EP

epic-permissions

Explains how to implement and validate RBAC permissions for applications built on the Epic Stack.

Install

mkdir -p .claude/skills/epic-permissions && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1777" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/epic-permissions && rm skill.zip

Installs to .claude/skills/epic-permissions

Activation

This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.

Guide on RBAC system and permissions for Epic Stack
51 charsno explicit “when” trigger
Intermediate

Key capabilities

  • Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
  • Validate permissions on server-side or client-side
  • Create new permissions or roles
  • Restrict access to routes or actions
  • Implement granular permissions like 'own' vs 'any'

How it works

The system uses an RBAC model where users have roles, and roles have permissions, with a user's permissions being the union of all permissions from their roles.

Inputs & outputs

You give it
User roles and permission strings (e.g., 'delete:note:own')
You get back
Validated access control decisions

When to use epic-permissions

  • Implementing RBAC
  • Validating permissions
  • Restricting route access
  • Defining permission strings

About this skill

Epic Stack: Permissions

When to use this skill

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
  • Validate permissions on server-side or client-side
  • Create new permissions or roles
  • Restrict access to routes or actions
  • Implement granular permissions (own vs any)

Patterns and conventions

Permissions Philosophy

Following Epic Web principles:

Explicit is better than implicit - Always explicitly check permissions. Don't assume a user has access based on implicit rules or hidden logic. Every permission check should be visible and clear in the code.

Example - Explicit permission checks:

// ✅ Good - Explicit permission check
export async function action({ request }: Route.ActionArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserId(request)

	// Explicitly check permission - clear and visible
	await requireUserWithPermission(request, 'delete:note:own')

	// Permission check is explicit and obvious
	await prisma.note.delete({ where: { id: noteId } })
}

// ❌ Avoid - Implicit permission check
export async function action({ request }: Route.ActionArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserId(request)
	const note = await prisma.note.findUnique({ where: { id: noteId } })

	// Implicit check - not clear what permission is being checked
	if (note.ownerId !== userId) {
		throw new Response('Forbidden', { status: 403 })
	}
	// What permission does this represent? Not explicit
}

Example - Explicit permission strings:

// ✅ Good - Explicit permission string
const permission: PermissionString = 'delete:note:own'
// Clear: action (delete), entity (note), access (own)

await requireUserWithPermission(request, permission)

// ❌ Avoid - Implicit or unclear permissions
const canDelete = checkUserCanDelete(user, note)
// What permission is this checking? Not explicit

RBAC Model

Epic Stack uses an RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) model where:

  • Users have Roles
  • Roles have Permissions
  • A user's permissions are the union of all permissions from their roles

Permission Structure

Permissions follow the format: action:entity:access

Components:

  • action: The allowed action (create, read, update, delete)
  • entity: The entity being acted upon (user, note, etc.)
  • access: The access level (own, any, own,any)

Examples:

  • create:note:own - Can create own notes
  • read:note:any - Can read any note
  • delete:user:any - Can delete any user (admin)
  • update:note:own - Can update only own notes

Prisma Schema

Models:

model Permission {
  id          String @id @default(cuid())
  action      String // e.g. create, read, update, delete
  entity      String // e.g. note, user, etc.
  access      String // e.g. own or any
  description String @default("")

  roles Role[]

  @@unique([action, entity, access])
}

model Role {
  id          String @id @default(cuid())
  name        String @unique
  description String @default("")

  users       User[]
  permissions Permission[]
}

model User {
  id    String @id @default(cuid())
  // ...
  roles Role[]
}

Validate Permissions Server-Side

Require specific permission:

import { requireUserWithPermission } from '#app/utils/permissions.server.ts'

export async function action({ request }: Route.ActionArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserWithPermission(
		request,
		'delete:note:own', // Throws 403 error if doesn't have permission
	)

	// User has the permission, continue...
}

Require specific role:

import { requireUserWithRole } from '#app/utils/permissions.server.ts'

export async function loader({ request }: Route.LoaderArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserWithRole(request, 'admin')

	// User has admin role, continue...
}

Conditional permissions (own vs any) - explicit:

export async function action({ request }: Route.ActionArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserId(request)

	// Explicitly determine ownership
	const note = await prisma.note.findUnique({
		where: { id: noteId },
		select: { ownerId: true },
	})

	const isOwner = note.ownerId === userId

	// Explicitly check the appropriate permission based on ownership
	await requireUserWithPermission(
		request,
		isOwner ? 'delete:note:own' : 'delete:note:any', // Explicit permission string
	)

	// Permission check is explicit and clear
	// Proceed with deletion...
}

Validate Permissions Client-Side

Check if user has permission:

import { userHasPermission, useOptionalUser } from '#app/utils/user.ts'

export default function NoteRoute({ loaderData }: Route.ComponentProps) {
	const user = useOptionalUser()
	const isOwner = user?.id === loaderData.note.ownerId

	const canDelete = userHasPermission(
		user,
		isOwner ? 'delete:note:own' : 'delete:note:any',
	)

	return (
		<div>
			{canDelete && (
				<button onClick={handleDelete}>Delete</button>
			)}
		</div>
	)
}

Check if user has role:

import { userHasRole } from '#app/utils/user.ts'

export default function AdminRoute() {
	const user = useOptionalUser()
	const isAdmin = userHasRole(user, 'admin')

	if (!isAdmin) {
		return <div>Access Denied</div>
	}

	return <div>Admin Panel</div>
}

Create New Permissions

En Prisma Studio o seed:

// prisma/seed.ts
await prisma.permission.create({
	data: {
		action: 'create',
		entity: 'post',
		access: 'own',
		description: 'Can create their own posts',
		roles: {
			connect: { name: 'user' },
		},
	},
})

Permiso con múltiples niveles de acceso:

await prisma.permission.createMany({
	data: [
		{
			action: 'read',
			entity: 'post',
			access: 'own',
			description: 'Can read own posts',
		},
		{
			action: 'read',
			entity: 'post',
			access: 'any',
			description: 'Can read any post',
		},
	],
})

Assign Roles to Users

When creating user:

const user = await prisma.user.create({
	data: {
		email,
		username,
		roles: {
			connect: { name: 'user' }, // Assign 'user' role
		},
	},
})

Assign multiple roles:

await prisma.user.update({
	where: { id: userId },
	data: {
		roles: {
			connect: [{ name: 'user' }, { name: 'moderator' }],
		},
	},
})

Permissions and Roles Seed

Seed example:

// prisma/seed.ts

// Create permissions
const permissions = await Promise.all([
	// User permissions
	prisma.permission.create({
		data: {
			action: 'create',
			entity: 'note',
			access: 'own',
			description: 'Can create own notes',
		},
	}),
	prisma.permission.create({
		data: {
			action: 'read',
			entity: 'note',
			access: 'own',
			description: 'Can read own notes',
		},
	}),
	prisma.permission.create({
		data: {
			action: 'update',
			entity: 'note',
			access: 'own',
			description: 'Can update own notes',
		},
	}),
	prisma.permission.create({
		data: {
			action: 'delete',
			entity: 'note',
			access: 'own',
			description: 'Can delete own notes',
		},
	}),
	// Admin permissions
	prisma.permission.create({
		data: {
			action: 'delete',
			entity: 'user',
			access: 'any',
			description: 'Can delete any user',
		},
	}),
])

// Create roles
const userRole = await prisma.role.create({
	data: {
		name: 'user',
		description: 'Standard user',
		permissions: {
			connect: permissions.slice(0, 4).map((p) => ({ id: p.id })),
		},
	},
})

const adminRole = await prisma.role.create({
	data: {
		name: 'admin',
		description: 'Administrator',
		permissions: {
			connect: permissions.map((p) => ({ id: p.id })),
		},
	},
})

Permission Type

Type-safe permission strings:

import { type PermissionString } from '#app/utils/user.ts'

// Tipo: 'create:note:own' | 'read:note:own' | etc.
const permission: PermissionString = 'delete:note:own'

Parsear permission string:

import { parsePermissionString } from '#app/utils/user.ts'

const { action, entity, access } = parsePermissionString('delete:note:own')
// action: 'delete'
// entity: 'note'
// access: ['own']

Common examples

Example 1: Proteger action con permiso

// app/routes/users/$username/notes/$noteId.tsx
export async function action({ request }: Route.ActionArgs) {
	const userId = await requireUserId(request)
	const formData = await request.formData()
	const { noteId } = Object.fromEntries(formData)

	const note = await prisma.note.findFirst({
		select: { id: true, ownerId: true, owner: { select: { username: true } } },
		where: { id: noteId },
	})

	if (!note) {
		throw new Response('Not found', { status: 404 })
	}

	const isOwner = note.ownerId === userId

	// Validate permiso según si es propietario o no
	await requireUserWithPermission(
		request,
		isOwner ? 'delete:note:own' : 'delete:note:any',
	)

	await prisma.note.delete({ where: { id: note.id } })

	return redirect(`/users/${note.owner.username}/notes`)
}

Example 2: Mostrar UI condicional basada en permisos

export default function NoteRoute({ loaderData }: Route.ComponentProps) {
	const user = useOptionalUser()
	const isOwner = user?.id === loaderData.note.ownerId

	const canDelete = userHasPermission(
		user,
		isOwner ? 'delete:note:own' : 'delete:note:any',
	)
	const canEdit = userHasPermission(
		user,
		isOwner ? 'update:note:own' : 'update:note:any',
	)

	return (
		<div>
			<h1>{loaderData.note.title}</h1>
			<p>{loaderData.note.content}</p>

			{(canEdit || canDelete) && (
				<div className="flex gap-2">
					{canEdit && (
						<Link to="edit">
							<Button>Edit</Button>
						</Link>
					)}
					{canDelete && (
						<DeleteNoteButton noteId={loaderData.note.id} />
					)}
				</div>
			)}
		</div>
	)
}

Example 3: Ruta solo para admin

// app/routes/admin/users.tsx
export async function loader({ request }: Route.LoaderArgs) {
	await requireUserWithRole(request, 'admin')

	const users = await pr

---

*Content truncated.*

Limitations

  • Permissions must be explicitly checked
  • Permissions must be validated on the server-side
  • The 'own' vs 'any' access level must be explicitly verified

How it compares

This skill emphasizes explicit permission checks and structured permission strings, contrasting with implicit or unclear access control logic.

Compared to similar skills

epic-permissions side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.

SkillInstallsUpdatedSafetyDifficulty
epic-permissions (this skill)36moNo flagsIntermediate
epic-auth16moReviewAdvanced
linear-security-basics125dReviewIntermediate
middleware-protection16moReviewIntermediate

Try saying

Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.

Search skills

Search the agent skills registry