dispatching-parallel-agents
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents-jorge-mendoza-corella && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/16833" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents-jorge-mendoza-corella && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents-jorge-mendoza-corella
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependenciesAbout this skill
Dispatching Parallel Agents
Overview
When multiple unrelated failures or tasks exist (different test files, different subsystems, different bugs), investigating them sequentially wastes time. Each investigation is independent and can happen in parallel.
Core principle: Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.
When to Use
Use when:
- 3+ test files failing with different root causes
- Multiple subsystems broken independently
- Each problem can be understood without context from others
- No shared state between investigations
Don't use when:
- Failures are related (fix one might fix others)
- Agents would interfere with each other (editing same files)
- Still in exploration phase
The Pattern
1. Identify Independent Domains
Group failures by what's broken. Each domain is independent.
2. Create Focused Agent Tasks
Each agent gets:
- Specific scope: One test file or subsystem
- Clear goal: Make these tests pass
- Constraints: Don't change other code
- Expected output: Summary of what you found and fixed
3. Dispatch in Parallel
All agents run concurrently via the Agent tool.
4. Review and Integrate
When agents return: verify fixes don't conflict, run full test suite, integrate all changes.
Good Agent Prompt Structure
- Focused — One clear problem domain
- Self-contained — All context needed to understand the problem
- Specific about output — What should the agent return?
Example:
Fix the 3 failing tests in src/agents/agent-tool-abort.test.ts:
1. "should abort tool with partial output capture" - expects 'interrupted at' in message
2. "should handle mixed completed and aborted tools" - fast tool aborted instead of completed
Root cause likely: timing/race condition issues.
Return: Summary of what you found and what you fixed.
Common Mistakes
| Wrong | Right |
|---|---|
| "Fix all the tests" | "Fix agent-tool-abort.test.ts" |
| No context | Paste the error messages |
| No constraints | "Do NOT change production code" |
| Vague output | "Return summary of root cause and changes" |
Verification After Agents Return
- Read each summary — understand what changed
- Check for conflicts — did agents edit same code?
- Run full suite — verify all fixes work together
- Spot check — agents can make systematic errors