llm-app-patterns
Best-practice patterns for building and monitoring LLM applications, including RAG and agent architectures.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/llm-app-patterns && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1672" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/llm-app-patterns && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/llm-app-patterns
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.Key capabilities
- →Define chunking strategies like fixed-size or semantic splitting
- →Configure vector database selection and integration
- →Map multi-agent collaboration and communication patterns
- →Implement observability hooks for production monitoring
- →Structure retrieval-augmented generation pipeline stages
How it works
Applies established architectural design patterns and Pydantic-based configuration schemas to standardize data ingestion and LLM interaction workflows.
Inputs & outputs
When to use llm-app-patterns
- →Design RAG pipelines for knowledge retrieval
- →Implement observability for production LLMs
- →Structure multi-agent collaboration patterns
About this skill
🤖 LLM Application Patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by Dify and industry best practices.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Designing LLM-powered applications
- Implementing RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
- Building AI agents with tools
- Setting up LLMOps monitoring
- Choosing between agent architectures
1. RAG Pipeline Architecture
Overview
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) grounds LLM responses in your data.
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Ingest │────▶│ Retrieve │────▶│ Generate │
│ Documents │ │ Context │ │ Response │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Chunking│ │ Vector │ │ LLM │
│Embedding│ │ Search │ │ + Context│
└─────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
1.1 Document Ingestion
# Chunking strategies
class ChunkingStrategy:
# Fixed-size chunks (simple but may break context)
FIXED_SIZE = "fixed_size" # e.g., 512 tokens
# Semantic chunking (preserves meaning)
SEMANTIC = "semantic" # Split on paragraphs/sections
# Recursive splitting (tries multiple separators)
RECURSIVE = "recursive" # ["\n\n", "\n", " ", ""]
# Document-aware (respects structure)
DOCUMENT_AWARE = "document_aware" # Headers, lists, etc.
# Recommended settings
CHUNK_CONFIG = {
"chunk_size": 512, # tokens
"chunk_overlap": 50, # token overlap between chunks
"separators": ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "],
}
1.2 Embedding & Storage
# Vector database selection
VECTOR_DB_OPTIONS = {
"pinecone": {
"use_case": "Production, managed service",
"scale": "Billions of vectors",
"features": ["Hybrid search", "Metadata filtering"]
},
"weaviate": {
"use_case": "Self-hosted, multi-modal",
"scale": "Millions of vectors",
"features": ["GraphQL API", "Modules"]
},
"chromadb": {
"use_case": "Development, prototyping",
"scale": "Thousands of vectors",
"features": ["Simple API", "In-memory option"]
},
"pgvector": {
"use_case": "Existing Postgres infrastructure",
"scale": "Millions of vectors",
"features": ["SQL integration", "ACID compliance"]
}
}
# Embedding model selection
EMBEDDING_MODELS = {
"openai/text-embedding-3-small": {
"dimensions": 1536,
"cost": "$0.02/1M tokens",
"quality": "Good for most use cases"
},
"openai/text-embedding-3-large": {
"dimensions": 3072,
"cost": "$0.13/1M tokens",
"quality": "Best for complex queries"
},
"local/bge-large": {
"dimensions": 1024,
"cost": "Free (compute only)",
"quality": "Comparable to OpenAI small"
}
}
1.3 Retrieval Strategies
# Basic semantic search
def semantic_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5):
query_embedding = embed(query)
results = vector_db.similarity_search(
query_embedding,
top_k=top_k
)
return results
# Hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
def hybrid_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.5):
"""
alpha=1.0: Pure semantic
alpha=0.0: Pure keyword (BM25)
alpha=0.5: Balanced
"""
semantic_results = vector_db.similarity_search(query)
keyword_results = bm25_search(query)
# Reciprocal Rank Fusion
return rrf_merge(semantic_results, keyword_results, alpha)
# Multi-query retrieval
def multi_query_retrieval(query: str):
"""Generate multiple query variations for better recall"""
queries = llm.generate_query_variations(query, n=3)
all_results = []
for q in queries:
all_results.extend(semantic_search(q))
return deduplicate(all_results)
# Contextual compression
def compressed_retrieval(query: str):
"""Retrieve then compress to relevant parts only"""
docs = semantic_search(query, top_k=10)
compressed = llm.extract_relevant_parts(docs, query)
return compressed
1.4 Generation with Context
RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """
Answer the user's question based ONLY on the following context.
If the context doesn't contain enough information, say "I don't have enough information to answer that."
Context:
{context}
Question: {question}
Answer:"""
def generate_with_rag(question: str):
# Retrieve
context_docs = hybrid_search(question, top_k=5)
context = "\n\n".join([doc.content for doc in context_docs])
# Generate
prompt = RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE.format(
context=context,
question=question
)
response = llm.generate(prompt)
# Return with citations
return {
"answer": response,
"sources": [doc.metadata for doc in context_docs]
}
2. Agent Architectures
2.1 ReAct Pattern (Reasoning + Acting)
Thought: I need to search for information about X
Action: search("X")
Observation: [search results]
Thought: Based on the results, I should...
Action: calculate(...)
Observation: [calculation result]
Thought: I now have enough information
Action: final_answer("The answer is...")
REACT_PROMPT = """
You are an AI assistant that can use tools to answer questions.
Available tools:
{tools_description}
Use this format:
Thought: [your reasoning about what to do next]
Action: [tool_name(arguments)]
Observation: [tool result - this will be filled in]
... (repeat Thought/Action/Observation as needed)
Thought: I have enough information to answer
Final Answer: [your final response]
Question: {question}
"""
class ReActAgent:
def __init__(self, tools: list, llm):
self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
self.llm = llm
self.max_iterations = 10
def run(self, question: str) -> str:
prompt = REACT_PROMPT.format(
tools_description=self._format_tools(),
question=question
)
for _ in range(self.max_iterations):
response = self.llm.generate(prompt)
if "Final Answer:" in response:
return self._extract_final_answer(response)
action = self._parse_action(response)
observation = self._execute_tool(action)
prompt += f"\nObservation: {observation}\n"
return "Max iterations reached"
2.2 Function Calling Pattern
# Define tools as functions with schemas
TOOLS = [
{
"name": "search_web",
"description": "Search the web for current information",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Search query"
}
},
"required": ["query"]
}
},
{
"name": "calculate",
"description": "Perform mathematical calculations",
"parameters": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"expression": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Math expression to evaluate"
}
},
"required": ["expression"]
}
}
]
class FunctionCallingAgent:
def run(self, question: str) -> str:
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": question}]
while True:
response = self.llm.chat(
messages=messages,
tools=TOOLS,
tool_choice="auto"
)
if response.tool_calls:
for tool_call in response.tool_calls:
result = self._execute_tool(
tool_call.name,
tool_call.arguments
)
messages.append({
"role": "tool",
"tool_call_id": tool_call.id,
"content": str(result)
})
else:
return response.content
2.3 Plan-and-Execute Pattern
class PlanAndExecuteAgent:
"""
1. Create a plan (list of steps)
2. Execute each step
3. Replan if needed
"""
def run(self, task: str) -> str:
# Planning phase
plan = self.planner.create_plan(task)
# Returns: ["Step 1: ...", "Step 2: ...", ...]
results = []
for step in plan:
# Execute each step
result = self.executor.execute(step, context=results)
results.append(result)
# Check if replan needed
if self._needs_replan(task, results):
new_plan = self.planner.replan(
task,
completed=results,
remaining=plan[len(results):]
)
plan = new_plan
# Synthesize final answer
return self.synthesizer.summarize(task, results)
2.4 Multi-Agent Collaboration
class AgentTeam:
"""
Specialized agents collaborating on complex tasks
"""
def __init__(self):
self.agents = {
"researcher": ResearchAgent(),
"analyst": AnalystAgent(),
"writer": WriterAgent(),
"critic": CriticAgent()
}
self.coordinator = CoordinatorAgent()
def solve(self, task: str) -> str:
# Coordinator assigns subtasks
assignments = self.coordinator.decompose(task)
results = {}
for assignment in assignments:
agent = self.agents[assignment.agent]
result = agent.execute(
assignment.subtask,
context=results
)
results[assignment.id] = result
---
*Content truncated.*
When not to use it
- →For simple, non-AI application development
- →When the system does not involve data retrieval or agent coordination
Limitations
- →Requires manual alignment of chosen architecture with project goals
- →Templates assume specific library support such as Dify-inspired structures
How it compares
It provides standardized industry-specific structural templates rather than generic code generation for RAG and agents.
Compared to similar skills
llm-app-patterns side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| llm-app-patterns (this skill) | 3 | 6mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| langchain | 26 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| senior-ml-engineer | 6 | 7mo | Review | Advanced |
| ai-agents-architect | 5 | 6mo | No flags | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by davila7
View all by davila7 →You might also like
langchain
zechenzhangAGI
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG applications. Best for rapid prototyping and production deployments.
senior-ml-engineer
davila7
World-class ML engineering skill for productionizing ML models, MLOps, and building scalable ML systems. Expertise in PyTorch, TensorFlow, model deployment, feature stores, model monitoring, and ML infrastructure. Includes LLM integration, fine-tuning, RAG systems, and agentic AI. Use when deploying ML models, building ML platforms, implementing MLOps, or integrating LLMs into production systems.
ai-agents-architect
davila7
Expert in designing and building autonomous AI agents. Masters tool use, memory systems, planning strategies, and multi-agent orchestration. Use when: build agent, AI agent, autonomous agent, tool use, function calling.
dspy
davila7
Build complex AI systems with declarative programming, optimize prompts automatically, create modular RAG systems and agents with DSPy - Stanford NLP's framework for systematic LM programming
ai-engineer
sickn33
Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations. Use PROACTIVELY for LLM features, chatbots, AI agents, or AI-powered applications.
llm-application-dev
skillcreatorai
Building applications with Large Language Models - prompt engineering, RAG patterns, and LLM integration. Use for AI-powered features, chatbots, or LLM-based automation.