langfuse-core-workflow-b
Set up automated LLM output evaluation and scoring using Langfuse datasets and benchmarks.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/langfuse-core-workflow-b && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/7936" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/langfuse-core-workflow-b && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/langfuse-core-workflow-b
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Execute Langfuse secondary workflow: Evaluation, scoring, and datasets.Key capabilities
- →Create numeric scores for LLM traces
- →Implement categorical scores for LLM outputs
- →Apply boolean scores for user feedback
- →Manage versioned prompts for LLM applications
- →Build datasets for LLM evaluation experiments
- →Run experiments with evaluators for LLM benchmarking
How it works
The skill uses the Langfuse SDK to create numeric, categorical, and boolean scores for LLM traces and outputs. It also manages versioned prompts, creates datasets for testing, and runs experiments with custom evaluators.
Inputs & outputs
When to use langfuse-core-workflow-b
- →Create numeric quality scores for traces
- →Implement categorical pass/fail feedback
- →Set up experiment datasets for benchmarking
- →Integrate automated LLM evaluation
About this skill
Langfuse Core Workflow B: Evaluation, Scoring & Datasets
Overview
Implement LLM output evaluation using Langfuse scores (numeric, categorical, boolean), the experiment runner SDK for dataset-driven benchmarks, prompt management with versioned prompts, and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation patterns.
Prerequisites
- Langfuse SDK configured with API keys
- Traces already being collected (see
langfuse-core-workflow-a) - For v4+:
@langfuse/clientinstalled
Instructions
Step 1: Score Traces via SDK
Langfuse supports three score data types: Numeric, Categorical, and Boolean.
import { LangfuseClient } from "@langfuse/client";
const langfuse = new LangfuseClient();
// Numeric score (e.g., 0-1 quality rating)
await langfuse.score.create({
traceId: "trace-abc-123",
name: "relevance",
value: 0.92,
dataType: "NUMERIC",
comment: "Highly relevant answer with good context usage",
});
// Categorical score (e.g., pass/fail classification)
await langfuse.score.create({
traceId: "trace-abc-123",
observationId: "gen-xyz-456", // Optional: score a specific generation
name: "quality-tier",
value: "excellent",
dataType: "CATEGORICAL",
});
// Boolean score (e.g., thumbs up/down)
await langfuse.score.create({
traceId: "trace-abc-123",
name: "user-approved",
value: 1, // 1 = true, 0 = false
dataType: "BOOLEAN",
comment: "User clicked thumbs up",
});
Step 2: User Feedback Collection
// API endpoint for frontend feedback widget
app.post("/api/feedback", async (req, res) => {
const { traceId, rating, comment } = req.body;
// Thumbs up/down
await langfuse.score.create({
traceId,
name: "user-feedback",
value: rating === "positive" ? 1 : 0,
dataType: "BOOLEAN",
comment,
});
// Granular star rating (1-5)
if (req.body.stars) {
await langfuse.score.create({
traceId,
name: "star-rating",
value: req.body.stars,
dataType: "NUMERIC",
comment: `${req.body.stars}/5 stars`,
});
}
res.json({ success: true });
});
Step 3: Prompt Management
// Fetch a versioned prompt from Langfuse
const textPrompt = await langfuse.prompt.get("summarize-article", {
type: "text",
label: "production", // or "latest", "staging"
});
// Compile with variables -- replaces {{variable}} placeholders
const compiled = textPrompt.compile({
maxLength: "100 words",
tone: "professional",
});
// Chat prompts return message arrays
const chatPrompt = await langfuse.prompt.get("customer-support", {
type: "chat",
});
const messages = chatPrompt.compile({
customerName: "Alice",
issue: "billing question",
});
// messages = [{ role: "system", content: "..." }, { role: "user", content: "..." }]
Step 4: Create and Populate Datasets
// Create a dataset for evaluation
await langfuse.api.datasets.create({
name: "customer-support-v1",
description: "Test cases for customer support chatbot",
metadata: { version: "1.0", domain: "support" },
});
// Add test items
const testCases = [
{
input: { query: "How do I cancel my subscription?" },
expectedOutput: { intent: "cancellation", sentiment: "neutral" },
metadata: { category: "billing" },
},
{
input: { query: "Your product is amazing!" },
expectedOutput: { intent: "feedback", sentiment: "positive" },
metadata: { category: "feedback" },
},
];
for (const testCase of testCases) {
await langfuse.api.datasetItems.create({
datasetName: "customer-support-v1",
input: testCase.input,
expectedOutput: testCase.expectedOutput,
metadata: testCase.metadata,
});
}
Step 5: Run Experiments with the Experiment Runner
import { LangfuseClient } from "@langfuse/client";
const langfuse = new LangfuseClient();
// Define the task function -- your LLM application logic
async function classifyIntent(input: { query: string }): Promise<string> {
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: "gpt-4o-mini",
messages: [
{ role: "system", content: "Classify the user intent. Return one word." },
{ role: "user", content: input.query },
],
temperature: 0,
});
return response.choices[0].message.content?.trim() || "";
}
// Define evaluator functions
function exactMatch({ output, expectedOutput }: {
output: string;
expectedOutput: { intent: string };
}) {
return {
name: "exact-match",
value: output.toLowerCase() === expectedOutput.intent.toLowerCase() ? 1 : 0,
dataType: "BOOLEAN" as const,
};
}
// Run the experiment
const result = await langfuse.runExperiment({
datasetName: "customer-support-v1",
runName: "gpt-4o-mini-classifier-v1",
runDescription: "Testing intent classification with gpt-4o-mini",
task: classifyIntent,
evaluators: [exactMatch],
});
console.log(`Experiment complete. ${result.runs.length} items evaluated.`);
// View results in Langfuse UI: Datasets > customer-support-v1 > Runs
Step 6: LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
async function llmJudge({ output, input, expectedOutput }: {
output: string;
input: { query: string };
expectedOutput: { intent: string; sentiment: string };
}) {
const judgment = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: "gpt-4o",
temperature: 0,
messages: [
{
role: "system",
content: `You are an AI evaluator. Score the response 0-10 on accuracy and helpfulness.
Return JSON: {"score": <number>, "reasoning": "<explanation>"}`,
},
{
role: "user",
content: `Query: ${input.query}\nExpected: ${JSON.stringify(expectedOutput)}\nActual: ${output}`,
},
],
response_format: { type: "json_object" },
});
const result = JSON.parse(judgment.choices[0].message.content || "{}");
return {
name: "llm-judge-quality",
value: result.score / 10, // Normalize to 0-1
dataType: "NUMERIC" as const,
comment: result.reasoning,
};
}
// Use as an evaluator in experiments
await langfuse.runExperiment({
datasetName: "customer-support-v1",
runName: "judge-evaluation-v1",
task: classifyIntent,
evaluators: [exactMatch, llmJudge],
});
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Scores not appearing | API call failed silently | Await score.create() and check for errors |
| Score validation error | Wrong data type | Match value type to dataType (number/string/0-1) |
| LLM judge inconsistent | High temperature | Set temperature: 0 for evaluation calls |
| Dataset item missing | Wrong dataset name | Verify exact name match (case-sensitive) |
| Experiment not in UI | Run not flushed | Check runExperiment completed without errors |
Resources
Next Steps
For common error debugging, see langfuse-common-errors. For CI/CD integration of evaluations, see langfuse-ci-integration.
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Score validation errors occur if the value type does not match the dataType
- →LLM judge inconsistency can result from high temperature settings
How it compares
This skill provides a structured framework for LLM evaluation, prompt management, and experiment execution within Langfuse, offering more specific control than manual testing.
Compared to similar skills
langfuse-core-workflow-b side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| langfuse-core-workflow-b (this skill) | 0 | 27d | Review | Intermediate |
| dependency-upgrade | 26 | 5mo | Review | Intermediate |
| woocommerce-dev-cycle | 5 | 3mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| lint-and-validate | 6 | 6mo | Review | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
dependency-upgrade
wshobson
Manage major dependency version upgrades with compatibility analysis, staged rollout, and comprehensive testing. Use when upgrading framework versions, updating major dependencies, or managing breaking changes in libraries.
woocommerce-dev-cycle
woocommerce
Run tests, linting, and quality checks for WooCommerce development. Use when running tests, fixing code style, or following the development workflow.
lint-and-validate
davila7
Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.
coverage
alirezarezvani
Analyze test coverage gaps. Use when user says "test coverage", "what's not tested", "coverage gaps", "missing tests", "coverage report", or "what needs testing".
sentry-hello-world
jeremylongshore
Execute capture your first error with Sentry and verify it appears in the dashboard. Use when testing Sentry integration or verifying error capture works. Trigger with phrases like "test sentry", "sentry hello world", "verify sentry", "first sentry error".
verify-translator
zotero
Steps that MUST be performed to verify a Zotero translator after every addition or modification, and before submitting a PR.