FU

futurist-analyst

Strategic forecasting and foresight analysis for identifying emerging trends and future scenarios.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/futurist-analyst && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/471" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/futurist-analyst && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/futurist-analyst

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Analyzes events through futures lens using scenario planning, trend analysis, weak signals,drivers of change, and forecasting methods (exploratory, normative, backcasting).Provides insights on possible futures, emerging trends, disruptive forces, strategic foresight, and alternative scenarios.Use when: Strategic planning, emerging trends, technology assessment, long-term planning, uncertainty navigation.Evaluates: Trends, weak signals, drivers of change, plausible futures, strategic options, uncertainty ranges.
516 chars · catalog description✓ has a “when” triggerlonger than Claude Code's old 250-char listing cap (fine on current versions)
Advanced

Key capabilities

  • Perform scenario planning
  • Identify weak signals and drivers of change
  • Conduct long-term trend analysis
  • Build alternative future models

How it works

It uses futures studies frameworks to analyze events through systems thinking and backcasting to map plausible trajectories.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Event descriptions, current trends, or strategic goals
You get back
Analysis of trends, drivers, and potential future scenarios

When to use futurist-analyst

  • Long-term strategic planning under uncertainty
  • Evaluating the impact of emerging technologies
  • Conducting trend analysis for market foresight
  • Developing scenario plans for potential disruptions

About this skill

Futurist Analyst Skill

Purpose

Analyze events through the disciplinary lens of futures studies and strategic foresight, applying established forecasting frameworks (scenario planning, trend analysis, horizon scanning), anticipatory methods, and systems thinking to understand emerging trends, identify drivers of change, envision alternative futures, and develop strategic responses to uncertainty.

When to Use This Skill

  • Strategic Planning: Long-term planning under uncertainty
  • Trend Analysis: Identifying emerging patterns and their implications
  • Technology Assessment: Evaluating potential impacts of new technologies
  • Risk Anticipation: Identifying emerging threats and opportunities
  • Scenario Planning: Exploring multiple possible futures
  • Innovation Strategy: Understanding future markets and needs
  • Policy Development: Forward-looking policy design
  • Disruption Analysis: Identifying potential paradigm shifts

Core Philosophy: Futures Thinking

Futures analysis rests on fundamental principles:

The Future is Not Predetermined: Multiple futures are possible. Choices and actions shape which future emerges.

The Future Cannot Be Predicted: But we can identify plausible futures, understand uncertainty, and prepare for multiple scenarios.

Signals Are Everywhere: Weak signals today become strong trends tomorrow. Attending to edges reveals emerging futures.

Systems Thinking Required: Everything connects. Understanding futures requires seeing relationships, feedback loops, and cascading effects.

Mental Models Matter: Our assumptions about the future shape what we see. Challenging assumptions reveals alternative futures.

Exploration Over Prediction: The goal is not to predict THE future, but to explore possible futures and prepare for multiple scenarios.

Action Shapes Futures: Futures thinking is not passive forecasting but active shaping. Understanding possible futures empowers strategic action.


Theoretical Foundations (Expandable)

Framework 1: Three Horizons Framework

Origin: Sharpe, Hodgson, Leicester (International Futures Forum, 2004)

Core Principle: Three overlapping waves of change at different time scales

Three Horizons:

Horizon 1: The Dominant System (Present)

  • Current established systems, institutions, practices
  • Mature, optimized, but showing signs of decline
  • Fit for current context but not emerging challenges
  • Time frame: Present to near-term
  • Examples: Current business models, incumbent technologies

Horizon 2: Disruptive Innovations (Transition)

  • Emerging innovations disrupting H1
  • Transitional space between old and new
  • Competing paradigms, uncertainty, experimentation
  • Some will succeed (become H3), some will fail
  • Time frame: Near to medium-term
  • Examples: Emerging technologies, new business models, pilot programs

Horizon 3: Future Systems (Emerging)

  • Seeds of future systems
  • Currently marginal but may become dominant
  • Weak signals today, strong trends tomorrow
  • Fit for future context we're moving toward
  • Time frame: Medium to long-term
  • Examples: Radical innovations, paradigm shifts, transformative visions

Key Insights:

  • All three horizons coexist at any time
  • H1 declines while H2 experiments and H3 emerges
  • Transitions are messy, non-linear
  • Understanding all three horizons reveals strategic choices

When to Apply: Strategic planning, innovation strategy, understanding systemic change

Sources:

Framework 2: Scenario Planning

Origin: Herman Kahn (RAND, 1950s), refined by Royal Dutch Shell (1970s)

Core Principle: Develop multiple plausible future scenarios to prepare for uncertainty

Shell Method (Classic Approach):

Step 1: Identify Focal Issue

  • What decision, strategy, or question are we addressing?
  • What time horizon matters?

Step 2: Identify Driving Forces

  • What trends, forces, uncertainties shape the future?
  • Categorize: predetermined elements vs. critical uncertainties

Step 3: Select Critical Uncertainties

  • What 2-3 uncertainties have highest impact and highest uncertainty?
  • These become scenario axes

Step 4: Develop Scenario Logics

  • Create 2-4 distinct scenarios based on different combinations of uncertainties
  • Each scenario must be internally consistent and plausible

Step 5: Flesh Out Scenarios

  • Develop rich narratives for each scenario
  • What does this world look like? Feel like?
  • What are implications for focal issue?

Step 6: Identify Implications and Options

  • What strategies work across scenarios (robust)?
  • What early indicators signal which scenario emerging?
  • What actions prepare us for each?

Scenario Types:

  • Business-as-usual: Continuation of current trends
  • Best-case: Optimistic but plausible
  • Worst-case: Pessimistic but plausible
  • Wildcard: Low probability, high impact

Key Insights:

  • Scenarios are not predictions but explorations
  • Purpose is to challenge assumptions and expand thinking
  • Good scenarios are plausible, divergent, challenging, relevant
  • Robust strategies work across multiple scenarios

When to Apply: Strategic planning under high uncertainty, preparing for multiple futures

Sources:

Framework 3: Drivers of Change (STEEP/PESTLE)

Purpose: Systematic framework for identifying forces shaping the future

Five/Six Categories:

Social:

  • Demographics (aging, urbanization, migration)
  • Values and culture shifts
  • Social movements
  • Lifestyle changes
  • Health and wellness trends
  • Education and skills

Technological:

  • Emerging technologies (AI, biotech, nanotech, quantum)
  • Infrastructure developments
  • Digital transformation
  • Automation and robotics
  • Connectivity and computing power

Economic:

  • Growth patterns and cycles
  • Globalization vs. fragmentation
  • Inequality and wealth distribution
  • Labor market shifts
  • Resource scarcity or abundance
  • Financial system evolution

Environmental:

  • Climate change and impacts
  • Resource depletion
  • Biodiversity loss
  • Pollution and ecosystem health
  • Renewable energy transition
  • Circular economy

Political/Legal:

  • Governance models
  • Geopolitical shifts
  • Regulatory changes
  • Power distributions
  • Conflict and cooperation
  • Institutional strength or weakness

(Optional) Ethical:

  • Emerging ethical questions
  • Values conflicts
  • Moral frameworks

Analysis Approach:

  1. Scan each category for current trends and emerging shifts
  2. Assess direction, speed, and magnitude
  3. Identify interactions between categories
  4. Determine implications for focal question

Key Insights:

  • Changes in one domain affect others (systems thinking)
  • Multiple drivers interact to create complex futures
  • Some drivers reinforce each other, others conflict
  • Comprehensive scanning reduces blind spots

When to Apply: Horizon scanning, trend analysis, understanding context for scenarios

Framework 4: Weak Signals and Wild Cards

Weak Signals:

  • Definition: Early indicators of potential change, currently marginal or ambiguous
  • Characteristics: Low visibility, fragmented, uncertain significance
  • Examples: Niche innovations, edge behaviors, anomalies, surprises
  • Value: Detecting weak signals early enables proactive response

Identification Process:

  • Scan edges, margins, outsiders (not just mainstream)
  • Notice anomalies and surprises
  • Track niche innovations
  • Listen to fringe voices
  • Monitor leading indicators in related domains

Wild Cards:

  • Definition: Low probability, high impact events
  • Characteristics: Disruptive, paradigm-shifting, often sudden
  • Examples: Pandemics, financial crises, breakthrough discoveries, political shocks
  • Value: Preparing for wildcards builds resilience

Approach:

  • Identify potential wildcards
  • Assess probability and impact
  • Develop contingency plans
  • Build organizational agility

Key Insights:

  • Weak signals become strong trends
  • Ignoring weak signals leads to strategic surprise
  • Wild cards are inevitable even if unpredictable
  • Resilience matters more than prediction

When to Apply: Early warning systems, risk anticipation, innovation tracking

Framework 5: Forecasting Methods

Exploratory Forecasting (What could happen?):

  • Start from present, project forward
  • Identify trends and drivers
  • Extrapolate to future possibilities
  • Multiple scenarios, not single prediction

Normative Forecasting (What should happen?):

  • Start from desired future, work backward
  • Define goals and vision
  • Identify pathways to achieve
  • Also called "backcasting"

Delphi Method:

  • Systematic expert consultation
  • Multiple rounds to build consensus
  • Anonymous to reduce bias
  • Iterative refinement of forecasts

Trend Extrapolation:

  • Identify historical trends
  • Project continuation or inflection
  • Assess S-curves (emergence, growth, maturity, decline)
  • Caution: Trends can reverse or accelerate

Cross-Impact Analysis:

  • How do multiple trends/events interact?
  • Reinforcing or dampening effects?
  • Cascading consequences
  • Network effects

Key Insights:

  • Different methods serve different purposes
  • Combine methods for robust analysis
  • Forecasts are always uncertain—embrace probability ranges
  • Update forecasts as new information emerges

When to Apply: Strategic planning, risk assessment, policy development


Core Analytical Frameworks (Expandable)

Framework 1: FUTURES Cone (Voros)

Purpose: Visualize range of possible futures

Structure (expanding cone from present):

Potential Futures: All physically


Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • Predicting near-term stock prices
  • Calculating precise historical data
  • Replacing statistical forecasting models

Limitations

  • Outputs are speculative frameworks, not precise predictions
  • Requires high-quality inputs to generate meaningful scenarios
  • Not suitable for solving immediate technical bugs

How it compares

It moves beyond linear forecasting to explore multiple, non-deterministic future possibilities.

Compared to similar skills

futurist-analyst side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
futurist-analyst (this skill)78moNo flagsAdvanced
literature-review5592moReviewAdvanced
openalex-database487moReviewIntermediate
market-research-reports387moReviewAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

You might also like

literature-review

K-Dense-AI

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

5591,298

openalex-database

davila7

Query and analyze scholarly literature using the OpenAlex database. This skill should be used when searching for academic papers, analyzing research trends, finding works by authors or institutions, tracking citations, discovering open access publications, or conducting bibliometric analysis across 240M+ scholarly works. Use for literature searches, research output analysis, citation analysis, and academic database queries.

48202

market-research-reports

davila7

Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Features professional LaTeX formatting, extensive visual generation with scientific-schematics and generate-image, deep integration with research-lookup for data gathering, and multi-framework strategic analysis including Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, and BCG Matrix.

38162

scientific-brainstorming

davila7

Research ideation partner. Generate hypotheses, explore interdisciplinary connections, challenge assumptions, develop methodologies, identify research gaps, for creative scientific problem-solving.

37155

exa-search

benjaminjackson

Search the web for content matching a query with AI-powered semantic search. Use for finding relevant web pages, research papers, news articles, code repositories, or any web content by meaning rather than just keywords.

9106

scientific-critical-thinking

davila7

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

1888

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry