust weekly, TWIR, rust blog, Rust 日报, Rust 周报, Rust 新闻, Rust 动态

33

rust-router

actionbook

CRITICAL: Use for ALL Rust questions including errors, design, and coding. HIGHEST PRIORITY for: 比较, 对比, compare, vs, versus, 区别, difference, 最佳实践, best practice, tokio vs, async-std vs, 比较 tokio, 比较 async, Triggers on: Rust, cargo, rustc, crate, Cargo.toml, 意图分析, 问题分析, 语义分析, analyze intent, question analysis, compile error, borrow error, lifetime error, ownership error, type error, trait error, value moved, cannot borrow, does not live long enough, mismatched types, not satisfied, E0382, E0597, E0277, E0308, E0499, E0502, E0596, async, await, Send, Sync, tokio, concurrency, error handling, 编译错误, compile error, 所有权, ownership, 借用, borrow, 生命周期, lifetime, 类型错误, type error, 异步, async, 并发, concurrency, 错误处理, error handling, 问题, problem, question, 怎么用, how to use, 如何, how to, 为什么, why, 什么是, what is, 帮我写, help me write, 实现, implement, 解释, explain

36

You might also like

architect-review

sickn33

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

109320

solid-principles

SmidigStorm

Enforce SOLID principles (Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, Dependency Inversion) in object-oriented design. Use when writing or reviewing classes and modules.

57236

codex

Lucklyric

Invoke Codex CLI for complex coding tasks requiring high reasoning capabilities. This skill should be invoked when users explicitly mention "Codex", request complex implementation challenges, advanced reasoning, or need high-reasoning model assistance. Automatically triggers on codex-related requests and supports session continuation for iterative development.

32238

error-handling-patterns

wshobson

Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.

35170

deepwiki-rs

sopaco

AI-powered Rust documentation generation engine for comprehensive codebase analysis, C4 architecture diagrams, and automated technical documentation. Use when Claude needs to analyze source code, understand software architecture, generate technical specs, or create professional documentation from any programming language.

25170

senior-fullstack

davila7

Comprehensive fullstack development skill for building complete web applications with React, Next.js, Node.js, GraphQL, and PostgreSQL. Includes project scaffolding, code quality analysis, architecture patterns, and complete tech stack guidance. Use when building new projects, analyzing code quality, implementing design patterns, or setting up development workflows.

35110

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry