exa-ci-integration
Create CI pipelines with GitHub Actions to run unit and integration tests for Exa API integrations.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/exa-ci-integration && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/7117" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/exa-ci-integration && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/exa-ci-integration
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Configure Exa CI/CD integration with GitHub Actions and automated testing.Key capabilities
- →Configure GitHub Actions for unit and integration tests
- →Manage Exa API keys using GitHub repository secrets
- →Verify API connectivity with health checks
- →Run integration tests with real API calls
- →Gate releases based on test success
How it works
The skill provides CI/CD workflow templates that use GitHub Actions to run unit tests and integration tests, ensuring API connectivity and code integrity.
Inputs & outputs
When to use exa-ci-integration
- →Setup GitHub Actions
- →Configure integration tests
- →Add API health checks
About this skill
Exa CI Contract Verification
Overview
Add deterministic Exa contract checks to CI while keeping live credentials, spend, and volatile web results out of ordinary pull requests. Treat credentials, queries, retrieved content, generated output, spend, and destructive state as separately governed boundaries.
Prerequisites
- The target repository, environment, Exa team, product surface, and accountable owner.
- The workload's data classification, latency and freshness promise, cost ceiling, and retention policy.
- Current first-party documentation plus credentials only for a narrowly approved live check.
Current Contract
Offline CI can verify owned request and response schemas, error tags, webhook signatures, and redaction. A live lane should be protected, synthetic, manually or schedule authorized, tightly budgeted, and non-blocking until its reliability is understood.
Authentication
For normal REST work, inject EXA_API_KEY from an approved server-side secret manager and send it only as Authorization: Bearer to the configured first-party Exa API host. Team Management service keys, hosted MCP OAuth or enterprise managed authorization, and payment-protocol calls are separate trust models. Never print, commit, place in a URL, or expose a credential to an untrusted client.
Instructions
- Map the Exa adapter and enumerate contracts changed by the pull request.
- Add sanitized fixtures for success, partial Contents status, 429, 402, and 503.
- Verify no load-time shell commands or secret-dependent preprocessing occurs.
- Test webhook signature verification with fixed local payloads and clocks.
- Place a one-request live smoke lane behind protected credentials and concurrency.
- Publish content-free gate evidence and distinguish skipped from passed live checks.
Tool Discipline
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository code, configuration, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved implementation or documentation changes. Do not call Exa, run paid research, create or alter a Monitor, Webset, Agent run, Batch, team, member, API key, budget, webhook, or deployment merely because this skill was invoked.
Approval Boundaries
Require an accountable owner before live queries involving sensitive intent, production credentials, spend or rate-limit changes, forced live crawling, generated summaries, external delivery, deployment, member or key changes, schedule creation, or destructive cancellation, stopping, deletion, or revocation. Read-only repository inspection and synthetic offline validation do not authorize live vendor actions.
Failure Modes
- A skipped live job must not be reported as vendor validation.
- Snapshotting web ranks or text makes pull requests nondeterministic.
- Fork pull requests must never receive production Exa secrets.
Output
Return the operation scope, environment, team and product surface, authorization class, contract and policy decisions, deterministic validation results, content-free identifiers, status and cost counts, risks, cleanup or rollback state, and a concise pass or fail receipt. Exclude credentials, raw queries, prompts, presigned URLs, retrieved content, generated output, and customer-derived data unless separately approved.
Example
- Every PR runs fixture contracts; a protected nightly job performs one URL-only Search and retains request ID, shape, latency, and cost.
- Finish with request or resource IDs, assertion counts, cost and terminal state, rollback or deletion status, and the decision owner; never reproduce secrets or retrieved content.
Validation
Rerun the smallest relevant deterministic test, compare actual behavior with the requested outcome and current first-party contract, verify sensitive fields are absent from evidence, and confirm deadlines, terminal state, downstream retention, and rollback before reporting success.
References
Review the dated first-party evidence map before relying on any endpoint, parameter, search type, price, limit, beta, compliance, identity, retry, or lifecycle claim.
When not to use it
- →When running integration tests on untrusted forks
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Integration tests require valid API key
How it compares
It automates the validation of Exa integrations within the build pipeline rather than relying on manual verification.
Compared to similar skills
exa-ci-integration side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| exa-ci-integration (this skill) | 1 | 2mo | Caution | Intermediate |
| e2e-testing-patterns | 8 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| testing-workflow | 16 | 11mo | Review | Intermediate |
| perf-lighthouse | 13 | 7mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
e2e-testing-patterns
wshobson
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
testing-workflow
amo-tech-ai
Comprehensive testing workflow for E2E, integration, and unit tests. Use when testing applications layer-by-layer, validating user journeys, or running test suites.
perf-lighthouse
tech-leads-club
Run Lighthouse audits locally via CLI or Node API, parse and interpret reports, set performance budgets. Use when measuring site performance, understanding Lighthouse scores, setting up budgets, or integrating audits into CI. Triggers on: lighthouse, run lighthouse, lighthouse score, performance audit, performance budget.
xcodebuildmcp
cameroncooke
Official skill for XcodeBuildMCP. Use when doing iOS/macOS/watchOS/tvOS/visionOS work (build, test, run, debug, log, UI automation).
verify
Use when you want to validate changes before committing, or when you need to check all React contribution requirements.
playwright-pro
alirezarezvani
Production-grade Playwright testing toolkit. Use when the user mentions Playwright tests, end-to-end testing, browser automation, fixing flaky tests, test migration, CI/CD testing, or test suites. Generate tests, fix flaky failures, migrate from Cypress/Selenium, sync with TestRail, run on BrowserStack. 55 templates, 3 agents, smart reporting.