lindy-migration-deep-dive
Detailed guide for migrating existing automation platforms and custom scripts to Lindy AI agents.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/lindy-migration-deep-dive && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/6892" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/lindy-migration-deep-dive && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/lindy-migration-deep-dive
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Advanced migration strategies for moving to Lindy AI from other platforms.Key capabilities
- →Inventory existing automation workflows
- →Classify migration complexity
- →Redesign rule-based logic into AI agent steps
- →Execute phased migration with parallel runs
- →Validate post-migration performance
How it works
It guides users through mapping legacy rule-based automations to AI-driven agent workflows, emphasizing redesign over direct translation.
Inputs & outputs
When to use lindy-migration-deep-dive
- →Migrating from Zapier zaps to Lindy agents
- →Consolidating n8n workflows
- →Replacing custom automation scripts
- →Planning migration timelines
About this skill
Lindy Migration Deep Dive
Overview
Migrate existing automation workflows from Zapier, Make (Integromat), n8n, LangChain, or custom code to Lindy AI. Key insight: Lindy replaces rigid rule-based automations with AI agents that can reason, adapt, and handle ambiguity — so migration is a redesign opportunity, not a 1:1 translation.
Prerequisites
- Inventory of existing automations (source platform)
- Lindy workspace ready with required integrations authorized
- Migration timeline approved
- Rollback plan defined for customer-facing workflows
Migration Source Comparison
| Source Platform | Lindy Equivalent | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Zapier Zap | Lindy Agent | AI reasoning replaces rigid if/then |
| Make Scenario | Lindy Agent | No-code builder instead of module chains |
| n8n Workflow | Lindy Agent | Managed infra, no self-hosting |
| LangChain Agent | Lindy Agent Step | No-code, managed, no Python needed |
| Custom code | HTTP Request + Run Code | Less code, AI fills gaps |
Instructions
Step 1: Inventory Source Automations
For each existing automation, document:
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
| Name | Support Email Triage |
| Trigger | New email in [email protected] |
| Steps | 1. Parse email 2. Classify 3. Route to channel |
| Integrations | Gmail, Slack, Sheets |
| Frequency | ~50 runs/day |
| Complexity | Medium (3 steps, 1 condition) |
Step 2: Classify Migration Complexity
| Complexity | Criteria | Migration Approach | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple | 1-3 steps, no conditions | Build from scratch in Lindy | 30 min |
| Medium | 4-8 steps, conditions | Natural language description to Agent Builder | 1-2 hours |
| Complex | 9+ steps, multi-branch, loops | Redesign as multi-agent society | 1-2 days |
| Custom code | Python/JS logic | Run Code action + HTTP Request | 2-4 hours |
Step 3: Migration Strategy by Source
From Zapier:
Zapier Pattern → Lindy Pattern
────────────────────────────────
Trigger (New Email) → Trigger (Email Received)
Filter Step → Trigger Filter (more efficient)
Formatter → AI Prompt field mode (AI does formatting)
Lookup → Knowledge Base search or HTTP Request
Multi-step Zap → Single agent with conditions
Paths → Conditions (natural language branching)
From Make (Integromat):
Make Pattern → Lindy Pattern
────────────────────────────────
Scenario → Agent workflow
Module → Action step
Router → Conditions
Iterator → Loop
Aggregator → Run Code action (consolidation logic)
Error Handler → Agent prompt error instructions
From n8n:
n8n Pattern → Lindy Pattern
────────────────────────────────
Trigger Node → Trigger
Function Node → Run Code (Python/JS)
HTTP Request Node → HTTP Request action
IF Node → Condition
Merge Node → Agent step (AI merges intelligently)
From LangChain/Custom Code:
LangChain Pattern → Lindy Pattern
────────────────────────────────
Agent → Agent Step with skills
Tool → Action or HTTP Request
Memory → Lindy Memory (persistent)
Chain → Workflow steps
Vector Store → Knowledge Base
Retrieval Chain → Knowledge Base + AI Prompt
Step 4: Execute Migration (Phased)
Phase 1: Internal-Only Agents (Days 1-3)
- Migrate non-customer-facing automations first
- Build in Lindy using natural language description
- Test with real data for 48 hours
- Compare output quality to source automation
- Decommission source automation after verification
Phase 2: Low-Risk Customer-Facing (Days 4-7)
- Build Lindy agent alongside existing automation (parallel run)
- Route 10% of traffic to Lindy agent
- Compare results for 48 hours
- Gradually increase to 50%, then 100%
- Monitor task success rate and response quality
Phase 3: Critical Workflows (Days 8-14)
- Build Lindy agent as exact replacement
- Test extensively with staging data
- Schedule cutover during low-traffic window
- Keep source automation pausable (not deleted) for 7 days
- Monitor closely for 48 hours post-cutover
Step 5: Redesign Opportunities
Migration is a chance to improve, not just replicate:
| Old Pattern | Lindy Improvement |
|---|---|
| Rigid if/then classification | AI classifies naturally, handles edge cases |
| Template-based email responses | AI generates contextual, personalized responses |
| Multiple automations for variations | Single agent with conditions handles all |
| Manual data transformation | Run Code action or AI handles transformation |
| No error handling | Agent prompt includes fallback behavior |
Step 6: Validate and Cutover
# Post-migration validation checklist
echo "=== Migration Validation ==="
# 1. Task completion rate
echo "Check: Agent Tasks tab - expect >95% success rate"
# 2. Response quality
echo "Check: Compare 10 agent outputs to old automation outputs"
# 3. Trigger coverage
echo "Check: All events triggering correctly (no missed events)"
# 4. Performance
echo "Check: Task duration within acceptable range"
# 5. Cost
echo "Check: Credit consumption within budget"
Migration Checklist
- Source system inventory complete
- Each automation classified by complexity
- Lindy integrations authorized
- Phase 1 (internal) agents migrated and verified
- Phase 2 (low-risk) agents running in parallel
- Phase 3 (critical) agents tested with staging data
- Cutover window scheduled
- Rollback procedure tested
- Source automations paused (not deleted)
- 7-day post-cutover monitoring complete
- Source automations decommissioned
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Output quality lower | AI prompt needs tuning | Add few-shot examples to agent prompt |
| Missing edge cases | Source had specific rules | Add condition branches or prompt instructions |
| Higher cost than expected | Overuse of large models | Right-size models per step |
| Integration auth fails | OAuth not set up in Lindy | Authorize integrations before migration |
| Data format mismatch | Different field names | Map fields in Run Code action |
Resources
Next Steps
This completes the Flagship tier. Review Standard and Pro skills for comprehensive Lindy mastery.
When not to use it
- →When the existing automation is already performing optimally without AI reasoning needs
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires manual validation of agent output quality
- →Complex workflows may require multi-agent societies
How it compares
It treats migration as a redesign opportunity to use AI reasoning instead of performing a 1:1 translation of rigid logic.
Compared to similar skills
lindy-migration-deep-dive side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lindy-migration-deep-dive (this skill) | 1 | 25d | Review | Advanced |
| webapp-testing | 353 | 3mo | Review | Intermediate |
| resolve-conflicts | 81 | 8mo | Review | Intermediate |
| telegram-bot-builder | 106 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
webapp-testing
anthropics
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
resolve-conflicts
antinomyhq
Use this skill immediately when the user mentions merge conflicts that need to be resolved. Do not attempt to resolve conflicts directly - invoke this skill first. This skill specializes in providing a structured framework for merging imports, tests, lock files (regeneration), configuration files, and handling deleted-but-modified files with backup and analysis.
telegram-bot-builder
davila7
Expert in building Telegram bots that solve real problems - from simple automation to complex AI-powered bots. Covers bot architecture, the Telegram Bot API, user experience, monetization strategies, and scaling bots to thousands of users. Use when: telegram bot, bot api, telegram automation, chat bot telegram, tg bot.
dev-browser
SawyerHood
Browser automation with persistent page state. Use when users ask to navigate websites, fill forms, take screenshots, extract web data, test web apps, or automate browser workflows. Trigger phrases include "go to [url]", "click on", "fill out the form", "take a screenshot", "scrape", "automate", "test the website", "log into", or any browser interaction request.
openspec-onboard
studyzy
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
codex-cli-bridge
alirezarezvani
Bridge between Claude Code and OpenAI Codex CLI - generates AGENTS.md from CLAUDE.md, provides Codex CLI execution helpers, and enables seamless interoperability between both tools