FL

flow-next-prime

A readiness assessment tool that scans codebases for 48 criteria across 8 pillars to prepare them for AI agent integration.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/flow-next-prime && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/8799" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/flow-next-prime && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/flow-next-prime

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Comprehensive codebase assessment for agent and production readiness. Scans 8 pillars (48 criteria), verifies commands work, checks GitHub settings. Reports everything, fixes agent readiness only. Triggers on /flow-next:prime.
226 charsno explicit “when” trigger
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Scores codebase against 48 readiness criteria
  • Generates reports on agent and production health
  • Automates remediation for agent-specific readiness issues
  • Validates existence of local setup scripts and documentation

How it works

Scans project directories for missing configuration files, hooks, and documentation; executes automated patches for common environment gaps.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Optional flags: --report-only or --fix-all
You get back
Readiness score report and automated environment file updates

When to use flow-next-prime

  • Evaluate codebase for AI agent compatibility
  • Identify missing local setup requirements
  • Check production readiness criteria
  • Automate readiness reporting

About this skill

Flow Prime

Comprehensive codebase assessment inspired by Factory.ai's Agent Readiness framework.

Role: readiness assessor, improvement proposer Goal: full visibility into codebase health, targeted fixes for agent readiness

Two-Tier Assessment

CategoryPillarsWhat Happens
Agent Readiness1-5Scored, maturity level calculated, fixes offered
Production Readiness6-8Reported for awareness, no fixes offered

This gives you full visibility while keeping remediation focused on what actually helps agents work.

Criteria counts live in pillars.md, never here. pillars.md is the single census source (the legacy scored criteria feeding the maturity level, the informational rows, and the new agent-readiness tier groups AO/DR/TO/HP). Do not restate a count in this file - a hardcoded number drifts the moment a criterion is added. The classification, operability ladder, per-shape playbooks, per-stack matrix, and harness check-set live in the four reference files: classification.md, playbooks.md, stacks.md, harness.md.

Why This Matters

Existence checks lie. A repo can carry a CLAUDE.md, a hook file, and a lint script yet be un-agentic in practice - the file is an empty template, the build is broken, imports don't resolve, or it is really one of 99 sibling repos. Prime judges substance, not existence, and names the single highest-leverage next action.

Agents waste cycles when:

  • No closed verify loop → can't confirm a change works without a full CI round-trip; the feedback gate belongs at the RIGHT layer (edit-time/commit format+lint, tests via the verify command + acceptance requirements + CI required check - never a test-running pre-commit hook agents --no-verify around or stall on)
  • Undocumented env vars → guesses, fails, guesses again
  • No agent instruction file (or a generic/stale one) → doesn't know project conventions, the operability tier, or which files are off-limits
  • The app can't be built or driven → can't verify changes work; a legacy stack with no headless build has no feedback loop at all

These are environment problems, not agent problems. Prime grades them as layered gates and helps fix the ones that help agents work.

Input

Full request: $ARGUMENTS

Accepts:

  • No arguments (scans current repo)
  • --report-only or report only (skip remediation, just show report)
  • --fix-all or fix all (apply all agent readiness fixes without asking)
  • --classify-only or classify only (print the Phase 0.5 classification block and EXIT - the cheap portfolio-triage sweep over many repos; see classification.md)
  • A path to a different repo root (first non-flag argument)

Examples:

  • /flow-next:prime
  • /flow-next:prime --report-only
  • /flow-next:prime --classify-only ~/other-project
  • /flow-next:prime ~/other-project

Resolve ROOT from $ARGUMENTS (the first non-flag token; default .). If ROOT is not the cwd, it MUST thread through everything: cd "$ROOT" before the .flow/meta.json pre-check, the Phase 0.5 classification probes (the flowctl prime classify emitter takes ROOT as its positional argument, e.g. flowctl prime classify --json "$ROOT"), and the Phase 2 verification commands; and every scout dispatch prompt in Phase 1 starts "Assess the repo at ROOT" (scouts scan cwd by default

  • without this they'd scan the wrong repo and the report would be confidently wrong end-to-end). If threading ROOT isn't feasible, error rather than silently scan cwd.

Route Before Reading References

Parse the mode before loading any reference:

  • --classify-only: read classification.md directly, run its emitter + judgment-layer contract, print its fixed classification block, and EXIT. Do not read workflow.md, pillars.md, playbooks.md, or remediation.md; never ask, dispatch scouts, verify, report, or remediate.
  • All other modes: read workflow.md and execute it. The workflow loads classification, pillars, playbooks, stacks, harness, and remediation guidance only at their consuming phases. --report-only stops after the report and must never load remediation templates.

This dispatch is fail-open for an unknown/malformed mode: use the full workflow, never silently skip assessment or safety instructions.

The Eight Pillars

Agent Readiness (Pillars 1-5) — Fixes Offered

PillarWhat It Checks
1. Style & ValidationLinters, formatters, type checking, pre-commit hooks
2. Build SystemBuild tools, commands, lock files, monorepo tooling
3. TestingTest framework, commands, coverage, verification
4. DocumentationREADME, CLAUDE.md, setup docs, architecture
5. Dev Environment.env.example, Docker, devcontainer, runtime version

Production Readiness (Pillars 6-8) — Report Only

PillarWhat It Checks
6. ObservabilityLogging, tracing, metrics, error tracking, health endpoints
7. SecurityBranch protection, secret scanning, CODEOWNERS, Dependabot
8. Workflow & ProcessCI/CD, PR templates, issue templates, release automation

Workflow

The mode router above selects the entry reference. Do not pre-read references for branches that will not execute.

Maturity Levels (Agent Readiness)

The maturity level is secondary metadata, NOT the headline. The report LEADS with the verdict headline - classification line + operability tier + hard-gate status + top-5 ranked next-actions (see playbooks.md). The level moves below the scores table: at portfolio scale a bare "Level 5" from existence checks is exactly the false signal this skill exists to retire. The level still computes for cross-repo comparability, but a reader acts on the ranked actions, not the badge.

LevelNameDescriptionScore
1MinimalBasic project structure only<30%
2FunctionalCan build and run, limited docs30-49%
3StandardizedAgent-ready for routine work50-69%
4OptimizedFast feedback loops, comprehensive docs70-84%
5AutonomousFull autonomous operation capable85%+

Level 3 is the target for most teams. Don't over-engineer.

The score band above is necessary but NOT sufficient. The maturity level ALSO requires the per-pillar floors defined in pillars.md (Level 3 needs every pillar ≥40%, L4 ≥60%, L5 ≥80%). pillars.md is the single source — compute the level there, not from this table alone, or a repo at 72% overall with one 45% pillar gets reported "Level 4" when it's Level 3.

What Gets Fixed vs Reported

PillarsCategoryRemediation
1-5Agent Readiness✅ Fixes offered via AskUserQuestion
6-8Production Readiness❌ Reported only, address independently

Guardrails

General

  • Never modify code files (only config, docs, scripts)
  • Never commit changes (leave for user to review)
  • Never delete files
  • Respect .gitignore patterns

User Consent

  • MUST use AskUserQuestion tool for consent (call ToolSearch with select:AskUserQuestion first if its schema isn't loaded). Never just print questions as text. (sync-codex.sh rewrites this to a plain-text numbered prompt in the Codex mirror.)
  • Always ask before modifying existing files — except under --fix-all, which waives the prompt for append/merge edits (adding a .gitignore line, augmenting an agent file, appending a hook) INCLUDING their required devDependencies for the Critical/High/Medium tiers. --fix-all still does NOT: overwrite/replace existing file content unseen, touch the Bonus tier (devcontainer, CI workflow — those stay explicit-request-only), or bypass the glossary read-back gate. A destructive overwrite always needs consent even under --fix-all.
  • Don't add dependencies without consent (a Critical/High/Medium fix's own devDeps are covered by that fix's consent, incl. --fix-all; never add unrelated deps)
  • Glossary terms are never written unseen — the Phase 5.5 bootstrap shows the full proposal (term + definition + file-ref evidence) at read-back before any flowctl glossary add; --fix-all does not bypass this gate, and a populated glossary (total_terms > 0) is never rewritten

--fix-all boundaries (resolutions 5/6)

--fix-all auto-applies ONLY in-ROOT, non-structural, non-harness fixes at the Critical/High/Medium tier - the in-root Pillars 1-5 fixes PLUS scored-group agent-file content whose catalog row is marked --fix-all-eligible in its consent column (the ranked catalog carries the tier AND consent columns and is authoritative on which scored-group items qualify - see playbooks.md). It NEVER waives consent for:

  • Anything outside the repo ROOT - the home-base / constellation kit (parent instruction file, repos.yaml, run-everything scripts) is always explicit-consent-only.
  • Any harness settings/hook file - deny/ask rule scaffolds, hook wiring, MCP config. A scaffolded hook is exercised in the same pass (never a stub); the offer itself still needs explicit consent.
  • All structural / playbook artifacts - a generated map, nested per-package instruction files, the home base, the greenfield bootstrap plan. Structural = restructures the repo → explicit consent regardless of tier.
  • On greenfield, --fix-all applies ONLY to exercised hygiene files (.gitignore, lockfile, .env.example, .editorconfig) - never structural or generated artifacts, and never a bulk-generated instruction file (measured harm).

Re-run reuse (resolution 6): a Phase 7 re-assessment reuses the session's Phase 0.5 class


Content truncated.

When not to use it

  • When performing deep security audits outside of project readiness
  • If you need to remediate production readiness issues (tool only fixes agent issues)

Prerequisites

jq

Limitations

  • Does not provide automated remediation for production readiness issues
  • Requires existing project structure to analyze readiness criteria

How it compares

It focuses specifically on environmental configuration gaps that prevent agents from running effectively, rather than code quality alone.

Compared to similar skills

flow-next-prime side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
flow-next-prime (this skill)02moReviewIntermediate
requesting-code-review53moReviewIntermediate
bat05moReviewIntermediate
ln-513-agent-reviewer05moNo flagsAdvanced

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry