defense-in-depth-validation
A methodology to secure applications by validating data at every system layer.
Install
mkdir -p .claude/skills/defense-in-depth-validation && curl -L -o skill.zip "https://agentskills.codes/api/skills/download/1174" && unzip -o skill.zip -d .claude/skills/defense-in-depth-validation && rm skill.zipInstalls to .claude/skills/defense-in-depth-validation
Activation
This is the description your AI agent reads to decide when to run this skill — the better it matches your request, the more reliably it fires.
Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossibleKey capabilities
- →Reject invalid input at API boundaries
- →Ensure data makes sense for specific operations
- →Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts
- →Capture context for forensic analysis
- →Trace data flow to identify where bad values originate and are used
- →Add validation at entry, business logic, environment, and debug layers
How it works
The skill applies validation at four layers: entry point, business logic, environment guards, and debug instrumentation. This ensures data integrity and prevents bugs by catching invalid data at various stages.
Inputs & outputs
When to use defense-in-depth-validation
- →Add entry point validation to API endpoints
- →Implement business logic validation checks
- →Secure data flow between application layers
- →Create environment-specific security guards
About this skill
Defense-in-Depth Validation
Overview
When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.
Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.
Why Multiple Layers
Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"
Different layers catch different cases:
- Entry validation catches most bugs
- Business logic catches edge cases
- Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
- Debug logging helps when other layers fail
The Four Layers
Layer 1: Entry Point Validation
Purpose: Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary
function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
}
if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 2: Business Logic Validation
Purpose: Ensure data makes sense for this operation
function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
if (!projectDir) {
throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 3: Environment Guards
Purpose: Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
// In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));
if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
throw new Error(
`Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
);
}
}
// ... proceed
}
Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation
Purpose: Capture context for forensics
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
logger.debug('About to git init', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
stack,
});
// ... proceed
}
Applying the Pattern
When you find a bug:
- Trace the data flow - Where does bad value originate? Where used?
- Map all checkpoints - List every point data passes through
- Add validation at each layer - Entry, business, environment, debug
- Test each layer - Try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it
Example from Session
Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code
Data flow:
- Test setup → empty string
Project.create(name, '')WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')git initruns inprocess.cwd()
Four layers added:
- Layer 1:
Project.create()validates not empty/exists/writable - Layer 2:
WorkspaceManagervalidates projectDir not empty - Layer 3:
WorktreeManagerrefuses git init outside tmpdir in tests - Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
Result: All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce
Key Insight
All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:
- Different code paths bypassed entry validation
- Mocks bypassed business logic checks
- Edge cases on different platforms needed environment guards
- Debug logging identified structural misuse
Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.
How it compares
This skill implements validation at multiple system layers to make bugs structurally impossible, unlike single validation checks that can be bypassed.
Compared to similar skills
defense-in-depth-validation side by side with the closest alternatives in the catalog.
| Skill | Installs | Updated | Safety | Difficulty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| defense-in-depth-validation (this skill) | 3 | 9mo | Review | Intermediate |
| security-requirement-extraction | 7 | 2mo | No flags | Intermediate |
| api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty | 9 | 6mo | Review | Advanced |
| secure-workflow-guide | 3 | 2mo | No flags | Advanced |
Try saying
Example prompts that trigger this skill in your AI assistant.
More by mrgoonie
View all by mrgoonie →You might also like
security-requirement-extraction
wshobson
Derive security requirements from threat models and business context. Use when translating threats into actionable requirements, creating security user stories, or building security test cases.
api-fuzzing-for-bug-bounty
davila7
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test API security", "fuzz APIs", "find IDOR vulnerabilities", "test REST API", "test GraphQL", "API penetration testing", "bug bounty API testing", or needs guidance on API security assessment techniques.
secure-workflow-guide
trailofbits
Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas.
cross-site-scripting-and-html-injection-testing
davila7
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.
semgrep-rule-creator
trailofbits
Creates custom Semgrep rules for detecting security vulnerabilities, bug patterns, and code patterns. Use when writing Semgrep rules or building custom static analysis detections.
broken-authentication-testing
davila7
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for broken authentication vulnerabilities", "assess session management security", "perform credential stuffing tests", "evaluate password policies", "test for session fixation", or "identify authentication bypass flaws". It provides comprehensive techniques for identifying authentication and session management weaknesses in web applications.