FI

Performs security audits and bug detection on code diffs to ensure quality.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/find-bugs && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1429" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/find-bugs && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/find-bugs

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
184 chars✓ has a “when” trigger
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Audit user input points for injection risks
  • Verify authorization checks across code paths
  • Detect insecure cryptographic practices
  • Check for common session fixation vulnerabilities

How it works

Applies a structured security audit checklist to changed code lines, checking for common pattern-based vulnerabilities.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
Git diff or branch comparison
You get back
Security checklist status and vulnerability report

When to use find-bugs

  • Review code for security
  • Find vulnerabilities in diffs
  • Check for SQL injection
  • Audit local branch code

About this skill

Find Bugs

Review changes on this branch for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues.

Phase 1: Complete Input Gathering

  1. Get the FULL diff: git diff master...HEAD
  2. If output is truncated, read each changed file individually until you have seen every changed line
  3. List all files modified in this branch before proceeding

Phase 2: Attack Surface Mapping

For each changed file, identify and list:

  • All user inputs (request params, headers, body, URL components)
  • All database queries
  • All authentication/authorization checks
  • All session/state operations
  • All external calls
  • All cryptographic operations

Phase 3: Security Checklist (check EVERY item for EVERY file)

  • Injection: SQL, command, template, header injection
  • XSS: All outputs in templates properly escaped?
  • Authentication: Auth checks on all protected operations?
  • Authorization/IDOR: Access control verified, not just auth?
  • CSRF: State-changing operations protected?
  • Race conditions: TOCTOU in any read-then-write patterns?
  • Session: Fixation, expiration, secure flags?
  • Cryptography: Secure random, proper algorithms, no secrets in logs?
  • Information disclosure: Error messages, logs, timing attacks?
  • DoS: Unbounded operations, missing rate limits, resource exhaustion?
  • Business logic: Edge cases, state machine violations, numeric overflow?

Phase 4: Verification

For each potential issue:

  • Check if it's already handled elsewhere in the changed code
  • Search for existing tests covering the scenario
  • Read surrounding context to verify the issue is real

Phase 5: Pre-Conclusion Audit

Before finalizing, you MUST:

  1. List every file you reviewed and confirm you read it completely
  2. List every checklist item and note whether you found issues or confirmed it's clean
  3. List any areas you could NOT fully verify and why
  4. Only then provide your final findings

Output Format

Prioritize: security vulnerabilities > bugs > code quality

Skip: stylistic/formatting issues

For each issue:

  • File:Line - Brief description
  • Severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low
  • Problem: What's wrong
  • Evidence: Why this is real (not already fixed, no existing test, etc.)
  • Fix: Concrete suggestion
  • References: OWASP, RFCs, or other standards if applicable

If you find nothing significant, say so - don't invent issues.

Do not make changes - just report findings. I'll decide what to address.

When not to use it

  • Full infrastructure security audits
  • Automated penetration testing against live systems

Prerequisites

git

Limitations

  • Limited to logic review, does not execute code
  • False positives possible in complex business logic

How it compares

It enforces a rigorous review process on specific git changes rather than scanning for general static analysis warnings.

Compared to similar skills

find-bugs side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
find-bugs (this skill)57moNo flagsIntermediate
tech-debt-analyzer59moReviewIntermediate
static-analysis56moNo flagsAdvanced
agent-code-analyzer36moReviewIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

software-architecture

davila7

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

333868

planning-with-files

davila7

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.

233106

telegram-bot-builder

davila7

Expert in building Telegram bots that solve real problems - from simple automation to complex AI-powered bots. Covers bot architecture, the Telegram Bot API, user experience, monetization strategies, and scaling bots to thousands of users. Use when: telegram bot, bot api, telegram automation, chat bot telegram, tg bot.

106130

scroll-experience

davila7

Expert in building immersive scroll-driven experiences - parallax storytelling, scroll animations, interactive narratives, and cinematic web experiences. Like NY Times interactives, Apple product pages, and award-winning web experiences. Makes websites feel like experiences, not just pages. Use when: scroll animation, parallax, scroll storytelling, interactive story, cinematic website.

101142

humanizer

davila7

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer

90175

game-development

davila7

Game development orchestrator. Routes to platform-specific skills based on project needs.

70195

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry