HA

harness-writing

Provides best practices for creating and optimizing fuzzing entrypoints across multiple programming languages.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/harness-writing && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/3482" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/harness-writing && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/harness-writing

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Techniques for writing effective fuzzing harnesses across languages. Use when creating new fuzz targets or improving existing harness code.
139 chars · catalog description✓ has a “when” trigger
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Constructs structured fuzzing entrypoints
  • Maps random bytes to API inputs
  • Ensures deterministic execution paths
  • Handles multi-operation fuzzing scenarios

How it works

Applies a harness pattern that bridges raw bytes from a fuzzer to application functions using structured data providers.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
System API signature
You get back
Fuzzing harness boilerplate

When to use harness-writing

  • Creating a new fuzz target from scratch
  • Improving code coverage for existing fuzzing setups
  • Debugging non-reproducible crashes found by a fuzzer
  • Handling complex, structured inputs in a fuzz harness

About this skill

Writing Fuzzing Harnesses

A fuzzing harness is the entrypoint function that receives random data from the fuzzer and routes it to your system under test (SUT). The quality of your harness directly determines which code paths get exercised and whether critical bugs are found. A poorly written harness can miss entire subsystems or produce non-reproducible crashes.

Overview

The harness is the bridge between the fuzzer's random byte generation and your application's API. It must parse raw bytes into meaningful inputs, call target functions, and handle edge cases gracefully. The most important part of any fuzzing setup is the harness—if written poorly, critical parts of your application may not be covered.

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
HarnessFunction that receives fuzzer input and calls target code under test
SUTSystem Under Test—the code being fuzzed
Entry pointFunction signature required by the fuzzer (e.g., LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput)
FuzzedDataProviderHelper class for structured extraction of typed data from raw bytes
DeterminismProperty that ensures same input always produces same behavior
Interleaved fuzzingSingle harness that exercises multiple operations based on input

When to Apply

Apply this technique when:

  • Creating a new fuzz target for the first time
  • Fuzz campaign has low code coverage or isn't finding bugs
  • Crashes found during fuzzing are not reproducible
  • Target API requires complex or structured inputs
  • Multiple related functions should be tested together

Skip this technique when:

  • Using existing well-tested harnesses from your project
  • Tool provides automatic harness generation that meets your needs
  • Target already has comprehensive fuzzing infrastructure

Quick Reference

TaskPattern
Minimal C++ harnessextern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t* data, size_t size)
Minimal Rust harness`fuzz_target!(
Size validationif (size < MIN_SIZE) return 0;
Cast to integersuint32_t val = *(uint32_t*)(data);
Use FuzzedDataProviderFuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data(data, size);
Extract typed data (C++)auto val = fuzzed_data.ConsumeIntegral<uint32_t>();
Extract string (C++)auto str = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);

Step-by-Step

Step 1: Identify Entry Points

Find functions in your codebase that:

  • Accept external input (parsers, validators, protocol handlers)
  • Parse complex data formats (JSON, XML, binary protocols)
  • Perform security-critical operations (authentication, cryptography)
  • Have high cyclomatic complexity or many branches

Good targets are typically:

  • Protocol parsers
  • File format parsers
  • Serialization/deserialization functions
  • Input validation routines

Step 2: Write Minimal Harness

Start with the simplest possible harness that calls your target function:

C/C++:

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    target_function(data, size);
    return 0;
}

Rust:

#![no_main]
use libfuzzer_sys::fuzz_target;

fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| {
    target_function(data);
});

Step 3: Add Input Validation

Reject inputs that are too small or too large to be meaningful:

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    // Ensure minimum size for meaningful input
    if (size < MIN_INPUT_SIZE || size > MAX_INPUT_SIZE) {
        return 0;
    }
    target_function(data, size);
    return 0;
}

Rationale: The fuzzer generates random inputs of all sizes. Your harness must handle empty, tiny, huge, or malformed inputs without causing unexpected issues in the harness itself (crashes in the SUT are fine—that's what we're looking for).

Step 4: Structure the Input

For APIs that require typed data (integers, strings, etc.), use casting or helpers like FuzzedDataProvider:

Simple casting:

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    if (size != 2 * sizeof(uint32_t)) {
        return 0;
    }

    uint32_t numerator = *(uint32_t*)(data);
    uint32_t denominator = *(uint32_t*)(data + sizeof(uint32_t));

    divide(numerator, denominator);
    return 0;
}

Using FuzzedDataProvider:

#include "FuzzedDataProvider.h"

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data(data, size);

    size_t allocation_size = fuzzed_data.ConsumeIntegral<size_t>();
    std::vector<char> str1 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);
    std::vector<char> str2 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);

    concat(&str1[0], str1.size(), &str2[0], str2.size(), allocation_size);
    return 0;
}

Step 5: Test and Iterate

Run the fuzzer and monitor:

  • Code coverage (are all interesting paths reached?)
  • Executions per second (is it fast enough?)
  • Crash reproducibility (can you reproduce crashes with saved inputs?)

Iterate on the harness to improve these metrics.

Common Patterns

Pattern: Beyond Byte Arrays—Casting to Integers

Use Case: When target expects primitive types like integers or floats

Implementation:

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    // Ensure exactly 2 4-byte numbers
    if (size != 2 * sizeof(uint32_t)) {
        return 0;
    }

    // Split input into two integers
    uint32_t numerator = *(uint32_t*)(data);
    uint32_t denominator = *(uint32_t*)(data + sizeof(uint32_t));

    divide(numerator, denominator);
    return 0;
}

Rust equivalent:

fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| {
    if data.len() != 2 * std::mem::size_of::<i32>() {
        return;
    }

    let numerator = i32::from_ne_bytes([data[0], data[1], data[2], data[3]]);
    let denominator = i32::from_ne_bytes([data[4], data[5], data[6], data[7]]);

    divide(numerator, denominator);
});

Why it works: Any 8-byte input is valid. The fuzzer learns that inputs must be exactly 8 bytes, and every bit flip produces a new, potentially interesting input.

Pattern: FuzzedDataProvider for Complex Inputs

Use Case: When target requires multiple strings, integers, or variable-length data

Implementation:

#include "FuzzedDataProvider.h"

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    FuzzedDataProvider fuzzed_data(data, size);

    // Extract different types of data
    size_t allocation_size = fuzzed_data.ConsumeIntegral<size_t>();

    // Consume variable-length strings with terminator
    std::vector<char> str1 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);
    std::vector<char> str2 = fuzzed_data.ConsumeBytesWithTerminator<char>(32, 0xFF);

    char* result = concat(&str1[0], str1.size(), &str2[0], str2.size(), allocation_size);
    if (result != NULL) {
        free(result);
    }

    return 0;
}

Why it helps: FuzzedDataProvider handles the complexity of extracting structured data from a byte stream. It's particularly useful for APIs that need multiple parameters of different types.

Pattern: Interleaved Fuzzing

Use Case: When multiple related operations should be tested in a single harness

Implementation:

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    if (size < 1 + 2 * sizeof(int32_t)) {
        return 0;
    }

    // First byte selects operation
    uint8_t mode = data[0];

    // Next bytes are operands
    int32_t numbers[2];
    memcpy(numbers, data + 1, 2 * sizeof(int32_t));

    int32_t result = 0;
    switch (mode % 4) {
        case 0:
            result = add(numbers[0], numbers[1]);
            break;
        case 1:
            result = subtract(numbers[0], numbers[1]);
            break;
        case 2:
            result = multiply(numbers[0], numbers[1]);
            break;
        case 3:
            result = divide(numbers[0], numbers[1]);
            break;
    }

    // Prevent compiler from optimizing away the calls
    printf("%d", result);
    return 0;
}

Advantages:

  • Faster to write one harness than multiple individual harnesses
  • Single shared corpus means interesting inputs for one operation may be interesting for others
  • Can discover bugs in interactions between operations

When to use:

  • Operations share similar input types
  • Operations are logically related (e.g., arithmetic operations, CRUD operations)
  • Single corpus makes sense across all operations

Pattern: Structure-Aware Fuzzing with Arbitrary (Rust)

Use Case: When fuzzing Rust code that uses custom structs

Implementation:

use arbitrary::Arbitrary;

#[derive(Debug, Arbitrary)]
pub struct Name {
    data: String
}

impl Name {
    pub fn check_buf(&self) {
        let data = self.data.as_bytes();
        if data.len() > 0 && data[0] == b'a' {
            if data.len() > 1 && data[1] == b'b' {
                if data.len() > 2 && data[2] == b'c' {
                    process::abort();
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Harness with arbitrary:

#![no_main]
use libfuzzer_sys::fuzz_target;

fuzz_target!(|data: your_project::Name| {
    data.check_buf();
});

Add to Cargo.toml:

[dependencies]
arbitrary = { version = "1", features = ["derive"] }

Why it helps: The arbitrary crate automatically handles deserialization of raw bytes into your Rust structs, reducing boilerplate and ensuring valid struct construction.

Limitation: The arbitrary crate doesn't offer reverse serialization, so you can't manually construct byte arrays that map to specific structs. This works best when starting from an empty corpus (fine for libFuzzer, problematic for AFL++).

Advanced Usage

Tips and Tricks

TipWhy It Helps

Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • Simple unit testing
  • When built-in coverage tools are sufficient

Prerequisites

Target code under testFuzzing engine

Limitations

  • Requires understanding of the SUT
  • Determinism depends on harness implementation
  • High setup effort

How it compares

It focuses on the bridge between data generation and API calling to maximize code coverage.

Compared to similar skills

harness-writing side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
harness-writing (this skill)32moReviewAdvanced
windows-ui-automation178moReviewAdvanced
qa-tester298moNo flagsIntermediate
reviewing-code218moNo flagsIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

More by trailofbits

View all by trailofbits

differential-review

trailofbits

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.

3115

code-maturity-assessor

trailofbits

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations.

416

modern-python

trailofbits

Configures Python projects with modern tooling (uv, ruff, ty). Use when creating projects, writing standalone scripts, or migrating from pip/Poetry/mypy/black.

427

semgrep-rule-creator

trailofbits

Creates custom Semgrep rules for detecting security vulnerabilities, bug patterns, and code patterns. Use when writing Semgrep rules or building custom static analysis detections.

416

ton-vulnerability-scanner

trailofbits

Scans TON (The Open Network) smart contracts for 3 critical vulnerabilities including integer-as-boolean misuse, fake Jetton contracts, and forward TON without gas checks. Use when auditing FunC contracts.

410

cosmos-vulnerability-scanner

trailofbits

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchains for 9 consensus-critical vulnerabilities including non-determinism, incorrect signers, ABCI panics, and rounding errors. Use when auditing Cosmos chains or CosmWasm contracts.

32

You might also like

windows-ui-automation

martinholovsky

Expert in Windows UI Automation (UIA) and Win32 APIs for desktop automation. Specializes in accessible, secure automation of Windows applications including element discovery, input simulation, and process interaction. HIGH-RISK skill requiring strict security controls for system access.

17126

qa-tester

svilupp

Browser automation QA testing skill. Systematically tests web applications for functionality, security, and usability issues. Reports findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) with immediate alerts for critical failures.

29113

reviewing-code

CaptainCrouton89

Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.

21105

web3-testing

wshobson

Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.

789

zod-4

prowler-cloud

Zod 4 schema validation patterns. Trigger: When creating or updating Zod v4 schemas for validation/parsing (forms, request payloads, adapters), including v3 -> v4 migration patterns.

1260

pr-review

pytorch

Review PyTorch pull requests for code quality, test coverage, security, and backward compatibility. Use when reviewing PRs, when asked to review code changes, or when the user mentions "review PR", "code review", or "check this PR".

638

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry