incident-commander
Provides an SRE-focused framework for managing, coordinating, and analyzing technology incidents.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/incident-commander-anubhavg-icpl && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/11626" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/incident-commander-anubhavg-icpl && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/incident-commander-anubhavg-icpl
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Comprehensive incident response framework from detection through resolution and post-incident review. Battle-tested SRE/DevOps practices: severity classification, timeline reconstruction, structured post-incident analysis. Use when declaring an incident, coordinating multi-team response during an outage, leading a post-mortem, or setting up on-call practices for a new service.Key capabilities
- →Classify incident severity based on impact and urgency.
- →Reconstruct chronological incident timelines from events.
- →Generate complete Post-Incident Review (PIR) documents.
- →Apply multiple Root Cause Analysis (RCA) frameworks.
- →Provide communication templates for stakeholder updates.
- →Generate actionable runbooks from incident patterns.
How it works
The skill classifies incident severity, reconstructs timelines, generates PIRs using RCA frameworks, and provides communication templates and runbook integration.
Inputs & outputs
When to use incident-commander
- →Managing production outages
- →Conducting incident post-mortems
- →Coordinating multi-team responses
- →Defining on-call incident workflows
About this skill
Incident Commander Skill
Category: Engineering Team
Tier: POWERFUL
Author: Claude Skills Team
Version: 1.0.0
Last Updated: February 2026
Overview
The Incident Commander skill provides a comprehensive incident response framework for managing technology incidents from detection through resolution and post-incident review. This skill implements battle-tested practices from SRE and DevOps teams at scale, providing structured tools for severity classification, timeline reconstruction, and thorough post-incident analysis.
Key Features
- Automated Severity Classification - Intelligent incident triage based on impact and urgency metrics
- Timeline Reconstruction - Transform scattered logs and events into coherent incident narratives
- Post-Incident Review Generation - Structured PIRs with multiple RCA frameworks
- Communication Templates - Pre-built templates for stakeholder updates and escalations
- Runbook Integration - Generate actionable runbooks from incident patterns
Skills Included
Core Tools
-
Incident Classifier (
incident_classifier.py)- Analyzes incident descriptions and outputs severity levels
- Recommends response teams and initial actions
- Generates communication templates based on severity
-
Timeline Reconstructor (
timeline_reconstructor.py)- Processes timestamped events from multiple sources
- Reconstructs chronological incident timeline
- Identifies gaps and provides duration analysis
-
PIR Generator (
pir_generator.py)- Creates comprehensive Post-Incident Review documents
- Applies multiple RCA frameworks (5 Whys, Fishbone, Timeline)
- Generates actionable follow-up items
Incident Response Framework
Severity Classification System
SEV1 - Critical Outage
Definition: Complete service failure affecting all users or critical business functions
Characteristics:
- Customer-facing services completely unavailable
- Data loss or corruption affecting users
- Security breaches with customer data exposure
- Revenue-generating systems down
- SLA violations with financial penalties
Response Requirements:
- Immediate escalation to on-call engineer
- Incident Commander assigned within 5 minutes
- Executive notification within 15 minutes
- Public status page update within 15 minutes
- War room established
- All hands on deck if needed
Communication Frequency: Every 15 minutes until resolution
SEV2 - Major Impact
Definition: Significant degradation affecting subset of users or non-critical functions
Characteristics:
- Partial service degradation (>25% of users affected)
- Performance issues causing user frustration
- Non-critical features unavailable
- Internal tools impacting productivity
- Data inconsistencies not affecting user experience
Response Requirements:
- On-call engineer response within 15 minutes
- Incident Commander assigned within 30 minutes
- Status page update within 30 minutes
- Stakeholder notification within 1 hour
- Regular team updates
Communication Frequency: Every 30 minutes during active response
SEV3 - Minor Impact
Definition: Limited impact with workarounds available
Characteristics:
- Single feature or component affected
- <25% of users impacted
- Workarounds available
- Performance degradation not significantly impacting UX
- Non-urgent monitoring alerts
Response Requirements:
- Response within 2 hours during business hours
- Next business day response acceptable outside hours
- Internal team notification
- Optional status page update
Communication Frequency: At key milestones only
SEV4 - Low Impact
Definition: Minimal impact, cosmetic issues, or planned maintenance
Characteristics:
- Cosmetic bugs
- Documentation issues
- Logging or monitoring gaps
- Performance issues with no user impact
- Development/test environment issues
Response Requirements:
- Response within 1-2 business days
- Standard ticket/issue tracking
- No special escalation required
Communication Frequency: Standard development cycle updates
Incident Commander Role
Primary Responsibilities
-
Command and Control
- Own the incident response process
- Make critical decisions about resource allocation
- Coordinate between technical teams and stakeholders
- Maintain situational awareness across all response streams
-
Communication Hub
- Provide regular updates to stakeholders
- Manage external communications (status pages, customer notifications)
- Facilitate effective communication between response teams
- Shield responders from external distractions
-
Process Management
- Ensure proper incident tracking and documentation
- Drive toward resolution while maintaining quality
- Coordinate handoffs between team members
- Plan and execute rollback strategies if needed
-
Post-Incident Leadership
- Ensure thorough post-incident reviews are conducted
- Drive implementation of preventive measures
- Share learnings with broader organization
Decision-Making Framework
Emergency Decisions (SEV1/2):
- Incident Commander has full authority
- Bias toward action over analysis
- Document decisions for later review
- Consult subject matter experts but don't get blocked
Resource Allocation:
- Can pull in any necessary team members
- Authority to escalate to senior leadership
- Can approve emergency spend for external resources
- Make call on communication channels and timing
Technical Decisions:
- Lean on technical leads for implementation details
- Make final calls on trade-offs between speed and risk
- Approve rollback vs. fix-forward strategies
- Coordinate testing and validation approaches
Communication Templates
Initial Incident Notification (SEV1/2)
Subject: [SEV{severity}] {Service Name} - {Brief Description}
Incident Details:
- Start Time: {timestamp}
- Severity: SEV{level}
- Impact: {user impact description}
- Current Status: {investigating/mitigating/resolved}
Technical Details:
- Affected Services: {service list}
- Symptoms: {what users are experiencing}
- Initial Assessment: {suspected root cause if known}
Response Team:
- Incident Commander: {name}
- Technical Lead: {name}
- SMEs Engaged: {list}
Next Update: {timestamp}
Status Page: {link}
War Room: {bridge/chat link}
---
{Incident Commander Name}
{Contact Information}
Executive Summary (SEV1)
Subject: URGENT - Customer-Impacting Outage - {Service Name}
Executive Summary:
{2-3 sentence description of customer impact and business implications}
Key Metrics:
- Time to Detection: {X minutes}
- Time to Engagement: {X minutes}
- Estimated Customer Impact: {number/percentage}
- Current Status: {status}
- ETA to Resolution: {time or "investigating"}
Leadership Actions Required:
- [ ] Customer communication approval
- [ ] PR/Communications coordination
- [ ] Resource allocation decisions
- [ ] External vendor engagement
Incident Commander: {name} ({contact})
Next Update: {time}
---
This is an automated alert from our incident response system.
Customer Communication Template
We are currently experiencing {brief description of issue} affecting {scope of impact}.
Our engineering team was alerted at {time} and is actively working to resolve the issue. We will provide updates every {frequency} until resolved.
What we know:
- {factual statement of impact}
- {factual statement of scope}
- {brief status of response}
What we're doing:
- {primary response action}
- {secondary response action}
Workaround (if available):
{workaround steps or "No workaround currently available"}
We apologize for the inconvenience and will share more information as it becomes available.
Next update: {time}
Status page: {link}
Stakeholder Management
Stakeholder Classification
Internal Stakeholders:
- Engineering Leadership - Technical decisions and resource allocation
- Product Management - Customer impact assessment and feature implications
- Customer Support - User communication and support ticket management
- Sales/Account Management - Customer relationship management for enterprise clients
- Executive Team - Business impact decisions and external communication approval
- Legal/Compliance - Regulatory reporting and liability assessment
External Stakeholders:
- Customers - Service availability and impact communication
- Partners - API availability and integration impacts
- Vendors - Third-party service dependencies and support escalation
- Regulators - Compliance reporting for regulated industries
- Public/Media - Transparency for public-facing outages
Communication Cadence by Stakeholder
| Stakeholder | SEV1 | SEV2 | SEV3 | SEV4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering Leadership | Real-time | 30min | 4hrs | Daily |
| Executive Team | 15min | 1hr | EOD | Weekly |
| Customer Support | Real-time | 30min | 2hrs | As needed |
| Customers | 15min | 1hr | Optional | None |
| Partners | 30min | 2hrs | Optional | None |
Runbook Generation Framework
Dynamic Runbook Components
-
Detection Playbooks
- Monitoring alert definitions
- Triage decision trees
- Escalation trigger points
- Initial response actions
-
Response Playbooks
- Step-by-step mitigation procedures
- Rollback instructions
- Validation checkpoints
- Communication checkpoints
-
Recovery Playbooks
- Service restoration procedures
- Data consistency checks
- Performance validation
- User notification processes
Runbook Template Structure
# {Service/Component} Incident Response Runbook
## Quick Reference
- **Severity Indicators:** {list of conditions for each severity level}
- **Key Contacts:** {on-call rotations and escalation paths}
- **Critical Commands:** {list of emergency commands with descriptions
---
*Content truncated.*
When not to use it
- →When the user wants to prevent all incidents.
- →When the user needs to manage non-technology incidents.
- →When the user wants to focus on individual mistakes rather than system failures.
Limitations
- →The skill implements battle-tested practices from SRE and DevOps teams at scale.
- →The skill provides structured tools for severity classification, timeline reconstruction, and thorough post-incident analysis.
- →The goal isn't to prevent all incidents (which is impossible), but to detect them quickly, respond effectively, communicate clearly, and learn continuously.
How it compares
This skill provides a complete, structured framework for incident response, automating severity classification and PIR generation, which is more efficient than manual incident management.
Compared to similar skills
incident-commander side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| incident-commander (this skill) | 0 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| devops-troubleshooter | 1 | 4mo | No flags | Advanced |
| observability-monitoring-monitor-setup | 1 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| Logging and Monitoring for Agentic Workflows | 0 | 3mo | Caution | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by anubhavg-icpl
View all by anubhavg-icpl →You might also like
devops-troubleshooter
sickn33
Expert DevOps troubleshooter specializing in rapid incident response, advanced debugging, and modern observability. Masters log analysis, distributed tracing, Kubernetes debugging, performance optimization, and root cause analysis. Handles production outages, system reliability, and preventive monitoring. Use PROACTIVELY for debugging, incident response, or system troubleshooting.
observability-monitoring-monitor-setup
sickn33
You are a monitoring and observability expert specializing in implementing comprehensive monitoring solutions. Set up metrics collection, distributed tracing, log aggregation, and create insightful da
Logging and Monitoring for Agentic Workflows
Hack23
Comprehensive observability patterns for GitHub Agentic Workflows including structured logging, metrics collection, alerting strategies, debugging techniques, and production monitoring best practices for autonomous agent systems.
jaeger-tracing
ssrjkk
Tracing with Jaeger. distributed tracing.
observability-setup
spideynolove
Set up metrics, logs, and traces for a service. Use when a mid-level developer needs basic observability coverage.
service-mesh-observability
wshobson
Implement comprehensive observability for service meshes including distributed tracing, metrics, and visualization. Use when setting up mesh monitoring, debugging latency issues, or implementing SLOs for service communication.