exa-enterprise-rbac
Implements RBAC through multi-key architectures and application-level permission logic for Exa.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/6864" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/exa-enterprise-rbac
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Manage Exa API key scoping, team access controls, and domain restrictions.Key capabilities
- →Implement multi-key architecture for use-case isolation
- →Enforce application-level search permissions
- →Restrict search results to specific domains per team
- →Track API key usage for budget enforcement
- →Perform secure API key rotation
How it works
It implements access control by using multiple API keys and application-layer logic to enforce usage limits and domain restrictions.
Inputs & outputs
When to use exa-enterprise-rbac
- →Implement multi-key architecture
- →Set up per-team search limits
- →Apply domain-level restrictions
- →Configure role-based access for search
About this skill
Exa Enterprise RBAC
Overview
Manage access to Exa search API through API key scoping and application-level controls. Exa is API-key-based (no built-in RBAC), so access control is implemented through multiple API keys per use case, application-layer permission enforcement, domain restrictions per team, and per-key usage monitoring.
Prerequisites
- Exa API account with team/enterprise plan
- Dashboard access at dashboard.exa.ai
- Multiple API keys for key isolation
Instructions
Step 1: Key-Per-Use-Case Architecture
// config/exa-keys.ts
import Exa from "exa-js";
// Create separate clients for each use case
const exaClients = {
// High-volume RAG pipeline — production key with higher limits
ragPipeline: new Exa(process.env.EXA_KEY_RAG!),
// Internal research tool — lower volume key
researchTool: new Exa(process.env.EXA_KEY_RESEARCH!),
// Customer-facing search — separate key for isolation
customerSearch: new Exa(process.env.EXA_KEY_CUSTOMER!),
};
export function getExaForUseCase(
useCase: keyof typeof exaClients
): Exa {
const client = exaClients[useCase];
if (!client) throw new Error(`No Exa client for use case: ${useCase}`);
return client;
}
Step 2: Application-Level Permission Enforcement
// middleware/exa-permissions.ts
interface ExaPermissions {
maxResults: number;
allowedTypes: ("auto" | "neural" | "keyword" | "fast" | "deep")[];
allowedCategories: string[];
includeDomains?: string[]; // restrict to these domains
dailySearchLimit: number;
}
const ROLE_PERMISSIONS: Record<string, ExaPermissions> = {
"rag-pipeline": {
maxResults: 10,
allowedTypes: ["neural", "auto"],
allowedCategories: [],
dailySearchLimit: 10000,
},
"research-analyst": {
maxResults: 25,
allowedTypes: ["neural", "keyword", "auto", "deep"],
allowedCategories: ["research paper", "news"],
dailySearchLimit: 500,
},
"marketing-team": {
maxResults: 5,
allowedTypes: ["keyword", "auto"],
allowedCategories: ["company", "news"],
dailySearchLimit: 100,
},
"compliance-team": {
maxResults: 10,
allowedTypes: ["keyword", "auto"],
allowedCategories: [],
includeDomains: ["nist.gov", "owasp.org", "sans.org", "sec.gov"],
dailySearchLimit: 200,
},
};
function validateSearchRequest(
role: string,
searchType: string,
numResults: number,
category?: string
): { allowed: boolean; reason?: string } {
const perms = ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role];
if (!perms) return { allowed: false, reason: "Unknown role" };
if (!perms.allowedTypes.includes(searchType as any)) {
return { allowed: false, reason: `Search type ${searchType} not allowed for ${role}` };
}
if (numResults > perms.maxResults) {
return { allowed: false, reason: `Max ${perms.maxResults} results for ${role}` };
}
if (category && perms.allowedCategories.length > 0 && !perms.allowedCategories.includes(category)) {
return { allowed: false, reason: `Category ${category} not allowed for ${role}` };
}
return { allowed: true };
}
Step 3: Domain Restrictions per Team
// Enforce domain restrictions so compliance-sensitive teams
// only see results from vetted sources
async function enforcedSearch(
exa: Exa,
role: string,
query: string,
opts: any = {}
) {
const perms = ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role];
if (!perms) throw new Error(`Unknown role: ${role}`);
const validation = validateSearchRequest(
role,
opts.type || "auto",
opts.numResults || 10,
opts.category
);
if (!validation.allowed) throw new Error(validation.reason);
return exa.searchAndContents(query, {
...opts,
numResults: Math.min(opts.numResults || 10, perms.maxResults),
type: opts.type || "auto",
// Merge domain restrictions from role permissions
includeDomains: perms.includeDomains || opts.includeDomains,
});
}
Step 4: Per-Key Usage Tracking
// Track usage per API key / role for budget enforcement
class KeyUsageTracker {
private usage = new Map<string, { count: number; resetAt: number }>();
checkAndIncrement(role: string): void {
const perms = ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role];
if (!perms) throw new Error(`Unknown role: ${role}`);
const now = Date.now();
const dayStart = new Date().setHours(0, 0, 0, 0);
let entry = this.usage.get(role);
if (!entry || entry.resetAt < now) {
entry = { count: 0, resetAt: dayStart + 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000 };
}
if (entry.count >= perms.dailySearchLimit) {
throw new Error(
`Daily search limit (${perms.dailySearchLimit}) exceeded for ${role}`
);
}
entry.count++;
this.usage.set(role, entry);
}
getUsage(role: string) {
const entry = this.usage.get(role);
const limit = ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role]?.dailySearchLimit || 0;
return {
used: entry?.count || 0,
limit,
remaining: limit - (entry?.count || 0),
};
}
}
Step 5: Key Rotation Procedure
set -euo pipefail
# 1. Create new key in Exa dashboard (dashboard.exa.ai)
# 2. Deploy new key alongside old key
# 3. Verify new key works
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
-X POST https://api.exa.ai/search \
-H "x-api-key: $NEW_EXA_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query":"key rotation test","numResults":1}'
# 4. Switch traffic to new key
# 5. Monitor for errors
# 6. Revoke old key in dashboard after 24h
Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
401 on search | Invalid or revoked API key | Regenerate in dashboard |
429 rate limited | Key-level rate limit exceeded | Distribute across keys |
| Daily limit hit | Search budget exhausted | Adjust limits or wait for reset |
| Wrong domain results | Missing domain filter | Apply includeDomains per role |
Resources
Next Steps
For policy enforcement, see exa-policy-guardrails. For multi-env setup, see exa-multi-env-setup.
When not to use it
- →When a single API key is sufficient for all operations
- →When organization-level governance is not required
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Access control is enforced at the application layer, not the API layer
- →Requires manual management of multiple API keys
How it compares
It builds custom RBAC logic on top of Exa's key-based system since Exa does not have built-in role-based access control.
Compared to similar skills
exa-enterprise-rbac side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| exa-enterprise-rbac (this skill) | 1 | 27d | Caution | Advanced |
| github-code-review | 13 | 2mo | Review | Advanced |
| windows-ui-automation | 17 | 8mo | Review | Advanced |
| qa-tester | 29 | 9mo | No flags | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
github-code-review
ruvnet
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
windows-ui-automation
martinholovsky
Expert in Windows UI Automation (UIA) and Win32 APIs for desktop automation. Specializes in accessible, secure automation of Windows applications including element discovery, input simulation, and process interaction. HIGH-RISK skill requiring strict security controls for system access.
qa-tester
svilupp
Browser automation QA testing skill. Systematically tests web applications for functionality, security, and usability issues. Reports findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) with immediate alerts for critical failures.
reviewing-code
CaptainCrouton89
Systematically evaluate code changes for security, correctness, performance, and spec alignment. Use when reviewing PRs, assessing code quality, or verifying implementation against requirements.
reviewing-nextjs-16-patterns
djankies
Review code for Next.js 16 compliance - security patterns, caching, breaking changes. Use when reviewing Next.js code, preparing for migration, or auditing for violations.
game-engine-resources
gmh5225
Guide for game engine development resources including engine source code, plugins, and development guides. Use this skill when researching game engines (Unreal, Unity, Godot, custom engines), engine architecture, or game development frameworks.