designing-tests
Provides a framework for designing testing strategies and implementing coverage across unit, integration, and E2E tests.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/designing-tests && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/3071" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/designing-tests && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/designing-tests
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.Key capabilities
- →Selects testing frameworks per language
- →Applies testing pyramid balancing
- →Tracks implementation progress via checklist
- →Identifies testable units in codebases
How it works
Utilizes a defined testing pyramid strategy and framework table to guide the incremental implementation of test suites.
Inputs & outputs
When to use designing-tests
- →Adding unit tests to a project
- →Setting up E2E testing infrastructure
- →Debugging failing integration tests
- →Improving test coverage
About this skill
Designing Tests
When to Load
- Trigger: Adding tests, test strategy planning, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure
- Skip: Non-test code changes where testing is not part of the task
Test Implementation Workflow
Copy this checklist and track progress:
Test Implementation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify what to test
- [ ] Step 2: Select appropriate test type
- [ ] Step 3: Write tests following templates
- [ ] Step 4: Run tests and verify passing
- [ ] Step 5: Check coverage meets targets
- [ ] Step 6: Fix any failing tests
Testing Pyramid
Apply the testing pyramid for balanced coverage:
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/----\ - Critical user journeys
/ \ - Slow but comprehensive
/--------\ Integration Tests (20%)
/ \ - Component interactions
/------------\ - API contracts
/ \ Unit Tests (70%)
/________________\ - Fast, isolated
- Business logic focus
Framework Selection
JavaScript/TypeScript
| Type | Recommended | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Vitest | Jest |
| Integration | Vitest + MSW | Jest + SuperTest |
| E2E | Playwright | Cypress |
| Component | Testing Library | Enzyme |
Python
| Type | Recommended | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | pytest | unittest |
| Integration | pytest + httpx | pytest + requests |
| E2E | Playwright | Selenium |
| API | pytest + FastAPI TestClient | - |
Go
| Type | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Unit | testing + testify |
| Integration | testing + httptest |
| E2E | testing + chromedp |
Test Structure Templates
Unit Test
describe("[Unit] ComponentName", () => {
describe("methodName", () => {
it("should [expected behavior] when [condition]", () => {
// Arrange
const input = createTestInput();
// Act
const result = methodName(input);
// Assert
expect(result).toEqual(expectedOutput);
});
it("should throw error when [invalid condition]", () => {
expect(() => methodName(invalidInput)).toThrow(ExpectedError);
});
});
});
Integration Test
describe("[Integration] API /users", () => {
beforeAll(async () => {
await setupTestDatabase();
});
afterAll(async () => {
await teardownTestDatabase();
});
it("should create user and return 201", async () => {
const response = await request(app)
.post("/users")
.send({ name: "Test", email: "[email protected]" });
expect(response.status).toBe(201);
expect(response.body.id).toBeDefined();
});
});
E2E Test
describe("[E2E] User Registration Flow", () => {
it("should complete registration successfully", async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto("/register");
await page.fill('[data-testid="email"]', "[email protected]");
await page.fill('[data-testid="password"]', "SecurePass123!");
await page.click('[data-testid="submit"]');
await expect(page.locator(".welcome-message")).toBeVisible();
await expect(page).toHaveURL("/dashboard");
});
});
Coverage Strategy
What to Cover
- ✅ Business logic (100%)
- ✅ Edge cases and error handling (90%+)
- ✅ API contracts (100%)
- ✅ Critical user paths (E2E)
- ⚠️ UI components (snapshot + interaction)
- ❌ Third-party library internals
- ❌ Simple getters/setters
Coverage Thresholds
{
"coverageThreshold": {
"global": {
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80,
"lines": 80,
"statements": 80
},
"src/core/": {
"branches": 95,
"functions": 95
}
}
}
Test Data Management
Factories/Builders
// factories/user.js
export const userFactory = (overrides = {}) => ({
id: faker.string.uuid(),
name: faker.person.fullName(),
email: faker.internet.email(),
createdAt: new Date(),
...overrides,
});
// Usage
const admin = userFactory({ role: "admin" });
Fixtures
// fixtures/users.json
{
"validUser": { "name": "Test", "email": "[email protected]" },
"invalidUser": { "name": "", "email": "invalid" }
}
Mocking Strategy
When to Mock
- ✅ External APIs and services
- ✅ Database in unit tests
- ✅ Time/Date for determinism
- ✅ Random values
- ❌ Internal modules (usually)
- ❌ The code under test
Mock Examples
// API mocking with MSW
import { http, HttpResponse } from "msw";
export const handlers = [
http.get("/api/users", () => {
return HttpResponse.json([{ id: 1, name: "John" }]);
}),
];
// Time mocking
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(new Date("2024-01-01"));
Test Validation Loop
After writing tests, run this validation:
Test Validation:
- [ ] All tests pass: `npm test`
- [ ] Coverage meets thresholds: `npm test -- --coverage`
- [ ] No flaky tests (run multiple times)
- [ ] Tests are independent (order doesn't matter)
- [ ] Test names clearly describe behavior
If any tests fail, fix them before proceeding. If coverage is below target, add more tests for uncovered code paths.
# Run tests
npm test
# Run with coverage
npm test -- --coverage
# Run specific test file
npm test -- path/to/test.spec.ts
# Run in watch mode during development
npm test -- --watch
When not to use it
- →Running production code
- →Non-testing refactoring tasks
Limitations
- →Cannot test complex non-deterministic logic
- →Requires knowledge of specific framework syntax
How it compares
It provides a strategic testing framework tailored to the tech stack rather than just generating boilerplate code.
Compared to similar skills
designing-tests side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| designing-tests (this skill) | 1 | 6mo | Review | Beginner |
| unit-testing-test-generate | 2 | 4mo | Review | Intermediate |
| test-generator | 1 | 9mo | Review | Beginner |
| checking-changes | 1 | 5mo | Review | Beginner |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by CloudAI-X
View all by CloudAI-X →You might also like
unit-testing-test-generate
sickn33
Generate comprehensive, maintainable unit tests across languages with strong coverage and edge case focus.
test-generator
alirezarezvani
Automatically suggest tests for new functions and components. Use when new code is written, functions added, or user mentions testing. Creates test scaffolding with Jest, Vitest, Pytest patterns. Triggers on new functions, components, test requests, testing mentions.
checking-changes
streamlit
Validates all code changes before committing by running format, lint, type, and unit test checks. Use after making backend (Python) or frontend (TypeScript) changes, before committing or finishing a work session.
migrate
alirezarezvani
Migrate from Cypress or Selenium to Playwright. Use when user mentions "cypress", "selenium", "migrate tests", "convert tests", "switch to playwright", "move from cypress", or "replace selenium".
moai-foundation-quality
modu-ai
Enterprise code quality orchestrator with TRUST 5 validation, proactive analysis, and automated best practices enforcement
add-new-setting-field
tsukumijima
【設定追加時は必ず参照】KonomiTV に新しい設定 (v-switch/v-select など) を追加する際の必須手順。SettingsStore.ts / Settings.ts / config.py / Settings/*.vue への追加が必要