handling-api-errors
Standardizes API error responses for better error management.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/handling-api-errors && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/6340" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/handling-api-errors && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/handling-api-errors
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Implement standardized error handling with proper HTTP status codesKey capabilities
- →Audit existing error handling implementations
- →Define a standardized RFC 7807 error response envelope
- →Create typed error classes for common API errors
- →Implement centralized error handling middleware
- →Configure environment-aware error detail exposure
How it works
This skill standardizes API error handling by defining a consistent error response format based on RFC 7807. It uses typed error classes and a centralized middleware to convert various exceptions into structured JSON responses, controlling detail exposure based on the environment.
Inputs & outputs
When to use handling-api-errors
- →Standardizing API error envelopes
- →Mapping database errors to HTTP status codes
- →Improving front-end error handling
- →Centralizing error logging
About this skill
Handling API Errors
Overview
Implement standardized API error handling with RFC 7807 Problem Details responses, centralized error middleware, typed error classes, and environment-aware stack trace exposure. Convert framework exceptions, validation failures, database errors, and upstream service failures into consistent, machine-readable error responses with appropriate HTTP status codes.
Prerequisites
- Web framework with middleware/error handler support (Express, FastAPI, Spring Boot, Gin)
- Structured logging library for error event recording with correlation IDs
- Error monitoring service: Sentry, Bugsnag, or Rollbar for production error tracking
- RFC 7807 Problem Details specification for response format guidance
- API documentation listing all possible error codes and their meanings
Instructions
- Audit existing error handling using Grep to find
try/catchblocks, error middleware, and exception handlers, identifying inconsistent error response formats across endpoints. - Define a standardized error response envelope following RFC 7807:
type(URI identifying error type),title(human-readable summary),status(HTTP code),detail(specific explanation), andinstance(request path). - Create typed error classes for each error category:
ValidationError(400),AuthenticationError(401),AuthorizationError(403),NotFoundError(404),ConflictError(409), andRateLimitError(429). - Implement centralized error handling middleware that catches all thrown errors, maps them to the appropriate HTTP status code and RFC 7807 body, and prevents raw stack traces from leaking to clients.
- Add validation error formatting that transforms framework-specific validation failures into a consistent array of field-level errors with
field,message, andcodeproperties. - Configure environment-aware error detail: include stack traces and internal error codes in development/staging responses; omit them in production while logging the full error server-side.
- Integrate error monitoring (Sentry/Bugsnag) that captures 5xx errors with full context (request details, user info, stack trace) and groups them by root cause for triage.
- Handle unhandled rejections and uncaught exceptions at the process level, returning 500 with a generic error message while logging the full failure and triggering alerts.
- Write tests verifying that each error type produces the correct HTTP status code, RFC 7807 response body, and that stack traces are hidden in production mode.
See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/implementation.md for the full implementation guide.
Output
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/errors/- Typed error classes (ValidationError, NotFoundError, etc.)${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/middleware/error-handler.js- Centralized error handling middleware${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/errors/formatters.js- Error-to-RFC-7807 response transformation${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/errors/codes.js- Error code registry with human-readable descriptions${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/config/error-config.js- Environment-aware error detail configuration${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/tests/errors/- Error handling tests for each error type and scenario
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Stack trace leaked | Error handler omits production check; raw Error thrown without wrapping | Verify NODE_ENV/APP_ENV check in error formatter; wrap all thrown errors in typed classes |
| Inconsistent error format | Some endpoints return {error: "msg"} while others return RFC 7807 | Ensure all errors flow through centralized middleware; remove per-handler try/catch that formats differently |
| Unhandled promise rejection | Async handler throws without catch; Express does not catch async errors | Use express-async-errors wrapper or explicit async error forwarding with next(err) |
| Database error exposed | Raw SQL error message returned to client containing table/column names | Map database errors to generic messages at the error handler layer; log full details server-side |
| Error monitoring noise | High volume of expected 4xx errors flooding Sentry/Bugsnag | Configure error monitoring to capture only 5xx; track 4xx via metrics, not error monitoring |
Refer to ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/errors.md for comprehensive error patterns.
Examples
RFC 7807 response: {"type":"https://api.example.com/errors/validation","title":"Validation Error","status":400,"detail":"Request body contains 2 validation errors","errors":[{"field":"email","message":"Invalid email format","code":"INVALID_FORMAT"}]}
Centralized Express error handler: Single app.use((err, req, res, next) => {...}) middleware that handles all error types, sets status codes, formats RFC 7807 bodies, logs with correlation ID, and reports to Sentry.
Graceful upstream failure: When a downstream payment service returns 500, wrap it in a ServiceUnavailableError with a user-friendly message, log the upstream response for debugging, and trigger a circuit breaker.
See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/examples.md for additional examples.
Resources
- RFC 7807 Problem Details for HTTP APIs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7807
- Sentry error monitoring: https://sentry.io/
- Express error handling best practices
- HTTP status code decision tree for API responses
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Requires explicit wrapping of all thrown errors in typed classes
- →Requires verification of middleware on all routes to prevent privilege escalation
How it compares
This skill provides a structured, RFC 7807-compliant approach to API error handling, ensuring consistency and machine-readability, unlike ad-hoc error handling that can lead to inconsistent formats and leaked internal details.
Compared to similar skills
handling-api-errors side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| handling-api-errors (this skill) | 1 | 27d | Review | Intermediate |
| swapper-integration | 6 | 5mo | Caution | Intermediate |
| run-api-e2e-tests | 7 | 6mo | Review | Beginner |
| langfuse-ci-integration | 2 | 27d | Review | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
swapper-integration
shapeshift
Integrate new DEX aggregators, swappers, or bridge protocols (like Bebop, Portals, Jupiter, 0x, 1inch, etc.) into ShapeShift Web. Activates when user wants to add, integrate, or implement support for a new swapper. Guides through research, implementation, and testing following established patterns.
run-api-e2e-tests
novuhq
Run e2e tests for the API service. Use when the user wants to run API E2E tests.
langfuse-ci-integration
jeremylongshore
Configure Langfuse CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and automated testing. Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, or integrating Langfuse tests into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "langfuse CI", "langfuse GitHub Actions", "langfuse automated tests", "CI langfuse", "langfuse pipeline".
api-test-generator
mikopbx
Генерация полных Python pytest тестов для REST API эндпоинтов с валидацией схемы. Использовать при создании тестов для новых эндпоинтов, добавлении покрытия для CRUD операций или валидации соответствия API с OpenAPI схемами.
http-generate
spring-ai-alibaba
Generates HTTP request examples for Spring Boot Web interfaces according to task specification and saves them as .http files in module-generate.md directories
openapi-analyzer
mikopbx
Извлечение и анализ OpenAPI 3.1.0 спецификации из MikoPBX для валидации эндпоинтов. Использовать при проверке соответствия API, генерации тестов, проверке схем эндпоинтов или интеграции с навыками endpoint-validator и api-test-generator.