detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities
Scan and sanitize your application code to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities and enforce secure query patterns.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/4800" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Detect and analyze SQL injection vulnerabilities in application codeKey capabilities
- →Discover database interaction code
- →Identify user input surfaces
- →Trace data flows to SQL queries
- →Detect vulnerable SQL injection patterns
- →Generate remediation code for vulnerable queries
How it works
The skill scans application source code to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities by tracing user input through data flows into database query construction, identifying insecure patterns, and generating parameterized remediation code.
Inputs & outputs
When to use detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities
- →Scanning codebase for SQL injection
- →Reviewing raw SQL query construction
- →Validating input sanitization logic
- →Identifying insecure ORM raw query usage
About this skill
Detecting SQL Injection Vulnerabilities
Overview
Scan application source code for SQL injection vulnerabilities (CWE-89, OWASP A03:2021) by tracing user input from entry points through data flows into database query construction. Detect string concatenation, format string interpolation, and inadequate parameterization across raw SQL, ORM raw query methods, stored procedure calls, and dynamic query builders.
Prerequisites
- Application source code accessible in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/ - Database query files, ORM models, and repository/DAO layers available
- Framework and language identified (Django, Rails, Express, Spring, Laravel, ASP.NET, Go, etc.)
- Database type known (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, MSSQL, Oracle) for syntax-specific detection
- Write permissions for reports in
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/security-reports/
Instructions
- Discover database interaction code: search for SQL keywords (
SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE,EXEC) and ORM raw query methods (raw(),execute(),createNativeQuery(),$wpdb->query()) across all source files. - Identify input surfaces: map all user-controllable data entry points -- HTTP parameters, request bodies, URL path segments, headers, cookies, file uploads, and WebSocket messages.
- Trace data flows: follow each input surface through the code to determine whether user data reaches a SQL query. Flag any path where input is not passed through parameterized query binding.
- Detect vulnerable patterns:
- String concatenation:
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=" + userId - f-string/format interpolation: Python f-strings embedding variables directly into SQL strings
- Template literals:
`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=${req.params.id}` - ORM raw queries without bindings:
Model.objects.raw("SELECT * FROM t WHERE x='" + val + "'")
- String concatenation:
- Classify each finding: assign CVSS 3.1 score, identify attack type (classic injection, blind boolean/time-based, UNION-based exfiltration, second-order/stored injection), and document exploitability (authentication required, network access).
- Assess impact per finding: determine data exposure scope (authentication bypass, data exfiltration, data modification, OS command execution via
xp_cmdshellorLOAD_FILE()). - Generate remediation code: provide parameterized equivalents for each vulnerable query. Use framework-idiomatic patterns --
%splaceholders for Python DB-API,?for Node.js,$1for PostgreSQL, named parameters for Spring JPA. - Recommend defense-in-depth measures: input validation (allowlists over denylists), stored procedures with parameterized calls, least-privilege database accounts, WAF rules, and ORM-only data access policies.
- Produce the vulnerability report at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/security-reports/sqli-scan-YYYYMMDD.mdwith per-finding severity, CWE-89 mapping, file path and line number, vulnerable code snippet, attack vector demonstration, and remediated code.
See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/implementation.md for the detection pattern library. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/critical-findings.md for example vulnerability write-ups with attack demonstrations.
Output
- Vulnerability Report:
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/security-reports/sqli-scan-YYYYMMDD.mdwith all findings classified by severity - Finding Details: per-finding file path, line number, vulnerable code, attack vector, CVSS score, and remediation code
- Remediation Summary: parameterized query replacements grouped by language/framework
- Defense Recommendations: input validation rules, database privilege changes, and WAF configuration
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown ORM or database framework | Custom or uncommon data access library | Apply generic SQL injection pattern detection; note limited framework-specific guidance |
| Cannot analyze compiled/minified code | Production bundles or bytecode instead of source | Request unminified source; document reduced detection accuracy |
| False positive on sanitized input | Proper sanitization exists but not recognized | Trace sanitization implementation manually; whitelist verified-safe patterns |
| Complex dynamic query builder logic | Multi-step query construction across modules | Trace full data flow manually; flag for manual security review |
| Cannot analyze stored procedure definitions | SQL source files not available in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/ | Request .sql files or database schema exports; focus on application-layer code |
Examples
- "Scan the codebase for SQL injection risks in dynamic query construction, focusing on controllers and API handlers."
- "Review these query snippets and propose parameterized equivalents with unit tests validating the fix."
- "Detect second-order SQL injection in the user profile update flow where stored data is later used in admin queries."
Resources
- OWASP SQL Injection Prevention Cheat Sheet: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/SQL_Injection_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
- CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of SQL Syntax: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html
- OWASP A03:2021 Injection: https://owasp.org/Top10/A03_2021-Injection/
- CAPEC-66 SQL Injection: https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/66.html
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/critical-findings.md-- example vulnerability write-ups with attack vectors${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/errors.md-- full error handling reference${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/examples.md-- additional usage examples- https://intentsolutions.io
When not to use it
- →When analyzing compiled or minified code
- →When SQL source files for stored procedures are unavailable
- →When the ORM or database framework is unknown or uncommon
Prerequisites
Limitations
- →Cannot analyze compiled/minified code
- →May produce false positives on sanitized input if not recognized
- →Limited framework-specific guidance for unknown or uncommon ORMs
How it compares
This skill provides a structured approach to identify and remediate SQL injection vulnerabilities by tracing data flows and generating specific parameterized code, unlike manual code review.
Compared to similar skills
detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| detecting-sql-injection-vulnerabilities (this skill) | 3 | 27d | Review | Advanced |
| sap-memory | 0 | 3mo | No flags | Advanced |
| backend-security-coder | 24 | 4mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| security-audit | 3 | 6mo | Review | Intermediate |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by jeremylongshore
View all by jeremylongshore →You might also like
sap-memory
OOBE-PROTOCOL
|
backend-security-coder
sickn33
Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.
security-audit
ruvnet
Comprehensive security scanning and vulnerability detection. Includes input validation, path traversal prevention, CVE detection, and secure coding pattern enforcement. Use when: authentication implementation, authorization logic, payment processing, user data handling, API endpoint creation, file upload handling, database queries, external API integration. Skip when: read-only operations on public data, internal development tooling, static documentation, styling changes.
security-best-practices
openai
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.
ark-pentest-issue-resolver
mckinsey
Resolve common penetration testing issues in Ark. Use when fixing security vulnerabilities from pentest reports, security audits, or OWASP Top 10 issues.
damage-control
disler
Install, configure, and manage the Claude Code Damage Control security hooks system. Use when user mentions damage control, security hooks, protected paths, blocked commands, install security, or modify protection settings.