gsd-audit-uat
Tracks UAT status across the entire project for verification and sign-off.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/gsd-audit-uat-gustavosareto && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/12872" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/gsd-audit-uat-gustavosareto && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/gsd-audit-uat-gustavosareto
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Cross-phase audit of all outstanding UAT and verification itemsKey capabilities
- →Scan phases for pending UAT items
- →Scan phases for skipped UAT items
- →Scan phases for blocked UAT items
- →Scan phases for human_needed UAT items
- →Cross-reference against codebase for stale documentation
- →Produce prioritized human test plan
How it works
This skill scans all project phases for outstanding UAT and verification items, cross-references them against the codebase to detect stale documentation, and then produces a prioritized human test plan.
Inputs & outputs
When to use gsd-audit-uat
- →Audit UAT status
- →Check verification backlog
- →Verify sign-off items
- →Review project compliance
About this skill
<codex_skill_adapter>
A. Skill Invocation
- This skill is invoked by mentioning
$gsd-audit-uat. - Treat all user text after
$gsd-audit-uatas{{GSD_ARGS}}. - If no arguments are present, treat
{{GSD_ARGS}}as empty.
B. AskUserQuestion → request_user_input Mapping
GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header→headerquestion→question- Options formatted as
"Label" — description→{label: "Label", description: "description"} - Generate
idfrom header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscores
Batched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2])→ singlerequest_user_inputwith multiple entries inquestions[]
Multi-select workaround:
- Codex has no
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.
Execute mode fallback:
- When
request_user_inputis rejected (Execute mode), present a plain-text numbered list and pick a reasonable default.
C. Task() → spawn_agent Mapping
GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y")→spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...")→ omit (Codex uses per-role config, not inline model selection)fork_context: falseby default — GSD agents load their own context via<files_to_read>blocks
Parallel fan-out:
- Spawn multiple agents → collect agent IDs →
wait(ids)for all to complete
Result parsing:
- Look for structured markers in agent output:
CHECKPOINT,PLAN COMPLETE,SUMMARY, etc. close_agent(id)after collecting results from each agent </codex_skill_adapter>
<execution_context> @C:/Users/gusta/OneDrive/Documentos/gerenciador-de-quadras/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/audit-uat.md </execution_context>
<context> Core planning files are loaded in-workflow via CLI.Scope: Glob: .planning/phases//-UAT.md Glob: .planning/phases//-VERIFICATION.md </context>
When not to use it
- →When not auditing outstanding UAT items
- →When not verifying items across phases
- →When not needing a human test plan
Limitations
- →Limited to UAT and verification items
- →Scope is limited to `.planning/phases/*/*-UAT.md` and `.planning/phases/*/*-VERIFICATION.md`
- →Requires core planning files to be loaded in-workflow via CLI
How it compares
This workflow provides a structured, cross-phase audit of UAT items, integrating codebase checks for documentation staleness, which a manual UAT review might not systematically include.
Compared to similar skills
gsd-audit-uat side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gsd-audit-uat (this skill) | 0 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| empirical-validation | 1 | 4mo | Review | Beginner |
| linear-ci-integration | 1 | 25d | Caution | Intermediate |
| work-on-issue | 0 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by Gustavosareto
View all by Gustavosareto →You might also like
empirical-validation
toonight
Requires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works"
linear-ci-integration
jeremylongshore
Configure Linear CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and testing. Use when setting up automated testing, configuring CI pipelines, or integrating Linear sync into your build process. Trigger with phrases like "linear CI", "linear GitHub Actions", "linear automated tests", "CI linear pipeline", "linear CI/CD".
work-on-issue
meta-pytorch
Start work on a GitHub issue. Extracts requirements, creates worktree, sets up TDD workflow.
tpp
photostructure
Work on a Technical Project Plan. Use when starting or continuing work on a TPP from _todo/.
regression
ThePalaceProject
Run a full release regression test — sets up workspace, runs automated tools, guides manual testing, generates report and Jira tickets. Use for release gates and QA cycles.
team-qa
bullish0x
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sig