exa-enterprise-rbac
Implements RBAC through multi-key architectures and application-level permission logic for Exa.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/6864" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Manage Exa API key scoping, team access controls, and domain restrictions.Key capabilities
- →Implement multi-key architecture for use-case isolation
- →Enforce application-level search permissions
- →Restrict search results to specific domains per team
- →Track API key usage for budget enforcement
- →Perform secure API key rotation
How it works
It implements access control by using multiple API keys and application-layer logic to enforce usage limits and domain restrictions.
Inputs & outputs
When to use exa-enterprise-rbac
- →Implement multi-key architecture
- →Set up per-team search limits
- →Apply domain-level restrictions
- →Configure role-based access for search
About this skill
Exa Team and Enterprise Access Governance
Overview
Govern Exa membership, API and service keys, team budgets, MCP OAuth, and enterprise managed authorization through least privilege and revocation evidence. Treat credentials, queries, retrieved content, generated output, spend, and destructive state as separately governed boundaries.
Prerequisites
- The target repository, environment, Exa team, product surface, and accountable owner.
- The workload's data classification, latency and freshness promise, cost ceiling, and retention policy.
- Current first-party documentation plus credentials only for a narrowly approved live check.
Current Contract
Exa teams own usage and plan features; team admins invite members. Team Management is separately enabled and uses service keys to manage API keys. Enterprise managed authorization for Claude follows Okta directory state for eligible organizations, uses auth.exa.ai and mcp.exa.ai/mcp with scope mcp:tools, and does not create users.
Authentication
For normal REST work, inject EXA_API_KEY from an approved server-side secret manager and send it only as Authorization: Bearer to the configured first-party Exa API host. Team Management service keys, hosted MCP OAuth or enterprise managed authorization, and payment-protocol calls are separate trust models. Never print, commit, place in a URL, or expose a credential to an untrusted client.
Instructions
- Inventory organization, teams, admins, members, keys, OAuth clients, and workloads.
- Map each human and service identity to an accountable owner and required surface.
- Separate administrative service keys from ordinary runtime keys.
- Apply key budgets and rate limits where the enabled API supports them.
- Test member removal, key revocation, directory deprovisioning, and MCP session termination.
- Review access, orphaned schedules, spend, and exceptions on a fixed cadence.
Tool Discipline
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository code, configuration, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved implementation or documentation changes. Do not call Exa, run paid research, create or alter a Monitor, Webset, Agent run, Batch, team, member, API key, budget, webhook, or deployment merely because this skill was invoked.
Approval Boundaries
Require an accountable owner before live queries involving sensitive intent, production credentials, spend or rate-limit changes, forced live crawling, generated summaries, external delivery, deployment, member or key changes, schedule creation, or destructive cancellation, stopping, deletion, or revocation. Read-only repository inspection and synthetic offline validation do not authorize live vendor actions.
Failure Modes
- A team membership model is not a claim of fine-grained resource RBAC.
- Enterprise managed authorization requires pre-provisioned matching users.
- Removing an application key does not revoke a user's OAuth or managed-auth access.
Output
Return the operation scope, environment, team and product surface, authorization class, contract and policy decisions, deterministic validation results, content-free identifiers, status and cost counts, risks, cleanup or rollback state, and a concise pass or fail receipt. Exclude credentials, raw queries, prompts, presigned URLs, retrieved content, generated output, and customer-derived data unless separately approved.
Example
- A production worker gets a budgeted runtime key; only a controlled automation service gets the separately enabled Team Management service key.
- Finish with request or resource IDs, assertion counts, cost and terminal state, rollback or deletion status, and the decision owner; never reproduce secrets or retrieved content.
Validation
Rerun the smallest relevant deterministic test, compare actual behavior with the requested outcome and current first-party contract, verify sensitive fields are absent from evidence, and confirm deadlines, terminal state, downstream retention, and rollback before reporting success.
References
Review the dated first-party evidence map before relying on any endpoint, parameter, search type, price, limit, beta, compliance, identity, retry, or lifecycle claim.
When not to use it
- →When a single API key is sufficient for all operations
- →When organization-level governance is not required
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Access control is enforced at the application layer, not the API layer
- →Requires manual management of multiple API keys
How it compares
It builds custom RBAC logic on top of Exa's key-based system since Exa does not have built-in role-based access control.
Compared to similar skills
exa-enterprise-rbac side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| exa-enterprise-rbac (this skill) | 1 | 2mo | Caution | Advanced |
| github-code-review | 13 | 4mo | Review | Advanced |
| windows-ui-automation | 17 | 10mo | Review | Advanced |
| qa-tester | 29 | 10mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
github-code-review
ruvnet
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
windows-ui-automation
martinholovsky
Expert in Windows UI Automation (UIA) and Win32 APIs for desktop automation. Specializes in accessible, secure automation of Windows applications including element discovery, input simulation, and process interaction. HIGH-RISK skill requiring strict security controls for system access.
qa-tester
svilupp
Browser automation QA testing skill. Systematically tests web applications for functionality, security, and usability issues. Reports findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) with immediate alerts for critical failures.
reviewing-code
CaptainCrouton89
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.
reviewing-nextjs-16-patterns
djankies
Review code for Next.js 16 compliance - security patterns, caching, breaking changes. Use when reviewing Next.js code, preparing for migration, or auditing for violations.
game-engine-resources
gmh5225
Guide for game engine development resources including engine source code, plugins, and development guides. Use this skill when researching game engines (Unreal, Unity, Godot, custom engines), engine architecture, or game development frameworks.